J&M GSO_CC RZ staff reportREZONING STAFF REPORT
Case:
PLAN1911-0003
Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board:
December 2, 2019
County Commissioners:
December 16, 2019
Requesting a Rezoning from RA-30 to Industrial
Applicant Information
Owner of Record:
Applicant:
Name:
J&M GSO FV, LLC
Name:
J&M GSO FV, LLC
Address:
4792 Rawls Church Rd
Address:
4792 Rawls Church Rd
City/State/Zip:
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
City/State/Zip:
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Property Description
PIN(s):
0655-70-5277
Acreage:
.91 (totaling 2.7)
Address/SR No.:
4792 Rawls Church Rd
Township:
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
Physical Characteristics
Site Description: Site is currently occupied by an existing business which has been in operation for several years.
Surrounding Land Uses: Single family residential and agricultural uses. US 401 & the Employment Mixed Use development node is ½ mile to the west.
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other: unverified
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count: 1,800
Site Distances: Good
Zoning District Compatibility
The following is a summary list of general/ potential uses. For all actual permitted uses please refer to the UDO Use Table.
CURRENT
REQUESTED
RA-30
Industrial
Parks & Rec
X
X
Natural Preserves
X
X
Bona Fide Farms
X
X
Single Family
X
Manufactured Homes, Design Regulated
X
Manufactured Homes
X
Multi-Family
X
Institutional
X
X
Commercial Services
X
Retail
X
Wholesale
X
Processing & Assembly
X
General & Light Manufacturing
X
Traditional Standards of Review and Worksheet
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed
by the Planning Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation unless:
Yes
No
A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes
No
B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
Yes
No
C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to
make of the property involved.)
Yes
No
D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes
No
E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances
the public interest.
DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a
new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend
to make of the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning