HomeMy WebLinkAbout120125 agenda packetREGULAR MEETING
Date: Monday, December 1, 202 5
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Location: Commissioners Meeting Room Harnett County Resource Center & Library 455 McKinney Parkway, Lillington
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Page | 1
1.Call to order – Chairman Matthew Nicol
2.Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation – Commissioner Barbara McKoy
3.Harnett County Heroes Remembrance Presentation
4.Consider additions and deletions to the published agenda
5.Public Comment PeriodPeriod of up to 30 minutes for informal comments allowing 3 minutes for each presentation. Speakers arerequested to sign up prior to the meeting. Speakers may sign up by contacting the clerk atmdcapps@harnett.org at least one hour prior to the start of the meeting or by utilizing the signup sheet atthe back of the room. The signup form will be picked up by the clerk 5 minutes before the publishedmeeting start time.
6.Consent AgendaA.Minutesi.Work Session Minutes of November 12, 2025ii.Regular Meeting Minutes of November 17, 2025iii.Work Session Minutes of November 25, 2025
B.A Greenway Feasibility Study has been completed on proposed greenway routes between the
Town of Lillington and Campbell University, Campbell University and the Town of Coats, and the
Town of Coats and the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail. The Study assessed the feasibility of alternative
routes within these corridors, identified preferred routes, and defines specific next steps for
future phases of greenway development. Parks and Recreation requests adoption of this
Greenway Feasibility Study to aid in future funding opportunities and guide County staff with
future greenway trail design and construction.
C.Sheriff Coats requests approval to enter into a MOU with Homeland Security Investigations.
The Agreement establishes the responsibilities of both parties and the procedures for the
reimbursement of certain overtime expenses and other law enforcement pursuant to 31 USC
9705 (31 USC 9705 deals the Department of the Treasury Forfeiture Fund).
D.Sheriff Coats requests approval to enter into an agreement with Cornerstone Detention
Products to upgrade our present video surveillance system for the Detention Center and
Sheriff's Office and approve the associated budget amendment. The upgrade will include but
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 1
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Page | 2
not limited to increasing the amount of digital recording that is stored, adding additional
cameras and upgrading the operating systems. This will be a "Sole Source" purchase based on
Cornerstone, which is the service provider for the Video Surveillance system and this system
communications with other systems within the Detention Center that is also maintained by
Cornerstone. This project is one of the items on the Sheriff's Office CIP projects.
E. Sheriff Coats requests approval to extend the contract with Pay Tel Communications for three
years ending December 3, 2029. Pay Tel provides phone services for inmates in the Detention
Center and other services that enhances the Sheriff's Office ability to monitor the activities of
inmates. Pay Tel extension will allow access to their WIFI system to Guard1 at no cost. Guard1 is
a new system that records time and location of staff making cell checks. Pay Tel Communication
has been a partner with the Harnett County Sheriff's Office for over twenty-five years.
F. Sheriff Coats requests approval to surplus certain weapons (a list is attached). These weapons
have been replaced because of upgrades due to technological advancements, safety concerns
with existing models, or a regular replacement cycle, which can be anywhere from 5 to 10 years.
If approved, the Sheriff's Office will solicit bids from a minimum of three approved gun dealers.
G. Harnett County Public Library respectfully requests permission to accept a commemorative
bench and plaque donation honoring Paul Green. The bench and accompanying plaque will be
donated by The Paul Green Foundation and will be installed on the front porch of the Harnett
County Public Library near the Main Library Entrance. Paul Green was a Pulitzer Prize winning
playwright, author, and educator from North Carolina best known for his connection to social
issues, southern culture, and human condition with ties to Harnett County. The library currently
displays a bust of Paul Green and houses the Paul Green Collection in our local history room. All
costs for the bench and plaque will be covered by the donor.
H. Harnett County Public Library respectfully requests permission to apply for and accept if
awarded the State Library of North Carolina Continuing Education Scholarship Grant in the
amount of $2,500. This grant would be used to send a Librarian to the American Library
Association’s annual conference.
I. The Harnett County Board of Commissioners would like to accept the resignation of Laura
Barney from the Harnett County Commission on Women and Youth, accept the resignation of
Kandi Tudor from the Board of Health, appoint Betty Gwen Johnson Goodwin as the public
member to the Board of Health, reappoint Cindy Delgado as County Commissioner Appointee
on the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and appoint Katasha Tew to the Juvenile Crime
Prevention Council.
J. Official review of surety bonds for County Officials per G.S. 58-72-20.
7. Recess and Reconvene for Reorganization of the Board – Selection of Chairman and Vice
Chairman pursuant to NCGS 153A-39.36 - Melissa Capps, Clerk to the Board
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 2
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Page | 3
8. Public Hearing for a Proposed Text Amendment to the Harnett County Historic Preservation Ordinance.
9. Consider appointments to the Harnett County First Responders Advisory Committee.
10. County Manager’s Report – Brent Trout, County Manager A. Recommended Capital Improvements Program for Fiscal Years 2027-2033 B. Department of Social Services Monthly Report C. Budget Revisions D. Budget Amendments – Motion to approve budget amendments as requested by the Finance Director. E. Contracts/Amendments exceeding County Manager’s Signature Threshold – Motion to
authorize the Chairman to sign contract amendments exceeding the manager’s signature
threshold.
i. GFL Environmental (dba Waste Industries) contract for Fiscal Years 2026–2031
11. New Business
12. Closed Session
13. Adjourn CONDUCT OF THE DECEMBER 1, 2025 MEETING
Live audio of the meeting will be streamed on the Harnett County Government’s YouTube Channel
at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU7mTF6HTD65x_98EhAMeMg/featured.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 3
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 1 of 6
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Minutes of Work Session
November 12, 2025
The Harnett County Board of Commissioners met in work session on Wednesday, November 12,
2025 at 9:00 am, in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Harnett County Resource Center and
Library, 455 McKinney Parkway, Lillington, North Carolina.
Members present: Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman
William Morris, Vice Chairman
Barbara McKoy, Commissioner
Duncan “Eddie” Jaggers, Commissioner
Member absent: W. Brooks Matthews, Commissioner
Staff present: Dwight Snow, County Attorney
Kimberly Honeycutt, Finance Officer
Brent Trout, County Manager
Melissa Capps, Clerk
Chairman Nicol called the Harnett County Board of Commissioners meeting to order at 9:00 am.
Commissioner Jaggers led the Pledge of Allegiance and provided the invocation.
Eric Truesdale, Veterans Services Director, presented information regarding the new Harnett
County Heroes Remembrance recognition. We are recognizing and honoring veterans that appear
on our Wall of Heroes. These individuals have received awards for acts of individual heroism,
not as a unit. Mr. Truesdale read First Lieutenant Jose J. Anzaldua’s citation. Chairman Nicol
presented First Lieutenant Anzaldua with a certificate.
Chairman Nicol called for any additions or deletions to the published agenda. Commissioner
Jaggers made a motion to approve the agenda as published. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner McKoy and carried unanimously.
The following agenda was before the Board of Commissioners:
1.Call to order – Chairman Matthew B. Nicol
2.Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation – Commissioner Duncan “Eddie” Jaggers
3.Harnett County Heroes Remembrance Presentation
4.Consider any additions and/or deletions to the published agenda.
5.Update on Land Sales for the 2026 Reappraisal; Christine Wallace, Tax
Administrator
6.Carolina Across 100 Affordable Housing Update; Coley Price, Deputy County
Manager
Item 6Ai
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 4
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 2 of 6
7. Discuss a request to consider and approve contract negotiations for Construction
Manager at Risk (CMAR) for Construction Services for Harnett County Animal
Adoption Center; Barry Blevins, General Services Director and Coley Price, Deputy
County Manager
8. Discuss a request to add a Tech1/Painter position to Facilities Maintenance
Department; Kenneth Snipes, Facilities Maintenance Director
9. Discuss a request to accept the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund grant of the
construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills Creek Park Master Plan; Carl Davis,
Parks and Recreation Director
10. Discuss a request to accept the Land and Water Conservation Fund grant funding
for the construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills Creek Park Master Plan; Carl
Davis, Parks and Recreation Director
11. Development Services briefing:
• Proposed Zoning Change from the RA-20R to Commercial Zoning District,
PLAN2509-0001: Landowner / Applicant: B & B Land Holdings, LLC-Ron
Burgess / Greg Bagley; 6.26 +/- acres; Pin # 0549-91-0349.000; From RA-
20R to Commercial Zoning District; Lillington Township; Intersection of NC
Hwy 210 South & SR # 1133 (Shawtown Road)
• Proposed Zoning Change from the Commercial to the RA-20R Zoning
District, PLAN2509-0002: Landowner / Applicant: Mary Lou Mize, Steven
Pointer, Kevin & Kathleen Harris, Nancy Ouellette / Harnett County
Development Services; 18.13 +/- acres; Pin #’s 9576-37-2987.000, 9576-28-
9973.000, 9576-38-1432.000, 9576-37-3037.000, 9576-37-3735.000, 9576-
37-3220.000, 9576-37-2250.00, 9576-37-2372.000; From Commercial to RA-
20R Zoning District; Barbecue Township; NC 87 N & SR # 1113 (Old NC
87)
• Proposed Zoning Change from the RA-20M to the Commercial Zoning
District, PLAN2510-0001: Landowner / Applicant: Kelley Inez Marsh f/k/a
Kelley Bullock Hasapis, Darius Marsh, Angelo K Hasapis/ 4C Development,
LLC-Wesley Campbell; 5.32 +/- acres; Pin # 0504-92-7415.000; From RA-
20M to Commercial Zoning District; Anderson Creek Township; Intersection
of SR # 1121 (Ray Road) & SR # 1122 (McKay Drive)
12. Discuss a for approval of the conversion of two part-time positions to one full-time
Library Assistant Position; Kimberly Van Beck, Library Director
13. Discuss a request to apply for and accept Libraries Transforming Communities
(LTC): Accessible Small and Rural Communities Grant Round 4 – Erwin Public
Library; Kimberly Van Beck, Library Director
14. Discuss a request for permission to apply for and accept if awarded a Libraries
Strengthening Connections Grant in the amount of $25,800; Joanna Cox, Assistant
Library Director/Systems Administrator
15. Discuss a request to change the name of Human Resources and Legal
Departments; Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney
16. Discuss a request for the approval of a Land Lease Agreement between the County
and Harnett Air, LLC.; Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 5
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 3 of 6
17. Discuss Historic Preservation and Heritage Tourism Commission Ordinance;
Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney
18. Discuss a request to approve a Resolution to Direct the Expenditure of Opioid
Funds; Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney
19. Discuss updating Board of Commissioners’ Rules of Procedure; Christopher Appel,
Senior Staff Attorney
20. Discuss 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting dates; Melissa Capps, Clerk to the
Board
21. Review applications for Boards and Committees.
22. County Manager’s Report – Brent Trout, County Manager
• November 17, 2025 Regular Meeting Agenda Review
• Upcoming meetings and invitations
23. Closed Session
24. Adjourn
Christine Wallace, Tax Administrator, provided an update on vacant land sales as part of the
ongoing preparations for the 2026 reappraisal.
Coley Price, Deputy County Manager, Sarah Arbour, Planner II and Barry Blevins, General
Services Director, provided an update on the Carolina Across 100 Affordable Housing Initiative.
Discussion included affordability of housing, housing supply and the real estate market.
Mr. Price also reviewed a request for approval of contract negotiations with Edifice LLC,
Charlotte, NC. Edifice Construction is ranked first (1) of three (3) short listed firms who
responded to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Animal Adoption Center. Bordeaux
Construction (2) and Samet Corporation (3) are the other short-listed firms. There was a total of
twelve (12) respondents to the RFQ. After considerable deliberation from the RFQ Review
Committee, Edifice is rated the most qualified firm to provide Construction Manager at Risk
(CMAR) services for the Animal Adoption Center. Consensus of the Board was to place this
item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Kenneth Snipes, Facilities Maintenance Director, reviewed a request for approval to add a
Tech1/ Painter position to our Department. This position will mainly be at the Sheriff’s office.
With the building being over 16 years old, maintenance requests have been increasing. Having
staff there from 8 to 5 Monday through Friday, we can increase our duties at this facility. This
will include painting the cells, pods, plumbing and electrical. We are looking at starting this
position on January 1, 2026. This position can be funded using lapse salaries from the Sheriff’s
Office and contingency funds from Facilities. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on
the next consent agenda for approval.
Carl Davis, Parks and Recreation Director, reviewed a request for approval to accept the Parks
and Recreation Trust Fund grant funding for the construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills
Creek Park Master Plan (adopted in March 2024). Phase 1 will include playground, picnic
shelter, restrooms, walking trail, and additional infrastructure for Phase 1 and future phases. The
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 6
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 4 of 6
awarded grant is $500,000 and requires a dollar for dollar match from the County. The County
currently has $739,400 allocated in the CIP for this project and a $500,000 grant from the Land
and Water Conservation Fund has also been awarded for this project. Consensus of the Board
was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Mr. Davis also reviewed a request for authorization to accept the Land and Water Conservation
Fund grant funding for the construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills Creek Park Master Plan
(adopted in March 2024). Phase 1 will include playground, picnic shelter, restrooms, walking
trail, and additional infrastructure for Phase 1 and future phases. The awarded grant is $500,000
and requires a dollar for dollar match from the County. The County currently has $739,400
allocated in the CIP for this project and a $500,000 grant from the Parks and Recreation Trust
Fund has also been awarded for this project. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on
the next consent agenda for approval.
Sarah Arbour, Planner II, provided a briefing on the following upcoming public hearings:
• Proposed Zoning Change from the RA-20R to Commercial Zoning District, PLAN2509-
0001: Landowner / Applicant: B & B Land Holdings, LLC-Ron Burgess / Greg Bagley;
6.26 +/- acres; Pin # 0549-91-0349.000; From RA-20R to Commercial Zoning District;
Lillington Township; Intersection of NC Hwy 210 South & SR # 1133 (Shawtown Road)
• Proposed Zoning Change from the Commercial to the RA-20R Zoning District,
PLAN2509-0002: Landowner / Applicant: Mary Lou Mize, Steven Pointer, Kevin &
Kathleen Harris, Nancy Ouellette / Harnett County Development Services; 18.13 +/-
acres; Pin #’s 9576-37-2987.000, 9576-28-9973.000, 9576-38-1432.000, 9576-37-
3037.000, 9576-37-3735.000, 9576-37-3220.000, 9576-37-2250.00, 9576-37-2372.000;
From Commercial to RA-20R Zoning District; Barbecue Township; NC 87 N & SR #
1113 (Old NC 87)
• Proposed Zoning Change from the RA-20M to the Commercial Zoning District,
PLAN2510-0001: Landowner / Applicant: Kelley Inez Marsh f/k/a Kelley Bullock
Hasapis, Darius Marsh, Angelo K Hasapis/ 4C Development, LLC-Wesley Campbell;
5.32 +/- acres; Pin # 0504-92-7415.000; From RA-20M to Commercial Zoning District;
Anderson Creek Township; Intersection of SR # 1121 (Ray Road) & SR # 1122 (McKay
Drive)
Kimberly VanBeck, Library Director reviewed a request for permission to convert two existing
part-time Library Assistant positions into one full-time Library Assistant Position. Both part-
time roles are currently vacant and the change would require no additional funding as the
combined budgeted hours (29 hours) and salary allocations fall within the parameters of a full-
time equivalent position. This alignment has been confirmed with the budget director. The
library hopes to gain improved retention and recruitment, consistency, enhanced coverage, and
professional development and growth within our organization to align with our strategic goals.
Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 7
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 5 of 6
Ms. VanBeck also reviewed a request for permission to apply for and accept if awarded the
Accessible Small and Rural Communities Grant Round 4. Erwin Public Library is requesting a
$20,000 dollar grant for updates to doorways, tables, and book drops to meet ADA compliance.
This is a non-matching grant and no additional funds are needed if awarded. Consensus of the
Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Joanna Helms, Assistant Library Director, reviewed a request for permission to apply for and
accept if awarded a Libraries Strengthening Connections Grant in the amount of $25,800, with
no match required. This project will expand the library’s current Chromebook lending program
with 75 additional kits and improve a virtual conferencing space for patrons to participate in
remote work, education, and telehealth. The library will also offer digital literacy classes
teaching internet basics, productivity tools, and emerging technologies. This project is funded
with a federal award from the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF),
established under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 and was appropriated to the
North Carolina Department of Information Technology (NCDIT). Consensus of the Board was to
place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney, reviewed a request for approval of name changes of
the Human Resources and Legal Departments. The Human Resources & Risk Management
Department will be changed to Human Resources. The Legal Department will be changed to
Legal & Risk Management. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent
agenda for approval.
Attorney Appel also reviewed a request for the approval of a Land Lease Agreement between the
County and Harnett Air, LLC. The lease is for a 26,571 square foot parcel located at Harnett
Regional Jetport. The term of the lease is twenty (20) years with three (3) five (5) year options to
renew. The lease amount is $7,439.88 annually with a twenty-five percent (25%) increase at the
end of the initial term, and a three (3%) increase at each subsequent renewal term. Consensus of
the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Attorney Appel also reviewed proposed amendments to the Historic Preservation and Heritage
Commission Ordinance. A public hearing will be scheduled for the December 1, 2025 Board
Meeting.
Attorney Appel also reviewed a request for approval of the Board of Commissioners approve a
Resolution to Direct the Expenditure of Opioid Funds. The Resolution directs the expenditure for
the following: $40,000 for Naloxone distribution; $10,550 for creating and distributing "hygiene-
type" kits for the Harnett County Post-Overdose Response Team; and $1,000 to cover the costs
of training for pharmacists. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent
agenda. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Attorney Appel also reviewed a request for the approval of the changes to the Rules of Procedure
for the Board of County Commissioners. The update to Rule 6 - Regular and Special Meetings
includes the addition of the meeting on the Second Tuesday of each Month at 9 a.m. and updates
the location of the regular meetings.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 8
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 12, 2025
Page 6 of 6
Melissa Capps, Clerk to the Board reviewed a request for the Board to approve the adoption of a
Resolution to Adopt the 2026 Schedule of Meetings for the Harnett County Board of
Commissioners. Consensus of the Board was to change the April 6th meeting date to Tuesday,
April 7th and place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
The Board of Commissioners reviewed applications to serve on the various Boards and
Committees. Consensus was to place on the next consent agenda for approval the reappointment
of Ashley Dunn to the Board of Equalization and Review as an at-large member and
reappointment of Matthew Tucker to the Harnett County Planning Board as an alternate member.
Brent Trout, County Manager, reminded the Board tomorrow we will have our first Harnett
County Economic Development update meeting at Campbell University. We have a number of
speakers and it is from 8:00 am to 10:00 am. He also reminded the Board this Friday they have
been invited to a retirement reception for Paul Poliniski.
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to go into Closed Session for the following purposes:
Consultation with and instructions to the County staff concerning the position to be taken by the
County in negotiating a proposed contract for the acquisition of real property; and to consult with
the County legal staff in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege concerning the handling
of certain litigation, namely, the workers compensation claim “Yergeau v. County of Harnett, IC
file no. 24027894. The motion is made pursuant to NC General Statute Section 143-318.11 (a)(5)
and (3). The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
Following a motion to come out of Closed Session, Chairman Nicol called the meeting back into
open session.
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to adjourn the Board of Commissioners at 10:59 am.
Commissioner Jaggers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
____________________________________ ___________________________________
Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman Melissa Capps, Clerk
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 9
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 1 of 9
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
The Harnett County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, November 17, 2025 at
6:00 pm, in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Harnett County Resource Center and Library, 455
McKinney Parkway, Lillington, North Carolina.
Members present: Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman
William Morris, Vice Chairman
Barbara McKoy, Commissioner
W. Brooks Matthews, Commissioner
Duncan “Eddie” Jaggers, Commissioner
Staff present: Brent Trout, County Manager
Dwight Snow, County Attorney
Kimberly Honeycutt, Finance Officer
Melissa Capps, Clerk
Chairman Nicol called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.
Commissioner Jaggers led the Pledge of Allegiance and provided the invocation.
Eric Truesdale, Veterans Services Director, presented information regarding the Harnett County Heroes
Remembrance recognition. We are recognizing and honoring veterans that appear on our Wall of
Heroes. These individuals have received awards for acts of individual heroism, not as a unit. Mr.
Truesdale read Corporal Ricky D. Manning’s citation. Chairman Nicol presented Corporal Manning
with a certificate.
Chairman Nicol called for any additions or deletions to the published agenda. Vice Chairman Morris made
a motion to approve the agenda as published. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and
carried unanimously.
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Matthews seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The items on the consent agenda were as follows:
A.Minutes
i.Regular Meeting Minutes of November 3, 2025
B.General Services requests the Board of Commissioners approve contract negotiations
with Edifice LLC, Charlotte, NC. Edifice Construction is ranked first (1) of three (3)
short listed firms who responded to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Animal
Adoption Center. Bordeaux Construction (2) and Samet Corporation (3) are the other
short-listed firms. There was a total of twelve (12) respondents to the RFQ. After
considerable deliberation from the RFQ Review Committee, Edifice is rated the most
Item 6Aii
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 10
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 2 of 9
qualified firm to provide Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) services for the Animal
Adoption Center.
C. Facilities requests approval to add a Tech1/ Painter position to our Department. This
position will mainly be at the Sheriff’s office. With the building being over 16 years old,
maintenance requests have been increasing. Having staff there from 8 to 5 Monday
through Friday, we can increase our duties at this facility. This will include painting the
cells, pods, plumbing and electrical. We are looking at starting this position on January 1,
2026. This position can be funded using lapse salaries from the Sheriff’s Office and
contingency funds from Facilities.
D. Parks and Recreation requests approval to accept the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund
grant funding for the construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills Creek Park Master
Plan (adopted in March 2024). Phase 1 will include playground, picnic shelter,
restrooms, walking trail, and additional infrastructure for Phase 1 and future phases. The
awarded grant is $500,000 and requires a dollar for dollar match from the County. The
County currently has $739,400 allocated in the CIP for this project and a $500,000 grant
from the Land and Water Conservation Fund has also been awarded for this project.
E. Parks and Recreation requests authorization to accept the Land and Water Conservation
Fund grant funding for the construction of Phase 1 outlined in the Neills Creek Park
Master Plan (adopted in March 2024). Phase 1 will include playground, picnic shelter,
restrooms, walking trail, and additional infrastructure for Phase 1 and future phases. The
awarded grant is $500,000 and requires a dollar for dollar match from the County. The
County currently has $739,400 allocated in the CIP for this project and a $500,000 grant
from the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund has also been awarded for this project.
F. Harnett County Public Library respectfully requests permission to convert two existing
part-time Library Assistant positions into one full-time Library Assistant Position. Both
part-time roles are currently vacant and the change would require no additional funding
as the combined budgeted hours (29 hours) and salary allocations fall within the
parameters of a full-time equivalent position. This alignment has been confirmed with the
budget director. The library hopes to gain improved retention and recruitment,
consistency, enhanced coverage, and professional development and growth within our
organization to align with our strategic goals.
G. Erwin Public Library respectfully requests permission to apply for and accept if awarded
the Accessible Small and Rural Communities Grant Round 4. Erwin Public Library is
requesting a $20,000 dollar grant for updates to doorways, tables, and book drops to meet
ADA compliance. This is a non-matching grant and no additional funds are needed if
awarded.
H. The Harnett County Public Library requests permission to apply for and accept if
awarded a Libraries Strengthening Connections Grant in the amount of $25,800, with no
match required. This project will expand the library’s current Chromebook lending
program with 75 additional kits and improve a virtual conferencing space for patrons to
participate in remote work, education, and telehealth. The library will also offer digital
literacy classes teaching internet basics, productivity tools, and emerging technologies.
This project is funded with a federal award from the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal
Recovery Funds (SLFRF), established under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 11
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 3 of 9
2021 and was appropriated to the North Carolina Department of Information Technology
(NCDIT).
I. The Legal Department requests name changes of the Human Resources and Legal
Departments. The Human Resources & Risk Management Department will be changed to
Human Resources. The Legal Department will be changed to Legal & Risk Management.
J. The Legal Department requests the approval of a Land Lease Agreement between the
County and Harnett Air, LLC. The lease is for a 26,571 square foot parcel located at
Harnett Regional Jetport. The term of the lease is twenty (20) years with three (3) five (5)
year options to renew. The lease amount is $7,439.88 annually with a twenty-five percent
(25%) increase at the end of the initial term, and a three (3%) increase at each subsequent
renewal term.
K. The Legal Department requests the Board of Commissioners approve a Resolution to
Direct the Expenditure of Opioid Funds. The Resolution directs the expenditure for the
following:$40,000 for Naloxone distribution; $10,550 for creating and distributing
"hygiene-type" kits for the Harnett County Post-Overdose Response Team; and $1,000 to
cover the costs of training for pharmacists. (Attachment 1)
L. Legal Department requests the approval of the changes to the Rules of Procedure for the
Board of County Commissioners. The update to Rule 6 - Regular and Special Meetings
includes the addition of the meeting on the Second Tuesday of each Month at 9 a.m. and
updates the location of the regular meetings.
M. Administration requests the Board of Commissioners approve a Resolution to Adopt the
2026 Schedule of Meetings for the Harnett County Board of Commissioners.
(Attachment 2)
N. As discussed at the November 12, 2025 Work Session the Harnett County Board of
Commissioners would like to reappoint Ashley Dunn to the Board of Equalization and
Review as an at-large member and reappoint Matthew Tucker to the Harnett County
Planning Board as an alternate member.
Chairman Nicol opened the meeting for informal comments by the public, allowing up to 3 minutes for
each presentation up to 30 minutes. The following person spoke:
1. Larry Mitchell of 478 Century Drive, Cameron, NC.
2. Alan Longman of 234 Hamilton Road, Bunnlevel, NC.
3. Rebekah Brock of 5220 Christian Light Road, Fuquay-Varina, NC.
4. Laura Monk of 114 Tun Tavern Drive, Cameron, NC.
5. Steve Vendetti of 629 Pendergraft Road, Bunnlevel, NC.
No one else spoke. The public comment period was closed.
Christine Wallace, Tax Administrator, requested the Board of Commissioners’ approval of the Uniform
Schedules, Standards, and Rules as required by NCGS 105-317(b)(1), and to issue an Order to Adopt the
2026 Schedule of Values to be used in the reappraisal of Real Property and Present-Use Values in
Harnett County. Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to approve the Uniform Schedules, Standards,
and Rules as required by NCGS 105-317(b)(1), and to issue an Order to Adopt the 2026 Schedule of
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 12
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 4 of 9
Values to be used in the reappraisal of Real Property and Present-Use Values in Harnett County. The
motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously. (Attachment 3)
Sarah Arbour, Planner II, petitioned the Board of Commissioners for a public hearing on Proposed
Zoning Change Case # PLAN2509-0001: Landowner / Applicant: B & B Land Holdings, LLC-Ron
Burgess / Greg Bagley; 6.26 +/- acres; Pin # 0549-91-0349.000; From RA-20R to Commercial Zoning
District; Lillington Township; Intersection of NC Hwy 210 South & SR # 1133 (Shawtown Road). In
conjunction with the rezoning request, a Land Use Map Amendment from Medium Density Residential
to the Commercial Mixed Use will be considered. The site consists of a vacant parcel located at the
intersection of NC 210 South and Shawtown Road in Lillington. The property features three street
frontages—one along NC 210 South and two along Shawtown Road. The site is situated adjacent to a
satellite annexation of the Town of Lillington and lies approximately 1 mile outside of the town’s
incorporated limits. Surrounding land uses are primarily agricultural, with established residential
development to the west. This section of the NC 210 S. corridor is changing in character as Lillington
continues to expand their current incorporated limits southward through satellite annexations. The
property located immediately to the north was recently annexed into the town of Lillington and zoned
for light industrial use.
Staff’s evaluation:
• The intersection of NC 210 S. and Shawtown Rd. has been transitioning away from its
agricultural and residential character since the recent annexation and rezoning to Light
Industrial of the parcel located immediately to the north. Shawtown Rd. and NC 210 N. serve
as a boundary between the subject property and properties currently used for non-commercial
purposes.
• All uses permitted in the Commercial Zoning district would be in the interest of the general
public because the uses permitted in the Commercial Zoning district will encourage rural
businesses and increase investment potential on NC 210 S., a major gateway in Harnett
County.
• There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed zoning district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. The property
has access to a major thoroughfare, NC 210 S., is adjacent to a property in the town limits of
Lillington zoned “Light Industrial”, and has access to the county water system. Additionally,
the property has a flat topography and sufficient area to accommodate the uses permitted in
the Commercial zoning district.
• There is a convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by the uses permitted in the requested zoning district. The
uses permitted in the Commercial zoning district are more compatible with the uses permitted
in the town of Lillington’s Light Industrial zoning classification than uses permitted in the
current zoning district, RA-20R. Further, the County may experience benefits from future
commercial development such as an increase in employment opportunities and local
investment.
• The proposed rezoning to Commercial is not compatible with the current land use
classification, Medium Density Residential. Approval of the proposed rezoning to
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 13
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 5 of 9
Commercial will automatically amend the future land use classification to “Commercial
Mixed Use.”
Ms. Arbour reviewed the procedure for amending the Future Land Use Classification when in conflict
with the requested zoning district.
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to Commercial would not have an unreasonable
impact on the surrounding community. The request is consistent with two strategies outlined in the
Harnett Horizons 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan that encourage commercial growth. The subject
property has access to a major corridor and county water, and it is compatible with the adjacent property
to the north, which is zoned Light Industrial within the Town of Lillington’s jurisdiction.
Therefore, it is recommended that the requested rezoning is APPROVED and the future land use map
reclassified as Commercial Mixed Use.
At the November 3, 2025 Planning Board, the board voted (3-0) to recommend that the rezoning request
be approved and to amend the land use classification to Commercial Mixed-Use.
No one spoke in opposition.
Chairman Nicol opened the public hearing and the following people spoke:
1. Greg Bagley of 225 Southern Magnolia Lane, Fuquay-Varnia, NC spoke in favor of the request.
2. Larry Mitchell of 478 Century Drive, Cameron, NC spoke in favor of the request and cautioned
rural farmland is slowing deteriorating and HWY 210 is a highly traveled road.
No one else spoke and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to approve the request to rezone the property from RA-20R to
Commercial Zoning District and amend the land use classification to Commercial Mixed-Use. The
motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously. (Attachment 4)
Ms. Arbour petitioned the Board for a Public Hearing for Proposed Zoning Change from the
Commercial to the RA-20R Zoning District, PLAN2509-0002: Landowner / Applicant: Mary Lou
Mize, Steven Pointer, Kevin & Kathleen Harris, Nancy Ouellette / Harnett County Development
Services; 18.13 +/- acres; Pin #’s 9576-37-2987.000, 9576-28-9973.000, 9576-38-1432.000, 9576-37-
3037.000, 9576-37-3735.000, 9576-37-3220.000, 9576-37-2250.00, 9576-37-2372.000; From
Commercial to RA-20R Zoning District; Barbecue Township; NC 87 N & SR # 1113 (Old NC 87). The
subject properties included in this rezoning request consist of 4 parcels used for single-family residential
purposes, and one small, vacant parcel of land. The rear property lines of the subject properties adjoin
the NC 87 N Exit Ramp onto NC HWY 27 W. The surrounding land uses consist of rural, single-family
homesites and agricultural activities. This rezoning petition is being initiated by the Development
Services Department as directed by the Board of Commissioners at the September 16, 2024, Board
Meeting. At the Board meeting, staff presented a rezoning petition as requested by a single property
owner, Mr. Jeffrey Branson (Case# PLAN2407-0002). Mr. Branson requested to rezone his property,
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 14
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 6 of 9
760 Old NC 87, Sanford from the Commercial to the RA-20R zoning district. Through the review
process for Mr. Branson’s rezoning request, staff learned that other property owners residing on Old NC
87 were also interested in rezoning their properties to the RA-20R zoning district. Upon learning this
information, staff informed the other interested owners that the Development Services staff would
initiate a petition to rezone their properties to RA-20R without charge at a later date. The properties on
the east side of Old NC 87 have been zoned Commercial since zoning was adopted for the Barbecue
Township in 2000. The properties along Old NC 87 are currently used for single-family residential and
agricultural purposes and never developed for commercial use. In an effort to reach all impacted
property owners, staff mailed letters, went door-to-door, and posted the sites of the property owners who
provided consent for the rezoning early to increase awareness of the pending rezoning petition in order
to include as many interested property owners as possible. However, a recent update to NC GS 160D-
601 requires written consent from the property owner(s) for an amendment to the zoning map that will
result in a reduction of permitted uses of the land that are specified in a zoning ordinance to fewer uses
than were allowed under its previous usage. Therefore, staff did not include properties on Old NC 87 in
the petition if express, written consent was not provided by the property owner(s).
Staff’s evaluation:
• The subject properties are contiguous to the requested zoning district, RA-20R, and would not
require an evaluation for reasonableness as a small-scale rezoning. The properties are
currently used for single-family and agricultural purposes, which are outright permitted uses
in the RA-20R zoning district.
• There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district would
be in the interest of the general public and not merely in the interest of the individual group.
These properties are located in a residential neighborhood and the uses permitted in the RA-
20R zoning district are more compatible with the surrounding land uses than the uses in the
current zoning classification, Commercial.
• There is convincing evidence that all uses permitted in the proposed district classification
would be appropriate in the area. The uses permitted in the RA-20R zoning district are more
appropriate than the uses incompatible permitted in the current zoning classification,
Commercial.
• There is a convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any of the uses permitted in the RA-20R zoning district.
A change of zoning to the requested zoning district would ensure that the character of the
neighborhood remains compatible with the surrounding low-density residential land uses.
• The subject properties in the rezoning request have two land use classifications, Rural Center
and Employment Growth Area. The requested zoning district is compatible with the future
land use designations.
• Additionally, the proposed change is in accordance with sound planning practices due to the
location of the site, conditions of site access, available utilities and surrounding land uses, a
change of zoning would be in accordance with sound planning practices.
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to the RA-20R zoning district is reasonable based on
the compatibility with the current use of the subject properties, surrounding land uses, and the Harnett
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 15
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 7 of 9
Horizons 2040 Comprehensive Land Use plan. It is recommended that this rezoning request be
APPROVED.
At the November 3, 2025 Planning Board meeting, the board voted (3-0) to approve the zoning change
from the Commercial to the RA-20R Zoning District.
There was no one present to speak in opposition.
Commissioner Jaggers asked, the property owners understand with that one plot of land, they could still
build a commercial business there, right. Ms. Arbour stated yes sir.
Chairman Nicol opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed.
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to approve the proposed zoning change from the Commercial to
the RA-20R Zoning District for the properties as described. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Jaggers. The motion carried unanimously. (Attachment 5)
Ms. Arbour also petitioned the board for a Public Hearing for Proposed Zoning Change from the RA-
20M to the Commercial Zoning District, PLAN2510-0001: Landowner / Applicant: Kelley Inez Marsh
f/k/a Kelley Bullock Hasapis, Darius Marsh, Angelo K Hasapis/ 4C Development, LLC-Wesley
Campbell; 5.32 +/- acres; Pin # 0504-92-7415.000; From RA-20M to Commercial Zoning District;
Anderson Creek Township; Intersection of SR # 1121 (Ray Road) & SR # 1122 (McKay Drive). The
site is a vacant and wooded parcel approximately 5.32 +/- acres in area located at the intersection of
McKay Dr. and Ray Rd. in Spring Lake. Surrounding land uses consists of single-family residential
homes, a manufactured home park, and various commercial uses. The site, which previously consisted
of 6 parcels varying in size, was recombined to meet the minimum lot size requirements of the
Commercial Zoning District. The recombination was recorded September 12, 2025. The RA-20M
Residential/Agricultural District (RA-20M) is established primarily to support agricultural and
residential development. Inclusive in such higher density residential developments may consist of single
-family dwellings, multifamily dwellings, duplexes, and manufactured home parks. It is the purpose of
the Commercial/Business District (COMM) to accommodate the widest variety of commercial,
wholesale, and retail businesses in areas that are best located and suited for such uses.
Staff’s evaluation:
•The property is located in a mixed-use area with existing commercial and non-residential
uses. Properties with a Commercial zoning designation are adjacent to the property and across
the intersection of McKay Dr. and Ray Rd.
•All uses permitted in the Commercial Zoning district would be in the interest of the general
public and not merely in the interest of the private property owner. There is infrastructure to
support the permitted uses in the commercial zoning district available to the property,
including a 4-lane road located at a signalized intersection and county water and sewer
services. Commercial use of the property may also increase investment potential and bring
employment opportunities to the community.
•There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed zoning district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. The uses
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 16
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 8 of 9
permitted in the Commercial zoning district are compatible with the surrounding and nearby
commercial land uses.
•There is a convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by the uses permitted in the requested zoning district. The
uses permitted in the Commercial zoning district are compatible with the nearby non-
residential land uses. Further, the neighborhood may experience benefits from future
commercial development such as an increase in employment opportunities and local
investment.
•The proposed rezoning to Commercial is not compatible with the current land use
classification, Medium Density Residential. Approval of the proposed rezoning to
Commercial will automatically amend the future land use classification to “Commercial
Mixed Use”.
•These areas are located along major roads and include a mix of commercial land uses and
some residential uses. This character area is home to medium-to-large-scale retail, services,
restaurants, offices and other businesses. Residential uses may include single-family homes,
townhomes, missing middle housing types and occasionally apartments.
Ms. Arbour reviewed the procedure for amending the Future Land Use Classification when in conflict
with the requested zoning district.
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to Commercial would not have an unreasonable
impact on the surrounding community due to the compatibility with the surrounding land uses and the
availability of infrastructure.
Therefore, it is recommended that the requested rezoning is APPROVED and the future land use map
reclassified as Commercial Mixed Use.
At the November 3, 2025 Planning Board, the board voted (3-0) to recommend that the rezoning request
be approved and to amend the land use classification to Commercial Mixed-Use.
No one spoke in opposition.
Chairman Nicol opened the public hearing and the following people spoke:
1.Greg Stewart with Rhetson Companies on behalf of 4C Development spoke in favor of the
request.
2.Larry Mitchell of 478 Century Drive, Cameron, NC stated Anderson Creek is highly populated
and traffic is busy. Mr. Mitchell stated he was in favor of commercial zoning
3.Jessica Bowers spoke on behalf of the applicant in favor of the request.
No one else spoke and the public hearing was closed.
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to approve the proposed zoning change from the RA-20M to the
Commercial Zoning District and amend the land use classification to Commercial Mixed-Use. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Jaggers and carried unanimously. (Attachment 6)
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 17
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2025
Page 9 of 9
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to approve the budget amendments as requested by the Finance
Officer. The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously. (Attachment 7)
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to approve the tax rebates, refunds and releases as request by the
Tax Administrator. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and carried unanimously.
(Attachment 8)
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to authorize the Chairman to sign contract amendment exceeding
the manager’s threshold for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Title 1 Adult,
Dislocated Worker and Youth Program Services Amendment 1. The motion was seconded by Vice
Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
Kimberly VanBeck reviewed a request for Board approval to accept the Request for Proposal bid from
TechOps Specialty Vehicles to provide manufacturing and build of the Library Mobile Outreach
Vehicle- Bookmobile. The bid estimate for this build is $325,663. Library administration reviewed
proposals and interviewed references of top finalists. We recommend TechOps Specialty Vehicles based
on library outreach vehicle expertise and experience as well as including all requested items in the
Request for Bid. Commissioner McKoy made a motion to approve the Request for Proposal bid from
TechOps Specialty Vehicles to provide manufacturing and build of the Library Mobile Outreach
Vehicle- Bookmobile. The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Jaggers stated I understand Central Carolina Community College would like to partner
with Harnett County on a CTE High School, and I would like to ask the Board if we could ask the
superintendent of the schools and school board if they would start that communication between the two
and see what Central Carolina is wanting to do. Chairman Nicol and Vice Chairman Morris spoke in
support of the request. Commissioner Jaggers asked the County Manager to see in other communities
that have CTE schools, how beneficial they are to those communities. Commissioner Matthews shared
they have been talking about this for a number of years and applying for grants.
Commissioner McKoy spoke on the importance of economic development.
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to go into closed session for consultation with and instructions to
the County staff concerning the position to be taken by the County in negotiating a proposed contract for
the acquisition of real property. This motion is made pursuant to NC General Statute Section 143-318.11
(a)(5). The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
Following a motion to come out of Closed Session, Chairman Nicol called the meeting back into open
session.
Vice Chairman Morris made a motion to adjourn at 7:08 pm. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Matthews and carried unanimously.
____________________________________ ___________________________________
Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman Melissa Capps, Clerk
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 18
Attachment 1
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 19
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 20
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 21
Attachment 2
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 22
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 23
Attachment 3
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 24
Attachment 4
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 25
Attachment 5
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 26
Attachment 6
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 27
Attachment 7
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 28
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 29
Attachment 8HCBOC 120125 Pg. 30
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 31
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 32
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 33
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 34
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 35
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 36
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 37
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 38
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 39
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 40
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 41
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 42
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 43
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 44
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 45
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 46
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 47
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 48
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 49
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 50
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 51
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 52
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 53
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 54
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 55
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 56
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 57
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 58
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 59
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 60
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 61
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 62
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 63
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 64
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 65
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 66
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 67
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 25, 2025
Page 1 of 4
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Minutes of Work Session
November 25, 2025
The Harnett County Board of Commissioners met in work session on Tuesday, November 25,
2025 at 9:00 am, in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Harnett County Resource Center and
Library, 455 McKinney Parkway, Lillington, North Carolina.
Members present: Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman
William Morris, Vice Chairman
Barbara McKoy, Commissioner
Duncan “Eddie” Jaggers, Commissioner
W. Brooks Matthews, Commissioner
Staff present: Kimberly Honeycutt, Finance Officer
Christopher Appel, Senior Staff Attorney
Brent Trout, County Manager
Melissa Capps, Clerk
Chairman Nicol called the Harnett County Board of Commissioners meeting to order at 9:00 am.
Commissioner Jaggers led the Pledge of Allegiance and provided the invocation.
Amy Noel, Assistant Veterans Services Director, presented information regarding the new
Harnett County Heroes Remembrance recognition. We are recognizing and honoring veterans
that appear on our Wall of Heroes. These individuals have received awards for acts of individual
heroism, not as a unit. Ms. Noel read Warrant Officer One (WOI) Robert A. Hinsley’s citation.
Chairman Nicol presented Mr. Hinsley with a certificate.
Chairman Nicol called for any additions or deletions to the published agenda. Commissioner
Jaggers made a motion to approve the agenda as published. The motion was seconded by Vice
Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
The following agenda was before the Board of Commissioners:
1.Call to order – Chairman Matthew B. Nicol
2.Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation – Commissioner Duncan “Eddie” Jaggers
3.Harnett County Heroes Remembrance Presentation
4.Consider any additions and/or deletions to the published agenda.
5.Harnett County Greenway Feasibility Studies Presentation; Carl Davis, Parks and
Recreation Director and Alta Planning + Design
6.Economic Development Quarterly Update; Stephen Barrington, Economic
Development Director
Item 6Aiii
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 68
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 25, 2025
Page 2 of 4
7. Discuss a request for approval to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with Homeland Security Investigations; Gary McNeill, Major, Sheriff’s
Office
8. Discuss a request for approval to enter into an agreement with Cornerstone
Detention Products to upgrade the video surveillance system for the Detention
Center and Sheriff's Office; Gary McNeill, Major, Sheriff’s Office
9. Discuss a request for approval to extend the contract with Pay Tel
Communications for three years ending December 3, 2029; Gary McNeill, Major,
Sheriff’s Office
10. Discuss a request for approval to surplus weapons; Gary McNeill, Major, Sheriff’s
Office
11. Discuss a request for permission to accept a commemorative bench and plaque
donation honoring Paul Green; Kimberly VanBeck; Library Director
12. Discuss a request to apply for and accept if awarded the State Library of North
Carolina (SLNC) Continuing Education Scholarship Grant in the amount of
$2,500; Kimberly VanBeck, Library Director
13. Review applications for Boards and Committees.
14. County Manager’s Report – Brent Trout, County Manager
• December 1, 2025 Regular Meeting Agenda Review
• Upcoming meetings and invitations
15. Closed Session
16. Adjourn
Carl Davis, Parks and Recreation Director introduced Steve Bzomowski, Project Manager with
Alta Planning +Design presented information on the Harnett County Greenway Feasibility Study
for trail connectivity between Lillington, Campbell University, Coats, and the Dunn-Erwin Rail
Trail. The Study assessed the feasibility of alternative routes within these corridors, identified
preferred routes, and defines specific next steps for future phases of greenway development. Mr.
Davis reviewed a request for adoption of the Greenway Feasibility Study to aid in future funding
opportunities and guide County staff with future greenway trail design and construction.
Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Stephen Barrington, Economic Development Director, presented the Economic Development
Quarterly Update.
Gary McNeill, Major for the Sheriff’s Office, reviewed a request for approval to enter into a
MOU with Homeland Security Investigations. The Agreement establishes the responsibilities of
both parties and the procedures for the reimbursement of certain overtime expenses and other
law enforcement pursuant to 31 USC 9705 (31 USC 9705 deals the Department of the Treasury
Forfeiture Fund). Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for
approval.
Major McNeill also reviewed a request for approval to enter into an agreement with Cornerstone
Detention Products to upgrade our present video surveillance system for the Detention Center
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 69
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 25, 2025
Page 3 of 4
and Sheriff's Office and approve the associated budget amendment. The upgrade will include but
not limited to increasing the amount of digital recording that is stored, adding additional cameras
and upgrading the operating systems. This will be a "Sole Source" purchase based on
Cornerstone, which is the service provider for the Video Surveillance system and this system
communications with other systems within the Detention Center that is also maintained by
Cornerstone. This project is one of the items on the Sheriff's Office CIP projects. Consensus of
the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Major McNeill also reviewed a request for approval to extend the contract with Pay Tel
Communications for three years ending December 3, 2029. Pay Tel provides phone services for
inmates in the Detention Center and other services that enhances the Sheriff's Office ability to
monitor the activities of inmates. Pay Tel extension will allow access to their WIFI system to
Guard1 at no cost. Guard1 is a new system that records time and location of staff making cell
checks. Pay Tel Communication has been a partner with the Harnett County Sheriff's Office for
over twenty-five years. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent
agenda for approval.
Major McNeill also reviewed a request for approval to surplus certain weapons. A list of these
weapons was provided to the Board. These weapons have been replaced because of upgrades due
to technological advancements, safety concerns with existing models, or a regular replacement
cycle, which can be anywhere from 5 to 10 years. If approved, the Sheriff's Office will solicit
bids from a minimum of three approved gun dealers. Consensus of the Board was to place this
item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Kimberly VanBeck, Library Director reviewed a request for permission to accept a
commemorative bench and plaque donation honoring Paul Green. The bench and accompanying
plaque will be donated by The Paul Green Foundation and will be installed on the front porch of
the Harnett County Public Library near the Main Library Entrance. Paul Green was a Pulitzer
Prize winning playwright, author, and educator from North Carolina best known for his
connection to social issues, southern culture, and human condition with ties to Harnett County.
The library currently displays a bust of Paul Green and houses the Paul Green Collection in our
local history room. All costs for the bench and plaque will be covered by the donor. Consensus
of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for approval.
Ms. VanBeck also reviewed a request for permission to apply for and accept if awarded the State
Library of North Carolina Continuing Education Scholarship Grant in the amount of $2,500.
This grant would be used to send a Librarian to the American Library Association’s annual
conference. Consensus of the Board was to place this item on the next consent agenda for
approval.
The Board reviewed applications to serve on various Board and Committees. Consensus of the
Board was to accept the resignation of Laura Barney from the Harnett County Commission on
Women and Youth, accept the resignation of Kandi Tudor from the Board of Health, appoint
Betty Gwen Johnson Goodwin as the public member to the Board of Health, reappoint Cindy
Delgado as County Commissioner Appointee on the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 70
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session Minutes
November 25, 2025
Page 4 of 4
appoint Katasha Tew to the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council. Applications for the First
Responder’s Advisory Board was deferred until next week.
Brent Trout, County Manager, recognized Christine Wallace, Tax Administrator who recently
received an award as the North Carolina Assessor of the Year from the North Carolina
Association of Assessing Officers. We are very proud of Christine and the work that she’s doing
in the department and it was great to have it recognized by her peers. Congratulations Christine.
Commissioner McKoy stated we are proud of you.
Commissioner Matthews stated as I understand it is the first time Harnett County has been
honored with someone winning an award such as this. Mr. Trout stated yes, this is the first time
that an assessor from that department has been recognized statewide.
Mr. Trout also shared the countywide survey citizen survey is live at harnettcountysurvey.org.
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to go into Closed Session for the following purpose to
instruct county staff concerning the position to be taken by the County in negotiating the price
and other material terms of contract for the acquisition of real property. The motion is made
pursuant to NC General Statute Section 143-318.11 (a)(5). The motion was seconded by Vice
Chairman Morris and carried unanimously.
Following a motion to come out of Closed Session, Chairman Nicol called the meeting back into
open session.
Commissioner Jaggers made a motion to adjourn the Board of Commissioners at 10:00 am.
Commissioner Matthews seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
____________________________________ ___________________________________
Matthew B. Nicol, Chairman Melissa Capps, Clerk
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 71
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6B.1
GreenwayFeasibilityStudyAdoption.docx Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Greenway Feasibility Study Report and Adoption
REQUESTED BY: Carl Davis, Parks and Recreation
REQUEST:
A Greenway Feasibility Study has been completed on proposed greenway routes
between the Town of Lillington and Campbell University, Campbell University and the
Town of Coats, and the Town of Coats and the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail. The Study
assessed the feasibility of alternative routes within these corridors, identified preferred
routes, and defines specific next steps for future phases of greenway development.
Parks and Recreation requests adoption of this Greenway Feasibility Study to aid in
future funding opportunities and guide County staff with future greenway trail design
and construction.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6B
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 72
Harnett County Board of Commissioners Meeting| November 25, 2025
Harnett County Greenway
Feasibility Studies
For trail connectivity between Lillington,
Campbell University, Coats, and the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 73
Agenda
•Project Background
•Study Process
•Study Results
•Next Steps
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 74
Project Background
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 75
Key Partners and Steering Committee
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 76
Project Background
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 77
Project Background
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 78
Study Process
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 79
Study Process
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 80
Public Engagement
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 81
Public Engagement
•Appx. 65 people attended the
two open houses
•11,910 views of the Harnett
County Social Media meeting
announcement
•61 surveys collected
•Public expressed need for:
•Building out trail system
•Parking at trailheads
•Trail separation from motor
vehicles
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 82
Study Results
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 83
Study Contents
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 84
Opportunities and Barriers
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 85
Preferred Alignments and
Alternatives Overview
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 86
Action Plan: Priority
Segments
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 87
Priority Segment 1: Cape Fear Shiner Park to the Capeton Development
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 88
Priority Segment 2: Capeton Development Riverfront Greenway
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 89
Priority Segment 3: Capeton to Campbell Health Sciences Campus
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 90
Priority Segment 4: Campbell Health Sciences Campus to Main Campus
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 91
Priority Segment 5:
Downtown Coats Rail Trail
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 92
Next Steps
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 93
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 94
Thank You!
Steve Bzomowski, Alta | Project Manager
stephenbzomowski@altago.com
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 95
Harnett County
Greenway Feasibility
Studies
2025
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 96
Acknowledgments
Steering Committee
Meade Bradshaw, Harnett County
Drew Bryant, Harnett County
Landon Chandler, Town of Lillington
Carl Davis, Harnett County
Brian Denny, Campbell University
Sarah Goldsmith, Town of Coats
Phillip Hart, NCDOT Division 6
Barbara Hollerand, Town of Coats
Luther Langley, Fayetteville Area MPO
Tim Lisk, Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee
Coley Price, Harnett County
Jami Tart, Campbell University
Kenneth Withrow, CAMPO
Consultant:
Alta Planning + Design
Katie Atkins, Technical Editor
Steve Bzomowski, Project Manager
Chelsea Cole, Landscape Designer
Spencer Finch, Senior Engineering Advisor
Katherine Mooney, Associate Engineer
Jason Reyes, Principal
Project Contact
Carl Davis, CPRE, Parks and Recreation Director
(910) 893-7518 | cdavis@harnett.org
455 McKinney Parkway (physical) |
P.O. Box 816 (mailing)
Lillington, NC 27546
Table of Contents
1
Project Overview......................3
2
Opportunities and
Barriers......................................9
3
Preferred Alignment
and Alternatives.......................15
4
Action Plan...............................25
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 97
1
Project Overview
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 98
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 4Project Overview
Study area corridors include Lillington to Campbell University, Campbell
University to Coats, and Coats to the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail.
Raven Rock Raven Rock
State ParkState Park
Anderson Anderson
Creek ParkCreek Park
Barbecue Barbecue
Creek ParkCreek Park
Dunn-Erwin Dunn-Erwin
Rail TrailRail Trail
Cape Fear Cape Fear
Shiner ParkShiner Park
Campbell Campbell
UniversityUniversity
Cap
e
F
e
a
r
R
i
ve
r
HARNETT
COUNTY
Existing Greenways
Study Area and Process Overview
Harnett County is studying the feasibility of greenway trail
connections for walking and bicycling between Lillington,
Campbell University, Coats, and the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail.
Project Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of alternative routes within these corridors,
identify preferred routes, and define specific next steps for project phasing.
Process Overview
February 2025
Base Map Development
and Committee Meeting #1
February-April 2025
Opportunities and
Barriers Analysis
April-June 2025
Preferred Alignments and
Committee Meeting #2
June-August 2025
Action Plan and
Draft Document
August-October 2025
Final Study and
Committee Meeting #3 Public Survey and Partner Engagement2026 Onward
Funding, Permitting, Design,
and Construction
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 99
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 5Project Overview
Harnett County leadership,
staff, and residents identified
the proposed trail segments in
this study as priorities within
adopted plans.
The Harnett County
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenway Plan (2021)
This plan focuses on bicycle, pedestrian,
and greenway routes and trails, detailing a
countywide system. The walking and biking trail
network will link parks, schools, municipalities,
cultural points of interest, and residential areas
within Harnett County, and will be designed
to connect to surrounding counties. This is a
community supported plan that included broad
public input.
The proposed network is a result of a
collaborative planning process that involved
a review of recent and past planning efforts,
public engagement, data collection, and
technical analysis. Specifically, the basis of
recommendations in the plan included:
• Committee and Public Input
• Connecting Destinations
• Mapping Analysis
• Previous Planning
• Project Prioritization
Project Background
Top priority trail project segments from the 2021
plan include:
1. Raven Rock State Park to Lillington River Park
(design underway to S River Rd Trailhead)
2. Lillington to Campbell University (featured in
this 2025 feasibility study)
3. Campbell University to Coats (featured in this
2025 feasibility study)
4. Coats to Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail (featured in this
2025 feasibility study)
Other Previous Plans
That Support the Trail
Corridors in This Study
Most of these and other past plans are
summarized in Chapter 1 of the 2021 Harnett
County Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenway Plan.
Some highlights relevant to this 2025 study
include:
• Harnett Horizons 2040 Comprehensive
Plan (2025): The updated Comprehensive
Plan supports investment in greenways
and highlights the corridors detailed in this
feasibility study as top priorities.
• Lillington Pedestrian Plan (2020): The
plan features proposed routing for trail
connections through downtown, including
connections over the Cape Fear River to the
Harnett County Government Complex.
• The Great Trails State Plan (2020): This plan
identifies a proposed network of shared use
paths connecting to every county in North
Carolina, including connecting Lillington to
Raven Rock State Park and connections to the
East Coast Greenway Corridor heading north
and south from the eastern side of Harnett
County.
• Campbell University Pollinator Meadows &
River Park (2020): This plan called for a series
of pollinator meadows and hiking trails on the
University's 325-acre abandoned "back-nine"
golf course along the Cape Fear River. The
plan is now outdated, but it demonstrates the
original vision for trails in this area.
• Sandhills Regional Bicycle Plan (2019): The
plan identifies the potential connection
between Raven Rock State Park and
downtown Lillington, as well as the
connection to Campbell University from
Lillington via a shared use path.
• Northwest Harnett Small Area Plan (2019):
This plan recommends multi-use paths
connecting Lillington and Campbell University,
among other regional destinations.
• Harnett County Comprehensive Parks,
Recreation, Greenway, and Blueways Master
Plan (2017): This plan outlines greenway
and blueway connections with countywide
strategies to enhance the effectiveness of
recreational services.
• Grow Harnett County Comprehensive Growth
Plan (2015): The plan recognizes the need
to develop a countywide greenway system,
providing multimodal transportation options.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 100
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 6Project Overview
There are multiple unique trail
cross-sections that will be required
to complete the trail segments in
this study, depending on the context
of each specific segment.
Most of these cross-sections fall under the umbrella of
shared use paths. A shared use path provides a travel
area separate from motorized traffic for bicyclists,
pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other
users. Please refer to Chapter 3 and Appendix A of the
2021 Harnett County Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenway
Plan for further design guidance.
Greenway Trail Types
NCDOT's typical cross-sections include guidance for sidepaths along numerous highway cross-section types (from two-lane to six-lane).
Please see the overview of NCDOT's typical cross-sections in the 2021 Harnett County Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenway Plan (p. 38).
RIVER ADJACENT TRAIL GRAVEL ROAD
SHARED USE PATH
BOARDWALK
MINOR HIGHWAY SIDEPATH
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 101
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 7Project Overview
Stakeholder and Public Engagement Approach
STEERING COMMITTEE
The steering committee was made up of
representatives from Harnett County, the Parks
and Recreation Advisory Committee, Town of
Lillington, Town of Coats, Campbell University,
North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT), Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (CAMPO), and the Fayetteville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
(FAMPO).
PROJECT WEBPAGE
The Harnett County website hosted a webpage
dedicated to the project, with background information
and links to project resources and participation
opportunities. Existing conditions base maps
were available for review in May 2025 and Draft
Recommendations maps were available for review in
September and October 2025.
PUBLIC SURVEY AND MAP COMMENTS
The survey was available as a hard copy and online from
May to July 2025. In all, 61 people completed the survey.
Additionally, 65 people attended in-person open house
events to review and comment on existing conditions base
maps and recommendations maps.
PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE EVENTS
The project team promoted and hosted two public
open house events, providing opportunities to answer
questions and share information about the project. The
open houses were held in May 2025 and September
2025, at the Harnett County Resource Center and Library.
Approximately 20 people and 45 people attended these
open houses respectively. The announcement on social
media for the September 2025 open house had 11,910
views, 74 interactions, and 3 comments.
STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
The project team conducted small group interviews
with the following groups.
⊲Campbell University: Discussed constraints to be
aware of, such as proximity to dorms; addressed
crime and safety questions; discussed likely trail
users (families, students, neighbors using the
trail for exercise and getting outdoors); identified
some pinch points for trail routing and potential
solutions.
⊲Town of Coats and Coats Area Chamber of
Commerce: Discussed the idea of a featured trail
segment through downtown Coats, and some of
the likely routing options and constraints; also
discussed some aspects of potential next steps.
⊲NCDOT Division 6, Town of Lillington,
Greenfield Communities: Discussed
opportunities and constraints related to private
property, NCDOT rights-of-way (ROWs), rail
crossings, Capeton development connectivity,
the N Main Street bridge, and routes for
connectivity.
⊲Harnett County Solid Waste: Discussed
opportunities and constraints for trail routing near
the solid waste facility.
⊲Rail Owner/Operator: Discussed potential
options for crossing under the rail line through
Cape Fear Shiner Park.
The goals of engagement
were to understand the
public’s priorities and
concerns about the trail
corridors generally, and to
request specific feedback
on trail design features and
amenities.
This page and the following page highlight the
process and key feedback, including some
highlights from the original countywide plan.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 102
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 8Project Overview
Public Engagement Summary
“Yes, I fully support trail connectivity. With the
massive number of new homes in the county, expanded
running trails are a great way to promote health and
foster community activities (running/walking clubs,
sponsored running events). Likewise, trails serve
a significantly wide range of ages from the county
population.” —Public survey respondent
“I believe it would have a profound impact on the
mental and physical health of the community and
make the area a more desirable place to live and play.”
—Public survey respondent
“I have been eagerly awaiting the development of
these greenways since I first heard of them. I believe
that we have neglected our opportunities to develop
trails along the Cape Fear River, a wonderful natural
resource.” —Public survey respondent
KEY THEME: GREENWAY OPPORTUNITIES AND QUALITY OF LIFE
Many responses to the open-ended survey question, "What else would you like to
share about this study? Do you support the idea of these greenway trail connections?",
highlighted the importance of creating and protecting space for greenways as growth into
northern Harnett County continues at a rapid pace. Respondents cited greenways as a key
element of a high quality of life through active living.
87%
“What greenway trail
features are most important
to you?”
Respondents could select multiple answers;
top four results shown.
⊲81% Parking at trailheads
⊲69% Separation from roadways
⊲65% Shade along the trail
⊲60% Water fountains/restrooms
at trailheads
“What are the most
important benefits of
greenway trails?”
Respondents could select multiple answers.
⊲93% Recreation/health/fitness
⊲82% Access to nature and the
outdoors
⊲57% Economic development/
quality of life
⊲51% Wildlife habitat/water
quality
⊲41% Transportation/
connectivity to destinations
of respondents said the development
of greenway trails in Harnett County is
“very important” to them.
“This connection is very much needed, especially with the students at
Campbell University and these trails connecting them to businesses in
Lillington or Coats. I see a lot of individuals running along road shoulders on
Leslie Campbell Ave and Hwy 27. It's not currently very safe to do this once
you are outside of the sidewalk paths at Campbell, and it would be nice to
be able to walk adjacent to Hwy 421 towards Lillington and Hwy 27 towards
Coats without worrying about getting hit by vehicles.” —Public survey respondent
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 103
2
Opportunities and Barriers
Analysis
Subhead if needed
2
Opportunities and Barriers
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 104
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 10Opportunities and Barriers
Opportunities and Barriers Overview
These project corridors offer incredible opportunities for connectivity and partnerships, while still presenting
some common trail development challenges that require careful coordination and design work to overcome.
Key Opportunities Key Barriers
POTENTIAL TRAIL UNDERPASSES
Both the active railroad and the N Main Street
bridge have potential for grade-separated
crossings along the Cape Fear River. The trail
under-crossings would have to be carefully
coordinated through design, permitting, and
construction with railroad and highway owners
and operators.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Examples include the Cape Fear River's wide
floodway, at least 15 creek crossings, and
topographic challenges in the vicinity of larger
creeks, such as Buies Creek.
POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIPS FOR TRAIL
ROUTING AND DEVELOPMENT
Key partners along these corridors include Harnett
County, Lillington, Coats, Campbell University, the
developers of Capeton (Greenfield Communities).
and NCDOT. Each of these groups has expressed
interest in the potential for trails in the study area,
and in the many benefits of trails and greenways.
EASEMENTS NEEDED FOR TRAIL
RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW)
Like any trail project, these corridors will require
landowner negotiations (with willing and
interested landowners) for connectivity to be
achieved in key sections of trail. There may be
alternate routes or trail types that could be used
in some cases where a trail easement is not
possible.
POTENTIAL FOR TRAILS AS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A key trail benefit, especially in the Town of
Coats, could be the potential for economic
development. Downtown Coats has a unique
opportunity to use their existing trail ROW to
partner with nearby landowners and businesses
to create a cultural and historic trail through the
heart of downtown Coats.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES ALONG
PROPOSED SIDEPATHS
The section from Campbell University to Coats,
in particular, includes long sections of proposed
sidepath trail that are somewhat constrained
by existing ROW, drainage, and utilities. These
constraints will make it challenging to design and
develop a trail that still provides a high-quality
user experience (e.g., comfortable separation
from motor vehicles with a landscape buffer).
Existing conditions along the Cape Fear River
underneath the railroad and the N Main Street bridge.
Existing conditions in downtown Coats near the
former railroad corridor.
Existing conditions along US 421, looking west toward
W Buies Creek.
Existing conditions along NC 27 near Thorntons
Creek, looking east toward Coats.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 105
Route from 2021
Harnett County
Greenway Plan
FUTURE
CAPETON
DEVELOPMENT
Lillington
River Park
Campbell
University Health
Sciences CampusConservation
easement;
not part of
Capeton
Campbell University
owned landCape Fear
Shiner Park
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 11Opportunities and Barriers
Elevated railroad has sufficient
space for a greenway to cross
under in several locations.
Routing will depend on wetland
delineation.
Sufficient space for a greenway
to cross under the bridge within
NCDOT ROW; an encroachment
agreement would be needed.
Boardwalk may be needed
through wetlands.
Long-term opportunity for
sidepaths on future roadways
connecting to Capeton.
Opportunity for greenway along
Dry Creek as part of development.
Sidepath required to be built as
part of Capeton development.
Town of Lillington and Capeton
development plans include
greenway along Cape Fear River.
Duke Energy power lines.
Large crossing of W Buies Creek
needed.
Flat area along Health Sciences
Campus buildings could
accommodate greenway with
connections to buildings.
Old golf course site with existing
trails and pollinator gardens
(Campbell University).
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Opportunities and Barriers: Map 1
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
1
4
7
8
12
9 10
11
6
2
2
3
5
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 106
Route from 2021
Harnett County
Greenway Plan
Campbell
University Health
Sciences Campus
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 12Opportunities and Barriers
Opportunities and Barriers: Map 2
Widening the existing sidewalk
into a greenway would require
significant expenses (re-grading,
potential ROW acquisition, and
bridging Buies Creek).
An alternative connection could be
explored, partly using low-traffic
neighborhood streets.
A greenway route somewhat
parallel and south of US 421
could be an opportunity, but trail
easement ROW and a bridge over
Buies Creek would still be needed.
An alternative connection could
also be explored near Barker-Lane
Stadium.
Existing greenway tunnel under
US 421.
Sidepath on Kivett Rd would be
challenging due to narrow ROW
and number of property owners.
Existing Campbell University cross
country trails.
Wide ROW on both sides of Leslie
Campbell Ave.
East of Stewart Town Rd, ROW
varies from 60 to 100 feet.
Future roundabout.
Future reconfiguration: Sheriff
Johnson Rd will dead-end instead
of intersecting Leslie Campbell
Ave.
Stewart Town Rd, McLamb Rd, and
Fleming Rd are low-traffic routes
used by Campbell cross country
runners; NC 27 has higher traffic
volumes and speeds.
1 LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
10
11
9
12
6
41
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Campbell
University Main
Campus
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 107
8 Route from 2021
Harnett County
Greenway Plan
Carlie C's
IGA
NC 55NC 55
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 13Opportunities and Barriers
Opportunities and Barriers: Map 3
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
ROW approx. 60 feet.
Fleming is an opportunity for
on-road back roads connection
between Campbell University and
Coats
Stewart St/McKinley St intersection
lacks pedestrian signals and high-
visibility crosswalks.
Town-owned parcels.
Rail corridor in downtown
Coats is owned by Town and
several private property owners;
opportunity for linear park.
Lower traffic volume road that
makes a back roads connection
toward Erwin.
NC 55 was proposed to be
widened from two lanes to three
in NCDOT's State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), but
is currently unfunded. If funded,
there may be an opportunity to
include the rail trail/sidepath in the
roadway design.
Abandoned railroad corridor
parallels NC 55; more than 20
different landowners own property
along this section.
1
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Coats Elementary
School
Coats
Municipal Park
Downtown
Coats
2
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 108
Route from 2021
Harnett County
Greenway Plan
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 14Opportunities and Barriers
Opportunities and Barriers: Map 4
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
Dunn-
Er
wi
n
R
ail
Tr
ail
D
u
n
n
-
E
r
w
i
n
R
a
i
l
T
r
a
i
l
Existing sidepath (recently
constructed as part of new
development).
Rail corridor owned by Harnett
County and private property
owners; easement agreements
would be needed for greenway.
Harnett County owns land north
of rail bed; potential alternate
greenway route.
Greenway bridge would be
needed.
Greenway bridge would be
needed.
County-owned rail corridor section
from Ashe Ave to the existing
Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail could be a
near-term opportunity.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
3
2
6
5
4
Coats Erwin
Middle School
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 109
2
Opportunities and Barriers
Analysis
Subhead if needed
3
Preferred Alignment and
Alternatives
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 110
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 16Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
Preferred Alignments and Alternatives Overview
The proposed trail project seeks to extend and connect greenway trail segments from Lillington to Campbell University, Coats, and the
Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail. Key features of the preferred alignments and alternatives are summarized below and detailed on the pages that follow.
TRAIL EXTENSION OPPORTUNITIES
Several feasible segments are identified to
extend and connect the existing trail network,
particularly under and along key infrastructure
such as the railroad bridge, N Main Street bridge,
and US 421.
KEY CONNECTIONS
Plans include connections between Cape
Fear Shiner Park, N Main Street, the Capeton
development, Campbell University, downtown
Coats, and the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail. These
would require a mix of shared use path,
boardwalk, underpasses, bridges, and sidepath.
ALTERNATIVES & INTERIM OPTIONS
Various alternatives are proposed in case
primary routes are not feasible, including
neighborhood streets, back roads, and existing
utility easements.
COORDINATION NEEDS
Success depends on coordination with private
landowners, NCDOT, Campbell University, and
local government partners. Easements and
encroachment agreements will be required in
multiple areas.
DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATION
Capeton development and Campbell University
are key partners, with plans to incorporate trails
for connectivity to the greenway system.
SAFETY & ACCESSIBILITY
The study calls for enhanced pedestrian
infrastructure such as paths separated from
roadways, advisory shoulders, traffic calming,
and visible crosswalks.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Trail design must address floodplain
constraints, wetland areas, creek crossings,
safety improvements (e.g., buffer space from
roadways), and trail user protection under the
railroad bridge.
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
The trail is envisioned as a recreational,
transportation, and economic asset, especially
in downtown Coats, with potential trailheads
and heritage features near local landmarks.
US-421
NC 27
COATS
ERWIN
DUNN
BUIES
CREEK
HARNETT
COUNTY
Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail and
East Coast Greenway
(Existing Trail)
Future
Capeton
Development
Coats Erwin
Middle School
Downtown Rail Trail
Opportunity
County-
Owned
Land
(landfill)
CAPE FE
A
R
R
I
VE
RCape Fear
Shiner
Park
LILLINGTON RailroadN MAIN STCampbell
University Health
Sciences Campus
Preferred Alignment
Future Trail to
Raven Rock State
Park
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 111
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 17Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
FUTURE
CAPETON
DEVELOPMENT
Lillington
River Park
Campbell
University Health
Sciences Campus
Conservation
easement;
not part of
Capeton
Recommended Alignments: Map 1
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
PREFERRED ROUTE
The preferred route, based on direction from the
steering committee, stakeholders, and the project
team, is as follows, from west to east:
• From Cape Fear Shiner Park to the Capeton
development, on the north side of the Cape Fear
River.
• North to US 421, between the future Capeton
Development and Campbell University property.
• East along the south side of US 421, to Pearson Rd
at Campbell University's Health Sciences Campus.
TRAIL CONNECTORS AND ALTERNATIVES
These routes should also be pursued for development
to form a complete trail network, and could be
considered if sections of the preferred route become
infeasible or longer term than expected.
• Proposed sidepaths along N Main St (both sides,
from Cape Fear River Bridge to US 421), McKinney
Pkwy (north side, from Alexander Dr to the future
Capeton development), and US 421 (from N Main St
to W Buies Creek).
3 5
4
1 2
9
7
8
6
13
10 18
16
19
17
12
15
14
Campbell University
owned land
*Numbers correspond to map notes on the following page.
Cape Fear
Shiner Park
11
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 112
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 18Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Potential railroad under-crossing: Space exists underneath the RJ Corman railroad bridge to extend
the existing Cape Fear Shiner Park trail to the east—potentially cross under at the river's edge or
further north under railroad trestle support.
2 Cape Fear Shiner Park to N Main Street bridge: Routing from here to the N Main Street bridge will
depend on wetland delineation/boardwalk needed.
3 N Main Street bridge/greenway connection: If the greenway is constructed underneath the N Main
Street bridge along the Cape Fear River front, a switchback connection should also be constructed to
the N Main Street bridge sidewalk at the river to enhance cross-river connectivity.
4 N Main Street bridge - Lillington spur: The Lillington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (pg 66) recommends
creating an interim option that shifts some of the existing shoulder space to the sidewalk edge,
allowing space for a vertical barrier such as a concrete jersey barrier to provide additional protected
space for bicyclists and pedestrians—the Town of Lillington should continue to explore this option with
NCDOT Div 6 to better link greenways and destinations on both sides of the Cape Fear River.
5 N Main Street bridge under-crossing: Space exists between the bridge support and the Cape Fear
River for the proposed greenway and would avoid having to cross N Main St at grade.
6 A full traffic signal with a variety of bicycle and pedestrian safety treatments would be needed at the
McKinney Pkwy/N Main St intersection to create a safe sidepath crossing here.
7 Consider adding spurs to the proposed riverfront greenway along both sides of N Main St.
8 One private landowner between the N Main Street bridge and the Capeton development (floodplain).
9 Proposed McKinney Pkwy sidepath: Longer term, a road is proposed to continue McKinney Pkwy
to the Capeton development. This road should include a sidepath with a landscaped buffer, linking
to Capeton’s internal greenway/walking/biking system and N Main St—this could also serve as an
alternative if the greenway cannot be constructed along the Cape Fear River.
10 Proposed Parker Ln sidepath: Longer term, Parker Ln is proposed to connect to US 421—a sidepath
with a landscaped buffer to Capeton’s walking/biking/greenway system should be considered.
11 Future shared use paths as part of the Capeton development.
12 Plans for the Capeton development include the reservation or construction of a greenway along the
Cape Fear River along the south side of the development with several connection points into the
development (this section could also serve as the southern segment of a greenway loop around
Capeton). The Town of Lillington will build and maintain the greenway—this trail is currently in design.
Table 1. Map 1 Notes and Recommendations
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
13 US 421 sidepath: a sidepath along the south side of US 421 is required to be constructed as part of
the Capeton development, and could be the northern part of a greenway loop around Capeton. The
Capeton development is only required to construct the section along their property.
14 This property is not owned by the Capeton developers (and therefore no sidepath construction is
required here by the Capeton development).
15 Work with Campbell University and the Capeton development to create a greenway connection
between the two properties in this vicinity; steep topography here, will be a challenging link. The
existing trails in the old golf course property could serve as a starting point.
16 The trail would need to cross under the Duke Energy power lines—coordination with Duke Energy
needed for implementation.
17 Crossing W Buies Creek will require the construction of a bike/ped bridge and may need switchbacks
due to the grade.
18 For this section of the greenway, routing along the north side of the Campbell University property
(around north side of the hole #5 green) may need to utilize some NCDOT ROW and would require an
encroachment agreement.
19 The large, flat open space in front of the Health Science campus along the south side of US 421 would
be an ideal route for the greenway, and could be connected to the Health Sciences Campus.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 113
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 19Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
Recommended Alignments: Map 2
PREFERRED ROUTE
The preferred route, based on direction from the
steering committee, stakeholders, and the project
team, is as follows, from west to east:
• From the Campbell University Health Sciences
Campus at Pearson Rd, across Buies Creek
to Barker-Lane Stadium at Wade Stewart Cir,
connecting to the US 421 tunnel.
• Connectivity through Campbell University Main
Campus and to the east of Campbell University
will not be pursued at this time. Connectivity
from Cape Fear Shiner Park, Lillington, Capeton,
and to the west side of Campbell University campus
are the highest priorities at this time. To the east,
the Coats Downtown Rail is also identified as a high
priority.
• Several alternatives have been identified
connecting east through Cambpell University, but
no preferred option has been identified due to
Campbell University concerns over non-Campbell
University trail users coming through campus,
cost, and other priorities at this time. Additionally,
Campbell University will be conducting a campus
master plan over the next two years.
2
3
4
8
6
75
12
9
10
16
14
18
13
19
17
15
11
1
Campbell
University Main
Campus
*Numbers correspond to map notes on the following page.
Campbell
University
Health
Sciences
Campus
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 114
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 20Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Powell Ave is a private neighborhood street that could serve as a greenway connection.
2 Potential alternatives to create a greenway connection between the Health Sciences Campus and
the southern part of Main Campus. This would require a greenway bridge over Buies Creek and an
easement with one private landowner.
3 The existing sidewalk along US 421, while better than nothing, is too narrow for a standard greenway
and has a very small buffer with the roadway, leaving pedestrians limited space with US 421 motorist
traffic (the westernmost section has a slightly wider ROW). Expansion of this sidewalk or buffer
creation with the roadway would require significant expense in grading (steep drop-off on south side
of sidewalk) and building a bridge over Buies Creek.
4 Wade Stewart Cir could be a potential connection point for the greenway.
5 Consider utilizing Wade Stewart Cir to connect to the tunnel.
6 The bike/ped tunnel under US 421 connects both sides of Campbell University and is a key link for the
trail.
7 On the north side of US 421 - consider utilizing the space east of McCall Hall or other campus
pathways.
8 Several different campus pathways make the connection from the US 421 tunnel to Main Campus -
consider utilizing the pathways along Harmon Rd and Leslie Campbell Ave rather than going west of
McCall Hall.
9 Potential options to consider in the long-term - the existing path along Leslie Campbell Ave could
be extended along the southern edge of the parking lot/northern edge of Leslie Campbell Ave; the
existing path along the southern edge of the Convocation Center is wider (12’) and could serve as
another option; additionally, the sidewalk through the parking lot to the track has extra width and
could be considered as a routing option.
10 Main St through campus and Kivett Rd could be potential alternatives - Main St has just enough width
to stripe minimal bike lanes. Kivett Rd, however, has a narrow ROW and eight different property
owners making sidepath construction challenging (on-street routing would be more feasible than
a sidepath, but would require traffic calming/lowering of the speed limit and would not be the ideal
facility for all ages and abilities).
11 Campbell University owns this forested area that includes existing cross country trails. Routing
alternatives around both sides of the track and both sides of the private parcel east of the track should
be considered - north side would be safest, keeping trail away from roadway.
Table 2. Map 2 Notes and Recommendations
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
12 East of the Buies Creek crossing, Campbell University property ends, but the roadway ROW remains
very wide - both sides of the road should be explored for finishing the connection to Kivett Rd (one
private landowner on either side of the road if additional easements are needed beyond the existing
wide roadway ROW). Crossing the road here would require a crosswalk with a Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB). Staying on the north side and crossing at Stewart Town Rd would work best
operationally.
13 75’ roadway ROW with widest section along the south side of Leslie Campbell Ave from Stewart Town
Rd to Anna St.
14 Stewart Town Rd is a lower volume roadway - while a sidepath along NC 27 would be ideal in the
long term (as part of a roadway project or development), Stewart Town Rd offers a quieter back roads
option.
15 Roadway ROW shrinks to 60’ from Anna St to Old Stage Rd intersection (roundabout recently installed
at the NC 27/Old Stage Rd intersection).
16 A sidepath along NC 27 would be ideal since traffic volumes/speeds are higher; makes a needed
connection between Stewart Town Rd and McLamb Rd.
17 Roadway ROW widens to 85-100’ from Old Stage Rd to McLamb Rd.
18 Sheriff Johnson Rd intersection will be closed in the future.
19 McLamb Rd is unpaved and scenic, excellent option for the back roads connection.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 115
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 21Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
Carlie C's
IGA
NC 55NC 55
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
Recommended Alignments: Map 3
PREFERRED ROUTE
The preferred route, based on direction from the
steering committee, stakeholders, and the project
team, is as follows, from west to southeast:
• The preferred route follows the old railroad bed
in downtown Coats from the Stewart St/Mckinley
St intersection, through downtown, and finishing
at the Coats Museum.
• From downtown Coats to the Coats Erwin Middle
School, further exploration of alternatives and
consensus on a preferred alignment would require
additional public/stakeholder involvement, and
further study.
TRAIL CONNECTORS AND ALTERNATIVES
• NC 27 and NC 55: Sidepaths should be developed
along these corridors in the longer term (with
roadway widening/future development).
• Back Road Routes: Several low-volume, low-speed
roadways are shown south and west of the main
route that could be signed and striped as on-road
connectors.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Coats Elementary
School
Coats
Municipal Park
Downtown
Coats
*Numbers correspond to map notes on the following page.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 116
Right - Vacant Town of Coats
property along the former rail
bed through downtown.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 22Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
1 From McLamb Rd to Coats, ROW shrinks to ~60'.
2 Fleming Rd is a lower volume roadway, excellent option for the back roads connection along with
McLamb Rd and Stewart Town Rd between Coats and Campbell University.
3 No pedestrian signals and only two-bar crosswalks across two of the four legs of the NC 55/27
intersection - need pedestrian signals and high visibility crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection.
4 The northern several parcels of the old rail bed is owned by the Town of Coats and could serve as a
first segment constructed.
5 Utilize Carrie St and Main St to connect from Fleming Rd to the proposed downtown rail trail.
6 Seven private property owners own different sections of the old railroad bed from the NC 55/27
intersection to the Coats Museum. The Town of Coats owns a section of the northern end, and the
Coats Museum owns a section of the southern end.
7 A signed back roads bike route along Crawford Rd and Clayhole Rd could serve as an interim
connection between downtown Coats and Coats Erwin Middle School.
8 The abandoned railroad corridor runs adjacent to the NC 55 ROW for much of the section between
Coats Erwin Middle School and downtown Coats. Over 20 different landowners own property along
this section. This section has previously been proposed for widening from two to three lanes in the
STIP, but this project is currently unfunded. If it were funded, it could be an opportunity to include a
sidepath with a landscaped buffer into the roadway design.
Table 3. Map 3 Notes and Recommendations
9
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 117
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 23Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
LEGEND CORRIDOR SECTION MAPS
1 2 3
4
Dunn-
Er
wi
n
R
ail
Tr
ail
D
u
n
n
-
E
r
w
i
n
R
a
i
l
T
r
a
i
l
Recommended Alignments: Map 4
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Based on direction from the steering committee, stakeholders, and the project
team, no preferred route was identified, and this section is not considered a top
priority at this time.
• While the former rail bed between Coats Middle School to the Dunn-Erwin Rail
Trail would provide the safest and best user experience due to its directness,
relatively flat grade, and separation from the roadway, much of this section
is privately owned, and there is no local landowner interest in exploring this
option, or any of the options at the time of this writing. Further exploration of
alternatives and consensus on a preferred alignment would require additional
public/stakeholder involvement, and further study.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Coats Erwin
Middle School
*Numbers correspond to map notes on the following page.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 118
Right - Short existing section of
sidepath recently constructed as
part of new development.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 24Preferred Alignment and Alternatives
MAP
NOTE #NOTES / RECOMMENDATIONS
1 A signed back roads bike route along Crawford Rd and Clayhole Rd could serve as an interim
connection between downtown Coats and Coats Erwin Middle School.
2 Short existing section of sidepath recently constructed as part of new development - this segment is
along the old rail bed and could be connected to the proposed rail trail from the Coats Erwin Middle
School to the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail.
3 The old rail bed between the Coats Erwin Middle School and the existing Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail is
partially owned by Harnett County as well as three different private property owners. The rail bed
would be the ideal location for the greenway and would require purchase or easement agreements
with three different landowners before trail implementation can take place.
4 Harnett County owns much of this land north of the old rail bed (Harnett County Solid Waste facility),
which could be considered for alternative routing if easements cannot be agreed upon with private
landowners for the old rail bed; multiple creek crossings would be required in this alternative.
5 A new greenway bridge would be needed to cross Stewart Creek along the old rail bed here.
6 This section of the old rail bed crosses the Stewart Creek tributary here.
7 Harnett County owns the rail spur from the Dunn-Erwin Rail Trail to Ashe Ave, and could serve as an
opportunity for near-term implementation.
Table 4. Map 4 Notes and Recommendations
2
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 119
2
Opportunities and Barriers
Analysis
Subhead if needed
4
Action Plan
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 120
TRAIL SEGMENTS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION
This chapter provides Harnett County and
project partners with a better understanding of
the potential costs and variables at play for these
corridors, before the design phase begins.
Because of the distance and complexity of the
preferred alignment, it will likely not be feasible
to design and construct the trail all at one
time. By breaking these corridors into smaller
segments that could be completed as stand-
alone projects, Harnett County and project
partners can diversify the potential funding
mechanisms used to build each trail segment,
and create phased projects that cover shorter
distances and are easier to administer.
Depending on available funding and other
conditions during implementation, some of these
segments could also be combined (and some
may need to be).
IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERS:
PERMITTING AND ROW
In addition to implementation notes, the segment
sheets include an overview of implementation leads
(the entities thought to be the most likely champions
to lead implementation for a given segment) and
partners. Harnett County, Lillington, Coats, Campbell
University, Greenfield Communities, and voluntary
private landowners will all play important roles in
completing the various segments. Coordination
and approval will be needed from NCDOT for
encroachment agreements, USACE/NCDEQ* and
NCFIP* for environmental permitting, and utilities
such as Duke Energy.
PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES
The planning level cost estimates provided for each
segment give each implementation lead an idea of
potential costs for each segment so that appropriate
funding streams can be secured.
FUNDING STRATEGY
A summary of possible funding sources
is included at the end of this chapter.
Funding for these trail segments will
likely come from a combination of varied
funding sources/mechanisms.
ACTION STEPS
Action steps that summarize key next
steps in the implementation process
are also included in a table at the
end of this section. This table can be
used as a quick reference during the
implementation process.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 26Action Plan
Action Plan Overview
For implementation, the preferred alignment is broken into smaller segments that could be administered as individual projects. These
segments are summarized in the pages that follow with notes on implementation and potential project partners.
US-421
NC 27
NC 55COATS
ERWIN
DUNN
HARNETT
COUNTY
Dunn-Erwin Rail
Trail and East
Coast Greenway
(Existing Trail)
Future
Capeton
Development
Downtown Rail Trail
Opportunity
County-
Owned
Land
(landfill)
CAPE FE
A
R
R
I
VE
RCape Fear
Shiner
County
Park
LILLINGTON RailroadMAIN STCAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
Coats Erwin
Middle School
1
A
1B
1C
2 3A
3B
4A
4B 5Campbell
University Health
Sciences Campus
*USACE = United States Army Corps of Engineers; NCDEQ = North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality; NCFIP = North Carolina Floodplain Insurance Program
3C
Future Trail to
Raven Rock State
Park
Segment 1: Cape Fear
Shiner Park to Capeton
Segment 2: Capeton Riverfront Greenway
Segment 3: Capeton
to Campbell U
Segment 4: Campbell U - Health
Sciences to Main Campus
Segment 5: Coats
Downtown Rail Trail/
Linear Park
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 121
Overview
Cape Fear Shiner Park borders the Cape Fear River and is less than a mile
from the Capeton development. A riverfront connection could become a
signature trail link, opening up views and access to the Cape Fear River
and filling the gap between the existing greenways in Cape Fear Shiner
Park and the planned future greenway in the Capeton development.
Depending on ROW availability (negotiations and agreements with
existing property owners will be needed), segments 1A, 1B, and 1C could
be designed and constructed as individual projects, or they could be
combined as one project.
Segment 1A Notes (Distance = 0.3 Miles)
• Railroad under-crossing: Space exists underneath the RJ Corman
(owner of the railroad line) railroad bridge to extend the existing Cape
Fear Shiner Park trail to the east - options include a new connection
under the railroad bridge at the river’s edge or just to the north
underneath one of the gaps in the railroad trestle. This option would
also require a protective canopy underneath the railroad bridge or
trestle to protect trail users from debris. Additionally, a short bridge or
culvert crossing would need to be built to span a drainage ditch parallel
to the west of the railroad tracks. Consultation and approval would be
needed from RJ Corman.
• A specific alignment along this portion of the trail will be determined
during the design phase, will depend on a wetland delineation study
and will likely require some boardwalk - could follow river's edge here
or possibly the existing cleared utility easement to the north (or some
variation of these options).
• Combined with segment 1B and the existing Cape Fear Shiner Park
greenways, segment 1A could complete a larger loop within Cape Fear
Shiner Park.
Segment 1B Notes (Distance = 0.3 Miles)
• For the northern section of this trail segment, consider utilizing the
existing unpaved driveway from the Harnett County Department of
Public Utilities driveway to the existing billboard.
• South of the existing billboard, consider routing the trail along the
existing cleared utility path, connecting to the Cape Fear River and
segment 1A.
• Consider adding parking spaces along the Harnett County Department
of Public Utilities driveway edge to serve as a small trailhead.
Segment 1C Notes (Distance = 0.7 Miles)
• N Main Street bridge under-crossing: space is available between the
bridge support and the Cape Fear River for the proposed greenway
(utilizing NCDOT ROW).
• An agreement is needed with one private landowner to make
the connection from the N Main Street bridge to the Capeton
development along the Cape Fear River. Depending on coordination
with the landowner, Town of Lillington, Greenfield Communities
(Capeton developer), and a wetland delineation study, routing could
follow the river's edge here or the existing cleared waste water
easement to the north (or some variation of these options).
• Potentially connect into the Capeton development via the open
space here - depending on the final routing during the design phase,
several open space connections could be considered to link into
Capeton.
Implementation Lead
• Segments 1A and 1B - Harnett County
• Segment 1C - Harnett County and the Town of Lillington
Implementation Partners - Permitting and ROW
• USACE/NCDEQ Environmental Permitting
»Section 404/401 permitting will be required since each of these sections
are in the floodplain, and permitting will also be needed for each
jurisdictional stream crossing.
»A wetland delineation study will be needed to refine the final
routing and quantify how much boardwalk will be needed in
constructing the trail in these areas.
»A hydraulics and hydrology (H&H) study and a no rise
determination will be needed if the trail is to be constructed in the
Cape Fear River floodway for the railroad or N Main Street bridge
undercrossing.
• NCDOT Encroachment Agreement - will be needed for the
N Main Street bridge undercrossing and possibly for the
northern section of Segment 1B.
• RJ Corman (railroad owner) - consultation and approval would
be needed for crossing under the railroad tracks.
• Greenfield Communities (Capeton developer) and private
landowner west of Capeton - coordination and easements/
ROW needed to identify best connection point into Capeton
development and riverfront greenway.
• Segment 1B would run under Duke Energy power lines, and
part of 1C would need to cross under a Duke Energy power
line - coordination and approval needed with Duke Energy.
Priority Segment 1: Cape Fear Shiner
Park to the Capeton Development
Future Capeton
develpment sidepath
2
2
3
1
1
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
Stream crossing - bike/ped
bridge needed
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 27Action Plan
Cape Fear
Shiner Park
Harnett County Dept of
Public Utilities
FUTURE
CAPETON
DEVELOPMENT
C
a
p
e
F
e
a
r
R
i
v
e
r
LILLINGTON
2
1C1B1A
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 122
1
Connect to the
future Capeton
development
river front
greenway
2
3
4
5
6
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 28Action Plan
Cape Fear
Shiner Park
Cape Fear
Shiner Park
Railroad
undercrossing -
protective canopy
would be needed.
If the trail were to be
constructed along the Cape
Fear River, opportunities for
scenic views and river access.
Connect to existing
greenway in Cape
Fear Shiner Park.
Connect to existing
unpaved greenway in
Cape Fear Shiner Park.
Existing billboard and
southern terminus of
maintenance driveway.
Wetland delineation
needed east of the
railroad tracks.
Small bridge would
be needed over
creek/drainage.
Longer-term, consider building ramp
to N Main St bridge here to tie into
N Main St sidewalk (and proposed N
Main St improvements featured in the
2020 Lillington Pedestrian Plan).
Space exists for
greenway to cross
under N Main St
bridge.
C
a
p
e
F
e
a
r
R
i
v
e
r N MAIN STSmall bridge would
be needed over
creek/drainage.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 123
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 29Action Plan
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.3 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $86,000.00 $86,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $17,000.00 $17,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $105,000.00 $105,000.00
1121000000-E 520 730 $65.00 $47,450.00
1523000000-E 610 200 $270.00 $54,000.00
1575000000-E 620 15 $1,000.00 $15,000.00
70 $4,000.00 $280,000.00
500 $1,000.00 $500,000.00
1 $300,000.00 $300,000.00
1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
1 $69,000.00 $69,000.00
$1,534,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$460,200.00
$1,995,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$300,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$200,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$399,000.00
$2,894,000.00
NOTE:
DATE
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
LS
LS
LSGRADING
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
PRIORITY SEGMENT 1A: CAPE FEAR SHINER PARK TO NORTH MAIN STREET
1,225 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH AND OVERLOOK AREA
500 LF OF BOARDWALK
70 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
LILLINGTON, NC
10' CLEAR WIDTH WOOD BOARDWALK LF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
PROTECTIVE CANOPY @ RAILROAD TRESTLE LS
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/db36f122-c2a9-46d7-bbf1-f1a29589aeaa/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_1a.xlsx1
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.3 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $65,000.00 $65,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $135,000.00 $135,000.00
1121000000-E 520 850 $65.00 $55,250.00
1491000000-E 610 100 $400.00 $40,000.00
1503000000-E 610 70 $400.00 $28,000.00
1523000000-E 610 240 $270.00 $64,800.00
1575000000-E 620 25 $900.00 $22,500.00
50 $4,000.00 $200,000.00
435 $1,000.00 $435,000.00
1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
1 $52,000.00 $52,000.00
$1,159,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$347,700.00
$1,507,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$227,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$151,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$302,000.00
$2,187,000.00
NOTE:
DATE
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX TON
TONASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
ASPHALT CONC BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0C
ASPHALT CONC INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE I19.0C
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
TON
TON
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
LS
LS
LSGRADING
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
PRIORITY SEGMENT 1B: NORTH MAIN STREET TO RIVERFRONT
1,252 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
435 LF OF BOARDWALK AND 50 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
TRAILHEAD PARKING WITH 12 SPACES, INCLUDING UP TO 2 ADA SPACES
LILLINGTON, NC
10' CLEAR WIDTH WOOD BOARDWALK LF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/e17b2d23-c0bd-448d-b9d6-ffd9edb836b3/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_1b.xlsx1 HCBOC 120125 Pg. 124
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 30Action Plan
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.7 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $229,000.00 $229,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $198,000.00 $198,000.00
1121000000-E 520 490 $65.00 $31,850.00
1523000000-E 610 140 $270.00 $37,800.00
1575000000-E 620 10 $1,100.00 $11,000.00
100 $4,000.00 $400,000.00
2,880 $1,000.00 $2,880,000.00
1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
1 $183,000.00 $183,000.00
$4,081,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30% $1,224,300.00
$5,306,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$796,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$531,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$1,062,000.00
$7,695,000.00
NOTE:
DATE
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
LS
LS
LSGRADING
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
PRIORITY SEGMENT 1C: NORTH MAIN STREET TO THE CAPETON DEVELOPMENT
875 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
2880 LF OF BOARDWALK
100 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
LILLINGTON, NC
10' CLEAR WIDTH WOOD BOARDWALK LF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/72a3a9ab-3019-486c-8c84-b85122715e2c/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_1c.xlsx1 HCBOC 120125 Pg. 125
Priority Segment 2: Capeton Development Riverfront Greenway
• Preliminary site plans for the Capeton development include
several connections to the proposed riverfront greenway at these
locations - connection points to be finalized during design phase.
• Connect this greenway segment to the west toward Cape Fear
Shiner Park (see Segment 1 on page 27).
• Connect this greenway segment to the east to Campbell
University (see Segment 3 on the following pages).
Implementation Lead
• Town of Lillington
Implementation Partners - Permitting and ROW
• Greenfield Communities (Capeton developer) - as part of the
requirements for this development, Greenfield Communities
has dedicated a greenway easement to the Town of Lillington.
The Town of Lillington will lead the design, construction, and
maintenance of the greenway in coordination with Greenfield
Communities.
• USACE/NCDEQ Environmental Permitting
»Section 404/401 permitting will be required since most of the
proposed riverfront greenway is in the floodplain, and permitting will
also be needed for each jurisdictional stream crossing.
»Greenfield Communities has completed a wetland delineation study
along the riverfront, and the Town of Lillington is currently working on
trail design. Boardwalk may be needed for much of this project.
»A hydraulics and hydrology (H&H) study and a no rise determination
will be needed if the trail needs to be constructed in any part of the
Cape Fear River floodway.
• Dominion Energy Gas line - crossing or any trail development
over the gas line will require coordination and approval.
• A future waste water project will likely connect through this area
- coordination needed between the waste water project and
greenway project to save on cost and avoid having to redo work
in the near term.
Overview
The Capeton development will reserve an easement along the Cape
Fear River for a greenway trail, which will allow the Town of Lillington
to construct a greenway trail. Eventually, the trail can become a
riverfront destination on its own, and also fill a significant part of the
gap between Cape Fear Shiner Park and Campbell University. The
Capeton development will be mixed use, and this greenway project
will enhance connectivity for both residences and businesses to
the Cape Fear River and eventually to the Town of Lillington and
Campbell University. This project is currently in design*.
Segment 2 Notes (Distance = 1.8 Miles)
• The greenway is planned to be constructed along the southern
end of the Capeton Development property in the floodplain along
the riverfront. The exact route will be defined during the design
phase.
• This location will likely be a larger amenity space with a
connection to the riverfront greenway.
3A
To Cape
Fear Shiner
Park
To
Campbell
University
Future Capeton
develpment sidepaths
Stream crossing - bike/ped
bridge needed
2
3
1
4
5
1
2
33
3
4
5
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 31Action Plan
C
a
p
e
F
e
a
r
R
i
v
e
r
FUTURE
CAPETON
DEVELOPMENT
2
1C
*NOTE: No cost estimate was completed for this segment since it is currently in design by the Town of Lillington HCBOC 120125 Pg. 126
Priority Segment 3:
Capeton Development
to Campbell University
Health Sciences Campus
Overview
With the Capeton development reserving an
easement and the Town of Lillington designing
a riverfront greenway, an opportunity exists to
extend trail connectivity east to the Campbell
University Health Sciences Campus. Depending
on ROW coordination that would be needed,
segments 3A, 3B, and 3C could be designed and
constructed as individual projects, or they could
be combined as one project. Campbell University
will be conducting a campus master plan over the
next two years, and trail alignments should be
further explored as part of that process.
Segment 3A Notes (Distance = 0.7 Miles)
• This connection to the Capeton riverfront
greenway has steep slopes and will need more
grading and space to navigate the elevation
change (switchbacks) or possibly a bike/ped
bridge.
• Work with Campbell University to find the
ideal greenway route from the Capeton
development/Cape Fear River to the Health
Sciences Campus. This section of the
greenway would need to meander to avoid too
steep of a grade due to the slopes.
• This property is currently owned by Campbell
University. It is a former golf course that has
been converted into nature trails, pollinator
gardens, and left as generally forested.
Any future development should include a
greenway easement for this trail.
• Greenway will need to cross under Duke
Energy power lines.
Segment 3B Notes (Distance = 0.9 Miles)
• The large, flat open space in front of the
Health Sciences Campus would be an ideal
route for the greenway. The path should be
designed with enough buffer space for trees
between the trail and US 421 traffic, for trail
user safety and comfort. Campbell University
could decide in future design phases to also provide sidewalk or
path connections between the trail and the Health Sciences Campus
buildings. Connect to the US 421 sidewalk and Powell Ave.
• Trail routing could fit in between US 421 and the Campbell University
golf course hole #5 green - some cut, fill, and a low retaining wall
may be needed here due to the berm separating the green and US
421 (may need to use some NCDOT ROW).
• A greenway bridge will need to be constructed to cross W Buies
Creek - some amount of boardwalk may be needed depending on
exact extent of wetland on either side of W Buies Creek floodway.
Segment 3C Notes (Distance = 0.4 Miles)
• Continue the sidepath along the south side of US 421 from the
Campbell University Health Sciences Campus to the future Capeton
development sidepath, utilizing the NCDOT ROW that is very wide
here. This section can help close a potential greenway loop around
the Capeton development if combined with segment 3A and internal
Capeton trails. If combined with segment 3B, it could complete
the connection between the Campbell University Health Sciences
Campus and the Capeton development.
Implementation Lead
• Harnett County and Campbell University
Implementation Partners - Permitting and ROW
• Campbell University owns most of the land needed for this segment -
coordination and approval would be needed for implementation.
• Greenfield Communities will need to be consulted for any connectivity to
the Capeton development.
• USACE/NCDEQ Environmental Permitting
»Section 404/401 permitting will be required since segment 3B crosses the
W Buies Creek floodplain, and permitting will also be needed for each
jurisdictional stream crossing.
»A wetland delineation study will be needed to refine the final routing and
quantify how much boardwalk will be needed in constructing the trail in
crossing the W Buies Creek floodplain and wetlands.
»A hydraulics and hydrology (H&H) study and a no rise determination will be
needed for crossing the W Buies Creek floodway.
• NCDOT Encroachment Agreement - will be needed for sections of
segments 3B and 3C that will need to utilize the wide NCDOT ROW along
the south side of US 421.
• The northern part of segment 3A and parts of 3B and 3C would need to
cross under the Duke energy power lines - coordination and approval
needed with Duke Energy.
*Location of
photo sim on the
following page
Future Capeton
development
path
Stream crossing - bike/ped
bridge needed
1 1
2
2
3
4
5
3
6
7
4 5
8
6
7
8
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 32Action Plan
2 3A3B
3C
4A
4B
FUTURE
CAPETON
DEVELOPMENT
Campbell University
Health Sciences CampusW Bu
ie
s
C
reek
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 127
Photo simulation of proposed greenway heading east toward the Campbell University
Health Sciences campus, along the south side of US 421.
6
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 33Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 128
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 34Action Plan
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.7 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $96,000.00 $96,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $31,000.00 $31,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $450,000.00 $450,000.00
1121000000-E 520 1,720 $60.00 $103,200.00
1523000000-E 610 490 $130.00 $63,700.00
1575000000-E 620 30 $800.00 $24,000.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
200 $4,000.00 $800,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
1 $78,000.00 $78,000.00
$1,726,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$517,800.00
$2,244,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$337,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$225,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$449,000.00
$3,255,000.00
NOTE:
SIGNAL WORK ASSUMES IMPROVEMENT LISTED ONLY, AND EXCLUDES OTHER SIGNAL UPGRADE WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
DATE
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LS
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
LS
LS
LSGRADING
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
PRIORITY SEGMENT 3A: CAPETON RIVERFRONT GREENWAY TO CLUB ROAD
3,232 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
200 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
LILLINGTON, NC
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/64a4f221-44fc-46b8-a32c-37cc81973af5/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_3a.xlsx1
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.9 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $65,000.00 $65,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $43,000.00 $43,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $303,000.00 $303,000.00
1121000000-E 520 2,100 $60.00 $126,000.00
1523000000-E 610 590 $130.00 $76,700.00
1575000000-E 620 40 $700.00 $28,000.00
2605000000-N 848 3 $3,500.00 $10,500.00
2830000000-N 858 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
4709000000-E 1205 66 $15.00 $990.00
2 $12,500.00 $25,000.00
80 $4,000.00 $320,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00
1 $53,000.00 $53,000.00
$1,178,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$353,400.00
UTILITIES (ABOVE GROUND)$95,000.00
$1,627,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$245,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$163,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$326,000.00
$2,361,000.00
NOTE:
SIGNAL WORK ASSUMES IMPROVEMENT LISTED ONLY, AND EXCLUDES OTHER SIGNAL UPGRADE WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
DATE
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
PRIORITY SEGMENT 3B: CLUB ROAD TO CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CAMPUS
4,619 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
80 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
1 INTERSECTION WITH RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON AND RAISED CROSSWALK
LILLINGTON, NC
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS
LS
LSGRADING
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
CONCRETE CURB RAMP
ADJUSTMENT OF MANHOLES
EA
EA
LF
LS
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINES (24", 90 MILS)
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON CROSSING ASSEMBLY EA
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/230ba7e0-90d3-4cd6-aa92-7dfc072a5b8f/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_3b.xlsx1 HCBOC 120125 Pg. 129
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 35Action Plan
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.4 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $21,000.00 $21,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $129,000.00 $129,000.00
1121000000-E 520 1,080 $65.00 $70,200.00
1523000000-E 610 290 $175.00 $50,750.00
1575000000-E 620 20 $900.00 $18,000.00
2605000000-N 848 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
2830000000-N 858 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
4709000000-E 1205 222 $15.00 $3,330.00
2 $12,500.00 $25,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
$454,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$136,200.00
UTILITIES (ABOVE GROUND)$70,000.00
$661,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$100,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$67,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$133,000.00
$961,000.00
NOTE:
SIGNAL WORK ASSUMES IMPROVEMENT LISTED ONLY, AND EXCLUDES OTHER SIGNAL UPGRADE WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
DATE
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
PRIORITY SEGMENT 3C: CONNECTOR FOR FUTURE CAPETON DEVELOPMENT PATH TO CLUB ROAD
2,270 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
1 INTERSECTION WITH RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON
LILLINGTON, NC
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS
LS
LSGRADING
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
CONCRETE CURB RAMP
ADJUSTMENT OF MANHOLES
EA
EA
LF
LS
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINES (24", 90 MILS)
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON CROSSING ASSEMBLY EA
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/6ffa96cf-0dea-4c50-b522-a5adc22ef097/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_3c.xlsx1 HCBOC 120125 Pg. 130
Priority Segment 4: Campbell
University Health Sciences
Campus to Main Campus
Overview
This proposed segment would provide a safer, multimodal option,
protected from the high speeds and traffic volumes along US 421
to make this connection between the Campbell University Health
Sciences Campus and Main Campus. A sidewalk along US 421 with
almost no buffer is currently the only walking connection between
the two campuses (there is currently no connection for bicycles or
scooters). Two options are detailed for the northwest part of the
segment (4A and 4B) - whichever option is ultimately selected, it will
then need to cross Buies Creek to reach Wade Stewart Cir. Campbell
University will be conducting a campus master plan over the next
two years, and this trail should be further explored as part of that
process.
Segment 4A Notes (Distance = 0.9 Miles)
• From the Health Sciences Campus, Powell Avenue could
serve as a quiet neighborhood on-street connection between
segments 3B and 4A. Powell Ave is a Campbell University-
owned street, and permission would be needed from Campbell
University.
• From Powell Ave to the south side of Main Campus, an
agreement would be needed with one private landowner as well
as Campbell University to make this connection. This link would
require a greenway bridge over Buies Creek. The design for this
connection would need to include extensive switchbacks and
likely retaining walls to drop down into the creek bed before
bridging over the creek, or a longer bridge could be constructed
spanning the higher ground on either side of the creek
floodplain.
• Potential connection point routing near the terminus of Wade
Stewart Circle; this southernmost option provides greater
separation from nearby student housing, while still providing
access to nearby housing. Due to the slopes, a longer
switchback would be needed (would need to avoid lift station).
• Plenty of space for proposed greenway connection along the
south side of Wade Stewart Cir, but may need to shift the light
poles location slightly. The north side of Wade Stewart Cir has
space as well and could be an option. This connection would
also serve football game day pedestrian traffic from the parking
areas to Barker-Lane Stadium.
• Connect to existing bike/ped undercrossing of US 421.
• USACE/NCDEQ Environmental Permitting
»Section 404/401 permitting will be required since segment 4A
crosses the Buies Creek floodplain, and permitting will also be
needed for each jurisdictional stream crossing.
»A wetland delineation study will be needed to refine the final
routing and quantify how much boardwalk will be needed to
construct the trail crossing the Buies Creek floodplain and
wetlands.
»A hydraulics and hydrology (H&H) study and a no rise
determination will be needed for crossing the Buies Creek
floodway.
• NCDOT Encroachment Agreement - if option 4B is selected
instead of Powell Ave, an NCDOT encroachment agreement
will be needed to reconstruct the sidewalk into a sidepath in
the NCDOT ROW along the south side of US 421.
Segment 4B Notes (Distance = 1.1 Miles)
• As an alternative to Powell Ave, this option would utilize the
short section of US 421 with wider space for a sidepath before
dropping into the Buies Creek corridor to make the crossing. The
cost would be higher for this section compared to utilizing Powell
Ave as a shared street.
Implementation Lead
• Harnett County and Campbell University
Implementation Partners - Permitting and ROW
• Campbell University and one private landowner owns most of the
land needed for this segment - coordination and approval would
be needed for implementation.
• Powell Ave neighborhood - Powell Ave is a private street -
permission would be needed to utilize this section to connect the
greenway segments.
Stream crossing - bike/ped
bridge needed
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
6
5
6
4
5
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 36Action Plan
3B
4A/
4
B
4B
Buies CreekCampbell University Campbell University
Main CampusMain Campus
Barker-Lane
Stadium
Stadium View
Apartments
Pet Hall
Campbell University
Health Sciences Campus
McCall
Hall
4A/4B
4A
W ADE STEWAR T C IRW ADE STEWAR T C IRHCBOC 120125 Pg. 131
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 37Action Plan
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.9 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $125,000.00 $125,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $258,000.00 $258,000.00
1121000000-E 520 1,090 $65.00 $70,850.00
1523000000-E 610 300 $175.00 $52,500.00
1575000000-E 620 20 $900.00 $18,000.00
2591000000-E 848 1,410 $80.00 $112,800.00
2605000000-N 848 2 $3,500.00 $7,000.00
2612000000-E 848 60 $150.00 $9,000.00
4025000000-E 901 36 $20.00 $720.00
4072000000-E 903 54 $20.00 $1,080.00
4102000000-N 904 4 $150.00 $600.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00
4709000000-E 1205 420 $15.00 $6,300.00
4725000000-E 1205 9 $225.00 $2,032.20
8801000000-E SP 600 $150.00 $90,000.00
150 $4,000.00 $600,000.00
600 $1,000.00 $600,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
$2,229,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$668,700.00
UTILITIES (ABOVE GROUND)$70,000.00
$2,968,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$446,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$297,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$594,000.00
$4,305,000.00
NOTE:
DATE
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
CONTR FURN, ***SIGN (E)SF
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
SUPPORTS, 3-LB STEEL U-CHANNEL
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINES (24", 90 MILS)
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING SYMBOL (90 MILS)EA
LS
LF
SIGN ERECTION, TYPE E EA
LF
SY
SY
EACONCRETE CURB RAMP
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
LS
LS
LSGRADING
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
MSE RETAINING WALL NO 1 SF
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
PRIORITY SEGMENT 4 - CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CAMPUS TO MAIN CAMPUS
ALTERNATIVE A: POWELL AVENUE SHARED STREET
1,950 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH, 1,057 LF OF 12-FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEPATH
1,129 LF OF SHARED STREET, 150 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, 600 LF OF BOARDWALK
BUIES CREEK, NC
10' CLEAR WIDTH WOOD BOARDWALK LF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/1a9d2712-b267-4f00-92ed-7424d81bdca9/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_4alt a.xlsx1
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:1.1 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $149,000.00 $149,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $52,000.00 $52,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $388,000.00 $388,000.00
1121000000-E 520 1,410 $65.00 $91,650.00
1523000000-E 610 410 $270.00 $110,700.00
1575000000-E 620 25 $1,000.00 $25,000.00
2591000000-E 848 2,879 $70.00 $201,530.00
2605000000-N 848 3 $3,500.00 $10,500.00
2612000000-E 848 270 $150.00 $40,500.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
8801000000-E SP 600 $150.00 $90,000.00
150 $4,000.00 $600,000.00
600 $1,000.00 $600,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00
1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00
$2,669,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$800,700.00
UTILITIES (ABOVE GROUND)$90,000.00
$3,560,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$534,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$356,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$712,000.00
$5,162,000.00
NOTE:
SIGNAL WORK ASSUMES IMPROVEMENT LISTED ONLY, AND EXCLUDES OTHER SIGNAL UPGRADE WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
DATE
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
PRIORITY SEGMENT 4 - CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CAMPUS TO MAIN CAMPUS
ALTERNATIVE B: US421S SIDEPATH
2,643 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH, 2,159 LF OF 12-FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEPATH
150 LF OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, 600 LF OF BOARDWALK
BUIES CREEK, NC
10' CLEAR WIDTH WOOD BOARDWALK LF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LF
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.
MSE RETAINING WALL NO 1 SF
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS
LS
LSGRADING
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
CONCRETE CURB RAMP
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY
SY
EA
LSTEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/b7f6bc94-409a-4c0b-8f59-b04ce18bce00/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_4alt b.xlsx1 HCBOC 120125 Pg. 132
Priority Segment 5:
Downtown Coats Rail Trail
Linear Park
Overview (Distance = 0.5 Miles)
The Town Coats, Chamber of Commerce, private
property owners, and downtown businesses
should explore trail/linear park development
along the old rail bed (from Stewart St to Jackson
St) as part of a downtown economic development
strategy. This downtown linear park would
also serve a transportation function, safety
improvement, historical/cultural heritage feature,
and health and wellness benefit. From Stewart
St to Jackson St, the Town of Coats and Coats
Museum own about one-third of this property,
and eight other private property owners own the
other two-thirds the old railroad bed.
Segment 5 Notes - see following page.
Implementation Lead
• Harnett County and Town of Coats
Implementation Partners - Permitting and ROW
• Town of Coats, Chamber of Commerce, Coats
Museum, private property owners of old rail
bed - ROW agreements and coordination
needed. Coats Museum currently has plans
to expand and the idea of project should be
taken into account as part of that process.
• NCDOT - coordination for intersection
improvements needed at NC 55/27
intersection; encroachment agreement
possibly needed for section of Railroad St
between Main St and Lemon St.
• Several Duke Energy power lines/utility poles
may be impacted along corridor - coordination
and approval needed with Duke Energy.
Carlie
C's
IGA
Coats
Heritage
Square
38Action PlanHARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
Above - Coats Heritage Square at the southern
terminus of the proposed downtown rail trail/
linear park.
DOWNTOWN
COATS
Coats
Museum
Coats
Community
Building
Tienda
Mexicana
5
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 133
Priority Segment 5: Downtown Coats Rail Trail Linear Park
Rail Trail/Linear Park Notes (Distance = 0.49 Miles)
• The southeast corner of the NC 55/27 intersection and
several adjoining parcels to the south are owned by the
Town of Coats. This location could be a good location
for a trailhead/linear park/gateway into town. Consider
constructing this first as a small park with a trail along the
old rail bed. This could be the first segment constructed.
• Pedestrian signals and high visibility crosswalks needed
on all four legs of the NC 55/27 intersection.
• Opportunity to open back end of businesses (or future
businesses) with a connection to the proposed trail.
• One property is currently actively using the rail bed
at this location (at the site of the old depot) - either an
agreement with the property owner is needed or the
trail would need to be constructed in the NCDOT ROW
(options would include curb and gutter - may need to
narrow Railroad St some amount).
• Sidewalks on both sides of Main St would connect the
trail into downtown Coats.
• South of Main St, opportunities for businesses to connect
directly to the trail - also, opportunity for a downtown
trailhead.
• The Coats Museum owns 350 feet of the rail bed at the
southern end, opportunity for the museum to directly
interface with the trail.
• The Coats Museum, Coats Community Building, and the
neighboring grocery store along Jackson St could serve
as an excellent southern terminus of the downtown rail
trail, and could serve as a trailhead as well.
Carlie
C's
IGA
2
5
5
1
1
2
3
4
8
3
4
5
6
7
8
6
7
39Action PlanHARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
Downtown
Coats
Downtown
Coats
Coats
Museum
Coats
Community
Building
Tienda
Mexicana
Town
owned
property
that
could
serve as
a small
trailhead/
park/
gateway
Undeveloped
open space
(private) adjacent
to the proposed
rail trail with
potential for trail
interaction
Trailhead
opportunitiy
Undeveloped
open space
owned by the
museum
Undeveloped
open space
(private) adjacent
to the proposed
rail trail with
potential for trail
interaction
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 134
40Action PlanHARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
NC License #P-1301
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL LENGTH:0.5 MILE
TOWN/CITY:COUNTY:HARNETT
DESC.
NO.
SECT.
NO.
0000100000-N 800 1 $41,000.00 $41,000.00
0000400000-N 801 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00
0043000000-N 226 1 $164,000.00 $164,000.00
1121000000-E 520 1,380 $65.00 $89,700.00
1275000000-E 600 350 $9.00 $3,150.00
1297000000-E 607 700 $9.00 $6,300.00
1523000000-E 610 470 $130.00 $61,100.00
1575000000-E 620 30 $800.00 $24,000.00
2605000000-N 848 26 $3,500.00 $91,000.00
4457000000-N SP 1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00
4709000000-E 1205 1,820 $15.00 $27,300.00
1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
1 $33,000.00 $33,000.00
$735,000.00
CONTINGENCY 30%$220,500.00
UTILITIES (ABOVE GROUND)$200,000.00
$1,156,000.00
DESIGN AND PERMITTING 15%$174,000.00
NCDOT ADMINISTRATION FEE 10%$116,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI)20%$232,000.00
$1,678,000.00
NOTE:
SIGNAL WORK ASSUMES IMPROVEMENT LISTED ONLY, AND EXCLUDES OTHER SIGNAL UPGRADE WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
DATE
ASSUMES LAP FUNDING
BASED ON (2025) UNIT PRICES, INFLATION NOT INCLUDED
MINOR ITEMS (5%)LS
DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE LS
EROSION CONTROL ALLOWANCE LS
PRIORITY SEGMENT 5: DOWNTOWN COATS RAIL TRAIL LINEAR PARK
2,587 LF OF 12FT-WIDE ASPHALT SHARED USE PATH
1 INTERSECTION WITH RESURFACING AND PEDESTRIAN UPGRADES
COATS, NC
NC 55 / NC 27 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WORK - INSTALL PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS (4
LEGS)LS
PLANNING ESTIMATE
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
ITEM NO.UNIT
PRICE AMOUNTITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
MOBILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
PRIME COAT
MILLING ASPHALT PAVEMENT, 2" DEPTH
LS
LS
LSGRADING
10/29/2025
COMPUTED BY KATHERINE MOONEY
TON
TON
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TON
SY
GAL
ASPHALT BINDER FOR PLANT MIX
ASPHALT CONC SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5C
CONCRETE CURB RAMP EA
LF
LS
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINES (24", 90 MILS)
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL (2025)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2025)
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (2025)
ESTIMATE IS NOT BASED ON AN ENGINEERING DESIGN, AND IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY COORDINATION/RELOCATION COSTS UNKNOWN AND NOT INCLUDED.
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/35da086a-0cc4-4341-b409-742abe459a4c/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/2024.213 Planning Level Cost Estimate_5.xlsx1
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 135
Funding Strategy
Typically, a funding "quilt" is required to finance all elements of greenway development. This quilt may be made
from a variety of sources that are used in combination to fund project development. A project is most likely to be
funded with design completeness, some level of environmental review, and high degree of project readiness in
general. In some cases, funding for both design and construction can be accomplished through a federal grant,
although it is important to keep in mind that federal funding can often take 6 to 12 months just to get under
contract. Harnett County and local partners should be prepared to assist with matching funds for grants.
Local governments like Harnett County often plan for the funding of greenway projects through development
of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) or occasionally, through their annual Operating Budgets. Typical capital
funding mechanisms include the capital reserve fund, taxes, fees, and bonds. Grants from federal, state, and
private/non-profit sources should be pursued to leverage local dollars from Harnett County and local partners -
below and on the following pages is a list of these potential funding sources.
Potential Funding Sources:SEGMENT 1:
CAPE FEAR
SHINER PARK
TO CAPETON
SEGMENT
2: CAPETON
(CURRENTLY
IN DESIGN)
SEGMENT 3:
CAPETON TO
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 4:
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
TO MAIN
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 5:
COATS RAIL
TRAIL/ LINEAR
PARK
FEDERAL SOURCES
Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Grant Program - The BUILD program’s selection criteria gives special
consideration to projects that emphasize improved access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for projects in rural areas like
Harnett County. BUILD can fund design and/or construction. For more information - https://www.transportation.gov/BUILDgrants.
X X X X X
CAMPO Locally Administered Projects Program (LAPP) - This program is used by CAMPO to prioritize and program local
transportation projects in the region that utilize federal funding and are the responsibility of the MPO (such as Surface Transportation
Block Grant Program – Direct Allocation (STBGP-DA), Congestion Mitigation for Air Quality (CMAQ), etc.). Projects compete as either
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian, or transit projects. LAPP can fund design and/or construction. For more information - https://www.
campo-nc.us/funding/locally-administered-projects-program.
X X X X X
Land and Water Conservation Fund - In North Carolina, the Land and Water Conservation Fund is administered by the Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources for outdoor recreation development and land acquisition by local and state government agencies. For
more information - https://www.ncparks.gov/about-us/grants/land-and-water-conservation-fund.
X X X X X
Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Grants - RTP Grants in NC are administered by NC Parks and support all types of greenways and
trails for hikers, bikers, paddlers, equestrians, and off-road vehicle users. This grant program is geared to projects that are construction
ready. For more information - https://trails.nc.gov/trail-grants.
X X X X X
Building Capacity for Grant Writing
The funding quilt needed to build these trail segments can take considerable hours in grant
writing. Some ways to build capacity for grant writing include:
⊲Working with CAMPO, who regularly writes grants
⊲Coordinating with NCDOT IMD about any upcoming grant opportunities, as they often
have all-call submissions for potential projects in which they will then help write or pay for
professional grant writers, especially for larger federal grants
⊲Contract with professional grant writers that specialize in active transportation funding
X = Likely Eligible for Funding Source
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 41Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 136
Potential Funding Sources:SEGMENT 1:
CAPE FEAR
SHINER PARK
TO CAPETON
SEGMENT
2: CAPETON
(CURRENTLY
IN DESIGN)
SEGMENT 3:
CAPETON TO
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 4:
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
TO MAIN
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 5:
COATS RAIL
TRAIL/ LINEAR
PARK
STATE SOURCES
North Carolina Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) - PARTF awards matching grants to local governments for parks, public
beach access, and improvements in state parks. The statewide program helps local governments reach their park and public access goals
to improve the quality of life in their communities. For more information - https://www.ncparks.gov/about-us/grants/parks-and-recreation-
trust-fund.
X X X X X
Accessible Parks Grant - These grants can be used for the construction of or adaptation of existing facilities that meet the unique needs
of persons living with disabilities. Accessibility features for each of the proposed trail segments could consider utilizing this grant program.
For more information - https://www.ncparks.gov/about-us/grants/accessible-parks-grant.
X X X X X
Great Trails State Program - The Great Trails State Program provides funding for new trail development and extension of existing trails
anywhere in the state of North Carolina. This includes paved trails or greenways, natural surface trails, biking trails, equestrian trails,
and any other type of trail recognized by the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. All five of these segments are part of the
recommended 'Great Trails State Network' identified in the 2020 Great Trails State Plan. One time funding was provided for this grant
program through 2025, and continued funding has not been allotted at the time of this writing. For more information - https://www.
ncparks.gov/about-us/grants/great-trails-state-program.
X X X X X
North Carolina Land and Water Fund - Formerly known as the Clean Water Management Trust Fund, the NC Land and Water Fund
is used to conserve land including access to trails, greenways, and open space. This funding source is likely most appropriate for the
segments along or across riparian corridors where land acquisition/conservation is needed. For more information - https://nclwf.nc.gov/.
X X X X
Highway Safety Improvement Program/ SPOT Safety Program - The Spot Safety Program is used to develop smaller improvement
projects to address safety, potential safety, and operational issues. This could be a potential source of funding for improving the NC
55/27 intersection or other intersection improvements as part of the Coats Downtown Rail Trail/Linear Park project. For more information
- https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/safety/pages/nc-highway-safety-program-and-projects.aspx#:~:text=The%20Spot%20Safety%20
Program%20is,million%20per%20state%20fiscal%20year.
X
NC Forest Service - Urban and Community Forestry Financial Assistance Program - This grant is used to help plan and establish
street trees as well as trees for urban open space. This could be a potential source for creating a tree canopy along the proposed Coats
Downtown Rail Trail/Linear Park. For more information - https://www.ncagr.gov/divisions/nc-forest-service/urban/financial-assistance-
program#:~:text=The%20primary%20objective%20of%20the,matches%20their%20goals%20and%20capacity.
X
X = Likely Eligible for Funding Source
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 42Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 137
Potential Funding Sources:SEGMENT 1:
CAPE FEAR
SHINER PARK
TO CAPETON
SEGMENT 2:
CAPETON
SEGMENT 3:
CAPETON TO
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 4:
CAMPBELL
UNIVERSITY
HEALTH
SCIENCES
CAMPUS
TO MAIN
CAMPUS
SEGMENT 5:
COATS RAIL
TRAIL/ LINEAR
PARK
PRIVATE/ NON-PROFIT SOURCES
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy - Applications for projects on rail trails and rails-with-trails are given preference, which could be an
opportunity for segment 5. For more information - https://www.railstotrails.org/grants/.X
National Fish and Wildlife Fund - National Fish and Wildlife Foundation priorities include conservation of bird, fish, plants and wildlife
habitats, providing access for people to enjoy outdoors, and connecting existing protected lands. Projects with the greatest potential for
wildlife protection are noted. For more information - https://www.nfwf.org/apply-grant.
X X X X
The Trust for Public Land - The Trust for Public Land helps acquire land and transfer it to public agencies, land trusts, or other
groups that intend to conserve land for recreation and spiritual nourishment and to improve the health and quality of life of American
communities. For more information - https://www.tpl.org/state/north-carolina.
X X X X
The Conservation Alliance - Conservation Alliance projects seek to secure lasting and quantifiable protection of a specific wild land or
waterway and prioritize landscape-scale projects that have a clear benefit for habitat. For more information - https://conservationalliance.
com/grants/.
X X X X
X = Likely Eligible for Funding Source
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 43Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 138
CONSERVATION TOOLS
The following conservation tools offer various benefits and drawbacks to consider as ROW acquisition and
land conservation is pursued along these corridors in the coming years. Harnett County should coordinate
closely with conservation partners, such as land trusts operating in the region (such as the Conservation
Fund, Triangle Land Conservancy, and Three Rivers Land Trust) who have strong expertise in these
conservation tools and extensive local knowledge.
Land Acquisition Toolbox
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
CONSERVATION PRACTICES
The term “conservation practices”
refers to a variety of methods to
conserve natural resources by
a range of stakeholder types.
Examples of conservation practices
include stormwater management,
low impact development, soil and
nutrient management, riparian
restoration, etc. Examples of
stakeholders involved in these
practices include developers,
municipalities, households, farmers,
landowners, forest managers, and
businesses.
The main benefit of a conservation
practice over purchasing land or
conservation easements is that
practices can be implemented by
land owners and managers without
selling the land or putting it under
easement.
One challenge in relying only on
conservation practices to protect
natural resources and open spaces
is that most practices are voluntary
in nature, or may rely on incentives
for participation by landowners,
farmers, developers, and others.
Education and encouragement may
go a long way in increasing use of
conservation practices, but there is a
limit to which people are willing and
able to invest time and resources
into such practices.
TRAIL EASEMENT
This is a legal agreement typically
between a landowner and
government agency that involves
granting a specific right to use or
access a portion of private land
for a walking and/or biking trail (or
other trail use), while the landowner
retains ownership.
A trail easement can be effective
in preserving space for a trail if it
meets mutual goals of landowner
and agency, and can be a useful tool
when working with developers that
have trail requirements along their
property. Easement provisions are
tailored to needs of landowner and
site goals. Easements run with the
land, despite changes in ownership.
Less protection than outright
acquisition. Easement purchases
may be costly, even though they
are less than fee acquisition. Terms
must be carefully and clearly
outlined. Management intensive:
easements must be monitored and
enforced; grantee agency must work
closely with landowners. Easement
restrictions may limit property
resale opportunities. Tax benefits
may not be sufficient motivation
for landowner to donate or sell
easement.
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
This is a legal agreement between
a landowner and a qualified
conservation organization or
government agency to voluntarily
restrict the use and development
of the property. Easement grantee
(i.e. local government) would
hold a partial interest or some
specified right in a parcel of land. A
conservation, historic preservation,
open space, or scenic easement
is designed to protect a specific
sensitive natural, historic, or cultural
resource. An easement may be in
effect for a specified period of time,
but is usually perpetual.
A conservation easement can
be effective in preserving open
space if it meets mutual goals of
landowner and agency. Easement
provisions are tailored to needs of
landowner and site preservation
goals. Landowner retains ownership,
use and management of the land.
Potential property, income, and
estate tax benefits for donation or
bargain sale of an easement if it is
permanent. Easements run with the
land, despite changes in ownership.
Reduces costs for site protection
when easements are acquired at
less than fair market value for the
protected area.
Baseline survey required to identify
the extent of natural, historic,
or cultural resources within the
easement. Less protection than
outright acquisition. Easement
purchases may be costly, even
though they are less than fee
acquisition. Terms must be carefully
and clearly outlined. Management
intensive: easements must be
monitored and enforced; grantee
agency must work closely with
landowners. Easement grantee
must possess technical expertise
and financial wherewithal to monitor
and enforce easement. Easement
restrictions may limit property
resale opportunities. Tax benefits
may not be sufficient motivation
for landowner to donate or sell
easement.
FEE SIMPLE ACQUISITION
Usually the sale of land at full
market value. Ownership and
responsibilities are transferred
completely to the buyer. While cash
payment yields the greatest return,
taxes and other expenses may
reduce net return.
The most straight forward acquisition
method. Provides agency with full
control over future of property.
Most expensive. Buyer assumes
full responsibility for care and
management of property. Loss of
revenue when land is removed from
tax rolls. Capital gains issues for
seller.
DONATION
Owner grants full title and ownership
to conservation agency.
Resources are acquired at very low
costs to the agency. Agency may
receive endowment for long-term
land stewardship. Donor may qualify
for income tax deductions, estate tax
relief, and property tax breaks.
Landowner loses potential income
from sale of land. Receiving agency
must accept responsibility and long-
term costs of land management.
Stewardship endowments may
make donations cost prohibitive for
landowners.
BARGAIN SALE
Land, or a conservation easement,
is purchased at less than fair market
value. The difference between the
bargain sale price and the easement
or land’s fair market value becomes
a charitable donation.
Reduced acquisition costs. Seller
may qualify for tax benefits for
charitable donation. May offset
capital gains on the sale.
Difficult and time-consuming to
negotiate. May still be costly to
acquire land.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 44Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 139
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
Agreement giving the conservation
agency the option to match an
offer and acquire the property if the
landowner is approached by another
buyer. This can be done so when
the landowner decides to sell. The
agency or organization has the first
right to either purchase or refuse the
purchase.
Agency can gain extra time to
acquire funds for purchase.
Resource may be lost if offer can’t
be matched by the conservation
agency. Some landowners are
unwilling to enter into this kind of
binding agreement.
LEASE
An agreement between an agency
and landowner to rent the land to
protect and manage a sensitive
resource.
Low cost approach to site protection.
Landowner receives income and
retains control of property. An
alternative for preservation-minded
landowners not ready to commit to
sale of easement. Restrictions can
be included in the lease to direct the
activities of the conservation agency
on the land.
Short-term protection strategy.
Leases are not permanent.
ACQUISITION AND SALEBACK OR LEASEBACK
Agency or private organization
acquires land, places a conservation
and/or trail easement, protective
restrictions or covenants on the land,
then resells or leases land.
Proceeds from sale or lease can
offset acquisition costs. Land may be
more attractive to buyer due to lower
sale price resulting from restrictions.
Management responsibilities are
assumed by new owner or tenant.
It is often a complicated procedure.
Owner retains responsibility for the
land but may have less control over
the property. Leases may not be
suitable on some protected lands.
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT/CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS
Cluster development allows land
developers to develop in a compact
form at higher densities, thereby
preserving greenspace within
the same tract that would not be
developed. This approach can be
combined with conservation and/
or trail easements to protect the
undeveloped greenspace and
provide trail access.
Allows for flexibility in design to
protect natural resource areas
located on the parcel. Construction
and infrastructure costs for land
developers are reduced. Trail
connectivity can be woven into
greenspace.
Participation is voluntary. If not
implemented correctly, protected
lands are often scattered and
non-contiguous. Clustering may
not be a preferred option for
developers. Long-term management
of common greenspace may
become problematic for homeowner
associations.
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
INSTALLMENT SALE
A percentage of purchase price is
deferred and paid over successive
years.
Possible capital gains tax
advantages for seller.
Complicates budgeting and
financing of acquisitions.
ROLLING OPTION
A series of options to buy a property,
in portions or sections, extending the
purchase over a period of years.
When insufficient funds are
available, this option is used to
purchase land at fair market value
over a period of time using smaller
annual appropriations.
May not work for the landowner due
to elongated period of payment.
DONATION VIA BEQUEST
Land is donated to a conservation
agency at the owner’s death through
a will.
Reduces estate taxes and may
benefit heirs with reduced
inheritance taxes. Allows owner to
retain full use and control over land
while alive; ensures its protection
after death.
No income tax deduction for
donation of land through a will.
Requires careful estate planning by
the landowner.
DONATION WITH RESERVED LIFE ESTATE
Owner retains rights to use all or part
of the donated land for his or her
remaining lifetime and the lifetimes
of designated family members.
Allows owner to continue living on
and using the property during his or
her lifetime while ensuring the land’s
protection. Allows designation of
family members to remain on land.
Tax benefits may be earned prior to
death; some types of open space
may not qualify. May delay transfer
of title to the conservation agency
for a long period of time.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PARTNERSHIP
Federal, state, and local agencies
form joint partnerships to own and
manage land.
Sharing the responsibilities
and costs of acquisition and
management can protect larger or
more expensive properties. Can
foster countywide cooperation to
preserve greenspace.
Partners must agree on
management strategies in order
to reduce potential for conflict.
Agency budgets and acquisition
criteria may restrict acquisitions.
Slower response time; acquisition
opportunities may be lost due to
agency procedures. May remove
land from tax base.
AGENCY TRANSFER
Government transfers excess
land to another agency that can
assume resource protection and
management responsibilities.
Resource protection and
management with little additional
expenditures.
Excess property may not be suitable
for resource protection. Obtaining
fair market value for the property
may be agency’s priority.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 45Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 140
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
LAND EXCHANGE
Land may be exchanged for another
parcel that is more desirable for
resource protection.
Lower acquisition costs. Scattered
properties can be exchanged for a
single, larger parcel. When equal
value properties are exchanged,
there is no tax on the transfer.
Complicated process; not widely
known and rarely used. Subject to
IRS regulations. Property owners
must be willing to participate and
properties must be of equal value.
NONPROFIT ACQUISITION AND CONVEYANCE TO PUBLIC AGENCY
Nonprofit organization (such as
land trust) buys a parcel of land and
resells it to a local government or
other public agency.
Nonprofits can often move more
quickly to purchase and hold land
until the public agency is able to
purchase the land. Could reduce
acquisition costs for public agency.
Local government must be willing
to purchase land and assume
management responsibilities.
JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP
Strategy used by public agencies
and private organizations to
accomplish projects serving
mutual goals. For example, some
government grant programs could
be matched with both private
contributions and public funds.
Partners share benefits,
responsibilities, and costs of
acquisition and management.
Creates a coalition of support for
protecting diverse resources. Brings
diverse sources of knowledge
and expertise to solve resource
protection issues.
More complicated property
management and decision-making.
Conflicts in acquisition criteria and
funding priorities must be resolved.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Agreement between landowner and
conservation agency to manage
property to achieve resource
conservation goals.
Owner may be eligible for direct
payments, cost-share assistance,
or other technical assistance from
the agency. Management plan
is developed based on owner’s
preservation goals.
Mutual agreement is more easily
terminated than a lease. Agreements
are not permanent.
MUTUAL COVENANTS
Agreement between adjoining
landowners to control future land
uses through mutually agreed upon
restrictions.
Permanent (unless parties agree
to change); covenants can be
enforced by any of the landowners
or future landowners of the involved
properties. Significant incentive to
comply with restrictions since all
parties are aware of use controls.
Can reduce property taxes.
Loss in market value from mutual
covenants does not qualify as a
charitable deduction for income tax
purposes.
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION BENEFITS DRAWBACKS
PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE
Parkland dedication is a local
government requirement imposed
on subdivision developers or
builders mandating that they
dedicate land for a park and/or pay
a fee to be used by the government
entity to acquire and develop park
facilities. Harnett County currently
requires open space as part of new
development and fees for future
park land.
These dedications are a means of
providing park facilities in newly
developed areas of a jurisdiction
without burdening existing residents.
They may be conceptualized as a
type of user fee because the intent
is that the landowner, developer,
or new homeowners, who are
responsible for creating the demand
for the new park facilities, should
pay for the cost of new parks.
Difficult to introduce new
development regulations in some
communities and it does not address
the need for conservation outside of
new development areas.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Impact fees (currently used by
Harnett County) are also known
as exactions. In its simplest form,
the developer is charged an easy-
to-calculate fee. A formula may
be created to decide the cost that
development will impose on the
community. The formula can account
for the area of land affected, the
number of units built, the expected
market value of those units, the
distance from the fire and police
stations, costs of building roads, and
the expected population growth
resulting from the construction.
The exaction can come in forms
other than money. The developer
can be required to provide streets,
sewers, street lights, parks, or
other infrastructure and amenities.
The town or county can develop a
comprehensive system or formula
or exactions can be formulated on
a case-by-case basis from more
general criteria.
A “pay-as-you-grow” program that
really has been proven to help
communities keep pace with rapid
land development.
Can be difficult to implement, as it
must meet Supreme Court rulings
on “essential nexus,” fair and
equitable implementation. Politically
challenging because impact fees
are generally not favored by the
development community.
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 46Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 141
TASK ORGANIZATIONS RESOURCES NEEDED TIME FRAME
INITIAL ACTION
1. Approve Study - Jurisdictions present to regulating
board for approval.Harnett County, Town of Lillington, Town of Coats
Staff needed to present to regulating board (Alta to
provide a project summary PPT slide deck to Harnett
County)
Fall 2025
EARLY ACTIONS
2. Continue Partnership Meetings - Meet quarterly, or
as needed, to coordinate with partners.
Harnett County led, partners include Town of Lillington,
Town of Coats, Campbell University, NCDOT, CAMPO,
Greenfield Communities, RJ Corman, and other partners
as-needed (such as permitting agencies, utilities, and
other private landowners)
Staff time Ongoing
3. Solidify Alignments for the Design Phase - Work
with landowners and developers to secure ROW/
easements or dedicated future open space where
needed.
Harnett County and segment leads/partners Staff time; funding needed to secure easements if not
donated Ongoing
TRAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS
4. Appropriate Funding For Design, Complete
Design - Once land for trail segments are secured,
fully complete design (survey, plans, specifications, and
estimates (PS&E), permits).
Harnett County and segment leads/partners
Funding for consultant; Harnett County project manager
to manage consultant or be part of a project team
managing consultant
Funding secured as soon as possible, ideally completed
in next 1-3 years (depending on the segment/ROW
needs) before construction funds secured
5. Appropriate Funding For Construction - Fully fund
construction based on design.Harnett County and segment leads/partners Construction funding; staff time (or consultant) for grant
writing and/or local or county bond funding Secure within 2026-2030, if possible
6. Bid and Construct Trail Segments - Bid, award, and
construct segments.Harnett County and segment leads/partners
Construction funding; Harnett County project manager
to manage contractor or be on project team managing
contractor
Complete most or all segments within 10 years
ONGOING OPERATIONS
7. Operations and Maintenance - Develop operations
and maintenance (O&M) plan, program the greenway,
and evaluate performance.
Harnett County and segment leads/partners Staff time; funding for ongoing maintenance
O&M plan completed by step 6, (see Harnett County
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenway Plan (2021) for
overview of trail maintenance)
Summary Action Steps
HARNETT COUNTY GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES 47Action PlanHCBOC 120125 Pg. 142
Prepared for: Harnett County
Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design
Harnett County
GREENWAY FEASIBILITY STUDIES
2025
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 143
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6C.1 Agenda MOU Homeland Security.docx
Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: November 17, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with Homeland Security Investigations
REQUESTED BY: Sheriff Coats
REQUEST:
Sheriff Coats request approval to enter into a MOU with Homeland Security
Investigations. The Agreement establishes the responsibilities of both parties and the
procedures for the reimbursement of certain overtime expenses and other law
enforcement pursuant to 31 USC 9705 ( 31 USC 9705 deals the Department of the
Treasury Forfeiture Fund).
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6C
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 144
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6D.1 Sheriff - Agenda Video Surveillance
upgrade Project.docx Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Video System Upgrade
REQUESTED BY: Sheriff Coats
REQUEST:
Sheriff Coats request approval to enter into an agreement with Cornerstone Detention
Products to upgrade our present Video Surveillance system for the Detention Center
and Sheriff's Office. The upgrade will include but not limited to increasing the amount
of digital recording that is stored, adding additional cameras and upgrading the
operating sytems.
This will be a "Sole Source" purchase based on Cornerstone is the service provider for
the Video Surveillance system and this system commuications with other systems within
the Detention Center that is also maintained by Cornerstone.
Althought this project was included in the Sheriff's Office CIP projects, we are
requesting the Boards' consideration and approval to move forward immediately with
this upgrade due to the "end of life" of the equipment.
Request approval of attached budget amendment as well.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6D
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 145
Section 1. To amend the Sheriff's Capital Reserve Fund, the appropriations are to be changed as follows:
ORG OBJECT TASK SUB-TASK INCREASE DECREASE
5104390 555000 $ 400,000
ORG OBJECT TASK SUB-TASK INCREASE DECREASE
5103900 350490 $ 400,000
APPROVALS:
Department Head Date Budget Director Date
Finance Officer Date County Manager Date
Section 2.
Adopted this ________ day of ____________________ , 20 ____ .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF CODE
COUNTY OF HARNETT
BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Board of the County of Harnett,North Carolina, that the following amendment be made
to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026.
EXPENDITURE AMOUNT
Capital Outlay - Equipment
Copies of this budget amendment shall be furnished to the Clerk to the Board, and to the
Budget Officer and the Finance Officer for their direction.
REVENUE AMOUNT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF CODE
Interest Income
EXPLANATION:
To budget interest earnings to cover the upgrade to the Detention Center video surveillance system.
Melissa Capps Matthew Nicol, Chairman
Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 146
Cornerstone Detention Products, Inc.
East Coast Regional Office
621 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529
Phone (919) 779-0006, Fax (919) 325-4326
www.cornerstonedetention.com
NC-ASLB – #2543-CSA, VA DCJS #11-9615
SC ASLB #BAC-13857, MD #107-2037
July 21,
2025
To: Gary McNeill – Administrator
Maj. McNeill
McNeill,
As you are aware, Cornerstone Detention Products, Inc. (formerly Norment Security Group) provided
the Detention Equipment (door locking equipment) and Security Electronic Controls systems and
Video Surveillance System in the Harnett County Detention Center facility. Norment had completed
the Harnett County Detention Center in 2009. Norment was acquired by Cornerstone in 2014.
Cornerstone procured, designed, fabricated, and installed the security electronics products on these
projects.
Cornerstone has had a Maintenance Contract in place for the Harnett County Detention Center 2010.
The current Maintenance Contract provides emergency service hours and preventative maintenance
programs on the electronic systems and the locking hardware in the Detention Center and runs
through June 30, 2027.
Some of the major components to the facility are the detention door hardware manufactured by Airteq
(a division of Cornerstone), Video Surveillance Systems (manufactured by Bosch), PLC Door Control and
Touch Screen Officer interface (Omron, Wonderware respectively, and facility intercommunications
(Harding Instruments). As these systems are integrated together Cornerstone is a sole source provider
of these systems installed in your facility. The electronic control systems, Touch Screen units which
control the detention locks to include the aforementioned Airteq locks are critical to the operation of
the facility. The PLC and SCADA programming, which was written and is maintained by Cornerstone,
controls all doors, intercoms and CCTV cameras throughout the facility. Additionally, this programming
is specific to the facility, so care must be taken to ensure that the code is not modified in such a way
which would cause a security breach in the facility.
In addition to the PLC and SCADA programming that we provided, Cornerstone wrote custom scripts,
drivers and/or applications to interface between the following systems to allow for proper system
operation and a seamless interface to the end users:
•
•
•
PLC integration with Harding audio system
Touch Screen Workstation integration with the Bosch Video System
PLC integration with the Wonderware SCADA software
Should you have any additional questions please feel free to contact
me. Best Regards,
Mike Suriano
Mike Suriano
Regional Sales Manager, Cornerstone Detention Products, Inc.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 147
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6E.1 Agenda-Pay Tel extension.docx
Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: November 17, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Paytel contract extension
REQUESTED BY: Sheriff Coats
REQUEST:
Sheriff Coats request approval to extend the contract with Pay Tel Communications for
three years ending December 3rd, 2029. Pay Tel provides phone services for inmates in
the Detention Center and other services that enhances the Sheriff's Office ability to
monitor the activities of inmates. Pay Tel extension will allow access to their WIFI
system to Guard1 at no cost. Guard1 is a new system that records time and location of
staff making cell checks. Pay Tel Communication has been a partner with the Harnett
County Sheriff's Office for over twenty-five years.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6E
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 148
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6F.1 Agenda-Weapons surplus.docx
Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: November 17, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Weapons Surplus
REQUESTED BY: Sheriff Coats
REQUEST:
Sheriff Coats request approval to surplus the attached list of weapons. These weapons
have been replaced because of upgrades due to technological advancements, safety
concerns with existing models, or a regular replacement cycle, which can be anywhere
from 5 to 10 years.
If approved, the Sheriff's Office will solict bids from a minimum of three approved gun
dealers.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6F
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 149
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Wayne Coats
PO Box 399
175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-9111; Fax: 910-893-6450
May 28, 2025
Make Model Serial Number
1.Benelli Super 90 M144790
2.Benelli Super 90 m144791
3.Benelli Super 90 M229529
4.Benelli Super 90 M144792
5.Benelli Super 90 M223064
6.Benelli Super 90 M144787
7.Benelli Super 90 M144788
8.Benelli Super 90 M144785
9.Benelli Super 90 M229642
10.Benelli Super 90 M144786
11.Colt M4 A0241988
12.Colt M4 LHC000038
13.Colt M4 LHC000039
14.Colt M4 LHC000040
15.Colt M4 AD241986
16.Colt M16A2 L6C034238
17.Colt MI6A2 8079023
18.S&W MP15 ST58619
19.S&W MP15 SU59429
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 150
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Wayne Coats
PO Box 399
175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-9111; Fax: 910-893-6450
20. S&W MP15 ST58530
21. S&W MP15 ST58461
22. S&W MP15 ST58397
23. S&W MP15 ST58396
24. S&W MP15 ST58710
25. Federal Lab 37/38mm Launcher 964763
26. Federal Lab 37/38mm Launcher 022773
27. Colt M16A2 SP329282
28. S&W MP15 ST58549
29. S&W MP15 SU59432
30. S&W MP15 ST58706
31. S&W MP15 ST58772
32. S&W MP15 TH26499
33. S&W MP15 TF60195
34. S&W MP15 SU64053
35. S&W MP15 SU49506
36. S&W MP15 ST58778
37. S&W MP15 SU37025
38. S&W MP15 ST58761
39. S&W MP15 SU53415
40. S&W MP15 ST58692
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 151
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Wayne Coats
PO Box 399
175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-9111; Fax: 910-893-6450
41. S&W MP15 SU49502
42. S&W MP15 ST58522
43. S&W MP15 ST58388
44. S&W MP15 ST58620
45. S&W MP15 ST58780
46. S&W MP15 ST58526
47. S&W MP15 TF08031
48. S&W MP15 ST58704
49. S&W Shield JBJ1374
50. S&W Shield JBH9290
51. S&W Shield JBJ1362
52. S&W Shield JBJ1363
53. S&W Shield LDJ3434
54. S&W Shield JBJ1376
55. S&W Shield JBJ1542
56. S&W Shield HLS5796
57. S&W Shield HWC7766
58. S&W Shield HWF0355
59. S&W Shield JBC9639
60. S&W Shield JBH8626
61. S&W Shield JBC9647
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 152
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Wayne Coats
PO Box 399
175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-9111; Fax: 910-893-6450
62. S&W Shield JBJ1384
63. S&W Shield JBJ1368
64. S&W Shield JBH8750
65. S&W Shield JBJ1383
66. S&W Shield JBC9634
67. S&W Shield JBJ1543
68. S&W Shield JBB5970
69. S&W Shield JBB6441
70. S&W Shield JBJ1372
71. S&W Shield JBB5978
72. S&W Shield HPA4998
73. S&W Shield JBH9306
74. S&W Shield JBH8959
75. S&W Shield HWH5242
76. S&W Shield HWJ2266
77. S&W Shield HWC7792
78. S&W Shield HWC7755
79. S&W Shield HWF0349
80. Anderson AR15 15051399
81. Glock 17 (NO TRIGGER NO BARREL) G661
82. Bear Creek AR15 12673
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 153
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Wayne Coats
PO Box 399
175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-9111; Fax: 910-893-6450
83. Freedom Ordinance FX-9 001889
84. Century Arms AK-74 J003813
85. Glock 17 VEC035
86. Glock 17 WBU993
87. Glock 22 SMP322
88. Glock 17 ZFD236
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 154
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6G.1 Paul Green Bench and Plaque.docx
Page 1 of 2
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Approval to accept Commemorative bench and Plaque from Paul Green
Foundation.
REQUESTED BY: Kimberly VanBeck, Library Director
REQUEST:
Harnett County Public Library respectfully requests permission to accept a
commemorative bench and plaque donation honoring Paul Green. The bench and
accompanying plaque will be donated by The Paul Green Foundation and will be
installed on the front proch of the Harnett County Public Library near the Main
Library Entrance.
Paul Green was a Pulitzer Prize winning playwright, author, and educator from North
Carolina best known for his connection to social issues, southern culture, and human
condition with ties to Harnett County. The library currently displays a bust of Paul
Green and houses the Paul Green Collection in our local history room.
All costs for the bench and plaque will be covered by the donor.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6G
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 155
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6G.1 Paul Green Bench and Plaque.docx
Page 2 of 2
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 156
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 157
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 158
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 159
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 160
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 161
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 162
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 163
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 164
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 165
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 166
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 167
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 168
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 169
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Harnett County Public Library requests permission to Apply and Accept
SLNC Continuing Education Scholarship Grant in the amount of $2500
REQUESTED BY: Kimberly VanBeck, Library Director
REQUEST:
Harnett County Public Library respectfully requests permission to apply for and accept
if awarded the State Library of North Carolina Continuing Education Scholarship
Grant in the amount of $2,500. This grant would be used to send a Librarian to the
American Library Associations annual conference.
FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
C:\Users\kvanbeck\Downloads\agend afonn2025 (2).docx Page I ofl
Item 6H
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 170
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FA49DC9-ACBE-40C2-A137-BF8366BFBC9F
State Library of North Carolina Continuing
Education Scholarship Grant Application
Applicant The eligible library applying for the grant award.
Participant lndividual(s) receiving the educational content. The participant must be an employee
of the applicant library.
Authorizing Official: The person at the institution that is able to accept federal grant funds on the
institutions behalf. This person is generally a county or city manager, governing board chair, dean,
or CFO. In most cases the library director is NOT the authorizing official.
LSTA Library Services and Technology Act: The federal program through which the State Library
of NC (SLNC) receives funding for the Continuing Education Scholarship Grants. LSTA is a program
of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).
IMLS: Institute of Museum and Library.Services. The federal agency that awards LSTA funds to
SLNC for administering in the State of North Carolina.
Contact Information
N fAp I. t Lib Angier Public Library of Harnett County ame o p Ican rary:
Library Mailing Address: 28 N. Raliegh Street
Pa . . N joselyn williams rtIcIpant ame:
Part. . t Em .1 jwilliams@harnett.org IcIpan aI:
Library Director Namlim Van Beck
Library Director Emaif:vanbeck@harnett.org
Authorizing Official Name: Brent Trout
Authorizing Official Email: btrout@hamett.org
Angi~r. NC 27501
Participant Position Title: Branch Manager 11
Participant Phone: 98 4-888 -6 652
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 171
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FA49DC9-AC8E-40C2-A137-BF8366BFBC9F
Grant Application and Requirements
Please verify that you have completed the following:
~ I have reviewed the Continuing Education Grant Gu_ide found on the SLNC website and understand
the grant requirements and process details.
~ I have discussed this Continuing Education event with SLNC's Continuing Education Consultant. as
needed.
~ I have discussed this application with my library director and he/she approves of my application for
these grants funds.
Grant Details
I. Name of Continuing Education Event American Library Association Annual Conference
2. Provide a Brief Description of the Continuing Education Event
It's an event featuring top-quality education, best practices, and thought leaders, with special
programming for library professionals seeking to advance their libraries, careers, and communities!
3. URL for the website or details:
https://2026.alaannual.org/programming/poster-session-day
4. Are you presenting at the Continuing Education Event
Yes
X No
5. Based on preliminary information available about the event at this time, please list 3-4 sessions
you plan to attend based on your library's needs.:
While the sessions have not yet opened for registration, I have had the chance to explore the diverse array
of poster sessions and categories scheduled for 2026. I am especially enthusiastic about the Infrastructure
session, which promises to cover essential upgrades and innovations, the Diversity Fair, which aims to
celebrate and promote inclusivity, the Outreach and Engagement session that focuses on community
interaction, and the Educators sessions, which will foster valuable discussions on teaching practices and
learning strategies.
6. State event is occuring; IL
7. Event start date: 6/25/2026
8. Event end date: 6/29/2026
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 172
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FA49DC9-AC8E-40C2-A137-BF8366BFBC9F
Budget
In this section you will provide infonnation regarding your estimated expenses to participate in the event
outlined above. The budget table provided below lists allowable grant cost categories. Maximum grant
award is $1,000 for in-state conferences and $2,500 for out-of-state conferences. There is a no match
requirement.
Costs will be reviewed by the SLNC to determine if they are allowable. reasonable, and necessary. Care
should be taken to plan for the most efficient and economical method of travel. If no expenses are
estimated for a category, please enter 0.00
Estimated Amount Source for Estimate/Explanation
Conference Registration fee $ 450.00 https://2026 .alaannual.org/registra
Lodging $ 1325.00 https://2026. alaannual.org/hotels
Airfare $ 621.00 https://www.southwest.com/air/bo ,
Airfare baggage fee $ 35.00 https://www.southwest.com/air/b 0<
Airport-transportation fees $ 20.00 https://www.transitchicago.com/fa1
Rental car/fuel charges $ 0.00
Mileage $ 0.00
Indirect Costs 0.00
Total of Estimated Allowable Expenses: $ 2,451.00 Grant Request Amount$ 2500.00
ion-rates
king/price. ht
king/price.ht
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 173
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FA49DC9-AC8E-40C2-A137-BF8366BFBC9F
Impact Statement
Library Services and Technology Act (LST A) funds are federal funds awarded to the State Library of North
Carolina annually by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). The funds are governed by the
purposes and priorities set forth by the US Congress, in conjunction with the Office of Management and
Budget's (0MB) Uniform Grant Guidance, for allowable uses of federal funds. The State Library of North
Carolina Continuing Education Scholarship Grants utilize LSTA funds and must address one of the LSTA
Priorities in order to be eligible for these grant funds.
I. Describe the knowledge, skills, or information the participant anticipates gaining as a result of
attending this conference.
My library is preparing for a significant transformation, which includes implementing RFID technology to
streamline operations and enhance the user experience. We will also be making several structural changes
to improve our space. I eagerly await further guidance on how to navigate these exciting developments. I
believe there will be multiple sessions that will be beneficial for our growth and developmental future within
our community.
2. Continuing Education Scholarship Grants funded by LSTA are meant to ultimately benefit the
library's end users. What target audience/s will the participant be focusing on while attending the
conference and how will that target audience benefit from participant's newly acquired knowledge
and/or skills?
Participating in this conference session offers a valuable opportunity to engage with a diverse array of
vendors, each with unique solutions that can significantly enhance our collection in various ways. One key
initiative we aim to pursue next year is the search for a new Wi-Fi provider. As our current grant is set to
expire in the spring, it's essential to find an affordable option that meets our patrons' needs. Reliable Wi-Fi
is not just a service; it enriches the experience of our visitors, allowing them to access information, connect
with resources, and enjoy the full benefits of our offerings. Ensuring that we continue to provide this vital
service is a top priority.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 174
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FA49DC9-AC8E-40C2-A137-BF8366BFBC9F
Application Certification and Signatures
If awarded this CE Grant, do you agree to complete follow-up evaluations for State Library of North Carolina
reporting on the impact of your experience? The first evaluation is with the Initial funding reimbursement
request, and a second is requested approximately 6 months after the conference.
You are electronically signing this application and certifying that all the information provided on this
application is true and accurate to the best of your knowledge.
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the information provided herein is true, complete,
and accurate. I am aware that the provision of false, fictitious, or fraudulent Information, or the
omission of any material fact may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative consequences
including, but not limited to violations of U.S. Code Title 18, Sections 2, I 00 I, I 343 and Title 31,
Sections 3729-3730 and 3801-3812.
A copy of the application will be emailed to the participant and the library director listed above.
\ \ I 7 / .Q..,o:l-5
Date Signed
joselyn williams
Participant Name
Date igned
Kim Van Beck
Library Director Name
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 175
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6I.1 Boards and Commissions agenda
form.docx Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Appointments
REQUESTED BY: Administration
REQUEST:
As discussed at the November 25, 2025 Work Session, the Harnett County Board of
Commissioners would like to accept the resignation of Laura Barney from the Harnett
County Commission on Women and Youth, accept the resignation of Kandi Tudor
from the Board of Health, appoint Betty Gwen Johnson Goodwin as the public member
to the Board of Health, reappoint Cindy Delgado as County Commissioner Appointee
on the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and appoint Katasha Tew to the Juvenile
Crime Prevention Council.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6I
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 176
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 177
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 178
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 179
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 180
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 181
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 182
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 183
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\6J.1 Bond Review.docx Page
1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Official Review of surety bonds for County Officials per G.S. 58-72-20
REQUESTED BY: Administration
REQUEST:
G.S. 58-72-20 states the bonds of the officers named in G.S. 58‑72‑10 shall be examined
on the first Monday in December of every year to ensure that the security has not been
impaired or for any cause become insuficcient to secure the faithful performance of the
duties of those offices.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 6J
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 184
Electronically Filed Date: 11/19/2025 2:28 PM Harnett County Clerk of Superior Court
25R000329-420
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 185
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 186
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 187
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 188
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 189
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 190
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 191
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 192
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 193
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 194
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 195
\\lecfile\department\Admin\Clerk to the Board docs\AGENDAS\2025\120125\8.1Agenda Memo_Historic Preservation
Ordinance 25.docx Page 1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Historic Preservation Ordinance
REQUESTED BY: Christopher Appel - Senior Staff Attorney
REQUEST:
Legal Department requests a public hearing for comments regarding the amendments
to the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Once the public hearing is closed, the Legal
Department seeks adoption of the revised Historic Preservation Ordinance.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 8
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 196
1
HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
OF
HARNETT COUNTY
Adopted October 18, 2006
Amended through March 17, 2008
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 197
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 4
Section 2.0 Historic Properties Commission (HPC) ...................................................... 4
2.1 Creation and Appointment .................................................................................... 4
2.1.1 Representation of Jurisdiction ......................................................................... 4
2.2 Qualification of Members ...................................................................................... 4
2.3 Terms..................................................................................................................... 5
2.4 Rules of Procedure ................................................................................................ 5
2.5 Powers and Duties ................................................................................................ 5
Section 3.0 Historic Landmarks ..................................................................................... 6
3.1 Adoption of a Designation Resolution ................................................................... 6
3.2 Criteria for Designation ......................................................................................... 7
3.3 Inventory ............................................................................................................... 7
3.4 Required Procedures for Designation ................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Submittal of Application ................................................................................. 7
3.4.2 Contents of Application .................................................................................. 7
3.4.3 Designation Reports ...................................................................................... 7
3.4.4 Review Guidelines .......................................................................................... 8
3.4.5 Review by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
(NCDCR), Division of Archives and History ......................................................... 8
3.4.6 Consideration of the Report ........................................................................... 8
3.4.7 Submission to the Board of Commissioners ................................................... 9
3.4.8 Public Hearing ............................................................................................... 9
3.4.9 Adoption of a Designation Resolution ............................................................ 9
3.5 Actions Subsequent to Approval ........................................................................... 9
3.6 Denied Applications ............................................................................................. 9
Section 4.0 Historic Districts........................................................................................ 10
4.1 Adoption of a Designation Resolution................................................................. 10
4.2 Criteria for Designation ....................................................................................... 10
4.3 Inventory ............................................................................................................. 10
4.4 Required Procedures for Designation ................................................................. 10
4.4.1 Designation Report ...................................................................................... 10
4.4.2 Review by the NCDCR, Division of Archives and History .......................... 10
4.4.3 Review by Other Groups .............................................................................. 11
4.4.4 Adoption of a Designation Resolution .......................................................... 11
4.5 Revisions to Districts ........................................................................................... 11
Section 5.0 Certificate of Appropriateness .................................................................... 11
5.1 Rules and Regulations ......................................................................................... 11
5.1.1 Development Restriction ............................................................................... 11
5.1.2 Exterior Features .......................................................................................... 11
5.1.3 Building Permit Restriction.......................................................................... 11
5.1.4 Protection of Character ................................................................................. 12
5.2 Review Guidelines .............................................................................................. 12
5.3 Administrative Approval for Minor Works Allowed ............................................ 12
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 198
3
5.4 Limitations on Interior Review ........................................................................... 12
5.5 Certain Changes Not Prohibited ........................................................................ 12
5.6 Delay in Demolition of Designated Properties................................................... 13
5.7 Demolition by Neglect ........................................................................................ 13
5.8 Required Procedures .......................................................................................... 13
5.8.1 Submittal of Application ................................................................................ 13
5.8.2 Contents of Application ................................................................................. 14
5.8.3 Notification of Affected Property Owners .................................................... 14
5.8.4 Public Hearing ............................................................................................. 14
5.8.5 Reasons for HPC's Actions to Appear in Minutes........................................ 14
5.8.6 HPC Action on Application .......................................................................... 14
5.8.7 Time Limits .................................................................................................. 14
5.8.8 Submission of New Application ................................................................... 14
5.8.9 Appeals of the HPC's Decision ................................................................... 15
5.9 Publicly Owned Buildings and Structures .......................................................... 15
5.10 Remedies ........................................................................................................... 15
Section 6.0 Conflict with Other Laws ........................................................................... 15
Section 7.0 Effective ...................................................................................................... 15
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 199
4
Section 1.0 Purpose
WHEREAS the General Statues of North Carolina, provides for the establishment and
operation of Historic Commissions; and
WHEREAS it has become necessary to safeguard the heritage of Harnett County by
preserving important elements of our cultural, social, economic, and political, or architectural
history; and
WHEREAS in order to promote the use and conservation of such property for the education,
pleasure, and enrichment of the residents of Harnett County and the State as a whole;
BE IT NOW THEREFORE ORDAINED, that the Harnett County Board of County
Commissioners hereinafter referred to as “Board of Commissioners” does hereby establish
the HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE OF HARNETT COUNTY AND THE
HARNETT COUNTY HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION hereinafter referred as
the “Historic Properties Commission” or “HPC”; and ordain that it be governed by the
following provisions:
Section 2.0 Historic Properties Commission (HPC)
2.1 Creation and Appointment
The HPC shall consist of five (5) regular members and two (2) alternate members appointed
by the Board of Commissioners. All members must reside in Harnett County within the
jurisdiction of the HPC, which shall include the area wherein the county and municipalities
which adopt this ordinance have authority for planning and regulation of development. There
shall be a minimum of one (1) member from each of the five (5) Board of Commissioner’s
districts. The members of the HPC may receive for their services per diem compensation the
amount of which shall be fixed by the Board of Commissioners.
2.1 The HPC shall consist of five (5) regular members and two (2) alternate members
appointed by the Board of Commissioners. All members must reside in Harnett County within
the jurisdiction of the HPC, which shall include the area wherein the County and municipalities
which adopt this ordinance have authority for planning and regulation of development. The
regular members of the HPC should represent each of the five (5) Board of Commissioners’
districts, but the Board of Commissioners may select no more than two qualified candidates
from the same district. Alternate members shall be at-large members; however, both alternates
shall not reside in the same district unless the Board of Commissioners do not receive qualified
candidates from different districts.
2.1.1 Representation of Jurisdiction
In making appointments to the HPC, the Board of Commissioners shall strive to appoint
members geographically representing all areas of the HPC’s territorial jurisdiction, including
but not limited to, participating municipalities. The provisions of the Ordinance shall apply to
the unincorporated areas of Harnett County as specifically identified and delineated on the
zoning map identified as The Official Zoning Map of Harnett County, North Carolina. In
establishing the HPC and making appointments to it, the Board of Commissioners shall seek
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 200
5
the advice of state or local historical agencies, societies, or organizations as it may deem
necessary. The HPC may appoint advisory bodies and committees as appropriate.
2.2 Qualification of Members
A majority of the members of the HPC shall have demonstrated special interest, experience
or education in history, architecture, archaeology, or related fields.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 201
6
2.3 Terms
HPC members shall serve overlapping terms of three (3) years, and until their successors have
been appointed. Initially, the Board of Commissioners shall appoint three (3) regular members
to a full term of three (3) years and appoint two (2) regular members to a two (2) year term.
Alternate members shall be appointed to three (3) year terms. Thereafter, the Board of
Commissioners shall appoint members to three (3) year terms. Any vacancy during the
unexpired term of a member of the HPC shall be filled in accordance with the Rules of
Procedure for the Board of Commissioners.
2.4 Rules of Procedure
The HPC shall adopt Rules of Procedure necessary to the conduct of its affairs and in keeping
with the provisions of this ordinance. The Rules of Procedure adopted by the HPC shall at
least provide for the selection of its officers, the time and place of its regular meetings and the
calling of special meetings, the procedures for the conduct of public hearings, the conduct of
voting, the forms to be used in applying for and issuing or denying certificates of
appropriateness, and a list of minor works for which the Harnett County Planning Department
may issue Certificates of Appropriateness. These rules and procedures shall be kept on file in
the County Planning Department Office.
2.5 Powers and Duties
The HPC is authorized and empowered to undertake such actions reasonably necessary to the
discharge and conduct of its duties and responsibilities as outlined in this ordinance and the
N.C. General Statutes, including but not limited to the following:
a) Undertake an inventory of properties of historical, prehistorical, architectural,
archaeological, and/or cultural significance.
b) Recommend to the Board of Commissioners individual buildings, structures, sites, areas,
or objects within its zoning jurisdiction to be designated by designation resolution as "historic
landmarks," and areas within its zoning jurisdiction to be designated by designation resolution
as "historic districts."
(c) Recommend to the Board of Commissioners that designation of any area as a historic
district or part thereof, or of any building, structure, site, area, or object as a historic landmark,
be revoked or removed for cause.
(d) Review and act upon proposals for alteration or demolition of designated landmarks and
for alteration, demolition, or new construction within historic districts, pursuant to this
ordinance.
(e) Conduct educational programs on historic landmarks and districts within the County.
(f) Cooperate with State, Federal and local governments in pursuing the purposes of this
ordinance. The Board of Commissioners or the HPC when authorized by the Board of
Commissioners may contract with the State, or the United States of America, or any agency
of either, or with any other organization, provided the terms are not inconsistent with state or
federal law.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 202
7
(g) Prepare and recommend the official adoption of a historic preservation element as part of
the County's comprehensive plan, at the request of the Board of Commissioners.
(h) Acquire by any lawful means the fee or any lesser included interest, including options to
purchase, to any historic landmarks, land to which historic buildings or structures may be
moved, or properties located within historic districts; hold, manage, preserve, restore and
improve the interest; and exchange or dispose of the interest by public or private sale, lease,
or otherwise, subject to covenants or other legally binding restrictions which will secure
appropriate rights of public access and promote the preservation of the property. All lands,
buildings, structures, sites, areas, or objects acquired by funds appropriated by The HPC,
Board of Commissioners, or other County agency shall be acquired in the name of the Harnett
County unless otherwise provided by the Board of Commissioners.
(i) Restore, preserve, and operate such historic properties.
(j) Enter, at reasonable times, upon private property designated as a historic landmark, within
a historic district or under review for such designation and make examinations or surveys as
necessary to the performance of its official duties. The HPC shall make a good faith attempt
to notify the property owner(s) or his duly authorized agent prior to entry.
(k) Negotiate at any time with the owner(s) of a building, structure, site, area or object for its
acquisition or its preservation, when such action is reasonably necessary and appropriate.
Section 3.0 Historic Landmarks
3.1 Adoption of a Designation Resolution
Upon compliance with the procedures set out in Section 3.4, the Board of Commissioners
may adopt and, quarterly, amend or repeal a designation resolution of one or more historic
landmarks. The designation resolution shall include information which shall:
(a) List the name(s) of the owner(s) of the property;
(b) Describe each property in the designation resolution, including the approximate area (size)
of the property so designated;
(c) Describe those elements of the property that are integral to its historical, prehistorical,
architectural, archaeological, and/or cultural significance;
(d) Provide for each designated historic landmark, a suitable sign or plaque indicating that the
landmark has been so designated; and
(e) Any other information the HPC and/or Board of Commissioners deems necessary within
the authority of this ordinance and the general statutes.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 203
8
3.2 Criteria for Designation
In order for any building, structure, site, area, or object to be designated in a resolution as a
historic landmark, the HPC must find that the property is of special significance in terms of
its history, prehistory, architecture, archaeology and/or cultural importance, and that it
possesses integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association.
3.3 Inventory
The HPC shall use an inventory of buildings, structures, sites, areas, or objects of historical,
prehistorical, architectural, and archaeological significance in the County as a guide to the
identification, assessment, and designation of historic landmarks. The HPC shall update the
inventory quarterly.
3.4 Required Procedures for Designation
The Board of Commissioners may not adopt or amend a resolution, designating a historic
building, structure, site, area, or object, or acquire any landmark, until the steps prescribed by
this ordinance and its subsections have been taken, including rules of procedure and guidelines
for the altering, restoring, moving, or demolishing properties designated as historic.
Designation procedures may be initiated by the HPC or at the request of property owner(s) or
his duly authorized agent.
3.4.1 Submittal of Application
An application for a designation shall be obtained from and, when completed, filed with the
Planning Department. Applications for designation shall be considered by the HPC at its next
regularly scheduled meeting, provided they have been filed, complete in form and content, at
least fifteen (15) working days before the meeting; otherwise consideration shall be deferred
until the following meeting.
3.4.2 Contents of Application
The HPC shall, by uniform rule in its Rules of Procedure, require information as is reasonably
necessary to determine the nature of the application. An application for a designation shall not
be considered complete until the required information is included. An incomplete application
shall not be accepted. Nothing shall prevent the applicant(s) from filing with the application
additional relevant information bearing on the application.
3.4.3 Designation Reports
The HPC shall make, or cause to be made, an investigation and report that includes all the
information contained in this Section. Applications prepared by property owner(s) will be
judged by the same criteria as those prepared by the HPC.
(a) The name(s) of the property to be considered for designation; both common and historic
names, if they can be determined;
(b) The name(s) and address of the current property owner(s);
(c) The location of the property proposed to be designated historic, including the street
address, Harnett County tax map and parcel numbers and/or the parcel identification number;
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 204
9
(d) The date of construction and of any later alterations, if any, if they can be determined;
(e) An assessment of the significance of the site or structure pursuant to Section 3.2;
(f) An architectural and/or archaeological description of the area of the site or structure
proposed to be designated. If outbuildings or other appurtenant features are proposed to be
designated, the report shall contain a description of those features;
(g) A historical discussion of the site or structure within its type, period and locality;
(h) A photograph, current and historic if available, that clearly depicts the property proposed
to be designated and supplementary photographs showing facades, details and site layout; and
(i) A map showing the location of the property, including any outbuildings and appurtenant
features.
3.4.4 Review Guidelines
Prior to the designation of any historic landmark or district, the HPC shall prepare and adopt
guidelines, not inconsistent with the N.C. General Statutes for altering, restoring, moving, or
demolishing of property designated as historic. It is the intention of these guidelines to ensure,
insofar as possible, that changes in designated landmarks or properties located within
designated districts shall be in harmony with the reasons for designation.
3.4.5 Review by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources (NCDCR),
Division of Archives and History
A report accepted by the HPC shall be submitted to the NCDCR, Division of Archives and
History or its successor agency, for comments pursuant to NC General Statutes, as amended
from time to time. The NCDCR, Division of Archives and History or its successor agency,
acting through the State Historic Preservation Officer, shall, either at their own request or at
the initiative of the HPC, be given an opportunity to review and comment upon the substance
and effect of the designation of any landmark pursuant to this ordinance.
3.4.6 Consideration of the Report
Once the designation report has been prepared, either by the HPC or by the property owner(s),
and is deemed by the Planning Department to meet the provisions of subsection 3.4.1, the
HPC shall consider the report. The HPC may accept it, amend it, reject it, or recommend
further study. Prior to final action on a designation report, the HPC shall indicate the extent
to which the landmark meets the criteria for designation in Section 3.2. The HPC should
consider any comments received in writing from the NCDCR, Division of Archives and
History or its successor agency. If the NCDCR, Division of Archives and History does not
submit its written comments or recommendations in connection with any proposed
designation within thirty (30) days following receipt of the report, the HPC and Board of
Commissioners shall be relieved of any responsibility to consider such comments. After the
expiration of the thirty (30) day comment period given the NCDCR, Division of Archives and
History, the HPC may recommend to the Board of Commissioners that the property be
designated as a historic landmark.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 205
10
3.4.7 Submission to the Board of Commissioners
The HPC shall forward its recommendation to the Board of Commissioners. The HPC shall
submit a copy of the designation report, any written comments received from the NCDCR,
Division of Archives and History, and, if the recommendation is for approval, a proposed
designation resolution, to the Board of Commissioners.
3.4.8 Public Hearing
When a proposed designation resolution is submitted, the HPC and the Board of
Commissioners shall hold a joint public hearing or separate public hearings on the proposed
designation resolution. The HPC shall send a notification letter, including time and place, to
property owners adjacent to the subject property. It is recommended, but not required, that
the HPC also post a notification sign on the subject property and publish notice in a local
periodical.
3.4.9 Adoption of a Designation Resolution
Following the required public hearing, the Board of Commissioners shall consider the
designation report, the HPC's recommendation, the NCDCR, Division of Archives and
History’s comments, and the comments made at the public hearing, and may adopt the
designation resolution as proposed, adopt it with amendments, or reject the resolution.
3.5 Actions Subsequent to Approval
Upon adoption of the resolution:
(a) Planning Department shall send the owner(s) of the landmark, as identified by current tax
records, written notice of such designation of adoption of the resolution by certified mail,
return receipt requested.
b) The HPC shall file one copy of the resolution and any subsequent amendments thereto, in
the office of the Register of Deeds of Harnett County. The Register of Deeds shall index each
historic landmark according to the name of the owner(s) in the grantee and grantor indexes.
(c) All tax maps maintained by Harnett County shall clearly indicate the designation of a
building, structure, site, area, or object as a historic landmark for as long as the designation
remains in effect.
(d) The Planning Department shall notify the tax assessor of Harnett County of the landmark
designation. The assessor shall consider the designation and any recorded restriction on the
landmark in appraising it for tax purposes.
3.6 Denied Applications
If the Board of Commissioners denies a designation report, a copy of the minutes of the public
hearing at which such a decision to deny the report was made, shall be mailed to the owner(s)
of the property proposed for designation, as requested.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 206
11
Section 4.0 Historic Districts
4.1 Adoption of a Designation Resolution
No historic district may exist without a resolution designating it as such. Upon compliance
with the procedures contained in Section 4.4, the Board of Commissioners within its
jurisdiction, may adopt and, quarterly, amend or repeal a resolution designating one or more
historic districts.
4.2 Criteria for Designation
In order for any area to be designated in a resolution as a historic district, the HPC must find
that the area is of special significance in terms of its history, prehistory, architecture,
archaeology and/or cultural importance, and that it possesses integrity of design, setting,
workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association.
4.3 Inventory
The HPC shall use an inventory of buildings, structures, sites, areas, or objects of historical,
prehistorical, architectural, and archaeological significance in the County as a guide for the
identification, assessment, and designation of historic districts. The HPC shall update the
inventory quarterly.
4.4 Required Procedures for Designation
The Board of Commissioners may not adopt or amend a resolution designating a historic
district, nor may the Board of Commissioners or the HPC accept any district until the steps
prescribed by this Section have been taken.
4.4.1 Designation Report
The HPC shall prepare or review an investigation and report describing the significance of the
buildings, structure, features, sites, or surroundings included in any such proposed district, and
the description of the boundaries of such district. Such report shall be referred to the Board
of Commissioners and the Planning Department for its review and comment according to
procedures set forth in the Harnett County Zoning Ordinance.
4.4.2 Review by the NCDCR, Division of Archives and History
All designation reports shall be submitted to the NCDCR, Division of Archives and History
by the HPC. The NCDCR, Division of Archives and History or its successor agency, acting
through the State Historic Preservation Officer, shall, either upon their own request or at the
initiative of the HPC, be given an opportunity to review and comment upon the substance
and effect of the designation of any district. If the NCDCR, Division of Archives and History
does not submit its written comments or recommendations in connection with any proposed
designation within thirty (30) days following receipt of the report, the HPC and the Board of
Commissioners shall be relieved of any responsibility to consider such comments. After the
expiration of the thirty (30) day comment period given the NCDCR, Division of Archives and
History, the HPC may recommend to the Board of Commissioners that the area be designated
as a historic district.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 207
12
4.4.3 Review by Other Groups
The Board of Commissioners may also, in its discretion, refer the designation report and
proposed boundaries to any local preservation commission or other interested body for its
recommendations prior to taking action to adopt or amend the designation resolution.
4.4.4 Adoption of a Designation Resolution
On receipt of these reports and recommendations, the Board of Commissioners may proceed
in the same manner as would otherwise be required for the adoption or amendment of any
appropriate zoning ordinance provisions.
4.5 Revisions to Districts
With respect to any changes in the boundaries of an adopted historic district subsequent to its
initial establishment, the requirements and procedures contained in Section 4.0 shall apply.
Section 5.0 Certificate of Appropriateness
5.1 Rules and Regulations
5.1.1 Development Restriction
From and after the designation of a historic landmark or district, no exterior portion of any
building or other structure (including masonry walls, fences, light fixtures, steps and pavement,
or other appurtenant features), nor above-ground utility structure nor any type of outdoor
advertising sign shall be erected, altered, restored, moved, or demolished on such landmark or
within such district until after an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness as to exterior
features has been submitted to and approved by the HPC. A Certificate of Appropriateness
shall be required whether or not a building permit is required.
5.1.2 Exterior Features
For purposes of this ordinance, "exterior features" shall include the architectural style, general
design, and general arrangement of the exterior of a building or other structure, including the
kind and texture of the building material, the size and scale of the building or other structure,
and the type and style of all windows, doors, light fixtures, signs, and other appurtenant
fixtures. In the case of outdoor advertising signs, "exterior features" shall mean the style,
material, size, and location of all such signs. In adopting a resolution, establishing a historic
district, the Board of Commissioners may provide that "exterior features" also include historic
signs, color, and significant landscape, archaeological, and natural features of the area.
5.1.3 Building Permit Restriction
In adopting a resolution establishing a historic district, the County shall provide that no
building permit or other permit granted for the purposes of constructing, altering, moving, or
demolishing structures shall be issued unless the HPC has first issued a Certificate of
Appropriateness authorizing the construction, alteration, moving, restoration, or demolition.
Any building permit or such other permit not issued in conformity with this Section shall be
invalid. In approving a Certificate of Appropriateness, the HPC may attach reasonable
conditions necessary to carry out the purposes of this ordinance.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 208
13
5.1.4 Protection of Character
The HPC shall take no action under this section except to prevent the construction,
reconstruction, alteration, restoration, moving, or demolition of buildings, structures,
appurtenant fixtures, outdoor advertising signs, or other significant features which would be
incongruous with the special character of the landmark or district.
5.2 Review Guidelines
The HPC shall review the established guidelines prepared during the designation resolution
process for the subject property. It is the intention of these guidelines to ensure, insofar as
possible, that changes in designated landmarks or properties located within designated districts
shall be in harmony with the reasons for designation.
5.3 Administrative Approval for Minor Works Allowed
The Planning Department may issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for minor works, as
listed in the HPC's Rules of Procedure. Minor works shall include and are defined as those
exterior changes that do not involve substantial alterations, additions, or removals that could
impair the integrity of the property and/or district as a whole. No application for a minor
works Certificate of Appropriateness may be denied without formal action by the HPC.
5.4 Limitations on Interior Review
Notwithstanding this ordinance, jurisdiction of the HPC over interior spaces shall be limited
to specific interior features of architectural, artistic, or historical significance in publicly owned
landmarks, and of privately owned historic landmarks for which consent for interior review
has been given by the owner(s). If an owner’s consent for interior review has been filed with
the Register of Deeds of Harnett County and indexed according to the name of the owner(s)
of the property in the grantee and grantor indexes, such consent shall bind future owners
and/or successors in title. The designation resolution establishing the historic designation shall
specify the interior features to be reviewed and the specific nature of the HPC's jurisdiction
over those features.
5.5 Certain Changes Not Prohibited
Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of
any exterior architectural feature of a historic landmark or property located within a district
that does not involve a change in design, material, or outer appearance thereof. Nor shall this
ordinance be construed to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration,
moving, or demolition of any such feature when a building inspector or similar County official
certifies to the HPC that such action is required for the public safety because of an unsafe or
dangerous condition. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the property owner(s) from
making any use of his property not prohibited by other statutes, ordinances, or regulations.
Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent the maintenance of or, in the event of
an emergency, immediate restoration of any existing above-ground utility structure without
approval by the HPC.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 209
14
5.6 Delay in Demolition of Designated Properties
Except as provided below, the HPC may not deny an application for Certificate of
Appropriateness authorizing the demolition of a designated historic landmark or property
located within a district. However, the HPC may delay the effective date of such a Certificate
for a period of up to 365 days from the date of approval. The HPC may reduce the period of
delay where it finds that the owner(s) would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently
deprived of all beneficial use of or return from such property by virtue of the delay. During
such period, the HPC may negotiate with the owner and with any other parties in an effort to
find a means of preserving the property, as provided in the “Powers and Duties” Section of
this Ordinance. The HPC may deny an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness
authorizing the demolition or destruction of a building, site, or structure determined by the
State Historic Preservation Office to have statewide significance, as defined in the criteria of
the National Register of Historic Places, unless the HPC finds that the owner(s) would suffer
extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use or return by virtue of the
denial. If the HPC has voted to recommend designation of a property as a landmark or
designation of an area as a district, and final designation has not been made by the Board of
Commissioners, the demolition or destruction of any building, site, or structure located on
the property of the proposed landmark or in the proposed district may be delayed by the HPC
for a period of up to 180 days or until the Board of Commissioners takes action on the
designation, whichever occurs first. Should the Board of Commissioners approve the
designation prior to the expiration of the 180 day delay period, an application for a Certificate
of Appropriateness for demolition must then be filed; however, the maximum delay period of
365 days shall be reduced by the period of delay while the designation was pending.
5.7 Demolition by Neglect
Demolition by neglect of any designated historic landmark or property located within a district
shall constitute a violation of this ordinance. The Board of Commissioners and/or HPC with
the expressed consent of the Board of Commissioners may take appropriate actions to prevent
demolition by neglect, provided such actions include appropriate safeguards to protect the
property owner(s) from undue economic hardship.
5.8 Required Procedures
5.8.1 Submittal of Application
An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be obtained from and, when
completed, filed with the Planning Department. Applications for Certificates of
Appropriateness shall be considered by the HPC at its next regularly scheduled meeting,
provided they have been filed, complete in form and content, at least fifteen (15) working days
before the meeting; otherwise consideration shall be deferred until the following meeting.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 210
15
5.8.2 Contents of Application
The HPC shall, by uniform rule in its Rules of Procedure, require information as is reasonably
necessary to determine the nature of the application. An application for a Certificate of
Appropriateness shall not be considered complete until the required information is included.
An incomplete application shall not be accepted. Nothing shall prevent the applicant(s) from
filing with the application additional relevant information bearing on the application.
5.8.3 Notification of Affected Property Owners
Before considering an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the HPC shall notify
by mail the owner(s) of any adjacent property. The mailed notices are for the convenience of
the property owner(s) and occupant(s) and any defect or omission therein shall not impair the
validity of issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness, or any following action.
5.8.4 Public Hearing
When considering an application, the HPC shall give the applicant(s) and Stakeholder(s) of
any property likely to be materially affected by the application, an opportunity to be heard at
a public hearing.
5.8.5 Reasons for HPC's Actions to Appear in Minutes
The HPC shall cause to be entered into the minutes of its meeting the reasons for its actions,
whether it be approval, approval with modifications, deferral or denial. The minutes shall also
contain a summary of any citation to the evidence, testimony, studies, or other authority upon
which it based its decision.
5.8.6 HPC Action on Application
When considering the application, the HPC shall apply the review guidelines required by
Section 6.0, and shall, before final action on the application, make findings of fact indicating
the extent to which the application is or is not in compliance with the review criteria. The
HPC's action on the application shall be approval, approval with modifications, deferral, or
disapproval.
5.8.7 Time Limits
If the HPC fails to take final action upon any application within 180 days from the date the
complete application is filed with the Planning Department, the application shall be deemed
to be approved as submitted. This time period may be extended to an exact date upon mutual
agreement between the HPC and the applicant(s). A Certificate of Appropriateness shall expire
180 days after the date of issuance, or in the case of a demolition Certificate of
Appropriateness, the effective date, if the work authorized by the Certificate has not been
commenced. If the work has been discontinued for a period of 365 days after commencement,
the Certificate shall immediately expire.
5.8.8 Submission of New Application
If the HPC denies a Certificate of Appropriateness, a new application affecting the same
property may be submitted only if substantial change is made in plans for the proposed
construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, or moving.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 211
16
5.8.9 Appeals of the HPC's Decision
An appeal may be made to the Harnett County Board of Adjustment regarding the HPC's
action in approving or denying any application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. Written
notice of intent to appeal must be sent to the HPC, postmarked within twenty (20) days
following the HPC's decision, unless oral notice of appeal is made to the HPC during the
meeting at which the decision is rendered. Appeals must be filed with the Harnett County
Board of Adjustment within sixty (60) days following the Commission's decision. Appeals shall
be in the nature of certiorari. The Board of Adjustment's decision in any such case may be
appealed to the Superior Court of Harnett County.
5.9 Publicly Owned Buildings and Structures
Designated historic buildings, structures, sites, areas, or objects in the HPC’s jurisdiction
owned by State of North Carolina or any of its political subdivisions, agencies, or
instrumentalities shall be subject to the regulations imposed by this ordinance, in accordance
with N.C. General Statutes.
5.10 Remedies
In case any building, structure, site, area, or object designated a historic landmark or any
property located within a historic district is about to be demolished as the result of deliberate
neglect or otherwise, materially altered, remodeled, constructed, or removed, except in
compliance with this ordinance, the Board of Commissioners, the HPC, or other party
aggrieved by such action may institute any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent such
unlawful demolition, material alteration, remodeling, or removal, to restrain, correct or abate
such violation, or to prevent any illegal act or conduct with respect to such historic property.
Section 6.0 Conflict with Other Laws
Whenever the provisions of this ordinance are in conflict with any other statute, charter
provision, ordinance or regulation of the County, the more restrictive ordinance or regulation
shall govern.
Section 7.0 Effective
Duly adopted this day of , 200_
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairman
ATTEST:
Clerk to the Board
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 212
HARNETT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
A public hearing will be held by the Harnett County Board of Commissioners in the Board
Chambers 2nd floor of the Harnett County Resource Center and Library at 455 McKinney
Parkway in Lillington, NC, 27546 at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, December 1, 2025. The purpose of
this hearing is to hear the views of the residents of Harnett County on a Proposed Text Amendment
to the Harnett County Historic Preservation Ordinance.
The public will have the opportunity to listen to the meeting live online. Individuals interested in
providing comments regarding the public hearing may do so in person or submit their comments
in writing to mdcapps@harnett.org no later than 4:00 pm on Sunday, November 30, 2025 and
comments will be read aloud during the meeting.
Proposed Text Amendment: Section 1.0 Purpose; “Whereas §160D-303 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina…”Section 2.0; “Historic Preservation & Heritage Tourism
Commission (HPHTC).” Section 2.5(b); “Special consideration shall be given to any proposed
“historic landmarks” or “historic districts” which would promote heritage tourism in the
County.” Section 2.5(e); “and any other programs or activities which attract visitors who seek
authentic experiences that allow them to engage with local history, events, and people.” Section
2.5(j); “However, no member, employee, or agent of the HPHTC may enter any private building
or structure without express consent of the owner or occupant thereof.” Section 3.1(d); “If the
property owner does not consent to the placement on the property, the sign or plaque shall be
placed on a nearby public right-of-way.” Section 3.2; “Additional consideration shall be given to
any building, structure, site, area, or object that would promote heritage tourism.” Section 3.4.8;
“Notice of the hearing shall be made as provided by G.S. 160D-601.” Section 3.5(b); “A second
copy of the resolution and any subsequent amendments thereto shall be given to the Harnett
County Building Inspections Office.” Section 5.8.9; “Written notice of appeal must be sent to
the Harnett County Board of Adjustment within thirty (30) days of receipt of HPHTC’s written
decision. Appeals shall be in the nature of certiorari and, to the extent applicable, shall comply
with the provision set forth in G.S. 160D-1402. The Board of Adjustment’s decision in any such
case may be appealed to the Superior Court of Harnett County in accordance with the provisions
of G.S. 160D-1402.”
THE PUBLIC IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS REQUEST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
DEPENDING ON DISCUSSION, DEBATE AND PRESENTATIONS FROM OPPONENTS
AND PROPONENTS AT THE FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS.
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 213
THE DAILY RECORD:
Run Date: Friday, November 14, 2025 & Friday, November 21, 2025
Please Bill: Harnett County Administration
PO Box 769
Lillington, N.C. 27546
PLEASE SEND AN AFFIDAVIT AND A TEAR SHEET WITH EACH INVOICE
Questions regarding this ad should be directed to
Jaime Bell-Raig at (910) 814-6009.
Thank you
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 214
HARNETT COUNTY FIRST RESPONDERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
There are five vacancies on this Board. We have received applications for specific categories which are as
follows:
One member from the District 12 District Attorney’s Office.
One member from the Harnett County Emergency Services Department.
Two members from each of the County’s five voting districts.
There is one vacancy in District 1. We have received applications for consideration for
District 1 from the following candidates:
Larry Smith
Brian Wieking
Erica Hoskins
There are two vacancies in District 5. We have received applications for consideration for
District 5 from the following candidates:
Robert Thomas
Victoria Hall
Steven Monroe Topa, Jr.
Jason Mullen
Jessica Zinsmaster
Item 9
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 215
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 216
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 217
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 218
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 219
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 220
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 221
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 222
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 223
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 224
July August September October November December Jauary 2026 February March April May June Totals
Children's Services
CPS Reports Received 130 137 172 158
Reports Accepted 63 71 93 90
Total children in CPS cases 213 240 378 356
Total children in Plc/Custody 193 197 202 203
FC Money expended $247,899.80 219,053.22$ 226,917.65$ 221,239.88$ $915,110.55
Adult Services
APS Reports Screened In 19 36 15 22
# of trips scheduled 560 468 496 496
Total Cases 197 216 218 226
Work First
Energy Expenditures $23,034.37 $66,803.70 $73,361.67 $93,016.19
Total cases 92 91 95 92
Food & Nutrition Services
Apps In/Approved 889/536 809/499 740/469 797/437
Total Cases (households)8,266 8276 8246 8,288
Benefits Issued $2,899,404.00 $2,915,105.00 $2,869,985.00 $2,950,313.00
Timeliness 97.50%99.00%98.18%97.89%
Adult Medicaid
Apps In/Approved 147/67 159/56 140/89 163/89
Total Cases 10,262 10,757 10,667 11,173
Family & Children's Medicaid
Apps In/Approved 578/246 651/251 602/217 582/271
Total Cases 40,246 40,174 39,699 44,377
Medicaid Timeliness 95.5%98%96.8%96.75%
Fraud Total Collections $28,283.69 $76,060.87 $26,563.85 $25,715.39 $156,623.80
ChildCare
Children Served 639 646 639 619
Total Expenditures $433,927.00 $442,661.00 $436,809.00 $401,751.00
HC providers 61 61 61 61
Child Support
Total Collections $853,082 $812,278 $816,552 $853,024 $3,334,936.00
Total Cases 3987 3980 4005 4032
Harnett County DSS Monthly Report Totals 2025-2026
Item 10B
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 225
Item 10C
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 226
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 227
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 228
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 229
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 230
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 231
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 232
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 233
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 234
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 235
Item 10D
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 236
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 237
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 238
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 239
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 240
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 241
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 242
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 243
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 244
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 245
U:\Kelly J Smith\Agenda Items\GFL Contract Extension - agendaform2025.docx Page
1 of 1
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2025
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: GFL Environmental dba Waste Industries Contract
REQUESTED BY: Chad Beane, Solid Waste Director
REQUEST:
This is a request for the Board’s approval of the GFL Environmental (dba) Waste
Industries) contract for Fiscal Years 2026–2031. The estimated cost for the first year of
the contract is approximately $3,720,000, with annual adjustments not to exceed 3%
based on the CPI. This contract covers the transportation and hauling of Harnett
County’s solid waste to Sampson County.
A copy of the contract is attached for your review.
Please include this item under the County Manager Reports section of the agenda for
the next Board meeting.
FINANCE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Item 10E
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 246
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 247
HCBOC 120125 Pg. 248