HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Agenda Packet - JUNE 2025
HARNETT COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
Monday June 2, 2025
6:00 p.m.
Harnett County Development Services
420 McKinney Parkway, Lillington, NC 27546
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Call to order and welcome – Chairman Kathy Wood
2. Invocation & Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approval of Minutes
New Business
4. Proposed Zoning Change: Case #PLAN2505-0001
Landowner / Applicant: Blissful Properties & Realty, LLC / Morningstar Law Group
C/O Hunter Winstead; 1.96 +/- acres; Pin # 0655-41-5460.000; From RA-40 to
Commercial Zoning District; Hector’s Creek Township; Intersection of SR # 1414
(Piney Grove Rawls Road) & US 401 N.
5. Proposed Text Amendment: Case #PLAN2505-0002
Applicant: Harnett County Development Services; Harnett County Unified Development
Ordinance; Article VII, Sections: 6.4.1., “General Fire Hydrant Requirements”.
6. Other Business
7. Adjourn
STAFF REPORTPage 1 of 10
REZONING STAFF REPORT
Case: PLAN2505-0001
Sarah Arbour, Planner II
sarbour@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 814-6414 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board: June 2, 2025 County Commissioners: June 16, 2025
Rezoning from the RA-40 Zoning District to the Commercial Zoning District
Applicant Information
Owner of Record:Applicant:
Name: Blissful Realty, LLC Name: Hunter Winstead, Morningstar Law Group
Address: 201 Fenton Gateway Dr., Ste. 200 Address: 434 Fayetteville St. Suite 2200
City/State/Zip: Cary, NC 27511 City/State/Zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
Property Description
PIN(s): 0655-41-5460.000 Acreage: 1.96
Address/SR No.: U.S. 401 N., Fuquay-Varina
Township:
Johnsonville
Lillington
Neill’s Creek
Stewart’s Creek
Upper Little River
Anderson Creek
Averasboro
Barbecue
Black River
Buckhorn
Duke
Grove
Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 10
Physical Characteristics
Site Description
The property is currently a vacant, unimproved site formerly used for agricultural purposes. The property
is also bound by a railroad right-of-way to the west.
Note: The property only has access to US 401 N. and does not appear to have access to Piney Grove Rawls Rd. due to a small
portion of the parcel located to the north being situated between the subject property and the ROW.
Surrounding Land Uses
Surrounding land uses consist of single-family homes, a self-storage facility, a religious structure, a
memory care facility, and agricultural activities.
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other:
STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 10
Transportation:
The Annual Average Daily Traffic Counts:
US 401 N. 10,000
Piney Grove Rawls: 11,000
Site Distances:
Piney Grove Rawls and U.S. 401: Fair
US 401 North: Fair
US 401 South: Good
There is a curve in U.S. 401 to the north of the intersection that impacts site distance.
Intersection of Piney Grove Rawls Rd. & U.S. 401 N.
STAFF REPORTPage 4 of 10
Zoning District Compatibility
Current
RA-40
Requested
Commercial
Parks & Rec XX
Natural Preserves XX
Bona Fide Farms XX
Single Family X
Manufactured Homes, (with design criteria)
Manufactured Homes
Multi-Family
Institutional SUP X
Commercial Services SUP X
Retail X
Wholesale SUP
Industrial
Manufacturing
The above is a summary list of potential uses.
Land Use Classification Compatibility
PROPOSED
ZONING
LAND USES
Commercial Commercial Mixed-
Use
Parks & Rec XX
Natural Preserves XX
Bona Fide Farms XX
Single Family X
Manufactured
Homes, Design Regulated
Manufactured Homes
Multi-Family X
Institutional XX
Commercial
Service XX
Retail XX
Wholesale SUP X
Industrial
Manufacturing
The above is a summary list of potential uses. For all applicable uses for each Zoning district, please refer to the
UDO’s Table of Uses.
RA-30
RA-40
Commercial
STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 10
Land Use Description:
Commercial Mixed Use
These areas are located along major roads and include a mix of commercial land uses and some
residential uses. This character area is home to medium to large-scale retail, services, restaurants,
offices and other businesses. Residential uses may include single-family homes, townhomes, missing
middle housing types and occasionally apartments.
Site Photographs
STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 10
Road View
U.S. 401 N. North U.S. 401 N. South
Piney Grove Rawls – North View Piney Grove Rawls – South View
STAFF REPORT Page 7 of 10
Across Street
Across US 401 N. Across Piney Grove Rawls Rd.
Surrounding Land Uses
STAFF REPORT Page 8 of 10
Evaluation
Yes No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the
same category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
The subject property is located in an area characterized by a mix of residential and
commercial land uses. Recently, the area has experienced an influx of commercial
development, including a self-storage facility and a memory care center. Several
properties in the vicinity have recently been rezoned to the Commercial zoning
district, further signaling a trend toward increased commercial activity.
Yes No B. There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the
proposed district classification would be in the interest of the general public
and not merely the interest of the individual or small group.
The requested zoning district is compatible with the underlying land use, Commercial Mixed
Use. These areas are located along major roads and include a mix of commercial land uses
and some residential uses. This character area is home to medium to large-scale retail,
services, restaurants, offices and other businesses. The uses permitted in the Commercial
zoning district are compatible with the underlying land use.
Yes No C. There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the
proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in
the proposed change. (When a new district designation is assigned, any use
permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district
requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to
make of the property involved.)
There is a convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed
zoning district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed
change. The uses permitted in the Commercial zoning district are compatible with the
surrounding and nearby commercial land uses. Additionally, the property has access
to a major thoroughfare and water service and is located in the Commercial Mixed
Use land use area.
STAFF REPORT Page 9 of 10
Yes No D. There is a convincing demonstration that the character of the
neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use
permitted in the proposed change.
There is a convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not
be materially and adversely affected by the uses permitted in the requested zoning
district. The uses permitted in the Commercial zoning district are compatible with the
nearby non-residential land uses.
Yes No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and
sound planning practices.
The requested zoning district is compatible with the future land use classification,
Commercial Mixed-Use. These areas are located along major roads and include a mix of
commercial land uses and some residential uses. This character area is home to medium to
large-scale retail, services, restaurants, offices and other businesses. Residential uses may
include single-family homes, townhomes, missing middle housing types and occasionally
apartments.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that…)
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to Commercial would not have an unreasonable
impact on the surrounding community based on compatibility with the future land use plan. It is
recommended that this rezoning request be APPROVED.
Standards of Review and Worksheet
TYPICAL REVIEW STANDARDS
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
Yes No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category,
or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes No B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small group.
Yes No C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When
a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so
long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they
intend to make of the property involved.)
Yes No D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound
planning practices.
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the public interest. DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
STAFF REPORT Page 10 of 10
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it
meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of
the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning
practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page 1 of 2
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Planning Department
420 McKinney Pkwy P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Opt. 2 Fax: (910) 893-2793
Total Fee:
Receipt:
Permit:
Hearing Date:
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Applicant:
Name: Blissful Realty LLC Name: Hunter Winstead, Morningstar Law
Group
Address: 201 Fenton GatewayDr., Ste. 200 Address: 434 Fayetteville St, Suite 2200
City/State/Zip: Cary, NC 27511 City/State/Zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
E-mail: mstuart@morningstarlawgroup.com E-mail: hwinstead@morningstarlawgroup.com
Phone: 919-890-3318 Phone: 919-590-0396
Fax: n/a Fax: n/a
Property Description
PIN(s): 0655-41-5460.000 Acreage: _1.96__ Acres____
Address/SR No.: US 401 NC
Directions from Lillington: North on S. Main St; left on US 401; property is on the left after
9.4 miles
Deed Book:4247
Plat Book: 2009
Page:0682
Page:409
Utilities Available:
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other (Unverified)
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other (Unverified)
Existing Zoning:
Conservation
RA-20M
RA-20R
RA-30
RA-40
Commercial
Light Industrial
Industrial
Office & Inst’l
Requested Zoning:
Conservation
RA-20M
RA-20R
RA-30
RA-40
Commercial
Light Industrial
Industrial
Office & Inst’l
Township:
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
Attachments
x Written description of property from recorded deed
x Recorded map of property at scale of not less than one (1) inch = 200 feet
x Explanation of why the zoning change is requested, addressing applicable portions of Article XII of
the Zoning Ordinance
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page 2 of 2
Signatures
The undersigned applicant hereby certifies that, to the hest of his or her knowledge and belief, all
information supplied with this application is true and accurate:
Property Owner Signature Date Authorized Agent Signature Date
Requirements for Consideration
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
2.1 The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
2.2 There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small
group.
2.3 There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new district
designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district
requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the property
involved.)
2.4 There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and
adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
2.5 The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
Page 1 of 2
TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
(Internal)
Development Services
420 McKinney Pkwy.
P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793
Case: PLAN2505-0002
Planning Board: June 2, 2025 County Commissioners: June 16, 2025
Applicant Information
Applicant:
Name: Harnett County Development Services
Address: 420 McKinney Pkwy.
City/State/Zip: Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: 910-893-7525, x2
Type of Change
New Addition Revision
Ordinance:Unified Development Ordinance
Article: VII. Section: 6.4.1
Current Text:
6.4 Fire Protection
6.4.1 General Fire Hydrant Requirements
Adequate fire protection shall be provided to all new subdivision developments and nonresidential new
construction and expansions. The developer or subdivider shall install fire hydrants in such a manner that the
development is afforded adequate fire protection as provided in this Ordinance. The regulations contained herein
are intended to facilitate proper installation of required fire protection measures.
A. All hydrants shall be Harnett County Public Utilities and Fire Code Official approved, in accordance with the
requirements of this Section.
1. No fire hydrant shall be installed on less than a 6 inch (6”) main.
2. Hydrants shall have two (2) two and one half inch (2 ½”) and one (1) four and one half inch (4 ½”)
connections with threads of the National Pipe Thread (NPT) type.
3. The upper hydrant operation stem within the bonnet shall be sealed and lubricated by means of an oil or
grease bath, unless otherwise approved. The operating nut shall be pentagonal type measuring one and one
half inch (1 ½”) from point to flat. Hydrants shall open left.
4. All hydrants shall be furnished with barrel and stem extensions as required for the final field location.
Nominal minimum bury will be a depth of three and one half (3 ½) feet. All hydrants at finish grade shall
measure 18 inches (18”) from ground to center of steamer cap.
T
Page 2 of 2
Proposed Text:
6.4 Fire Protection
6.4.1 General Fire Hydrant Requirements
Adequate fire protection shall be provided to all new subdivision developments and nonresidential new
construction and expansions. The developer or subdivider shall install fire hydrants in such a manner that the
development is afforded adequate fire protection as provided in this Ordinance. The regulations contained herein
are intended to facilitate proper installation of required fire protection measures.
A. All hydrants shall be Harnett County Public Utilities and Fire Code Official approved, in accordance with the
requirements of this Section.
1. No fire hydrant shall be installed on less than a 6 inch (6”) main.
2. Hydrants shall have two (2) two and one half inch (2 ½”) and one (1) four and one half inch (4 ½”)
connections with threads of the National Pipe Thread (NPT) type five-inch (5 ”) Storz connection and cap.
3. The upper hydrant operation stem within the bonnet shall be sealed and lubricated by means of an oil or
grease bath, unless otherwise approved. The operating nut shall be pentagonal type measuring one and one
half inch (1 ½”) from point to flat. Hydrants shall open left.
4. All hydrants shall be furnished with barrel and stem extensions as required for the final field location.
Nominal minimum bury will be a depth of three and one half (3 ½) feet. All hydrants at finish grade shall
measure 18 inches (18”) from ground to center of steamer Storz cap. The Storz cap shall be street-facing.
Reason for Requested Change:
The Harnett County Development Services and Emergency Services Departments are requesting an
amendment to Article VII., Section 6.4.1., General Fire Hydrant Requirements, to ensure compliance with
fire protection industry standards and best practices in the interest of public safety.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency: (Staff concludes that…)
The requested Text Amendment is compatible with Harnett County regulatory documents and enhances
public safety. Therefore, it is recommended that this Text Amendment request be APPROVED.