Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Campbell Ridge Fire Flow Report
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Campbell Ridge Harnett County, North Carolina November 8, 2021 Prepared By: The Nau Company, PLLC PO Box 810 Rolesville, North Carolina, 27571 (919) 630‐2552 darnold@thenauco.com NCBELS License # P‐0751 Water System Analysis November 8, 2021 Campbell Ridge 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents information for the proposed water system for the proposed Campbell Ridge subdivision located on Old Stage Road in Harnett County, North Carolina. BACKGROUND At full build‐out the proposed subdivision will consist of 28 single‐family lots with public infrastructure to support the development REQUIREMENTS The water distribution system extensions shall provide water pressures and fire flows at a standard acceptable value for the applicable zoning requirements The water distribution system should maintain a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi Based on the current Harnett County Requirements the fire flow requirement for this project is 500 GPM METHODOLOGY Peak Domestic Demand Peak domestic flows for the project were taken from 15A NCAC 18C .0801. Based on 28 service connections a peak domestic flow was determined to be approximately 75 GPM. A copy of the chart used to determine this flow is included as an appendix to this report. Fire Flow and Peak Domestic Demand in the Water Model The demand for each fire hydrant node in the water model was set at 500 GPM. The fire flow was set for only one hydrant at a time. The domestic demand was distributed proportionally to some nodes in the water model to represent the actual demand in the system during a fire as closely as possible. The full peak domestic demand was present in the system model as each hydrant was checked for fire flow capacity. Calculations EPANET Version 2.2 was used to calculate the pressures resulting from the required peak domestic flow and fire flow. The results for this project were calculated in EPANET using the Hazen‐Williams formula. RESULTS Based on the results of this analysis, we believe that the Harnett County requirements will be met for the proposed development. Additional details can be found in the Appendix. APPENDICES Appendix A Model System Layout Appendix B Peak Domestic Demand Calculation Appendix C Fire Flow Test Results Appendix D EPANET Calculation Output APPENDIX A MODEL SYSTEM LAYOUT APPENDIX B PEAK DOMESTIC DEMAND CALCULATION PEAK DEMAND FOR RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS (Number of Connections vs Gallons per Minute) 260 240 200 180 120 80 40 300 200 100 80 10 60 20 40 30 Number of Connections Gallons Per Minute APPENDIX C FIRE FLOW TEST RESULTS APPENDIX D EPANET CALCULATION OUTPUT Page 1 11/8/2021 11:48:40 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 500.00 360.63 30.17 0.00 5 0.00 361.19 34.75 0.00 FH‐2 0.00 361.19 35.18 0.00 7 18.75 361.18 34.74 0.00 9 18.75 361.12 37.97 0.00 FH‐3 0.00 361.12 37.97 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 361.11 44.68 0.00 FH‐4 0.00 361.11 44.68 0.00 FH‐5 0.00 361.11 52.91 0.00 FH‐6 0.00 361.18 39.08 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 56.25 0.64 0.31 Open 3 56.25 0.64 0.31 Open 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 6 500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 7 37.50 0.43 0.15 Open 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 9 18.75 0.21 0.04 Open 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump Page 1 11/8/2021 11:50:54 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 0.00 361.31 30.46 0.00 5 0.00 353.34 31.34 0.00 FH‐2 500.00 353.14 31.69 0.00 7 18.75 353.33 31.34 0.00 9 18.75 353.27 34.56 0.00 FH‐3 0.00 353.27 34.56 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 353.25 41.27 0.00 FH‐4 0.00 353.25 41.27 0.00 FH‐5 0.00 353.25 49.51 0.00 FH‐6 0.00 353.33 35.67 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 3 56.25 0.64 0.31 Open 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 5 500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 7 37.50 0.43 0.15 Open 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 9 18.75 0.21 0.04 Open 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump Page 1 11/8/2021 11:51:31 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 0.00 361.31 30.46 0.00 5 0.00 353.34 31.34 0.00 FH‐2 0.00 353.34 31.78 0.00 7 18.75 352.79 31.11 0.00 9 18.75 343.93 30.52 0.00 FH‐3 500.00 343.75 30.44 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 343.92 37.23 0.00 FH‐4 0.00 343.92 37.23 0.00 FH‐5 0.00 343.92 45.46 0.00 FH‐6 0.00 352.79 35.44 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 3 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 7 537.50 6.10 20.48 Open 8 ‐500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 9 18.75 0.21 0.04 Open 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump Page 1 11/8/2021 11:51:58 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 0.00 361.31 30.46 0.00 5 0.00 353.34 31.34 0.00 FH‐2 0.00 353.34 31.78 0.00 7 18.75 352.79 31.11 0.00 9 18.75 343.93 30.52 0.00 FH‐3 0.00 343.93 30.52 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 336.90 34.19 0.00 FH‐4 500.00 336.73 34.11 0.00 FH‐5 0.00 336.90 42.42 0.00 FH‐6 0.00 352.79 35.44 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 3 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 7 537.50 6.10 20.48 Open 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 9 518.75 5.89 19.17 Open 10 ‐500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump Page 1 11/8/2021 11:52:20 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 0.00 361.31 30.46 0.00 5 0.00 353.34 31.34 0.00 FH‐2 0.00 353.34 31.78 0.00 7 18.75 352.79 31.11 0.00 9 18.75 343.93 30.52 0.00 FH‐3 0.00 343.93 30.52 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 336.90 34.19 0.00 FH‐4 0.00 336.90 34.19 0.00 FH‐5 500.00 328.08 38.60 0.00 FH‐6 0.00 352.79 35.44 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 3 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 7 537.50 6.10 20.48 Open 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 9 518.75 5.89 19.17 Open 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 11 500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump Page 1 11/8/2021 11:52:38 AM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * * Hydraulic and Water Quality * * Analysis for Pipe Networks * * Version 2.2 * ********************************************************************** Input File: CampbellRidge.net Link ‐ Node Table: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 2 3 61.15 6 2 3 5 365.19 6 3 5 7 25.30 6 4 7 FH‐6 469.23 6 5 5 FH‐2 11.05 6 6 3 FH‐1 38.01 6 7 7 9 432.38 6 8 FH‐3 9 10.15 6 9 9 11 366.82 6 10 FH‐4 11 9.41 6 11 11 FH‐5 492.41 6 12 2 FLOWHYDRANT 255.72 6 14 1 FLOWHYDRANT #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Usage Avg. Kw‐hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 14 100.00 75.00 341.89 11.80 11.80 0.00 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2 0.00 362.73 31.95 0.00 3 18.75 361.31 30.46 0.00 FH‐1 0.00 361.31 30.46 0.00 5 0.00 353.34 31.34 0.00 FH‐2 0.00 353.34 31.78 0.00 7 18.75 352.79 31.11 0.00 9 18.75 352.72 34.33 0.00 FH‐3 0.00 352.72 34.33 0.00 Page 2 Node Results: (continued) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID GPM ft psi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 11 18.75 352.71 41.04 0.00 FH‐4 0.00 352.71 41.04 0.00 FH‐5 0.00 352.71 49.27 0.00 FH‐6 500.00 344.38 31.80 0.00 FLOWHYDRANT 0.00 370.62 35.37 0.00 1 ‐575.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Link Results: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1 575.00 6.52 23.20 Open 2 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 3 556.25 6.31 21.82 Open 4 500.00 5.67 17.91 Open 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 7 37.50 0.43 0.15 Open 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 9 18.75 0.21 0.04 Open 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 Open 12 ‐575.00 6.52 30.87 Open 14 575.00 0.00 ‐81.62 Open Pump