HomeMy WebLinkAboutLU Amend.Woodshire_PB staff report
Land Use Plan/ Map Amendment
Development Services Department
Case: PLAN2105-0001
Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278 Planning Board: June 7, 2021 County Commissioners: June 21, 2021
Requesting an Amendment from Agricultural & Rural Residential to Medium Density Residential
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Applicant:
Name: Woodshire Partners, LLC Name: 4D Site Solutions, Inc
Address: 291 Breezwood Av, Suite 100 Address: 409 Chicago Dr, Suite 112
City/State/Zip: Fayetteville, NC 28303 City/State/Zip: Fayetteville, NC 28306
Property Description
PIN(s): 0506-88-4099 Acreage: 72.6
Address/SR No.: Nursery Rd (SR 1117)
Township:
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
Zoning
Land Use
Aerial
Physical Characteristics
The property is vacant land and, per the application is the last remaining tract for the final phases of
the existing development. All the other sections of this development have already the requested
MDR land use classification.
Surrounding land uses consist of single-family residences and several undeveloped parcels.
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other: unverified
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count:
6,500 on Nursery Rd
Site Distances: Moderate
Evaluation
Yes No The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding community is
reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or
harm to the community.
REASONING: The requested Land Use classification change to Medium Density
Residential will not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties as the same
classification exists for adjacent properties.
Yes No The requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification.
REASONING: The requested Land Use classification is compatible with the existing Land
Use as this classification is of a residential nature, and is the same classification as on
the adjacent properties.
Yes No The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare.
REASONING: The requested Medium Density Residential classification would enhance or
maintain the public health, safety, and general welfare since the zoning will be
maintained as RA-20R. Therefore, permitted uses, lot sizes, etc will remain the same.
Yes No The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for
reasonableness.
REASONING: The subject area is immediately adjacent to the designation of Medium
Density Residential and therefore this does not need to be evaluated for a Small Scale
amendment.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that…)
As explained in the evaluation, the requested Land Use Map amendment is compatible with Harnett
County regulatory documents and would not have an unreasonable impact on the surrounding community
due to the existing Medium Density Residential designated areas adjacent to the property as well as the
maintaining the current zoning district. Therefore, it is recommended that this reclassification request be
APPROVED.
Site Photographs
Site Site & Street view
Site & Street view Across the street
TRADITIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
Yes No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same
category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes No B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small group.
Yes No C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When
a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so
long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they
intend to make of the property involved.)
Yes No D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound
planning practices.
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the public interest. DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it
meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of
the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning
practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning