Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuckhorn Farms_RA-30_CC staff reportSTAFF REPORT Page 1 of 5 REZONING STAFF REPORT Case: PLAN 2101-0003 Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services jsikes@harnett.org Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278 Planning Board: February 1, 2021 County Commissioners: February 15, 2021 Requesting a Rezoning from RA-40 to RA-30 Applicant Information Owner of Record: Applicant: Name: Buckhorn Farms of NC, LLC Name: Mauldin-Watkins Surveying, PA Address: 9820 NC 42 Address: PO Box 444 City/State/Zip: Holly Springs, NC 27540 City/State/Zip: Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526 Property Description PIN(s): 0625-78-0787 & 0625-78-5740 Acreage: 64.60 Address/SR No.: NC 42 Township: (09) Johnsonville (10) Lillington (11) Neill’s Creek (12) Stewart’s Creek (13) Upper Little River (01) Anderson Creek (02) Averasboro (03) Barbecue (04) Black River (05) Buckhorn (06) Duke (07) Grove (08) Hectors Creek Vicinity Map STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 Physical Characteristics Site Description: The property is primarily agricultural use. Surrounding Land Uses: There are some major subdivisions in the vicinity, as well as single family residential lots and agricultural uses. Services Available Water: Public (Harnett County) Private (Well) Other: Unverified Sewer: Public (Harnett County) Private (Septic Tank) Other: unverified Transportation: Annual Daily Traffic Count: 3,200 along NC 42. Site Distances: Good STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 5 Zoning District Compatibility The following is a summary of potential uses. For all applicable uses for each Zoning district please refer to the UDO’s Table of Uses. CURRENT REQUESTED RA-40 RA-30 Parks & Rec X X Natural Preserves X X Bona Fide Farms X X Single Family X X Manufactured Homes, (with design criteria) X Manufactured Homes (SUP required) Multi-Family (SUP required) X Institutional X X Commercial Services Retail Wholesale Industrial Manufacturing Land Use Classification Compatibility The following is a summary of potential uses. For all applicable uses for each Zoning district please refer to the UDO’s Table of Uses. ZONING LAND USE RA-30 Ag & RR Parks & Rec X X Natural Preserves X X Bona Fide Farms X X Single Family X X Manufactured Homes, Design Regulated X X Manufactured Homes Multi-Family (via a SUP)_ X X Institutional Commercial Service Retail Wholesale Industrial Manufacturing STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 5 Site Photographs Site adjacent homes & possible access rd adjacent homes & possible access rd Site & adjacent homes STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 5 Evaluation Yes No The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding community is reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or harm to the community. REASONING: The impact to the surrounding community is reasonable, as the requested zoning district is similar in nature to adjacent zoning districts. Yes No The requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification. REASONING: The requested zoning is compatible with the Land Use classification of Agricultural & Rural Residential. These areas are typically outside of public sewer service areas and often within the Water Supply Watershed areas. Lower density, single-family residential lots approx. ½ acre or greater are typical in these areas. Yes No The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare. REASONING: The requested rezoning to RA-30, would enhance or maintain the public health, safety, and general welfare due to the existing residential uses within the area. Yes No The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for reasonableness. REASONING: Since this parcel is adjacent to the same zoning district, this application does not need to be considered for a Small Scale rezoning. Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that…) As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to RA-30 would not have an unreasonable impact on the surrounding community as it is compliant with the County’s Land Use Plan as well as it is adjacent to the same classification. Therefore, it is recommended that this rezoning request be APPROVED. Additional Information On February 1st, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of application based on compatibility with County’s Land Use Plan as well as similarity with the existing residential uses in this area. Several citizens attended the meeting and 3 spoke in opposition. Their concerns were…  Traffic and vehicle speeds along Hwy 42  The wish to preserve the rural landscape  Desire to preserve the area’s rural landscape  Schools are overcrowded already