HomeMy WebLinkAboutKDP_PB staff reportREZONING STAFF REPORT
Case:
PLAN2002-0001
Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board:
March 2, 2020
County Commissioners:
March 16, 2020
Requesting a Rezoning from RA-40 to RA-30
Applicant Information
Owner of Record:
Applicant:
Name:
Elizabeth Cannon
Name:
KDP Development, LLC
Address:
1456 Matthews Rd
Address:
1187 N. Raleigh St
City/State/Zip:
Lillington, NC 27546
City/State/Zip:
Angier, NC 27501
Property Description
PIN(s):
0651-96-2858 & 0651-96-2624
Acreage:
15.67
Address/SR No.:
Matthews Rd (SR 1436)
Township:
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
Vicinity Map
Physical Characteristics
Site Description: 1 residence on the 2 parcels. As per the application, the intent is to develop this property and build custom residential homes.
Surrounding Land Uses: Vacant/undeveloped and agricultural land. Also, single family residential uses that consist of stick-built & manufactured homes.
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other: unverified
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count: Unavailable
Site Distances: moderate
Zoning District Compatibility
The following is a summary list of general uses,
or actual permitted uses refer to the Zoning Ordinance.
CURRENT
REQUESTED
RA-40
RA-30
Parks & Rec
X
X
Natural Preserves
X
X
Bona Fide Farms
X
X
Single Family
X
X
Manufactured Homes, Design Regulated
X (with criteria)
Manufactured Homes
X
Multi-Family
X
Institutional
Commercial Services
Retail
X
X
Wholesale
Industrial
Manufacturing
Traditional Standards of Review and Worksheet
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed
by the Planning Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation unless:
Yes
No
A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes
No
B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
Yes
No
C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to
make of the property involved.)
Yes
No
D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes
No
E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances
the public interest.
DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a
new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend
to make of the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning