No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout041519a Agenda Package041519a HCBOC Page 1 HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS County Administration Building 420 McKinney Parkway Lillington, North Carolina Regular Meeting April 15, 2019 6:00 pm 1. Call to order -Chairman Gordon Springle 2. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation -Commissioner Barbara McKoy 3. Consider additions and deletions to the published agenda 4 . Consent Agenda A. Minutes B. Budget Amendments C. Tax rebates, refunds and releases D. Proclamation National Service Recognition 2019 E. General Services requests approval of the required NCDOT Division of Aviation Safety/Maintenance Letter of Commitment. F. General Services requests approval of a project ordinance that allocates $27,770 (10%) from the Airport Capital Reserve as a match to receive $277,700 through the NC Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation SFY18 State Aid to Airport Block Grant Program. G. Proclamation to Encourage Hamett County Citizens to participate in Spring Litter Sweep. H. Resolution to Support Future Interstate Upgrade for Highway 421 by the North Carolina Department of Transportation I. Resolution to Support The NC Carolina Core by the North Carolina Department of Transportation J. Support Reinvigoration of Mid-Carolina Council of Government through Strategic Planning and Implementation. K . Hamett County Emergency Services requests approval of the revised application and approval process for a Fireworks Discharge Permit. 5. Period of up to 30 minutes for informal comments allowing 3 minutes for each presentation 6. Appointments 7. Sandhills Center FY 19/20 Funding Request and Program Update, Victoria Whitt, Executive Director Page 1 041519a HCBOC Page 2 8. Public Hearing regarding the proposed Northwest Harnett Area Land Use Plan. This plan was presented to the Hamett County Board of Commissioners during their regular meeting on Monday, March 18, 2019. The purpose of this small area plan is to provide a framework to guide appropriate development within a high growth area while maintaining the rural character, environmentaJ quality, and enhancing livability of the area. Following the public hearing, Hamett County Development Services requests approval of a Resolution To Adopt The Northwest Hamett Area Land Use Plan. 9. Public Hearing -Proposed Zoning Change: Case# PLAN I 903-0001 Landowners/Applicants: Travis Scott Wester; 17.34 acres; Pin #'s 0661-26-0949.000, 0661- 16-6990.000, 0661-16-6469.000, 0661-16-6234.000; From RA-40 to RA-30 Zoning District; NC Hwy 210 North; Neill's Creek Township. 10. Pre-Budget public comment period. 11. County Manager's Report -Paula Stewart, County Manager Veteran Services Activities Report -March 2019 Public Health Activities Summary -March 2019 Harnett County School Financials -January & February 2019 12. New Business 13. Closed Session 14. Adjourn Page 2 041519a HCBOC Page 3 Agenda Item L/-A HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Minutes of Regular Meeting April 1, 2019 The Hamett County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, April 1, 2019, in the Commissioners Meeting Room, County Administration Building, 420 McKinney Parkway, Lillington, North Carolina. Members present: Staff present: Gordon Springle, Chairman Howard Penny, Vice Chairman Barbara McKoy, Commissioner Joe Miller, Commissioner Abe Elmore, Commissioner Paula Stewart, County Manager Dwight Snow, County Attorney Kimberly Honeycutt, F inance Officer Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk Chairman Springle called the meeting to order at 9:00 am. Commissioner Miller led the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation. Chairman Springle called for any additions or deletions to the published agenda. Commissioner Miller moved to approve the agenda as published. Vice Chairman Penny seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Vice Chairman Penny moved to approve items on the consent age nd a. Commissioner McKoy seconded the motion, which pas sed unanimously. 1. Budget Amendments: 602 Animal Shelter Code 1104512 502010 1104512 502020 1104512 503030 1104512 505050 1104512 506010 1104512 506020 1104512 507010 1104512 507050 1104512 507070 1104512 519000 1104512 519030 1104512 521010 Salaries & Wages Salaries & Wages -Part time 401 (k) -General State Retirement -General Medical Insurance Dental Ins urance Unemployment Insurance Employee Clinic OPEB Professional Services Medical Janitorial Supplies 8,517 increas e 12, 791 decrease 221 increas e 1,743 increase 3,557 increase 79 increase 11 increase 90 increase 60 increase 3,900 decrease 3 18 increase 5,000 increase April 1, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes Hamett County Board of Commi ssioners Page 1 of 4 041519a HCBOC Page 4 602 Animal Shelter continued Code 1104512 521030 Uniforms 1104512 523070 Animal Supplies 1104512 5260 IO Office Supplies 1104512 532030 Cellular Services 1104512 532050 Postage 1104512 533010 Electricity 1104512 533030 Natural LP Gas 1104512 533050 Water 1104512 533060 Sewer 1104512 533070 Sanitation 1104512 535010 R&M Buildings 61 8 increase 23,236 increase 38,201 decrease 2,348 increase 122 increase 2,000 increase 3,670 increase 5 00 increase 1104512 584000 Non-Cop Assets-Info Techno 662 increase 2,640 increase 18 decrease 482 decrease 2. Proclamation -Child Abuse Prevention Month -April 2019 3. Sheriffs Office requested approval to trade in 13 weapons to offset the cost of purchasing new weapons from Craig's Firearms Supply, Inc. Chairman Springle opened the floor for informal comments by the public, allowing up to 3 minutes for each presentation up to 30 minutes. No one spoke. Commissioner Miller moved to approve the appointment listed below. Vice Chairman Penny seconded the motion that passed unanimously . District H Tourism Authority John Privette was appointed to serve on this board for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2022. Hamett County Regional Jetport Committee Danny Honeycutt was appointed to serve on this committee as the District 3 representative for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2022 . Townsend Quinn was appointed to serve on this committee representing Campbell University for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2022. Hamett County Public Library Board Patsy Taylor was appointed to serve on this Board as the Boone Trail representative for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2022. Anthony DiMarzio was appointed to serve on this Board as the Anderson Creek representative for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2022. April 1, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes Hamett County Board of Commissioners Page 2 of 4 041519a HCBOC Page 5 Chairman Bob Woolston presented the Nonprofit Committee's recommendation for the 2019/2020 fiscal year funding. The Committee received 29 applications and recommended funding 16, totaling $56,000. Commissioner Elmore moved to approve the committee's recommendation as presented. Commissioner McKoy seconded the motion that passed unanimously . Chairman Springle opened the floor for the Pre-Budget Public Comment Period. No one spoke . Human Resources Director Heather Pollard requested approval of award of bid to Independent Benefit Advisors (IBA) as the benefit broker specialist for Harnett County from July 2019 through June 2022. Mrs. Pollard reviewed the two bids received. Plan cost for IBA was the lowest at $8 per employee per month costing approximately $6,800 for 850 employees. She noted a projected health cost increase of 8% to 11 % in 2019. Mrs. Pollard responded to questions from commissioners including how the County solicited and advertised for bids given only two companies submitted. Commissioner Miller moved to approve the award of bid to IBA as presented. Commissioner McKoy seconded the motion that passed unanimously . Brian Haney, Assistant County Manager, provided an update on Senate Bill 242, "An Act Relating to Subdivision Recreational Facilities in Harnett County". Currently the County has statutory authority to use the $500 "Recreation and Park Development fee" to purchase land for recreation to serve the districts from which the fees were collected. Senate Bill 242 will allow the County to acquire recreational land or areas and develop and construct recreational facilities however the new language in the bill limits fees to $500 per lot, which is the current fee. Mr. Haney noted that the bill, including the new language to limit the fees, had already passed through the Senate. Commissioners commented "this way we are getting what we want but at a cost". Commissioner Miller requested a breakdown of how much is in each district. Mrs . Stewart presented the following reports: Department of Public Health Activities Summary -February 2019 Interdepartmental budget amendments Mrs . Stewart sought direction regarding a draft Letter of Intent to the Volunteer Organizers of Project Uplift USA regarding the "FREEDOM BALLOON FEST". Following discussion, Commissioner Miller moved approve the Letter of Intent. Commissioner Elmore seconded the motion that passed unanimously. Discussions continued. Mrs. Stewart noted that Harnett Animal Welfare Coalition (HAWC) would be hosting an event on the grounds of the courthouse soon. She also mentioned the upcoming April 9, 2019 work session would be lengthy . Chairman Springle called for any new business. Vice Chairman Penny said he no longer wants to serve on the Mid-Carolina Aging Advisory Committee. Commissioners will discuss this vacancy, which must be filled by an elected official from Harnett County, during their upcoming work session. April 1, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes Harnett County Board of Commissioners Page 3 of 4 041519a HCBOC Page 6 As noted on the agenda, the public hearing regarding the proposed Northwest Harnett Area Land Use Plan will be held at 6:00 pm on Monday, April 15, 2019. Commissioner McKoy moved that the Board go into closed session to instruct the County staff concerning the position to be taken by the County in negotiating a contract for the acquisition of real property. This motion is made pursuant to N.C. General Statute Section 143-318.1 l(a)(S). Vice Chairman Penny second the motion that passed unanimously . Vice Chainnan Penny moved that the Board come out of closed session. Commissioner Miller second the motion, which passed unanimously . Commissioner Elmore moved to adjourn the meeting. Vice Chairman Penny second the motion that passed unanimously. Following the meeting, several commissioners attended the Child Abuse Prevention Month Opening Ceremony at 10 am at the Harnett County Department of Social Services. Gordon Springle, Chainnan Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk April 1, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes Harnett County Board of Commissioners Page 4 of 4 041519a HCBOC Page 7 Agenda Item L/-B COUNTY OF HARNETI BUDGE T ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Boord of the County of Harneft. North Carolina, that the followi ng amendment be mode to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the Health Deportment General Fund , the appropriations ore to be c hanged as follows: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 11051 10 526010 Office Su oolies $8,147 REVENUE AMOUNT ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 11051 10 33031 0 State Revenu e $8,147 EXPLANATION : To budge,t additional State funds received for the Food & Lodging program . APPROVALS : Dept Head (da t e) Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be Officer and t he Finance Officer for their direction. Adopted this ___ day of ________ , 20 __ . Margaret Regina Wheeler. C lerk to the Boord ~-Jc.. .t:f:e, )u,J-- County M anager (date ) Cieri:: to the Board, and to the BudgeH--3--fC, Gordon Springle. Chairman Boord of Commissioners 16 041519a HCBOC Page 8 BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Board of the County of Harnett, North Carolina that the following amendment be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019: Section 1. To amend General Services -Fleet Maintenance department, the appropriations are to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT AMOUNT CODE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 1104250 526010 Office Supplies 1,970.00 1104250 521030 Uniforms 750.00 1104250 531010 Training -Mileage 100.00 1104250 532010 Telephone Service 600.00 1104520 539050 Permits/ Taxes/ Fees 250.00 1104250 582000 Non-Cap Assest -Small Equip 70.00 1104250 587000 Non-Cap Assest -Office Furn it 200.00 REVENUE AMOUNT AMOUNT CODE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE EXPLANATION: To move funds within the Fleet Maintenance budget to cover expenses through the end of the fiscal year. APPROVALS : ~:1£o S±c A cJ u,d:: County Manager (date) '-{,.--G.·1°1 Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be furnished to the Clerk to the Board, and to the Budget Officer and the Finance Officer for their direction. Adopted this Margaret Regina Wheeler Clerk to the Board day of C. Gordon Springle, Chairman Harnett County Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 9 BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Board of the County of Harnett, North Carolina that the following amendment be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019: Section 1. To amend General Services -Fleet Acquisition budget, the appropriations are to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT AMOUNT CODE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 8809410 555000 Capital Outlay-Equipment 3,990.00 REVENUE AMOUNT AMOUNT CODE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 8809410 380890 Other Revenue 3,990 .00 EXPLANATION: To move funds within the Fleet Acquisition budget to pay for NC DMV 3% Highway Use Tax fees on six new vehicles being purchased through the General Services Fleet Acquisition program . APPROVALS: 2or, e~ .J ~ -~ ,..JCd:::: County Manager (date) 1 _.i ~ -,,....,.,,c, Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be furnished to the Clerk to the Board, and to the Budget Officer and the Finance Officer for their direction. Adopted this Margaret Regina Wheeler Clerk to the Board day of C. Gordon Springle, Chairman Harnett County Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 10 COUNTY OF HARNETT BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by !he Governing Boord of the County of Hamett. North Carolina. that the following amendment be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the General Fund, Facility Maintenance. the appropriations ore to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB 1104230 502010 1104230 502020 1104230 506010 1104230 507050 1104230 506020 ll04230 507070 1104230 505010 1104230 505050 1104230 503030 1104230 519090 1104230 521030 1104230 525010 1104230 526010 1104230 531030 1104230 531050 1104230 535020 1104230 537010 1104230 543080 1104230 584000 1104230 502050 1104230 507010 1104230 507030 1104230 519040 1104230 521010 1104230 535010 1104230 532010 1104230 532030 1104230 532030 1104230 533010 1104230 533070 1104230 535010 1104230 535015 1104230 543010 l 104610 544000 REVENUE ORG I OBJECT I PROJECT I TASK I SUB-TASK I JOB I I I I I I I I I I EXPLANATION: APPROVALS : ~/~ft~// ep! Head {dote) Adopted this ___ day of ____ _ ,20 _. Margaret Regina Wheeler. Clerk. to the Board AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE Salaries & Waoes Reoular $27,798 Salaries & Waqes. Part Time $1,226 Medical Insurance $8,276 Emolovee Clinic $30 Dental Insurance $507 Other Post Employment Benefit $20 FICA WH $3,098 State Retirement -General $3,375 401 I k.l -General $774 Professional Services -Other $1.500 Uniforms $1,718 Vehicle Suonlies -Fuel $7,235 Office Suoolies $9,073 Training -Lodging $2,000 Trainina -Reaistration $1,208 R&M Eauioment $10,270 Advertising $462 Rental Buildino $47.700 Non-Coo Info Techno $2,557 Salaries & Waaes -Lonaevity $30 Unemployment Insurance $741 Worker's Comoensation i..4,969 Enaineerina $2,185 Janitorial Suoolies $44,000 M&R Building Suoolies $75,000 T eleohone Services $158 Cellular Services $2,932 Postage $1 l Electricity $27,830 Sanitation $14,364 R&M Buildina $55,017 R&M Landscaping $1,500 Rental Cooier $90 Contracted Services $100,000 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE I DECREASE I I -~~y County Manager (da~..--.'!> .-i ~ erk to the Board. and to the Budget Officer Gordon Springle, Chairman Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 11 COUNTY OF HARNETI BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Board of the County of Harnett, North Carolina, that the following amendment be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the General Fund. Animal Shelter. the appropriations are to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK 1104512 502010 1104512 503030 1104512 505050 1104512 506010 1104512 506020 1104512 507010 1104512 507050 1104512 507070 1104512 519030 1104512 521010 1104512 521030 1104512 523070 1104512 532030 1104512 532050 1104512 533010 1104512 533030 1104512 533050 1104512 533060 1104512 533070 1104512 502050 1104512 502020 1104512 519000 1104512 519030 1104512 526010 1104512 534010 1104512 535010 1104512 535020 1104512 537010 1104512 544010 1104512 548000 1104512 584000 REVENUE ORG I OBJECT I PROJECT I TASK I SUB-TASK I I I I I I I I EXPLANATION: APPROVALS: 4~p/~/f ept Head (date) Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be and the Finance Officer tor their direction. Adopted this ___ day of Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board JOB I JOB I I AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE Salary & Wages -Regular $8,517 40l(k) -General $221 State Retirement -General $1,743 Medical Insurance $.'\557 Dental Insurance $79 Unemployment Insurance $11 Emolovee Clinic $90 Ofher Post Emolovment Benefit $60 Medical $318 Janitorial Suoolies $5,000 Uniforms $618 Animal Suoolies $23,236 Cellular Services $2,348 Postaae $122 Electricitv $2,000 Natural / LP Gos $3,670 Water $500 Sewer $662 Sanitation $2,640 Salaries & Wages -Longevity $3 Salaries & Waaes -Port nme $12,791 Professional Services $3,600 Medical $500 Office Suoolies $31,121 Printing $1,195 R&M Buildinos $3,000 R&M Equipment $1,300 Advertisina $1 ,000 Bank Charoes $250 Dues & Subscription $150 Non-Coo Assets -Info Techno $482 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE I DECREASE I I Pc.. " LJJ±c,.. ,)uk 2 (~ County Manager (date) -'-t, 3-t Clerk o the Boord, and to the Budget Officer C, Gordon Springle, Chairman Boord of Commissioners J[ 1110 b 041519a HCBOC Page 12 COUNTY OF HARNETI BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by !he Governing Boord of the County of Harnett. North Carolina . that the following amendment be mode to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the General Fund, Animal Control. the appropriations are to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB 1104510 502010 1104510 502050 1104510 506010 1104510 506020 1104510 505010 1104510 505050 1104510 503030 1104510 523010 1104510 523040 1104510 526010 1104510 531030 1104510 534010 1104510 531050 1104510 535010 1104510 535020 1104510 537010 1104510 543040 1104510 548000 1104510 507050 .1104510 507070 1104510 507010 1104510 507030 1104510 521030 1104510 523070 1104510 525090 1104510 531020 1104510 532010 11045 lO 532030 1104510 532050 1104510 533010 1104510 544000 1104510 584000 1104510 543030 l 104512 526010 l 104610 544000 REVENUE ORG I OBJECT I PROJECT I TASK I SUB-TASK I JOB I I I I I I I I I I EXPLANATION: Adopted this ___ day of _______ . 20 _ . Margaret Regina Wheeler. Clerk to the Boord AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE Salaries & Wages -Regular $3,875 Salaries & Wages -Longevity $11 Medical Insurance $480 Dental Insurance $55 FICA WH $950 State Retirement -General $500 401 fk) -General $65 Books, Media, & Publications $56 Medical Suoolies $400 Office Suoolies $1.900 Trainina -Lodaina $200 Printing $95 Trianino -Registration $1 ,000 R&M -Building $500 R&M -Eouioment $1,500 Advertising $300 Rental -Computers $15,012 Dues & Subscriotions $50 Emolovee Clinic .f..~8 Other Post Employment Benefits $25 Unemployment Insurance $422 Worker's Comoensation $106 Uniforms $906 Animal Services Suoolies $531 Vehicle Suoolies -Other $6,841 Troinina -Meals $200 Telephone Services $2.000 Cellular Services $9,391 Postoae $909 Electricity $644 Contracted Services $265 Non-Cao Assets -Info Techno $159 Rental -Vehicles $15,012 Office Suoolies $7,080 Contracted Services $3,420 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE I DECREASE I I P(...., 1-..,.d-::~, ,)c .... c:: [\ County Manager (dote) r, U,,-<,,tq Jerk to the Boord, ond to the Budget ollfcer Gordon Springle, Chairman Boord of Commissioners Jr_:t:F ) \ \ 5 & 041519a HCBOC Page 13 COUNTY OF HARNETT BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Boord of the County of Harnett, North Carolina, that the following amendment be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the General Fund, Airport , the appropriations are to be changed as follows : EXPENDITURE AMOUNT ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 1104650 519000 Professional Services $4,000 1104650 526010 Office Suoolies $9,227 1104650 531030 Training -Lodging $507 1104650 531050 Trianina -Reaistration $77 1104650 532010 Telephone Services $100 1104650 535010 R&M -Building $2.000 1104650 535015 R&M -Landscaping $1 ,500 1104650 545010 Insurance -Prooertv & Liab $254 1104650 548000 Dues & Subscriptions $110 1104650 519010 Prof . Services -Financial $4,000 1104650 522010 Food & Provisions $32 1104650 524010 M&R Sunnlies -Buildino $1,500 1104650 524015 M&R Suoolies -Landscapinq $1,000 1104650 524020 M&R Suoolies -Equipment $6,667 1104650 531010 Training -Mileaae $100 1104650 531020 Trainino -Meals $77 1104650 532050 Postage $100 1104650 532070 Internet Service $480 1104650 533010 Electricitv $2,000 1104650 539050 Permit/Taxes/Fees $103 1104650 544000 Contracted Services $816 1104650 584000 Non-Cap Assets -Info Techno $900 1104650 582000 Non-Cao Assets -Small Eauio $15,000 1104610 544000 Contracted Services $15,000 REVENUE AMOUNT ORG I OBJECT I PROJECT! TASK I SUB-TASK I JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE l DECREASE I I I I I I I I I I I I EXPLANATION: To align budget for the remainder of the fiscal year and to fund the replacement of outdated self fuel terminal. APPROVALS : A.~~~ /y/~ R . .LJ~+c.~ .. y ~ept Head (dote) F1 nee Offic (aa e~ County Manager (datet_.L _ ,8-iC, Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be furnished to e Clerk to the Board, and fo the Budget Officer and the Finance Officer for their direction. Adopted this ___ day ol __________ . 20 __ . Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk lo the Board Gordon Springle , Chairman Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 14 COUNTY OF HARNETT BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Boord of the County of Harnett, North Carolina, that the following amendment be made to t he annua l budget ordinance for the fiscal year end ing June 30, 2019 . Section 1. To amend the General Fund, Transportation, the appropriations are to be changed as follows: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE 1104610 502030 Salaries & Wages -Overtime $300 1104610 502020 Salaries & Wages -Part Time $11,302 1104610 507070 Other Post Emolovment Benefits $19 1104610 507010 Unemolovment Insurance $627 1104610 507030 Worker's Compensation $160 1104610 519030 Medical $1,040 1104610 521030 Uniforms $688 1104610 525010 Vehicle Sunolies -Fuel $1,503 1104610 525090 Vehicle Suoolies -Other $2,661 1104610 531020 Troinino -Meals $51 1104610 532030 Cellular Service $7.750 1104610 544050 Software & Maint Suooort $10,325 1104610 526010 Office Suoolies $5.446 1104610 544000 Contracted Services $21.882 1104610 584000 Non-Cao Assets -Info Techno $9,098 REVENUE AMOUNT ORG OBJECT PROJECT TASK SUB-TASK JOB DESCRIPTION OF CODE INCREASE DECREASE EXPLANATION: To allgn budget for the remainder of the fiscal year. APPROVALS: Section 2. Copies of this budget amendment shall be f and the Finance Officer for their direction. Adopted this ___ day of _______ . 20 Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board Gordon Springle, Chairman Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 15Date run: 4/5/2019 9:08:14 AM Data as of: 4/4/2019 8:08:57 PM TR-304 Bill Release Report Report Parameters: Release Date Start: 3/1/2019 Release Date End: 3/31/2019 Tax District: ALL Default Sort-By: Grouping: Bill #,Taxpayer Name.Release Date,Billing Date,Operator ID, Release Amount Release Reason Bill# T~x~ayer~Na·m·e . ---RELEASE REASON: Adjustment 0000000733-2014-2014-0000-00-REG ALLEN, NATT A 0000000733-2015-2015-0000-00-REG ALLEN, NA TT A 0000000733-2016-2016-0000-00-REG ALLEN, NATT A 0000000733-2017-2017-0000-00-REG ALLEN, NATT A 0000000733-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ALLEN, NATT A 0000026918-2015-2015-0000-00-REG HARRIS, KIMBERLY D 0000026918-2016-2016-0000-00-REG HARRIS, KIMBERLY D 0000026918-2017-2017-0000-00-REG HARRIS, KIMBERLY D 0000026918-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HARRIS, KIMBERLY D 0001885469-2019-2015-0000-00-REG RODRIGUEZ, ARACELI MARTINEZ 0001885469-2019-2016-0000-00-REG RODRIGUEZ, ARACELI MARTINEZ 0001885469-2019-2017-0000-00-REG RODRIGUEZ, ARACELI MARTINEZ 0002259205-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HOGGATT, DANA TESS PAGE 1 of7 Operator ID (Name) 8/9/2014 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/6/2016 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/6/2016 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 3/4/2019 APRIL DIAZ 3/4/2019 APRIL DIAZ 3/4/2019 APRIL DIAZ 8/21/2018 APRIL DIAZ NCPTS V4 -• 3/6/2019 912.32 3/6/2019 905.81 3/6/2019 899.30 3/6/2019 799.67 3/6/2019 793.16 3/4/2019 890.33 3/4/2019 900.33 3/4/2019 905.33 3/4/2019 905.33 3/4/2019 117.09 3/4/2019 109.29 3/4/2019 101.48 3/6/2019 365.93 Agenda Item Lf-C ----, -. Release: ' · 'A~~uni:($) ~ ------..:....--_ -! 473.27 473.27 427.78 380.31 380.30 651.41 659.35 663.73 663.73 20.66 25.71 29.85 365.93 -439.05 432.54 471.52 419.36 412.86 238.92 240.98 241.60 241.60 96.43 83.58 71.63 0.00 041519a HCBOC Page 16Bill# Taxpayer Name 0002259901-2018-2018-0000-00-REG VROOMAN, ANDREW VINCENT 0002260112-2018-2018-0000-00-REG RUSSO, JOHN JEFFERY 0002260112-2018-2018-0000-00-REG RUSSO, JOHN JEFFERY Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Business closed 0001559704-2011-2011-0000-00-REG JENNIFER/ BROOKS PHOTOGRAPHY Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Full rebate 0001654906-2014-2014-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2015-2015-0000-00-REG WEATHERS. HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2016-2016-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2017-2017-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0002247193-2015-2015-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002247193-2017-2016-0000-00-REG FLORES. NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002247193-2017-2017-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 000224 7193-2018-2018-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Homesite removed 0000038144-2016-2016-0000-00-REG MARTIN. ROBERT KEITH 0000038144-2017-2017-0000-00-REG MARTIN, ROBERT KEITH PAGE 2 of 7 Operator ID (Name) 8/21/2018 CRYSTAL THOMAS 8/21/2018 APRIL DIAZ 8/21/2018 APRIL DIAZ 11/22/2011 SHERRY LOCKAMY 8/9/2014 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/6/2016 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 2/27/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/6/2016 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 3/7/2019 3/11/2019 3/11/2019 3/25/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/29/2019 3/29/2019 -• 105.72 120.14 60.07 68.80 167.79 158.96 150.13 141.30 132.4 7 45.10 49.20 41.00 41.00 312.00 333.50 Release Amount($) 71.01 60.07 24.03 5,370.41 68.80 68.80 167.79 158.96 150.13 141.30 132.47 45.10 49.20 41.00 41.00 926.95 43.00 64.50 -34.71 60.07 36.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 269.00 269.00 041519a HCBOC Page 17Bill# Taxpayer Name 0000038144-2018-2018-0000-00-REG MARTIN, ROBERT KEITH Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Less than min amt 0001559704-2011-2011-0000-00-REG JENNIFER/ BROOKS PHOTOGRAPHY 0001654906-2014-2014-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2015-2015-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2016-2016-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2017-2017-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0001654906-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WEATHERS, HOWARD ROY 0002245698-2018-2018-0000-00-REG BRYANT, DAVID scon 0002247193-2015-2015-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002247193-2017-2016-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002247193-2017-2017-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002247193-2018-2018-0000-00-REG FLORES, NORMA ANGELICA-CASTANEDA 0002253324-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WRIGHT, JAMIE R 0002259205-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HOGGATT, DANA TESS Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Listed In Error 0002002299-2017-2017-0000-00-REG ROYAL OAKS BUILDING GROUP 0002002299-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ROYAL OAKS BUILDING GROUP Subtotal PAGE 3 of 7 Operator ID (Name) 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 11/22/2011 SHERRY LOCKAMY 8/9/2014 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/6/2016 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 SHANNON AUTRY 8/8/2015 MARGARET WRIGHT 2/27/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/19/2017 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 MARGARET WRIGHT 8/11/2018 APRIL DIAZ 8/21/2018 APRIL DIAZ 8/19/2017 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 3/29/2019 3/25/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/18/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/22/2019 3/6/2019 3/13/2019 3/13/2019 -• 333.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.00 323.00 Release Amount($) 64.50 172.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.00 323.00 646.00 -269.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 041519a HCBOC Page 18Bill# Taxpayer Name RELEASE REASON: Military 0002245698-2018-2018-0000-00-REG BRYANT. DAVID scan 0002253324-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WRIGHT, JAMIE R Subtotal RELEASE REASON: Ownership change 0000060507-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WOLBECK, BERNICE T Subtotal RELEASE REASON: SMALL UNDERPAYMENT 0000008539-2018-2018-0000-00-REG CADE. JOE ANDREW 0000008680-2018-2018-0000-00-REG CAIN, LARRY D 0000008992-2018-2018-0000-00-REG CAMERON, LUTHER W 0000011821-2018-2018-0000-00-REG BROWN, PATRICIA L 0000013004-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GIBBS, JEANNE P 0000014168-2018-2018-0000-00-REG SANOHILLS, PARTNERSHIP 0000016317-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ELDER, IZORA 0000018673-2019-2018-0070-00-REG FUNDERBURK, JAMES S 0000018993-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GARNER, BENJAMIN R 0000021096-2018-2018-0000-00-REG JACOBS, JERRY LEE 0000021688-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HAITHCOCK, TERESA 0000021980-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HAMIL TON, GARY 0000021982-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HAM IL TON. GARY 0000021983-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HAMIL TON, GARY 0000026884-2018-2018-0000-00-REG JOHN E BOOTH FARMS LLC PAGE 4 of7 Operator ID (Name) 8/11/2018 SHANNON AUTRY 8/11/2018 APRIL DIAZ 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KARA DANIELS 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 JANNA HIGDON 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 3/25/2019 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 YVON NE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 3/18/2019 3/22/2019 3/25/2019 3/29/2019 3/11/2019 3rrt2019 3/6/2019 3/26/2019 3/25/2019 3/13/2019 3/26/2019 317/2019 3/11/2019 3/5/2019 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 3/21/2019 -• 8.98 79.56 207.46 5.97 3.53 213.79 1,180.77 551.41 1,895.75 100.88 1,988.03 15.30 104.75 821.91 116.90 40.34 71.14 116.54 Release Amount($) 8.98 79.56 88.54 207.46 207.46 0.04 0.02 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.17 0.75 0.02 0.11 0.83 0.04 0.88 0.30 0.53 0.87 . -0.00 0.00 0.00 5.93 3.51 213.54 1,180.60 551.38 1,895.58 100.13 1,988.01 15.19 103.92 821.87 116.02 40.04 70.61 115.67 041519a HCBOC Page 19Bill# Taxpayer Name 0000031346-2018-2018-0000-00-REG LEWIS, ARTHUR MACHEN IV 0000033045-2018-2018-0000-00-REG MARSHBURN, MARK A 0000037270-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G MEYERS, SHIRLEYE R 0000037956-2017-2017-0000-00-REG MOODY, DANIEL G 0000038200-2018-2018-0000-00-REG MOORE. KENNETH EARL 0000042187-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ALEXANDER, JACQUELYN KIM 0000042759-2018-2018-0000-00-REG PAGE, LISA DEAN PLEASANT 0000042760-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G PAGE, LISA DEAN PLEASANT 00000497 44-2018-2018-0000-00-REG SPEARS, KEVIN D 0000050473-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G GONZALEZ, EDREI LARA 0000050519-2018-2018-0000-00-REG SPECIALIZED IRA SERVICES, FBO 0000050920-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ROETTGER, WILLIAM 0000051124-2018-2018-0000-00-R E G STEWART, PAUL 0000060006-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WILLIFORD, FAY B 0000060067-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WILLIS, ROBERT JOSEPH SR 0000062996-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G GREGORY, JAMES TRAVIS 0001261879-2018-2018-0000-00-REG NBM NEHEMIAH MINISTRIES, 0001284356-2018-2018-0000-00-REG SANDHILLS PARTNERSHIP 0001380225-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GREGORY, DONALD G 0001395738-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001395739-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH PAGE 5 of 7 Operator ID (Name) 8/11/2018 KARA DANIELS 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/19/2017 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 JANNA HIGDON 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN -• 3/29/2019 1,884.24 3/5/2019 53.30 3/25/2019 668.34 317/2019 1,190.75 3/1/2019 269.75 3/27/2019 284.66 3/5/2019 307.05 3/5/2019 486.73 3/6/2019 230.95 3/6/2019 1,334.12 3/28/2019 30.45 3/18/2019 621.95 3/27/2019 342.27 3/11/2019 459.27 3/7/2019 221.20 3/6/2019 40.92 3/27/2019 75.60 3/25/2019 229.85 3/14/2019 102.34 3/11/2019 392.21 3/11/2019 514.97 Release Amount($) 0.30 0.40 0.48 0.05 0.27 0.56 0.04 0.05 0.18 0.27 0.23 0.20 0.37 0.74 1.00 0.04 0.56 0.05 0.78 0.07 0.09 -1,883.94 52.90 667.86 1,190.70 269.48 284.10 307.01 486.68 230.77 1,333.85 30.22 621.75 341.90 458.53 220.20 40.88 75.04 229.80 101.56 392.14 514.88 041519a HCBOC Page 20Bill# I Taxpayer Name 00013957 40-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 00013957 42-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001395743-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001395745-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001395746-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001563334-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001723473-2017-2017-0000-00-REG EVANS, JOSEPH ARTHUR 0001765630-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0001854177-2015-2015-0000-00-REG WILLIAMS, MYDRICE SUE 0001854177-2016-2016-0000-00-REG WILLIAMS, MYDRICE SUE 0001976231-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GREGORY INC 0001984961-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ELLIS, GROVER DALE JR 0001988652-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GIBSON CONTRACTORS INC 0002076495-2018-2018-0000-00-REG FENN, PETER ALLEN 0002176494-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ELLIOTI, CLIFTON 0002177628-2017-2017-0000-00-REG DUNCAN, PATRICIA MICHELLE DEMARR 0002178392-2018-2018-0000-00-REG IGT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS/FKA GTECH 0002250041-2018-2018-0000-00-REG BURCH, DONNIE LAMONT 0002251763-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ARNOLD, MARK ALLEN 0002252770-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HORNE, RONNIE OLIVER 0002253179-2018-2018-0000-00-RE G TAYLOR, TIMOTHY AARON PAGE 6 of7 Operator ID {Name) 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/19/2017 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/8/2015 AMY BAIN 8/6/2016 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/19/2017 JANNA HIGDON 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER -• 3/11/2019 1,182.57 3/11/2019 263.12 3/11/2019 279.75 3/11/2019 135.77 3/11/2019 59.55 3/11/2019 205.26 3/22/2019 94.90 3/11/2019 116.80 3/11/2019 20.75 3/11/2019 22.83 3/14/2019 4.10 3/18/2019 9.35 3/5/2019 4.52 3/21/2019 90.54 3/25/2019 21.25 3/25/2019 18.53 3/11/2019 139.00 3/6/2019 30.80 3/8/2019 4.19 3/25/2019 45.36 3/8/2019 66.77 Release Amount{$) 0.18 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.37 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.03 0.07 0.18 0.66 0.16 0.13 0.03 0.23 0.14 0.34 0.50 -1,182.39 263.07 279.71 135.75 59.54 205.22 94.53 116.79 20.60 22.67 4.07 9.28 4.34 89.88 21.09 18.40 138.97 30.57 4.05 45.02 66.27 041519a HCBOC Page 21Bill# Taxpayer Name 0002254623-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ELLIS, LILA MARIE 0002255953-2018-2018-0000-00-REG ZIADY, KIMBERLY RHINEHARDT 0002256166-2018-2018-0000-00-REG TEXAS PIT BBQ INC 0002258720-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HOLLIDAY, WELDON 0002259177-2018-2018-0000-00-REG FLOOD, ANITA MARIE 0002259380-2018-2018-0000-00-REG PAGE, ELIZABETH PATTERSON 0002259502-2018-2018-0000-00-REG BLACKBURN, GROVER KELLY JR 0002259544-2018-2018-0000-00-REG SMITH, JAMES WILLIAM 0002259647-2018-2018-0000-00-REG WEST, SYLVIA RAYNOR 0002260223-2018-2018-0000-00-REG GERINGER, SHELDON 0002260295-2018-2018-0000-00-REG LEE, ANN MCLEOD 0002260373-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HORNE, RONNIE OLIVER 0002260430-2018-2018-0000-00-REG HONEYCUTT, ANTHONY CRAIG Subtotal Total PAGE 7 of 7 Operator ID (Name) 8/11/2018 AMY BAIN 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/11/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 8/21/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/21/2018 AMY BAIN 8/21/2018 AMY BAIN 8/21/2018 AMY BAIN 8/21/2018 IVR DPC 8/21/2018 YVONNE MCARTHUR 8/21/2018 AMY BAIN 8/21/2018 AMY BAIN 8/21/2018 KIMBERLY BAKER 3/18/2019 3nt2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/1/2019 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 3/20/2019 3/27/2019 3/13/2019 3/25/2019 3/6/2019 -18.58 56.58 926.05 11.44 60.01 9.44 4.36 23.72 8.30 15.80 61.70 27.76 16.89 Release Amount($) 0.14 0.43 0.10 0.07 0.90 0.07 0.03 0.17 0.06 0.11 0.46 0.20 0.13 18.11 7,498.27 -18.44 56.15 925.95 11.37 59.11 9.37 4.33 23.55 8.24 15.69 61.24 27.56 16.76 041519a HCBOC Page 22 Agenda Item l:/-D [ .,~ Harnett k___J '.(~ ..;...C ...;,O_U_N_T __ Y ____________________ _ -~::-~ _ -· NORTH CAROLINA 2019 National Service Recognition WHEREAS, service to others is a hallmark of the American character, and central to how we meet our challenges; and www .harnett.org WHEREAS, the nation's counties are increasingly turning to national service and volunteerism as a cost- effective strategy to meet county needs; and WHEREAS, AmeriCorps and Senior Corps participants address the most pressing challenges facing our communities, from educating students for the jobs of the 21st century and supporting veterans and military families to providing health services and helping communities recover from natural disasters: and WHEREAS, national service expands economic opportunity by creating more sustainable, resilient communities and providing education, career skills, and leadership abilities for those who serve; and WHEREAS, AmeriCorps and Senior Corps participants serve in more than 50,000 locations across the country, bolstering the civic, neighborhood, and faith-based organizations that are so vital to our economic and social well-being; and WHEREAS, national service participants increase the impact of the organizations they serve, both through their direct service and by managing millions of additional volunteers; and WHEREAS, national service represents a unique public-private partnership that invests in community solutions and leverages non-federal resources to strengthen community impact and increase the return on taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, national service participants demonstrate commitment, dedication, and patriotism by making an intensive commitment to service, a commitment that remains with them in their future endeavors; and WHEREAS, the Corporation for National and Community Service shares a priority with county executives nationwide to engage citizens, improve lives, and strengthen communities; and is joining with the National Association of Counties and county executives across the country for the month of April as Recognition for National Service. NOW THEREFORE, we, the Harnett County Board of Commissioners, do hereby proclaim April as National Service Recognition Month, and encourage residents to recognize the positive impact of national service in our county; to thank those who serve; and to find ways to give back to their communities. Adopted this 15th day of April 2019. HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS C. Gordon Springle, Chainnan Howard Penny, Vice Chainnan Abe Elmore Barbara McKay Joe Miller strong roots • new grow th 041519a HCBOC Page 23 Agenda Item '/-E. Board Meeting Agenda Item MEETING DATE: April 15, 2019 TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: NCDOT/Division of Aviation Airport Safety/Maintenance Commitment Letter REQUESTED BY: Barry A. Blevins REQUEST: General Services request the Hamett County Board of Commissioners consider and sign the required NCDOT Division of Aviation Safety/Maintenance Letter of Commitment. This ensures Hamett Regional Jetport continues to receive support from the NCDOT/DOA's airfield mainteance program for another five (5) year term. Airfield maintenance activities include asphalt patching, crack sealing, pavement repair, joint sealing, rubber removal and airfield painting. This maintenance prgram is state-funded with no cost to the Cormty. FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: C:\Users\apeele\AppData'Local\ Temp\agendafonn2019 _5184281\agendaform2019 .docx I of2 Page 041519a HCBOC Page 24 LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR AffiPORT SAFETY/MAINTENANCE PROJECTS THIS AGREEMENT is made, this day of , 20 by the (AirportOwner) to\.,Qhl of Hacnett as owner and operator (hereinafter referred to as ~onso.r") of the (Official Airport Name) Harne-t+ . ,-<:e~\QOO.\ Je+:poc+ (hereinafter referred to as "Airport,") and the North Ca Jina Department of Transportation (Division of Aviation), an agency of the State of North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as "Department"), for the purposes of future and as-yet unspecified safety or maintenance services to be performed by said Department in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions hereof. WITNESSETH WHEREAS , the Sponsor is primarily responsible for maintaining the facilities of the Airport to protect and preserve the safety of flight operations at, from and to the Airport; and WHEREAS , and the Department shares the interest of the Sponsor in the prompt and adequate maintenance and repair of the paved surfaces of the Airport which support aircraft movements on the Airport; and WHEREAS, the Sponsor and the Department may, from time to time, mutually determine that certain paved surfaces and adjacent areas on the airport have aged and deteriorated and/or that other infrastructure is in need of maintenance or repair, and that the Sponsor could benefit from the assistance of the Department in accomplishing such maintenance and repair; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 7 of North Carolina General Statute 63, the Department is authorized to undertake safety improvements of aircraft movement areas, on publicly owned and operated airports in North Carolina; and WHEREAS , the Sponsor and the Department agree that upon the request by the sponsor and the acceptance by the Department, certain needed improvements at the Airport may be undertaken by the Department in conformance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 63; and WHEREAS, the Department requires a Commitment and Release of Liability statement to be on file in its offices, in order to be able provide and oversee such maintenance and repair at the Airport; NOW THEREFORE, the Sponsor does hereby commit to the following measures: 1. This Letter of Agreement supersedes all prior agreements between the Department and Sponsor with respect to the subject matter of this Letter of Agreement. Page I of 5 041519a HCBOC Page 25 2. Upon the Sponsor's approval, the Department, using NCDOT state forces and/or private contractor(s) under a Purchase Order Contract, may perform the requested maintenance and repair to the Airport. This work may include, but not be limited to; Joint and Crack Sealing, Pavement Repairs and Patching, Surface Treatments, Maintenance Overlays, Electrical, Grading, Drainage Improvements, Pavement Markings, or other infrastructure maintenance. 3. The Sponsor will receive notification from the Department of the Department's willingness to perform (or pay to have performed) any item or items of work approved by the Sponsor and a proposed schedule for performing the work and the force or contractor the Department proposes to perform the work. 4. If the schedule and the force or contractor proposed by the Department for performing the work is acceptable to the Sponsor, the Sponsor shall authorize the Department (or its contractors) to enter upon the property of the Airport during the scheduled time to perform the work. 5. If the schedule and the force or contractor proposed by the Department for performing the work is unacceptable to the Sponsor, the Sponsor shall inform the Department of the reasons for its objections and the Sponsor and the Department will engage in dialogue with the intent of determining if an alternative schedule or force or contractor is acceptable to both the Sponsor and the Department. If the Sponsor and the Department cannot reach agreement through the process described in paragraph 4 then the Department will withdraw its offer to perform the requested work. 6. The Sponsor hereby represents to the Department that the title to the pavement and adjacent areas of the Airport is vested in the Sponsor. 7. The Sponsor agrees to provide a duly authorized representative who will be present and/or available at all times the work is in progress (including nights and weekends, as applicable) to monitor project operations and assist the Department's representative. 8. The Sponsor agrees to provide a duly qualified operator who will monitor the airport's UNICOM radio transceiver at all times the work is in progress (including nights and weekends, as applicable) and will issue airport advisories as necessary on the UNICOM radio transceiver. 9. The Sponsor agrees, when needed, to formally close any runway, taxiway, or apron at all times when the work is in progress on that pavement area and to take appropriate steps to prohibit use of such areas by aircraft and/or ground vehicles while the work is being performed or the subject pavement areas are in an unsafe or uncured condition due to the conduct of the work. I 0. The Sponsor agrees to issue and keep current the necessary Notices to Airmen (NOT AMS) through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) until all work is completed and the Department's represent.alive notifies the Sponsor's representative that the affected areas may be returned to service. Page 2 of 5 041519a HCBOC Page 26 11. The Sponsor agrees that the Department may, in its sole discretion, determine the design, scope of work, materials to be used, and methods of accomplishing the authorized work. The Department covenants that any and all such work as it performs or has performed at the Airport pursuant to this agreement will meet or exceed all relevant State of North Carolina and Federal Aviation Administration specifications for the type of pavement concerned and the type of maintenance or repair that is being performed. 12. To the maximum extent allowed by law, the Sponsor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Department and its officers and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character because of injury or damage received or sustained by any person, persons, or property resulting from work performed under this Commitment. This indemnity does not extend to causes of action arising from the negligence of the Department, its officers and employees or any of Department's contractors who performed the work. 13. Should Sponsor fail to comply with any material duty required of it under this Agreement the Department shall give written notice to the sponsor of the details of its non-compliance and provide a reasonable period in which the Sponsor can cure its non-compliance. Upon the expiration of said cure period without the Sponsor having come into compliance, the Sponsor agrees that, at its sole and unlimited discretion, the Department shall have the right to immediately stop all work being performed at the Airport and release the work area to the jurisdiction of the Sponsor. 14. The Sponsor understands that for the Department to perform maintenance or safety services, the Airport and Sponsor must be in good standing on all State and Federal Grant Requirements and Assurances before any project shall be performed under this Commitment. 15 . Subject to the provisions of paragraph 13 above, this Commitment will expire on December 31, 2023. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 13 above, this Commitment may be terminated by either the Department or the Sponsor by providing written notification of termination. The effective date of termination pursuant to this paragraph shall be the date of receipt of the notice of written termination by the non-terminating party. NC Division of Aviation BY: ----------------- Bobby Walston, P.E. Aviation Director Page 3 of 5 DATE: ----------- 041519a HCBOC Page 27 WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has executed this Commitment on the date first written on Page 1 of this document. FOR THE LOCAL AIRPORT SPONSORING AGENCY Signed: ______________________________ _ Title: eba; ( MDO o.£ c.fue. Boo cd Official Sponsor: l:C>uD't::l( o# thr:oe±f:- Attest: SEAL OF THE SPONSOR A digital copy of this LETTER OF AGREEMENT in adopted form should be emailed to the Statewide Program Manager and your Airport Project Manager. General telephone number is: (919) 814-0550. Statewide Program Manager -Randy Finger, P.E.afinger@ncdot.gov Airport Project Manager (NW) -Rachel Bingham, P.E. rsbingham @ ncdot.gov Airport Project Manager (NE)-Ron McCollum, P.E. remccollum (a),ncdot.g ov Airport Project Manager (SW)-Jared Penny jjpenny@nc dot.gov Airport Project Manager (SE)-Ashley Clowes, P.E. aec lowes @ ncdot.gov Airport Project Manager (Commercial Service) -Todd Meyer, P.E.tmeyer@ncdot.gov Page 4 of 5 041519a HCBOC Page 28 Resolution of the Sponsor A motion was made by (Name and title) _____________________ _ and seconded by (Name and Title) ----------------------- for the adoption of the following resolution, upon being put to a vote it was duly adopted: THAT WHEREAS (Airport Owner) L, b Un~ of: Ha.roe H: (hereinafter referred to as "Sponsor") the North Carolina Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as "Department") requires a Commitment and Release of Liability statement to be on file, in order to provide and oversee maintenance and safety improvements on the operational surfaces of the (Official Airport Name) Hucne-t+ kt3 I 6f)u.\ ; kf ()!2c± in accordance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 63. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT AND IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the (Title of Airport Official) C--hti, ( moo of ±h :Cr Wed. of the Sponsor be and is hereby authorized and empowered to enter into a Commitment and Release of Liability with the Department, thereby binding the Sponsor to fulfillment of its obligation as incurred under this resolution and its commitment to the Department. ********************************************************************************* I, (Name and title of Public Notary) ---------------------- of the (Name of Sponsoring Agency) ---------------------- do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the minutes of (Name of Authorizing Board of the Sponsoring Agency) --------------- held on (Date of Meeting) -------------------------- WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Sponsor . This the day of (month, day, year) ----------------------- Signed: ________________________________ _ NOTARY SEAL Page 5 of 5 041519a HCBOC Page 29 Agenda Item lf-t Board Meeting Agenda Item MEETING DATE: April 15, 2019 TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Harnett Regional Jetport Apron Expansion Project Ordinance REQUESTED BY: Barry A. Blevins, Director REQUEST: General Services Director requests the Board of Commissioners consider and approve a project ordinance that allocates $27,770 from the Airport Capital Reserve as a match to receive $277,700 through the NC Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation SFYl 8 State Aid to Aiport Block Grant Program. Total grant amount is $249,930 with a required 10% match of$27,770. These funds will be used to design, bidding assistance and permitting of the proposed apron expansion project at Hamett Regional Jetport. FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: C:\Users\bb levins\Desktop\Apron Expansion Project Ordinance.docx 1 of I Page 041519a HCBOC Page 30 HARNETT COUNTY JETPORT AIRCRAFT APRON & HELIP AD DESIGN CAPITAL PROJECT ORDINANCE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Harnett County, North Carolina, sitting as the governing board for Harnett County. Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. The County of Hamett Jetport is interested in expanding the aircraft apron and creating a helipad to accommodate for parking areas for larger turbo-prop and jet aircraft. The County of Hamett will receive a 90% federally funded grant through the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation State Fiscal Year 2018 State Aid to Airport Block Grant Program. Hamett County's local match is a I 0% contribution. The costs will be reimbursed by North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation. The officers of this unit are hereby directed to proceed with the capital project within the terms of the grant documents, loan documents, and the budget contained herein. The following amounts are hereby appropriated for this project: Aircraft Apron & Helipad Design $ 277,700 The following revenues are anticipated to be available to complete this project: North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation Grant Airport Capital Reserve Total $ $ $ 249,930 27,770 277,700 The Finance Officer is hereby directed to maintain within the Capital Project Fund sufficient specific detailed accounting records to satisfy the requirements of the grantor agency, the grant agreements, and federal regulations. Funds may be advanced from the General Fund for the purpose of making payments as due. Reimbursement request should be made to the grantor in an orderly and timely manner. The Finance Officer is directed to report, on a quarterly basis, on the financial status of each project element in Section 3 and on the total grant revenues received or cJaimed. The Budget Officer is directed to include a detailed analysis of past and future costs and revenues on this capital project in every budget submission made to this Board. Copies of this capital project ordinance shall be furnished to the Clerk to the Governing Board, and to the Budget Officer and the Finance Officer for direction in carrying out this project. Duly adopted this __ day of ___ , 2019. Gordon Springle, Chairman Harnett County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: ___________ _ Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board, Hamett County Board of Commissioners 041519a HCBOC Page 31 Agenda Item 4-G: Harnett COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PROCLAMATION ENCOURAGING HARNETT COUNTY RESIDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN SPRING LITTER SWEEP WHEREAS, Harnett County, in partnership with the North Carolina Department of Transportation, organizes an annual spring countywide roadside cleanup to ensure clean and beautiful roads across our county; and WHEREAS, the Spring Litter Sweep roadside cleanup encourages local governments and communities, civic and professional groups, businesses, churches, schools, families, and individual citizens to participate by sponsoring and organizing local roadside cleanups; and WHEREAS, Hamett County residents have the ability to preserve their beautiful landscapes and protect their roadways by preventing litter and road debris; and www.ha rnett.org WHEREAS, the great natural beauty of our county and a clean environment are sources of great pride for all Harnett County residents, attracting tourists and aidiug in recruiting new industries; and WHEREAS, the cleanup will increase awareness of the need for cleaner roadsides, emphasize the importance of not littering, and encourage recycling of solid wastes; and WHEREAS, the Spring Litter Sweep will be a part of educating the children of Harnett County regarding the importance of a clean environment to the quality of life in Harnett County; and WHEREAS, Harnett County recommends four ways the public can help prevent litter: (I) teach young people not to litter, (2) cover truck and trailer beds when transporting trash or other loose items, (3) use a litter bag in vehicles, and ( 4) participate in Harnett County litter sweeps; and WHEREAS, Hamett County encourages citizens to participate in sponsored annual Spring Litter Sweep programs to help beautify the county and raise awareness of the impact of litter on the environment while giving every citizen the opportunity to take responsibility for clean roads; and NOW, THEREFORE LET IT BE PROCLAIMED, by the Harnett County Board of Commissioners that April 13-27 is hereby recognized a s Hamett County Spring Litter Sweep on behalf of all the citizens of Harnett County. The Board does hereby encourage citizens to participate in the Harnett County Spring Litter Sweep and to support efforts to protect and clean our environment. We encourage all citizens to pick up litter to promote the well-being of this and future generations. Adopted this the 15 1h day of April 2019. HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS C . Gordon Springle, Chainnan Howard Penny, Vice Chairman Abe Elmore Barbara McKoy strong roots • new growth Joe Miller 041519a HCBOC Page 32 Agenda Item '-/-t{ RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT FUTURE INTERSTATE UPGRADE .FOR HIGHWAY 421 BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, Highway 421 connects Interstate 95 with Interstate 40 and 85 ; and WHEREAS, these interstates and their continued operations are critical to the state and nations economic wellbeing; and WHEREAS, Fort Bragg is a critical part of the national defense and access at all times is critical to this mission; and WHEREAS; two hurricane events in the last three years has closed portions oflnterstate 95 limiting access to Fayetteville and Fort Bragg; and WHEREAS, access from the west of Fort Bragg on surface streets were the only viable routes to provide access to and from Fort Bragg for several days during the storms; and WHEREAS, the Research Triangle Park and the Capital area growth continues to grow, adding thousands of vehicles to the current infrastructure; and WHEREAS, connecting Interstate 95 to Interstate 40 and 85 with an interstate facility would provide an alternate route for military and freight traffic; and WHEREAS, connecting Interstate 95 to Interstate 40 and 85 with an interstate facility would provide additional evacuation routes and relief and recovery routes to the region ; and WHEREAS, the population of the Triad region cons isting of Greensboro, Winston Salem, High Point and Burlington is over 1,668,000 and the population of the Fayetteville metropolitan area is in excess of 375 ,000; and WHEREAS, connecting Interstate 95 to Interstates 40 and 95 with an interstate facility would provide direct connections between two largely populated regions; and WHEREAS, the upgrade to Interstate status to Highway 421 would increase safety, mobility, access for the military and economic development; and WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation Board has passed a resolution in support of the future interstate designation; and WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation has recommended the future interstate designation be pursued through the North Carolina Congre ssional Delegation; and WHEREAS, the upgrade to interstate status would provide high design evacuation route in the event of natural dis asters as recently experience in Hurricane Florence; and WHEREAS, a high design interstate would expedite logistics and staging to Fort Bragg in the event of a natural disaster and provide sustainability during emergency events; and WHEREAS, provide an alternate connection to Interstate 40 and 85 to support freight and commuter flow traffic flow; and 041519a HCBOC Page 33 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners of Harnett County hereby, through adoption of this resolution, supports the efforts to designate US Highway 421 a future interstate corridor. Adopted this the 15th day of April, 2019 HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS C. Gordon Springle, Chairman Howard Penny, Vice Chairman Abe Elmore Barbara McKoy Joe Miller 041519a HCBOC Page 34 Agenda Item J.f-T -;jr_,;;~ -~;;;,, "~ H a r ne tt _'·-,~<F'J C O U N TY t.~,Jt_. __ ._; _N_O_R_T_H-CA_R_O_L_H_IA-------------------------------- RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT THE NC CAROLINA CORE BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, Highway 421 is the next engine for economic growth in the center of North Carolina; and www.h arnett.or g WHEREAS, We are an emerging megasite corridor between Winston-Salem, Greensboro, High Point and Fayetteville at the heart of North Carolina; and WHEREAS, The development of four megasites, plus industrial sites, urban research parks and mixed use developments, present large-scale economic transformation opportunity in the Carolina Core; and WHEREAS, Combining these megasites with a labor shed of more than one million workers fueled by the innovation mindset of more than 30 colleges and universities positions the Carolina Core globally as a compelling site for industry; and WHEREAS, The public and private sector have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure, sites and higher education, which will support economic growth in the Carolina Cor e like RTP over the las t 50 years ; and WHEREAS, This is the single largest opportunity for incremental and trans formational growth in North C arolina; and WHEREAS, The Carolina Core will brand and market the Hi ghway 421 corridor as a v ision fo r Central North Carolina t o include signage along the corridor; and NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Harnett C ounty B oard of C ommissioner s , through adoption of this resolution, s upports the efforts of the NC C arolina C ore . Ado pted this the 15th day of April, 2019 HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS C. Gordon Spring le, C ha irman Howard Penny, V ice Chairman Abe Elmore Barbara McKoy Joe Miller strong root s • new growth 041519a HCBOC Page 35 Agenda Item LJ-J [/~-~~Harnett /=:_:tr:)· -~-O_U_N_T_Y ___________________ e_o_a_r_d_o_f_c_o_m_m_is_s_io_n_e_r_s ____ -___ . NORTH CAROLINA www.harnett.org Glenda Dye, Acting Executive Director Mid-Carolina Council of Government 130 Gillespie Street, 3rd Floor Fayetteville, NC 28301 April 15, 2019 C. Gordon Springle, Chairman Howard Penny, Jr., Vice Chairman Abe Elmore Barbara McKoy Joe Miller Gina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board PO Box 759 102 E. front Street Lillington, NC 27546 Ms. Dye, lam writing to notify you that following the April 9, 2019, presentation of the "Mid- Carolina Council of Governments Study and Recommendations" from McGill Associates, the Hamett County Board of Commissioners has voted to remain a member of the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments, and to work with the Council and our government partners within the Council to reinvigorate the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments to provide additional and enhanced services for our citizens. We support "Option 3" as presented in the report from McGill, which "preserves the Mid-Carolina COG through intensive strategic planning and commitment by the local governments to plan implementation." We also agree with the recommendations the study makes to reinvigorate the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments including developing a strategic plan to guide this process, strengthening the role of the Mid-Carolina COG Board, recruiting a skilled executive director, implement performance measures based on the strategic plan, and revising the Joint Operations Agreement and Bylaws of the Mid-Carolina COG. ph: 910-893-7555 fax: 910-814-2662 We believe the opportunities as so ciated with reinvigorating the Mid-Carolina COG would provide substantial benefits for the citizens of Hamett County, as well as for our County's municipalities that are members of the Mid-Carolina COG. We look forward to engaging in this process and working with our partners for the benefit of all of our citizens. Sincerely, Gordon Springle, Chairman Hamett County Board of Commissioners cc: Jeannette Council , Chairman, MCCOG Board Edwin Causey, Sampson County Manager Page 1 of 2 strong root s • new growth 041519a HCBOC Page 36 Letter to Glenda Dye Acting Executive Director Regarding Mid-Carolina Council of Government Page Two April 15,2019 cc: Amy Cannon, Cumberland County Manager Nick Holcomb, Coats Town Manager Snow Bowden, Erwin Town Manager Steven Neuschafer, Dunn City Manager Joseph Jeffries, Lillington Town Manager Gerry Vincent, Angier Town Manager Page 2 of 2 www.harnen .org 041519a HCBOC Page 37 Mid-Carolina Council of Governments Study and Recommendations Prepared by McGill Associates, Inc. March 20, 2019 041519a HCBOC Page 38 041519a HCBOC Page 39 m~~1H -------------------S~h,aping Communities Together BACKGROUND McGill Associates was engaged by the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments (MCCOG) to evaluate the most effective arrangements for the Counties of Cumberland, Harnett and Sampson and the cities and towns in those counties to participate in a Council of Governments (COG). Some County representatives view the current membership in the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments (MCCOG) to be not as beneficial as it had previously been and feel participation in another COG could be more advantageous or that the MCCOG could be made more effective, making a COG membership change unnecessary . Through this scope of work, McGill Associates examined the current operation of the Mid- Carolina Council of Governments and how it could be more effective for its members. McGill also examined possible participation in other Councils of Government , either with all three participating in the same COG or in different COGs. The alternatives of improving the existing arrangement or other configurations was evaluated and compared. The study was conducted by the Consulting Services Division of McGill. The study was led by the Director, Jim Bourey. Jim has had a long public and private sector professional career, performing in a number of leadership roles and in a number of regions in the country. He served as a City Manager, County Administrator, Planning Director and Regional Council Executive Director in a number of states and currently lives in North Carolina. Joining Jim on the project team were Richard Smith who worked as a Planning Director as well as the majority owner of a planning consulting firm. Karen Kiehna. who worked for decades in Councils of Government, and Robert Hyatt and Gary Jackson, long time managers with cities and counties in North Carolina. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was initiated by the Board of the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments. It was motivated by dissatisfaction with the performance of the organization in fulfilling its mission to effectively and efficiently serve its member counties and municipalities . Initial discussions of purpose and scope began in November 2018, and a contract for the work was executed between MCCOG and McGill Associates in December 2018. The scope of work included review of the current state, analysis of alternative approaches, identification of services most desired by members, and development of recommendations for the best future service delivery model. A key element of the McGill approach was to reach out to stakeholders, seek their input, and apply it in the development of recommendations. Our major findings were as follows: 1. Current State -The MCCOG organization was significantly underperforming in terms of executive leadership and underperforming in delivering the depth and breadth of services expected by their membership, and when compared to the norm for COGs. Page 1 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 40 2. Service Delivery -The MC COG offered far fewer member services than the norm for North Carolina COGs . In addition to providing traditional services such as aging and transportation planning and planning administration services , other North Carolina COGs also provide a broader array of traditional services such as workforce development, mapping and data (GIS), and convening of leaders for collaborative planning and problem solving . More importantly, other regional councils also provide customized services emerging from member demand, including administrative , financial , human resources, emergency preparedness/responses , etc. McGill's analysis confirmed that the three neighboring COGs were performing well in delivering both traditional and customized services . 3. Services Demand -Members preferred to continue MCCOG administration of aging services grants and the rural transportation planning organization (RPO) and planning for smaller communities . Members indicated a strong desire for expanded service delivery, including but not limited to convening elected and appointed officials , training professional staff, providing reliable data and GIS, workforce development and writing grant applications for member counties and municipalities. 4 . Alternative Approaches -For both procedural and practical reasons . merger of the MCCOG with an adjoining COG would be the most difficult alternative to achieve . From simply a procedural standpoint , a more feasible alternative approach would be to disband the MCCOG and open the door for individual counties to apply for membership with adjoining COGs . 5 . Recommended Approach -The preference of stakeholders was to reinvigorate the MCCOG . McGill recommends an inclusive process to develop a strategic plan for the reinvigoration of the MCCOG . We feel this should be led by an outs i de expert skilled in developing strategic plans and knowledgeable in organizational management and regional council operations . McGill also strongly recommends: (a) recruitment of an executive director capable of leading the turnaround, and (b) strengthening of the role and oversight of the board of directors, (c) establishing a multi-year action/performance plan with clear and measurable goals, and (d) committing the organization to a culture of continuous improvement in service to its members _ OUR APPROACH To compare structures and services , McGill gathered relevant information on trends and best practices for COGs and conducted interviews of designated county representatives and met with the executive directors of other Councils of Government. The work plan included the following steps : • Review of the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments organizational structure , meetings , services , work program, budget and staffing. This entailed review of available documents and interviews with COG staff and with elected officials and staff from the participating counties, cities and towns . • Comparison of the services of the Mid-Carolina COG with the services of other North Carolina COGs, particularly those adjacent to the three counties . • Review of the demographics and challenges facing the three counties and a comparison with other counties in the surrounding area . This examined the similarities and dissimilarities of the three counties and the surrounding counties in the region . • Identification of the most appropriate and desirable services that could be provided to the three counites and municipalities by a COG. Page 2 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 41 • Identification of the best potential alternate COG options for the three counties as well as the cities and towns in the counties , assessment of how to modify the Mid-Carolina COG arrangement to more effectively serve the interests of the three counties , and analysis of the alternative arrangements to identify the best COG arrangement to serve the three counties . STRUCTURE AND SERVICES REVIEW McGill found it necessary to gather an extensive amount of information and to conduct numerous interviews for purposes of comparing the structure and services of the Mid-Carolina COG with the three surrounding COGs -Triangle J (T JCOG), Eastern Carolina (ECCOG), and Lumber River (LRCOG). Our review included examination of the following documents : • Published annual reports of the various COGs • Adopted annual budgets and financial reports • Web pages, biogs and other internet offerings • University of North Carolina School of Government reports • Materials made available by the Association of North Carolina Councils of Government • COG bylaws and relevant state statutes • Other documentation sources In terms of structure , the numbers of local governments served by COGs in North Carolina varies significantly . Populations served, staffing, budgets and services also vary from one region to another. The four COGs which are the focus of this study are no exception . The numbers in this case range from a low of three (3) counties and twenty-one (21) municipalities participating in the Mid-Carolina COG to highs of nine (9) counties and sixty-two (62) municipalities in the Eastern Carolina COG . Lumber River COG has five (5) participating counties and thirty-six (36) mun icipalities . The Mid-Carolina COG lists ten (10) staff members in their $4.8 million budget for FY2018. This compares with twelve (12) staff and a $5.5 million budget for Eastern Carolina , twenty-six (26) staff members and a $12 .9 million budget for Lumber River COG, and a staff of thirty-two (32) and a $13 .1 million budget for the Triangle J COG . For North Carolina Councils of Government, federal dollars account for the vast majority of operating revenues . This is true in the case of the four COGs which were reviewed as part of this study . The largest single revenue source for each entity is the federal Home and Community Care Block Grant. A comparison of revenue sources revealed that Mid-Carolina COG had the lowest dues rate per capita of the four COGs studied . MCCOG dues are $0 .24 per capita for municipalities and $0 .27 per capita for counties, with counties only paying for the unincorporated area population. The LRCOG dues rate is $0 .33 per capita for each member government. The ECCOG dues are $0 .353 per capita on each member government. The T JCOG dues are $0.39 per capita for governments with populations less than 150 ,000 , and $0 .20 per capita for governments with populations of 150,000 or more. McGill also compared the board structures of the COGs . Three of the COGs (T JCOG, LRGOG , and MCCOG) provide for an elected representative for each member government. Lumber River COG, while providing for one elected official for each member government, granted the ability for members to appoint an alternate . In contrast , the Eastern Carolina COG structure Page 3 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 42 provided for elected officials to fill 80% of the board seats, appointed officials to fill 10%, and private sector representatives to fill the remaining 10% of board seats. The trend in the past decade is for Councils of Government to expand and diversify services. According to the 2018 survey conducted by the North Carolina School of Government. the number of services provided by COGs statewide has increased. The current array of services provided generally fall into four categories : planning services, technical assistance, geographic information service (GIS), and help with federal and/or state grants and program administration . Consistent with the statewide trends , the three COGs surrounding the Mid-Carolina COG have consistently been expanding services, especially in areas of workforce development , planning services, grant writing, training and fostering regional collaboration . In contrast, the services of the Mid-Carolina COG have decreased dramatically during the past number of years. Please see Attachment A for further comparisons of structures and services. COUNTY DEMOGRAPHICS AND TRENDS ANALYSIS In consideration of alternative arrangements for providing COG services to the region, McGill examined demographic factors and trends for similarities and differences between and among Sampson, Harnett and Cumberland counties . The county comparisons are compiled and presented in Attachment B. The most obvious differences are in overall county population and the relative degree of urbanization within each county. According to the North Carolina Department of Commerce, only 15% of Sampson County's estimated population of 64,000 reside in urbanized areas . Harnett County has a population estimated at 131,000, with 44% of the population living in urbanized areas of the county . Finally, an overwhelming percentage 87% of Cumberland County's 329,000 population reside in urbanized areas. The economic data varies from county to county . The Sampson County median family income level of about $42,000/year is significantly lower than the $51-52,000/year levels for Harnett and Cumberland respectively . Median housing values differ significantly . The median housing value in Harnett County is $140,800, in Cumberland County is $129,000, and in Sampson County is $87,900. The mix of leading industries for Cumberland and Harnett are quite similar, with Retail, Health/Social Services, Hospitality, and Food representing the four largest employment sectors . In contrast, Sampson County's leading industries are manufacturing and agriculture, followed well behind by retail. Fort Bragg remains a key economic engine for all three counties , with salaries, supplies and service expenditures driving direct, indirect and induced economic impacts. An emerging economic influence on residential development in Harnett County is employment growth in the Raleigh/Research Triangle region . With anticipated transportation improvements. the connection between Harnett and the Triangle area is expected to strengthen . Likewise , North Carolina Highway 24 improvements will also improve the commute from Sampson to the Cumberland/Fayetteville employment centers. IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS To determine the options for best serving the regional interests of Sampson , Harnett and Cumberland counties and their localities, McGill reviewed the enabling statute for North Carolina Councils of Government (North Carolina GS 160A-474) and reviewed the by-laws of the MCCOG . Meetings were also held with the executive directors of Eastern Carolina , Lumber River and Triangle J COGs to discuss receptivity and practical considerations. Additionally, McGill sought historical perspective and advice from staff with the state association of COGs . Page 4 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 43 The fundamental mission of councils of governments is to provide creative regional solutions to relevant and emerg i ng issues l n thei r specific regions . The sixteen regional councils in North Carolina serve their member governments through both a traditional range of services and a range of customized services . Traditlonal services include the delivery of aging , transportation, workforce development, community planning -GIS mapping services, and convening of regional leaders for collaborative problem solving. As noted on the web site of the North Carolina Association of Regional Councils of Government. "A more robust range of services has emerged through member demand for administrative and financial services , interim executive management, financial administration , human services program delivery and economic development." Regional councils are capable of assisting counties and municipalities in many ways . However, in a 2018 survey, the North Carolina School of Government discovered stakeholders perceive wide variation in quality across the sixteen North Carolina COGs . Other themes which emerged from the North Carolina School of Government interviews are summarized below: • Regional councils have a unique and strong understanding of their regions. • High value placed on COGs role (or potential role) as regional convener. • The role or value-add of regional councils is not always clear to stakeholders. • Regional councils need to do a better job of demonstrating their value and telling their story. • Regionalism is extremely important now, but times are very different now than they were when COGs were created. It is time for COGs to be more adaptive or responsive to current needs and reinvent themselves. • They provide a lot of value in specific services that meet needs of member governments. Based on our research , the options available are as follows : Option 1. Merge the Mid-Carolina COG with one of the adjacent COGs • In this option , the local governments in the Mid-Carolina region collectively decide to merge with one of the adjacent COGs. • Staff of the Mid-Carolina COG could be merged with the staff of the other COG. • Requires both COG boards to agree to the merging of assets . Some negotiation of terms may be required. The previous merger of the Northwest Piedmont COG and Piedmont Triad COG into the newly formed Piedmont Triad Regional Council serves as a precedent and example to consider. • The RPO housed in Mid-Carolina could be moved to the merged COG with two RPOs housed in the same COG or the RPO could be merged with the RPO in the other COG . • Area Agency on Aging (AAA) funds would be combined with the newly merged COG with one AAA director . • This is potentially the most difficult option because it requires the local governments in the Mid-Carolina COG to act in unison and to all join/merge with the same existing COG {TJCOG or LRCOG). Option 2. Dissolve Mid-Carolina COG and local governments independently join an adjacent COG • In this option, each local government would choose which COG to join. Depending upon the local government, Eastern Carolina COG (ECCOG), Lumber River COG (LRCOG) and Triangle J COG (T JCOG) appear to be the logical options. Page 5 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 44 • The regions of the adjacent COGs would be expanded if and when Mid -Carolina COG local governments join their new COG . • The RPO housed in Mid-Carolina could be moved to one of the adjacent COGs or it could be dissolved , and the local governments jo in the RPO or MPO in the Lumber River or Triangle J COG . • AAA funds d istributed to the Mid-Carolina COG would be proportionally distributed (based on state wide formula) to the adjacent COGs based on new alignments . • Most or all current Mid-Carolina COG staff could be absorbed and employed by adjacent COGs. • State law (North Carolina GS 160A-474) requires action by May 1s1 to withdraw from a COG for an effective date of July P 1. Option 3. Reinvigorate the Mid-Carolina COG • This option preserves the Mid-Carolina COG through intensive strategic planning and commitment by the local governments to plan implementation. • The strategic planning process would address governance structure (bylaws/charter), services goals, and resource requirements from dues, fees and grant sources . • The product of the strategic planning process would be a multi-year action plan with clear and measurable goals . • After completion of the strategic plan , reinvigorating the organization would start with hiring a new, dynamic and skilled executive director to lead the organization in achievement of the performance goals outlined in the strategic plan. • In addition to competent executive leadership, re-establishing the Mid-Carolina COG as a respected , innovative service provider would require the active involvement , direction and support of the elected board members. COG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR INTERVIEWS McGill sought the perspectives of executive directors serving the Triangle J, Lumber River, Eastern Carolina, and Mid-Carolina COGs . We asked for the views of the executive directors on the possibilities for serving counties currently served by Mid -Carolina COG . Highlights from McGill notes taken at those meetings are as follows: A. Lumber River COG, David Richardson, Executive Director Open to conversation but not sure where it will lead. Believe the MCCOG RPO could transfer/merge easily. LRCOG could expand planning services. LRCOG works hard to meet needs of members, especially smaller towns . LRCOG works to provide training programs ... arranges regular meetings of city managers. B. Triangle J COG, Lee Worley, Executive Director Harnett County already uses some of T JCOG services and would be welcomed as a member. Harnett asked T JCOG to run a housing program as well as other services. Town of Angier (partially in Wake County) is already a member. TJCOG is also coordinating a water resources study for Cumberland County. Cumberland and Sampson are not naturally in the TJCOG area; big question for Cumberland is what region they want to be a part of moving forward. Page 6 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 45 Emphasized that TJCOG would expect Fayetteville to join if Cumberland sought to become a member. Provided some services for the City of Fayetteville Police Department C. East Carolina, Jay Bender, Interim Executive Director ECCOG is advertising for a new executive director. Aging services is the biggest and best ECCOG service . ECCOG is very strong in transportation planning -2 RPOs administered. Several others in area are not administered by ECCOG. It may cost the ECCOG money/time in restructuring the board and services to accommodate a new member(s). Regarding Sampson specifically joining, Clinton and other towns are a long way off from (COG offices in) New Bern . D. Mid-Carolina COG, Glenda Dye, Interim Executive Director (accompanied by other staff members) Services are fairly even across ail three counties. MCCOG hasn't held regional meetings for years, she believed it stopped in 2009. Previous Executive Director did not reach out to the local government members. Services were scaled back, when it started is uncertain, but many years ago ... not sure about what could be provided as additional services or what jurisdictions would be willing to fund. Senior games are a large activity coordinated by MCOG staff; aging services is heavily involved in the community. Aging Services Director sees potential to partner with health care agencies as a new revenue source. STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS McGill met with elected and appointed officials from the MCCOG member counties and municipalities. The purpose of the interviews was to learn the views of stakeholders on the current state of the MCCOG, learn the services most desired by stakeholders, and to learn member preferences for moving forward . Following are highlights from notes taken at these meetings: A. Views on the Current State Disappointed in the current limited scope of services. Think they (staff) are good people, but they were let down by executive leadership . Eight years ago, quality, expertise and variety of services being offered started to decline . MCCOG staff did not help when I called upon them . Experience with grant data support was poor. Not much on their web site. Experience with other COGs is they offer much more, especially with transportation. Not aware of what they do other than aging services and planning for Sampson County towns. Only services now being provided are aging grant administration and coordination of RPO/transportation . MCCOG was once involved in planning and workforce development, but that is no longer the case. The COG should be out communicating about its services, but all members ever heard about was aging services and senior games. Page 7 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 46 B. Services Desired Have a grant writer to assist the members. Grant writing, identification of new funding sources . Assist with identifying, applying and administering grants. Bring communities together to discuss regional issues. Provide reliable data bases . Being a clearinghouse for resources . C. Preferred Action Would like to see MCCOG remain if can be improved to provide services . Since dues as is may not be able to support more services, the towns wanting more services will have to pay for them. Concerned about limited attention if merged with larger COG. Concerned about travel distances with merging. Also, concerned about unfavorable dues structure should (Triangle J or Lumber River) COGs require Cumberland to pay for Fayetteville or expect Fayetteville to join . Need for discussion at the Mayor's coalition. RECOMMENDATIONS Since this study originated from MCCOG Board Members' dissatisfaction with the status quo, McGill gave priority to the feedback received during stakeholder interviews. Stakeholders were either disappointed in the limited scope of MCCOG services or unfamiliar with the service mix entirely. Our analysis confirmed that the service mix of the MCCOG is now more limited than before. A decade ago, the MCCOG services more closely resembled the typical array of COG services you would expect to find, including regional meetings of elected and appointed officials to collaborate and the provision of more regional planning services and workforce development. This culture of disengagement and retrenchment contrasts with the apparent responsiveness and adaptivity of the adjoining COGs -Lumber River, Triangle J, and Eastern Carolina . The most important piece of stakeholder feedback that McGill received is the prevalent desire to retain the MCCOG, if it can be reinvigorated to provide the services desired by its members. While there is obvious disappointment with the limited scope of services, the decline was almost solely attributed to the failures of executive leadership. McGill believes this factor alone would be sufficient cause alone to consider retaining the present structure over dissolution and merger options. Additionally , there are other causes for concerns with the options of dissolving the MCCOG and/or members leaving to join another COG. First , there is the disadvantage of accepting long distances to COG functions . Board appointees and other interested elected and appointed officials would lose time and (potentially} interest if long distances had to be regularly navigated to participate in COG functions . Second, while a new COG would likely be immediately attentive to a joining member, over time there is the risk of this initial enthusiasm waning . Third, there is the concern with simply having more limited influence with joining a larger, more distant COG office. This concern is especially true for the smaller cities and towns. Finally, regional identity is now more important than ever before. It would be most beneficial to all local governments in the Mid-Carolina region to unite and collaborate on common interests such as planning , transportation, economic development, climate adaptation and emergency preparedness . The region has a unique economy and personal ity, presenting both unique challenges and opportunities . These challenges and opportunities would most effectively be addressed by local leaders joining in a unified effort. Page 8 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 47 Taking all available information into consideration, McGill recommends a series of steps be undertaken to reinvigorate the Mid-Carolina Council of Governments : 1. Develop a Strategic Plan for Reinvigoration - A strategic planning process is recommended in order to reconnect the MCCOG organization with its member governments and its mission . Strategic planning is about determining what's most important for an organization to do and the best way to get it done. For MCCOG, McGill recommends an inclusive process to involve all member jurisdictions in review of the services desired and the sources and levels of resources necessary to successfully deliver those services. We also recommend an outreach to the City of Fayetteville to encourage them to rejoin MCCOG. McGill would be available to provide the highly recommended, professional facilitation which is key for a successful strategic planning process . The scope of these services would include preparation in advance of a work session, facilitation at the work session. and documentation of decisions and action items resulting from the work session. 2. Strengthen the Role of the MCCOG Board -The board's role is overseeing strategic direction, organizational effectiveness, and the performance of its executive director. Essential to creating a reinvigorated MCCOG is creating an effective board, one which is in agreement and is in alignment on where the board wants the organization to go. This point underscores the importance, at the outset, of a successful strategic planning process . Thereafter. preferably on an annual basis , an effective board of directors would meeUretreat to evaluate both the progress of the organization in achieving pre- established goals and to evaluate the board's own effectiveness. An annual retreat, early in 2020, is recommended for this purpose. 3 . Recruit a Skilled Executive Director - A high performance MCCOG will require a skilled Executive Director. The requirements of the position dictate that the person selected be a transformational leader, one who possesses special leadership, management and communication skills . McGill recommends special emphasis in the selection process on finding an Executive Director capable of leading the staff/organization through the desired transformation. Likewise, it is equally important that the next Executive Director be capable of establishing and sustaining exceptional, ongoing communications with the member jurisdictions. 4 . Performance Management -It will be challenging to keep the turnaround efforts on track . To support the efforts. McGill recommends format adoption of the vision and action plans resulting from the strategic planning process. The Executive Director and MCCOG staff should be tasked with tracking progress and producing a quarterly report to the Board . An annual report should also be produced for review at an annual planning session/retreat of the Board. Additionally , McGill recommends that Executive Board be charged with evaluating the Executive Director, initially at six months after hiring and thereafter on an annual basis. The purpose of the evaluation is to give constructive feedback as necessary for the Executive Director and the organization to perform at their full potential. It also gives the Executive Director an opportunity to inform the Board of support needed from the Board (policy direction, resources , etc.) in order for the potential to be achieved. 5. Revision of Joint Operations Agreement and Bylaws of the Mid Carolina Council of Government (MCCOG) -It is always an advisable and a healthy process to routinely review all operations agreements and bylaws of any organization, as laws change , times change, and the needs of the organization change . In our review, we noted that the original joint operational agreement and bylaws , while serving their initial purpose in creating the MCCOG. have not been reviewed and revised consistently by the entire membership for quite some time. As our study revealed, the current joint agreement and the bylaws are inconsistent. vague, and quite ambiguous with each other, thereby Page 9 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 48 lending themselves to multiple interpretations and possibly to meritorious and legal challenge. Accordingly, it is our recommendation that both documents should be modified to ensure compliance with the North Carolina General Statutes and the overall will of each of the participating governing bodies and the MCCOG Board as a whole . Such obvious things that we noted for serious future consideration in these documents should be : • The selection, replacement and removal process of the Board members . • The term limits of the Board members. • The duties, powers and liabilities of the Board members and the participating localities . • The appointment , hiring and termination process of the Executive Director and any other staff of the MCCOG. • The specifically defined job descriptions for the Executive Director and any staff member setting forth their respective powers , duties and responsibilities and to whom they ultimately report to. • The annual review process of the Executive Director and staff. • The specifics to be contained within the annual report of the Board to each of the participating localities . • The requirement of an annual financial report and audit of the MCCOG and the dates upon which each are to be submitted to the Board and the respective participating localities . • A clear and concise annual budgetary process for the MCCOG . • A clear and consistent membership contribution charge or calculation process of each of the MCCOG members . • A clearly defined method of how to amend the agreement and bylaws in the future. • A clearly defined method and procedure for the dissolution, termination or merger procedure of the MCCOG . While this is a condensed list of the observations that McGill noted from its review process and discussions with the MCCOG members, this is a serious topic that should be reviewed thoroughly on an annual basis. These documents govern the legal standing to be able to operate, and accordingly their review and amendments should be a first priority in moving the organization to a healthy and prosperous future . Page 10 of 10 041519a HCBOC Page 49 Agenda Item 4-K I ;.;_:j.: .~~:~~.Harnett $--A-<@) f· ·:--. :··r-{.-::/ C..;.....;;O;__;;.U_H_T_Y _________ _ _ _ _ ~-_ _ __ 1 ",,: : , r. r • t Fireworks Application Attached you will find an application for a Fireworks Discharge Permit. This application must be completed and returned to Central Permitting prior to issuance of the permit. Please allow thirty (30) calendar days for processing and Board of Commissioner approval. There is a $100.00 permit fee assessed per discharge event. Permit fees shall be paid prior to issuance of permits. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Items required for permit issuance : • All blanks must be completed on the application. • Permit holder is required to obtain liability insurance in an amount sufficient to cover the claims of any person(s) who may be injured or otherwise damaged as a result of the display. The insurance must name the County of Harnett as an additional insured with a minimum amount of one million dollars ($1,000 ,000). A copy of the Certificate of Insurance evidencing the coverage must accompany the application. • A detailed site plan indicating the discharge and storage locations as well as distance. • Manufacturer's technical data sheet of each type of pyrotechnic to be discharged. Application Index Section I: Information on the person , group , corporation , association, or entity sponsoring , holding , or primarily responsible for the event Section II: Information on the pyrotechnician Section Ill : Information on the actual display Section IV: Public safety information. (Name of fire district where the discharge will take place, address of the nearest fire station, and name and address of the nearest medical facility) Section V: Notarization of the application. (APPLICATION SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED) Section VI: Fire Department Comments. (Must be completed by the chief of the local fire department representing the district where the discharge will take place) Section VII: For Harnett County Fire Marshal use only Section VIII: Fireworks Permit Number . THE COMPLETED FIREWORKS PERMIT MUST BE ON SITE DURING THE DISCHARGE OF PYROTECHNICS 041519a HCBOC Page 50 h APPLICANT INFORMATION: Note: The applicant is the person , group, corporation, association, or other entity sponsoring, holding or primarily responsible for the event or enterprise for which this permit is requested. Please type or print Applicant: Billing Address: Contact Person: Contact Email: Contact Phone: , ___ )-___ -----___ }-___ ----- President or CEO (for corporate applications): ---------------------- Is the applicant insured with respect to the discharge of fireworks/pyrotechni cs : Yes _ .... n ........ ....___ No _ .... n_..___ If covered, specify the source, amount, and coverage period of the insurance : Source : _____________________ Amount:$ ________ _ Coverage Period:------------------------------ 2 041519a HCBOC Page 51 ·--~~·-.~--:·;~, .,. .' · Harnet·.t ~.~· .. ::· . --=-·: . . COU NTY ,. f ~ -: : -, • t, $-A-@ PYROTECHNICIAN INFORMATION: Note: This is to be completed by the individual who will shoot and/or discharge the fireworks or pyrotechnics . Technician Name : Billing Address: Contact Email : Contact Phone: , ____ )-___ -----, ____ )-___ ----- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms permit/license type and number: -------------- Pyrotechnicians' training and experience: Is the technician insured with respect to the discharge of fireworks/pyrotechnics: Yes ____ No ___ _ If covered, specify the source, amount, and coverage period of the insurance: Source : ______________________ Amount$ ________ _ Coverage Period:-------------------------------- 3 041519a HCBOC Page 52 ww-»;·J,~ ma1t.or9 DISPLAY INFORMATION : Who provided this information: Applicant: ____ Technician: ____ Both: ___ _ Type of display event: Carnival: ____ Exhibition: ____ Fair: ___ _ Public Celebration: Other: -------- Proposed date and time of the event:---------------------a.m. / p.m. Proposed location or site:---------------------------- Type and quantity of fireworks/pyrotechnics to be used and the sequence of the discharge/shooting: Estimated duration of the display:------------------------- Specify any safety precautions to be taken: 4 041519a HCBOC Page 53 ,.:J; .-::; ~;:.~·;~ ,~·'' ~-: \ H~c ~~.!!..~n..!!~e....!.~21,v _______ *_A-@) IV. PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION: tmc:-gcl\c,. !.u~·;ccs ~partmant -.-...·_h.,!l'Qtt,Otg The display will occur within the following fire district:-------------------- Location of the nearest fire station:-------------------------- Nearest medical facility: Name :-------------Location : ------------------- 5 041519a HCBOC Page 54 Applicant Printed Name:---------------------- Applicant Signature:----------------------- Date: ____________ _ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ____ _ I, ___________ , a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that __________ signed and sworn to before me this day. Witness my hand and official stamp, this the _ day of ___ , 20 . Notary Public My Commission Expires : ___ _ [SEAL] 6 041519a HCBOC Page 55 ·'. ~--~ ') ·!:-:.·~:: C.;;;.._;:O;__.;;;_U"""'N_T_Y _________ _ /;-~~·:/":';~. ~<Harnett $'. -£-@)-. ___ :.:L~-____ t .,". :. r.i .,,: VI. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Fire Marsha l's Office Comments : Fire Marshal's Office Comments: Fire Marshal 's Office Recommendation: Approve: D Deny: D Fire Marshal's Office Signature : -------------------Date: _____ _ Board of Commissioner's Comments: Final Board Approval: Approved: D Denied: D Board of Commissioner's Signature: -----------------Date: _____ _ Board of Commissioner's Representative (Printed Name): ------------------- Fireworks Permit Number: 7 041519a HCBOC Page 56 Lva.H.A. f£T~ Product & Services Manager, Residential Low Income Program s ~~GY. 410 S. Wilmington Street, NC14 I Raleigh, NC 27601 919-546-3 504 (Office) 11 919 -791-5906 (Cell) evans.taylor@duke-energy.com Agenda Item __,,5..,.__ __ Mr. Taylor will address the board briefly regarding Duke Energy's "Neighborhood "Energy Saver" Program during the public comment period. 041519a HCBOC Page 57 FR EE energy-saving products from Duke Energy can help customers save up to $95 * per year on their energy bills. Our Neighborhood Energy Saver Program provides customers in qualified neighborhoods with up to 16 free energy-saving products. Our teams install the products at no charge and also provide additional idea s for cutting energy costs. Customers are notified of their selection and are invited to a community information meeting to learn about how the program can save them energy and money. To date, the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program has provided free energy-saving products to over 150 neighborhood s across our service t e rritory in more than 88,000 homes. Thank you for your support of this important program. We look forward to working with you to serve your community. For more information contact: Evans Taylor Program Manager 919-546-3504 (offi ce ) 919-79 1-5 906 (Ce ll) evans.tay lor@ duke-e nergy.co m *Ac tual energy savings may difter from those estimated due to variations in individual energy use habits. home characteristics and measures installed. ((_~DUKE ~ ENERGY" DU KE-EN ERGY.COM/NES 041519a HCBOC Page 58 Neighborhood Energy Saver Program Here are some of the FREE energy-saving products that we install at no cost to the customer. A. Digital room thermometer E. Energy-efficient I ightbulbs B. Energy-saving showerhead or shower wand F. Water heater wraps/pipe wrap C. One-year supply of furnace filters G. Covers for window AC units D. Water-saving kitchen and bathroom faucet aerators H. Caulking, weatherstripping and door sweeps (_~DUKE ~ ENERGY® ©2017 Duke Energy Corporation 17 1341 6/17 041519a HCBOC Page 59 A Neighborhood-Based Approach to Energy Efficiency The Duke Energy Neighborhood Energy Saver Program uses a community approach to swiftly reduce energy bills for a large number of participants. By targeting low-income neighborhoods, working with local leaders to build neighborhood engagement and buy-in , and conducting energy assessments, energy-saving improvements, and participant education at no cost , the program is able to upgrade hundreds of homes in a cost-and time-efficient manner while reducing carbon pollution. Duke Energy, an electric and natural gas utility serving customers in the Southeast and Midwest, uses census and other data to identify low-income neighborhoods of approximately 1,000 homes. Program representatives then work with local leaders in interested neighborhoods to hold community events that explain the upgrade process and its benefits . Over the next 8-10 weeks, Duke Energy contractors conduct walk-through home energy assessments , install up to 20 energy-saving improvements in each participating home, and educate households about ways to further improve energy efficiency , all at no cost to participants. Fast Facts Program scope: A neighborhood- scale utility energy efficiency program for low-income households. Communities served: Low-income homeowners and tenants in individually metered residential buildings in pre-selected, census- defined neighborhoods. Funding: Utility ratepayers . Key partners : City and county governments, private and public organizations such as community groups and assistance agencies. Promising practices: Eliminate/reduce up-front costs, partner with trusted organizations. The program's free upgrades eliminate the barrier of up-front costs, and its focus on partnering with community leaders to build neighborhood engagement and buy-in overcomes common trust concerns associated with utility-sponsored programs . These tactics have led to an average 70 percent participation rate in neighborhoods served by the program. During its first decade (2006-2016), the program served more than 95 ,000 households in 156 communities, resulting in more than 218,000 megawatt-hours (MWh) of energy savings and avoiding 153,000 metric tons of CO~quivalent to the annual energy-related emissions from more than 16 ,000 average U.S. homes.1 The installed energy-efficiency measures generally save around $100 per year for a typical single-family home,2 representing a seven percent savings on an average annual electricity bill.3 &EPA Energy Effic iency and Renewable Energy in Low -Income Communities 1 041519a HCBOC Page 60 Making It Happen A Duke Energy subsidiary piloted the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program in 2006 in Florida, designing it to expand the reach of its existing Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program. Low-income communities were an underserved segment of the utility's customer base; many low-income residents could not afford the measures needed to make their energy bills more manageable. The utility's existing weatherization program was helpful, but not all low-income customers were eligible for or interested in in-depth weatherization services. The new pilot used a streamlined, neighborhood "blitz" to reach a larger number of low-income residents with cost- effective and convenient energy efficiency services. Crafting a Neighborhood Approach The developers of the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program use census and state income data to identify neighborhoods with large numbers of low-income households. The program defines low-income neighborhoods as those in which at least 50 percent of the residents live below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. After identifying a promising location (one that meets the income criteria and has local leaders interested in participating), program staff meet with community leaders to explore the program , build support, and ask for help in publicizing the program . They also canvass each neighborhood to solicit participants, walking door-to-door to explain the program and how it will benefit residents . This personalized approach helps gain the trust of the neighborhood and increase interest in the program. Program staff provide additional opportunities to learn about the program, including sending individual letters to residents inviting them to join an evening event with local leaders and Duke Energy representatives . At the event , residents can speak with energy specialists to ask questions and discuss any concerns they may have. To make attendance as convenient as possible, staff leave reminders on residents' doors before the event and provide a free dinner at the event. After the event, Duke Energy offers to have an energy specialist come to residents ' homes to identify energy efficiency opportunities and install improvements free of charge . Some of the 16-20 products and services provided during the assessment include: • water heating upgrades, including a water heater temperature check and adjustment, insulation for the water heater and pipes, faucet aerators, and low-flow showerheads; Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Low-Income Communities I 2 041519a HCBOC Page 61 • refrigerator efficiency improvements, including cleaning refrigerator coils and installing refrigerator thermometers; • space conditioning improvements, including wall plate thermometers, filters and filter- change calendars; door sweeps, caulking, foam insulation, and weather stripping. In 2016, Duke Energy added air-conditioning maintenance, duct sealing, and attic insulation to its program in Florida; and • seven compact fluorescent light bulbs, one LED light, and a calendar with energy-saving tips for each month of the year . Duke Energy uses the walk-through assessments to educate participants about the upgrades as they are being made and inform them of behavior changes they can make to conserve energy (e.g ., adjusting thermostats when they're not at home, turning off lights when rooms are not in use). Duke Energy's approach includes coordinating with local weatherization agencies and other community organizations to connect households to services that can help them make further improvements. Duke Energy contractors usually spend about 8-10 weeks in each neighborhood , providing plenty of opportunities for customers to participate in the program. The program makes special efforts to accommodate the schedules of working people: participants can request home visits to be performed during or after business hours, and on weekends, and the home visits (including the walk-through assessment and installation of improvements) usually take no longer than one hour. The visits generate interest and boost participation in the neighborhood as residents watch upgrades being performed to their neighbors' homes. From Pilot to Full-Scale Program The program 's success in Florida encouraged additional Duke Energy subsidiaries in North Carolina , South Carolina, Ohio, and Kentucky to adopt it in 2013, followed by Indiana in 2014. By 2016 , the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program had grown to serve about 21,000 homes per year across all participating Duke Energy companies. Each utility's program offerings and requirements differ slightly, though the general program services are the same. Duke Energy's efforts to communicate early and often, build trust through face-to-face contact, and emphasize convenience led to an average participation of 70 percent in the neighborhoods served by the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program. Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy 1n Low-Income Commurnt1es I 3 041519a HCBOC Page 62 Key Partners Each subsidiary's program has its own key partners, including city and county governments, private and public organizations, and community action agencies, which mainly help with o utreach and engagement. For example, when implementing the Neighborhood Energy Saver Program in Eustis, Florida , Duke Energy partnered with the City of Eustis, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the Lake Community Action Agency, the Eustis Housing Authority , and the Bates Avenue Improvement Council.4 In one neighborhood in Orlando, Florida , Duke Energy partnered with the Department of Economic Opportunity's Weatherization Assistance Program and the Orange County government. Partnering with trusted community members such as local government officials and nonprofit o rganizations has been instrumental in building support for the program in the communities it serves. Duke Energy also partners with agencies that provide supplementary energy services to the residents of the neighborhoods selected for upgrades: for example, it invites local weatherization agencies to neighborhood kickoff events, asks for their help in promoting the program, and helps them connect with eligible households about their weatherization services. Funding Sources Funding for the program comes from ratepayers, typically in the form of energy efficiency- demand s ide management charges that cover costs for the utility 's full portfolio of energy-saving programs offered to customers. Achievements Low-income partici pants in Duke Energy's Neighborhood Energy Saver Program benefit from lower energy bills and a greater awareness of how they can keep energy costs down , wh ile Duke Energy benefits from reduced peak demand and reduced risk of arrearages among its low-income customers. Other accomplishments include : • Particip ants in the program have saved a total of more than 218,000 MWh of electri city and avoided more than 153,000 metric tons of COz--equivalent to the annual energy- related emissions from more than 16,000 average U.S . homes.1 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Low-I ncome Communities I 4 041519a HCBOC Page 63 • In 2016, over 21,000 households participated in the program, saving more than 13,000 MWh annually. 2 • Households typically save an average of $100/year from the upgrades, representing a seven percent savings on the average electricity bill. 3 • Since its inception, the program has served more than 95,000 homes across 156 communities in Florida , Indiana , Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, and South Carolina.2 Replicability In addition to replication among Duke Energy's subsidiaries, several utilities around the country have replicated Duke Energy's approach of using census data to identify low-income neighborhoods in which to perform an energy upgrade blitz, including Jacksonville Electric Authority, the municipal utility for Jacksonville , Florida ; and DTE Energy, a Detroit-based electric and natural gas utility. (See EPA's profile of DTE Energy in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Low Income Communities series for more information.) Duke Energy's focus on engaging local government officials and community leaders early on and conducting personalized outreach to residents are other key elements of the program that could be replicated by utilities and other organizations. For More Information • Neighborhood Energy Saver Program website • EPA Informational Resources on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Low-Income Communities 1 Elect ricity savings provided by Duke Energy, January 10, 2017. Emis sions avoided and equivalencies estimated using EPA's Greenhouse Gas Eguivalencies Calculator. 2 Personal communication with Jeff Brooks and Lorri e Maggio, Duke Energy, January 10, 2017. 3 Calculated with 2014 U.S . average monthly r es id ential electric bill data from the Department of Ene rgy's Energy Information Administration : http://www.eia .gov/electricity/sales revenue price/pdf/tableS a.pdf 4 Duke Energy Florid a, 2013. Duke Energy provides free energy makeovers for low-income residents in Eusti s. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Low-Income Communities I 5 041519a HCBOC Page 64 041519a HCBOC Page 65 AGENDA ITEM 6 April 15, 2019 APPOINTMENTS NEEDED ADULT CARE HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE There are five (5) vacancies on this committee. AGRICULTURE ADVISORY BOARD There is (1) vacancy for a District 5 representative on this Board. BOARD OF HEALTH There is ( 1) vacancy for an engineer position on this board. COMMUNITY CHILD PROTECTION TEAM The team requests the following be appointed to serve: Wayne Coats, Thomas Hill, Scott Chase, Tonya Gray de Vaz. uez, Susana Rodriguez, Laurie Perez and Tara Fish (letter attached) HARNETT COUNTY REGIONAL JETPORT There is (1) vacancy for District 5 representative on this committee. HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT There is one (1) vacancy for an alternate member representing District 3 on this Board. There is one (1) vacancy for an alternate member representing District 5 on this Board. HOME AND COMMUNITY CARE BLOCK GRANT COMMITTEE Roger Brown would like to serve on this committee (ap2lication attached) There are three (3) vacancies on this committee . NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE There is ( 1) vacancy on this committee. NONPROFIT FUNDING COMMITTEE There is (1) vacancy for a District 4 representative on this committee. 041519a HCBOC Page 66 Harnett COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/31/2019 Harnett County Board of Commissioners In Re: CCPT Annual Report Dear County Board of Commissioners: Social Services Department www.hamett.org Hamett County Government Complex 311 Cornelius Hamett Boulevard RECEIVED MAR 1 2 2019 HARNETT COUNTY MAf",itl Cl~A·~ Q FFICE Lillington, NC 27546 ph: 910-a93-7500 fax: 910-a93-6604 Each year the Community Child Protection Team (CCPT) of Hamett County is required to submit an annual report that addresses any child protection needs within our county. CCPT was established in 1991 in North Carolina, as a response to the increased numbers of children being reported as abused, neglected or dependent in NC. Community Child Protection Teams were established to add a community dimension to child protection. The Community Child Protection Team is an interdisciplinary group of community representatives who meet to promote a community-wide approach to the problem of child abuse, neglect and dependency. The duties and responsibilities of the CCPT were adopted as North Carolina Administrative Code 411.0400. The original purpose and composition of CCPTs was further formalized and expanded by G.S. 78 1406, effective July 1, 1993 . In 1997, North Carolina designated CCPTs a s Citizen Review panels, which were required by the Child Abuse Prevention Act (CAPT A). Hamett County 's CCPT reviews active cases involving child abus e, neglect or dependency to identify any gaps in services for the family and/or identifies any barriers to child protection. The Harnett County CCPT also reviews any cases that involve a child that has died as a result of suspected abuse, neglect or dependency and the case is currently open for DSS Child Welfare Services or the child or the child 's family received child welfare services within the twelve months prior to the death. We meet in conjunction with the Hamett C ounty Child Fatality Prevention Team (CFPT), which is a program administered through the Harnett County Department of Public Health. The primary purpose of the local Child Fatality Prevention Team is to review the deaths of children ages 0-17, identify the causes of child deaths, identify gaps or deficiencies that may exist in order to improve the delivery of services to children and families and make and carry out recommendations for changes that could prevent future deaths. The meetings are held at the Hamett County Department of Public Hea lth quarterl y. We met on March 1, June 7, September 6 and December 6 , 2018.The meetings were well attended. Our membership did change some . strong roots • new growth 041519a HCBOC Page 67 -~~ Harnett COUNTY Social Services Department NORTH CAROLINA www.hamett.org Hamett County Government Complex 311 Cornelius Hamett Boulevard Lillington. NC 27546 Our membership is composed of: Required Members by Law ph: 910-693-7500 fax: 910-693-6604 1. Terri J. Crisp, CCPT Chairperson/DSS Staff Member as well as Lisa Hinson, CPS Program Manager 2. Paul Polinski, Hamett County DSS Director 3. Wayne Coats or designee from local law enforcement-Hamett County Sheriffs Department 4. Latonya Middleton or other designee, Department of Juvenile Justice-representing a Community Action Agency 5. Wendy Whittenton and Elsa Clayton, local School Superintendent's designee 6. Billie Bryant, Hamett County DSS Board member 7. Adrian Standish, Mental Health Professional with NAMI 8. Allison Delong, Guardian ad Litem 9. Debra Hawkins, Heath Director Designee/CFPT Chair and Yolanda Massey Health Department SW TO. Vernon Stewart, Don Harrop-DA or DA's designee 11. Leeann Champion or other nurse, RN-local health care provider-Hamett County Department of Public Health CFPT Members who are included on CCPT 12. Tammy Ward, parent of a child who died before reaching the age of 18 and CFPT member 13. Judge Resson Faircloth, District Court Judge and CFPT member 14. Holly Gardner-Blackbum, Community member Optional Members 15. Tom Hill , Scott Chase or other designee, Family Advocacy Program Manager from Fort Bragg 16. Tonya Gray de Vazquez, Susana Rodriguez or other designee, Executive Director of SAFE 17. Laurie Perez or other designee, Sandhills Center MCO 18. Tara Fi s h-Hamett County Partnership for Children There are certain members of our team that have to be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. Our team humbly requests that the Board of County Commissioners appoint these people to our Community Child Protection Team: Wayne Coats or other designee from the Harnett County Sherif.f's Department; Thomas Hill, Scott Chase or designee from the Family Advocacy Program at Fort Bragg as one of our optional members; Tonya Gray de Vazquez, Susana Rodriguez or designee as the Executive Director of SAFE as one of our optional members; Laurie Perez as a representative from our MCO (Sandhills Center) as one of our optional members, Tara Fish , an optional member from the Hamett County Partnership for Children. } 1 w}_ at/7~~ strong roots • new growth 041519a HCBOC Page 68 Harnett COUNTY Social Services Department NORTH CAROLINA www.hamett.org Hamett County Government Complex 311 Cornelius Hamett Boulevard Lillington, NC 27546 Identified Goals and Strategies: 1. The CCPT will continue to discuss safe sleep for infants at our meetings and come up with strategies to provide education for the public. 2. The CCPT will continue to discuss barriers to accessing services and gaps in services in our county and further discuss ways to overcome some of these issues_ ph: 910~93-7500 fax: 910~93-6604 3. The CCPT will continue to discuss the current Opioid epidemic in our state and county to find ways to educate the public about this issue. The members of the Community Child Protection Team respectfully requests that the Board of County Commissioners continue funding programs in our county that assist families in providing safe, healthy environments for the children of Harnett County. If this report needs to be presented at a BOCC meeting in order to appoint the necessary members, please let me know and the CCPT will do this. If the Board of County Commissioners needs any assistance from or have suggestions for our Community Child Protection Team, please contact me through the Harnett County Department of Social Services at 910-814-6670. espectfully submitted by: Terri J. Cr sp CCPT Chairperson 910-814-6670 strong roots • new growth 041519a HCBOC Page 69 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON A BOARD APPOINTED BY THE HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NAME: _ _,_,~~~'-'-"-'~-'-+'-.--,,,....__.~------------------ A DD RESS: -JA.~o:___~.J.LJ-.;:_:::_...!:::='_L:,.=2'...~~c.-::.-"--h----L.:..e-:..:.-....:..h..::.t/~~!ee:.,.,._.J!,"'-'~-b---,,"""""?i::::....----=--cf-'-~-=~===· ~=-·z,;~· ~----- / VOJ;.R«i DISTRICT: (Please check district number in which you live): 0' Disrrict 1, Commissioner McKay's D District 4, Commissioner Springle's D District 2, Conunissioner Elmore's D District 5, Commissioner Miller's 0 District 3, Commissioner Penny's TELEPHONE: (HOME) t/;c;--fl f '7--.:;t d:: ?,':-~ (WORK) _--...:...:;A/=-+-L-+lf_,_' ---- / ~ I L.i.A I PRESENT OCCUPATION: CI/A J/./;ff/if( .. /7/fR~ YEARS OF FORMAL EDUC A TJON: __ /_!:/ __________________ _ PLEASE TELL WHY YOU WOULD LIKE TO SERVE ON THE ABOVE LISTED BOARD: (µ/ t' cc (;# **************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : DATE RECEIVED: __ Lf~-~l _....,......_(--4'{ _________________ _ DA TE FORWARDED TO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS : --------------- 041519a HCBOC Page 70 Agenda Item __ 7 __ _ SANDHILLS CENTER Managing Mental Health, Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services 910-673-9111 (FAX) 910-673-6202 www.sandhillscenter.org Victoria Whitt, CEO March 13, 2019 Ms . Paula Stewart Harnett County Manager PO Box 759 Lillington, NC 27546 Dear Ms. Stewart: During its March 12th meeting, the Sandhills Center Board of Directors discussed the issue of our County General Budget Request from our nine (9) constituent counties for FY 19 -20. Based on a review of the current fiscal situation that impacts our State and counties, it was decided that the Center would not request an increase in County General Funding from Harnett County. This continues our practice of not requesting an increase for the past 15 years. Importantly, all county funding received is directed in support of local County Behavioral Health Urgent Care Centers and other county designated services/programs. FY 18 -19 Current County General Allocation: FY 19 -2 0 Funding Request • County General Request: • Total FY 19 -20 County General Request: Note: See Attached County General Funding Chart. $199,679 $199,679 $199,679 Since beginning the management of Medicaid service dollars in December 2012, Sandhills Center has realized savings and has made a commitment to reinvest those s avi ngs in the community. During the past year, Sandhills Center has worked with county and community representatives from each of our nine (9) constituent counties to identify high priority needs and projects at the county level. We have been able to reallocate local funds and commit LME/MCO reinvestment savings to numerous projects in each of our counties. Sandhills Center staff and I will continue to meet with County Managers and others to review the use of current county allocations and to identify behavioral health service areas in the county that may have been underserved and identify how available funding could be used to impact those areas. We will be working with the Clerk to the Board to schedule an opportunity to present a program update and the budget request to your County Commissioners within the next few months. P.O. Box 9, West End, NC 27376 24-Hour Access to Care line: 1-800-2 56-2452 TIY: 1-866-518-6778 or 711 Serving Anson , Guilford, Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph & Ri chmond counties ------.. ~ --~ -- 041519a HCBOC Page 71 Thank you for your continued support of Sandhills Center and the services we manage. The Sandhills Center's Board of Directors and staff are committed to providing the citizens of Hamett County with quality, cost-effective services. We appreciate the County's contribution to behavioral health seivices and appreciate partnering with you to improve access and availability of quality services in the local community. Sincerely, /_:__u.,._ Victoria Whitt Chief Executive Officer Attachments cc: Mr. Joe Miller, Harnett County Commissioner Ms. Kimberly Honeycutt, Harnett County Finance Officer P.O. Box 9, West End , NC 27376 24-Hour Access to Care Line: 1-800-256-2452 TIY: 1-866-518-6778 or 711 Serving Anson, Guilford, Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph & Richmond counties ,r-,) ,,.--.... , ,,.--...., ( ui'ac t urac) : urac '--' '---'---' ----..... _ .... _..,_ ............ 041519a HCBOC Page 72 COUNTY Anson Guilford Harnett Hoke Lee Montgomery Moore Randolph Richmond TOTALS SANDHILL$ CENTER COUNTY CONTRIBUTIONS FY 19-20 ACTUAL COUNTY PROPOSED JULY 1, 2019 COUNTY GENERAL PROJECTED* CONTRIBUTION GENERAL POPULATION FY 18-19 CONTRIBUTION FY 19-20 25,459 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 538,851 $ 9,674,000 $ 9,674,000 136,031 $ 199,679 $ 199,679 56,778 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 60,452 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 28,007 $ 60,775 $ 60,775 101,088 $ 256,202 $ 208,857 144,125 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 44,950 $ 132,525 $ 132,525 1,135,741 $ 11,520,181 $ 11,472,836 •The Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) COUNTY GENERAL PER CAPITA CONTRIBUTION FY 19-20 $ 2.16 $ 17.95 $ 1.47 $ 1.02 $ 3.97 $ 2.17 $ 2.53 $ 5.86 $ 2.95 $ 10.14 ••Reduction reflects the action of the Moore County Commissioners in FY 14/15 phasing out funding for non-profit organizations. FY 19/20 will include the final 20% reduction. Six of these non-profits receive this funding as flow through from Sand hills Center. 041519a HCBOC Page 73Harnett County Members Served April 201 9 Members Served by Calendar Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Highest Serving Behavioral Health Providers Last Year Provider Members (286 providers serving local members) Served Daymark Recoverv Services 981 Fayetteville Psychiatric Associates, PA 378 ABC Pediatrics of Dunn, PA 361 Harnett Health System, Inc. 31 5 Best Day Psychiatry and Counseling, PC 232 Coastal Carolina Neuropsychiatric Center 196 TriCare Counseling and Consulting, Inc. 1 71 Most Frequent Behavioral Health Services Received last Year Service Amount Paid ($18,431,592 total) Innovations Services $5,839,699 Intermediate Care Facilities $4,003 181 Outpatient Services $2,633,268 Inpatient Hospitalization $1,418,749 Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities $1,080,699 Behavioral Health Long Term Residential $1,033,102 Intensive In-Home Services $752,435 Assertive Community Treatment Team $430,792 Members Served Last Calendar Year 38%../ • Adult Mental Health • Child Mental Mcolth • Adult lntellectual/Oevelopmental Olsabilitles Child In te llectu al/Developmental Disabilities Adult SubstanctP Abuse Child Substance Abuse SANDHILLS CENTER 041519a HCBOC Page 74 ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT SAND HILLS CENTER Serving Anson, Guilford, Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph and Richmond counties in central North Carolina. 041519a HCBOC Page 75 Sandhills Center is a Local Management Entity (LME) and a Medicaid-funded Managed Care Organization (MCO) that acts as an agent of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services . As an LME-MCO , we provide access to publicly-supported mental health, intellectual/developmental disabilities and substance abuse services for the residents of Anson, Guilford, Harnett, Hoke, Lee , Montgomery, Moore, Randolph and Richmond counties . Sandhills Center offers access to services in your community, a provider network that is culturally competent and respectful, and a collaborative approach to problem-solving and resource development. Sandhills Center connects people in need of services with providers and other partners in their local communities. Together, we team to promote mental health, wellness and recovery . We offer initial screening and answers to many of your questions . The staff at Sand hills Center will advise you of available providers, and offer you opportunities to make choices that are right for you . Individuals who need help with mental health , substance abuse or intellectual/developmental disabilities are encouraged to call our 24- hour Call Center at 1-800-256-2452. Licensed mental health counselors are always available to take calls and connect people to the best care provider of their choice. When needed, interpreter services will be arranged through our Call Center. People with hearing impairments and/or speech disabilities are encouraged to call our TTY phone number: 1-866-518-6778. There is no cost for the call, screening or referral to a provider. Costs may be covered completely or in part by Medicaid, state funding or other insurance . Some of the services may include (but are not limited to): Addiction recovery Peer support Psychiatry I/DD assessments Housing assistance Skill bu ilding Supported employment Medication management Geriatric specialties Youth services Outpatient counseling Medication-Assisted Treatment for substance use disorders Sandhills Center also has a website that is dedicated to offering behavioral health information, as well as free and confidential self- screenings. The Access2Care evidence-based screen i ng tool allows individuals to take screenings any time from the privacy of a computer or mobile device with an internet connection . For more information, go to : 02 041519a HCBOC Page 76 03 OUR VISION Sandhills Center partners with individuals, their families , service providers , policy makers and other community stakeholders in creating , managing, and supporting behavioral health services that meet the needs of our community. WORKING PRINCIPLES We strive to promote : Access to a continuum of services to meet the behavioral health needs of the citizens of Anson, Guilford , Harnett, Hoke , Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph, and Richmond counties . Active partnerships among ind ividuals, families, providers and the community. High-quality mental health, substance abuse and intellectual/developmental disabilities services . Cost-effective delivery of services in the least restrictive environment, appropriate to individuals ' needs . A provider network that is culturally competent and respectful. A collaborative approach to problem solving and resource development. ACCESS Sandhills Center's customer service phone line is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week , including holidays . Licensed mental health counselors are always available to take your call and connect you to the best care provider of your choice . TOLL FREE -1 -800-256-2452 TTY-l -866-518 -6 77 8 THE REGION Sand hills Center i s on e of seven LME-MCOs in North Carolin a. We are located in the ce ntral part of the state , se rving Anson , Guilford , Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Mon t gom e ry , Moore, Randolph and Richmond counties. Sandhills Center Vaya Health I Partn er s Beh av ioral Health Ma nage ment Ca r di nal Innovations I A lliance Behavioral Healthcar e Eas t pointe I Trillium Hea l th Resources --An son/ Richmond Ho k 041519a HCBOC Page 77 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Victoria Whitt 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chair Commissioner Thad Ussery Vice Chair Commissioner Kay Cashion Secretary Michele Weatherly Anson County Commissioner Ross Streater Priscilla Little Guilford County Commissioner Kay Cashion Dixie Branch Gart Evans Carlos Townsend Harnett County Commissioner Joe Miller Bill Larrison Hoke County Commissioner Harry Southerland Shirley Hart Lee County Commissioner Kevin Dodson Walter Ferguson Montgomery County Commissioner Anthony Copeland Carol Whitaker Moore County Commissioner Oti s Ritter Matthew Rothbeind Randolph County Commissioner David Allen Mazie Fleetwood Leann Henkel Richmond County Commissioner Thad Ussery Michele Weatherly Provider Council Representative Jerry Earnhardt Hospital Representative Vacant Board photo credits George E. Reynolds Jr., NAMl·Moore County, and Heather Otkndahl, Sandhrlls Center Commumcarlons Specralisr. 041519a HCBOC Page 78 05 A MESSAGE FROM THE CEO As 2018 has drawn to a close, Sandhills Center enters its seventh year as a Managed Care Organizati on (MCO) under the Medicaid 191 S (b)/(c) waiver . Since 2012, we have seen an array of system improvements which have translated into expanded community services and a strengthened network of service providers . Through our commitment to quality, evidence-based practices and fiscal prudence, we have positioned Sandhills Center to operate a successful Local Management Entity (LME)-MCO for people living within Anson , Guilford , Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Randolph and Richmond counties . In 2018, we celebrated a number of achievements. We have engaged and encouraged a representative provider network, responded to identified service needs, and broadened relationships with stakeholders that focus on increasing access and elevating behavioral healthcare standards. As we reflect on 2018 and look ahead to the new year, Sandhills Center is grateful to our members and families, provider network, state and local leaders, and the residents of the region for their continued support. We especially appreciate the dedication of our Board of Directors, the guidance we receive from the Consumer & Family Advisory Committe, and the commitment of our staff. You have my commitment that Sandhills Center will persist in our efforts to live up to the high standards you expect. We will continue to develop a broader network of providers and expand partnership efforts with stakeholders in each of our communities . We also will extend our diligence toward ensuring that quality and cost-effective services are available to those in need. Victoria Whitt, Chief Executive Officer Sandhill s Center 041519a HCBOC Page 79 ENGAG I NG AND ENCOURAG I NG OUR PROVIDER NETWORK INCREASING SERVICE RATES Sandhills Center is committed to reinvesting savings in services , and we are dedicated to working with our network of providers to improve access and availability of high-quality behaviora l health serv i ces . We continue to explore opportunities to make adjustments to services , reimbursement rates and service-delivery models to more effectively meet our members' needs . Most recently, we increased service rates by 3 pe r cent for providers of community-based Inte r mediat e Care Facilities, Outpatient Services, including Evaluation and Management Coding , and all Innovations Waiver services . The new rates began July l , 2018 . TRAINING AN D PRO VI D ER D EV ELOPME NT Sand hills Center va l ues our provider network relationship. We believe that engaging and encouraging a high-qual ity ne t work involves taking a robust approach to traini n g and educationa l deve l o pm e nt. We know that pu t ting our providers on a p ath to kn owledge leads to better outcomes for t he indivi d uals and famil ies who r eceive services. In 2018, Sandh il ls Center hosted train ing and technica l ass istance se ssions on a vari ety of topi cs. Two exam ples includ e QPR Gatekeeper train-the -trainer i n struction, and informational programs on the new statewide Health Information Ex change (HIE). The QPR Gatekeeper sessions certifie d 16 in structors from various Sandhills Center counties. QP R stands for Question, Persuade and Refer , whic h are the three steps to help save lives from sui ci de. Sponsoring Q PR Gatekeeper instru ction has become a mutually-rewarding e x perience be cause participants gained valuable skills to help their organiza- tions, and Sandhills Ce nter gained 16 new training partners. T he newly-certified Gatekeepers have agreed to teach a minimum of three 2-hour QPR training sessions ann ually in collaboration with u s. For the HIE training , Sandhills Center hosted two sessions with i n the region to make the training ac ce ssib le to pro- viders . T he purpose of the training was to acquaint our network with NC HealthConne x , the new HIE that providers will need to connect with in order to su bmit data required by the NC Department of Health and Human Services . KEEPING PROVIDERS ON THE RIGHT PATH Sandhills Center will continue to monitor the training needs of the providers in our network . We host Provider Forums quarterly, with special Provider Orientation sessions held each May . An array of other training opportunities are of- fered each month throughout the year. Course descriptions and registration information can be obtained by logging on to our website and clicking on the HCalendar" headline. www .SandhillsCenter.org • Providers must connect to the new HIE to continue re ceiving payments for the Medicaid and state -funded services they offer. NC HealthConne x is ex pected to improve the qual ity of integrated care , enhance safety, boost recovery outcomes and reduce overall healthcare co sts by ma k ing heal th data available to participating providers. We know that the use of data allows organizatio n s to better manage their business st rategies. Sandhi l ls Center em b races high-quality programs l ike t he HIE informational meetings so that our providers are prepared for full implementation, which is planned for June l, 2019. Through the use of targeted training sessions , technical assi stance and community education, Sandhills Cente r is e levating the quality of servic es offe red throughout our area . We are ensuring t hat members are served by w ell -trained, e x peri e nced prov i der staff that are up to date on the most advanced clinical practice s. 06 041519a HCBOC Page 80 07 PROVIDER SATISFACTION SURVEY SAYS ... According to survey results released in early 2018, Sandhi/ls Center maintains a strong relationship with providers while successfully overseeing and managing behavioral health services. The survey measured provider satisfaction among each of North Carolina 's LME·MCOs, and was conducted by an independent review organization on behalf of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. Sandhills Center rated as the highest LME·MCO on 13 of 23 questions, the most of our peers. Our score was 91 .8 percent for the question that rates overall LME-MCO satisfaction . This was the highest score of our peer organizations and is significantly higher than the overall average from the previous year. Other areas where Sandhills Center scored the highest were: Accessibility for information, referrals and appointment scheduling. Response time for provider needs. Responsiveness to local community stakeholders. Accurate, timely processing of claims. Informative, helpful training for information technology and provider network issues and keeping providers updated, as well as answering questions accurately. Providing a useful website with the tools and materials necessary for successful operation. Sandhills Center is pleased that the survey results reaffirm our commitment to giving providers the tools they need to offer quality, evidence-based and appropriate treatment for our members. RESPONDING TO I DENTIFIED NEEDS A COMMITMEN T T O STEWARDSHIP AND QUALITY OF CA RE For the seco nd straight year, Sa n dhi l ls Center had the hig hest reported percen t age of servi ce level spending of the seven LME-MCOs in the state, according to a report from the NC Department of Heal t h and Hu man Services. The report shows investme n t in non -Medicaid services for the past fiscal year, which ended June 30, 2018. It ill ustrates that Sand hil ls Center spent 128.4 perce n t of the required service spendi ng for the year, exceeding the target of l 00 percent, and exceeding the stat ewide average spe n ding of l 07 percent. San d hi ll s Center takes innovative approaches to u tilizing o u r fund balance to ensure qual ity of care while monitoring appropriate use of resources. 041519a HCBOC Page 81 SANDHILLS CENTER REINVESTING SAVINGS IN FACILITY-BASED CRISIS SERVICES Sandhills Center has identified a need for crisis services for both children and adults in the region . Currently, there are three facilities planned with one location opening in 2019 that will offer Facility-Based Crisis services to our members . These are the projects that are currently underway: Randol ph County --Work began in 2018 to remodel an existing building located at 110 Walker Ave., in Asheboro, to offer Facility-Based Crisis services for adults. Construction is nearly complete .. The crisis center will be operated by Daymark Recovery Services , and will include a 16-bed, non-medical unit that will serve as an alternative to hosp italization for adults in crisis. Also included is an observation unit which offers time for individuals to be treated and their level of care needs assessed for up to 23 hours. Rich mo nd Coun t y --Community conversations sparked the development of a Child Facility-Based Crisis unit in the southern-most area of our region. Sa ndhill s Center was awarded $1 million from the state, al lowing the Board of Direct ors to purchase land and move forward with constructing a Child Faci lity-Bas ed Crisis center in Richmond Count y. It will offer 24/7 wal k-in crisis services , a 23 -hour observation unit, 16 beds , outpatient services and medicat ion management. Gui lford Cou nt y --In December 2018, Sandhil l s Cente r announced a partnership with the Guilford County Board of Commissioners and Cone Heal th to deve lop adult and youth Facility-Based Crisis services in one complex at a location in Greensboro. Two b uildings are p l anned. T he adult facility will feature a 16-bed crisis center , a 23- hour observation unit and outpatient services for adults , adolescents and children . The second building will be designed for children as a non-medical facility and an alternative to hospitalization. It also will have 16 beds, and servi ces will be available around the clock . Guilford County selected Cone Health to serve as the provider for the adult facility , and Sandh ills Center will choo se a provider for the youth center at a later date. Funding for a po rtion of these projects will come from reserve funds designated by the Sandhi ll s Center Board of Directors. Savi ng s from managing Medicaid services under the 1 91 5 (b)/(c) waiver ha s made it possible. One of the benefits of Sand hills Center becoming a waiver site for managing servic es was that savings could be reinvested back into local communities . Sand h ills Center is committed to seeing that adults and children who receive c ri sis services w i ll continue to partici- pate in behavioral health treatment by accepting referrals and connections to community providers. We look forward to the positive impact these serv ice additions will have on our region. INCREASED FOCUS ON INTEGRATED CARE THROUGH TCLI To ensure that individuals with severe mental illness can live stable lives, Sandhills Center has embraced the integrated or whole-person care model to address both physical and behavioral health. We believe that when an individual's physical health is diminished due to illness or medication side effects, it becomes difficult to maintain competitive employment, earn a steady paycheck and become fully active residents of their communities. In 2018, Sa ndhills Center identified a significant number of our members who met the criteria for the state's Transitions to Community Living Initiative (TCLI) were not able to take advantage of the services due to pervasive health care needs. TCLI provides eligible adults who have serious mental illnesses the opportunity to choose where they live and work, thereby promoting recovery through providing long-term housing, commu nit y-based services, supported employ- ment and community integration. Sandhills Center is now assessing both physical and mental health care challenges of people who fit the criteria . Staff continue to identify members who need follow -up assessments, including those taking medications intended to improve health but experience side effects that manifest in behavioral ways. 08 041519a HCBOC Page 82 FEEDBACK BRIDGES GAPS Sandhills Center values stakeholder feedback to identify gaps in services . The Community Needs Assessment Stakeholder Surveys are conducted each year to gain insights from members , families and other community partners. In 2018 , as in previous years, the Sandhills Center Consumer & Family Advisory Committee (CFAC) played an active role in helping to promote completion of the surveys. As a result , the survey clearly identified the need to expand crisis services throughout the region , as noted in this report. We also found a need to expand availability of Medication-Assisted Therapies (MAT) for opioids. A modifier was also added to our online provider directory to allow members to easily search for their desired MAT provider. Sandhills Center wishes to thank everyone who completed and contributed to distributing the stakeholder surveys . Strategies for addressing gaps in services are continuing . Recommendations and solutions are announced when appropriate. BROADENING RELATIONSHIPS WITH STAKEHOLDERS MEMBER EDUCATION IS IMPORTANT TO US Sand hills Center is proud of the opportunities our members and their families have to reach their full potential. Connecting them with our Family Support and Community Collaboration program continued to benefit families in 2018. The program is a partnership between Sandhills Center and North Carolina Families United. Five family support advocates represent Sand hills Cente r and Famili es United throughout the nine-county region. In each county, they regularly facilitate workshops and support groups where families are afforded opportunities to hear from professionals on important topics , share concerns and l earn from each other. The advocates also facilitate collaboration among stakeholders, and educate agencies about Sandhills Center resources . In 2018, programming offered through the partnership included : Anger and Stress Management workshops Foster parent support groups Human Trafficking workshops 09 Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders workshop "Autism 101" Autism support groups "Helping Your Child Identify and Ex press Their Feelings " "Living After Lo sing " Personality Disorders training Oppositional Defiant Disorders work shop "Understanding Data and Gaps in Mental Health Servi c es Among the Latino Community" Family Loss and T rauma support groups "Trends i n Marijuana and Opioid Use" Depression and Suicide Awareness "E-Cigarette Use Among Youth" Sand hills Cente r members are encourag ed to utilize Family Support and Community Collaboration resources throughout the year. The partnership is committed to linking member families with valuable educational programming within their communities . A complete schedule of events is posted on our website under the "Calendar" heading at www.SandhillsCenter.org. 041519a HCBOC Page 83 CELEBRATING 10 YEARS OF CRISIS TRAINING Sand hills Center had reason to celebrate a milestone in 2018. For 10 years, we have cosponsored Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training for first responders. CIT is a partnership between Sandhills Center, law enforcement and other first responder agencies, local NAMI chapters and area community colleges. The CIT training program was created to divert individuals living with behavioral health conditions from arrest through the creation of more effective interactions among law enforcement, providers, individuals living with mental illness and their families. CIT is a rigorous 40-hour program with blocks of information taught by subject matter experts. Students participate in simulation activities, as well as go into the community to meet with individuals with lived experience . The individuals share information about themselves, their loved ones and interactions they have had with first responders. Relationships and collaborations form throughout the week between the partici- pants and speakers. The emergency medical services (EMS) CIT curriculum is slightly shorter at 32 hours. For CIT alumni, 8-hour advanced courses have been held in the region for the last two years. In 2008 , Sandhills Center conducted its first CIT class for law enforcement personnel in Moore County. Over the past decade, CIT in the region has grown to include not only city police officers and county sheriff's deputies, but also NC Department of Public Safety probation and parole officers, telecommunicators, campus police , paramedics and military police. Sandhills Center has been involved with the CIT curriculum offered during Ba sic Law Enforcement Training (BLE T) at Randolph Community College for two years . In 2018, we had our first K-9 officer (see photo, right) graduate from the program , we held our first-ever Hoke County class , and we cosponsored a week-long session tailored to schoo l resource officers in Guilford County. In total for 2018, 12 classes were held in our communities, with 211 earning CIT certification. Here is the breakdown of participants during the year : Sworn office rs --101 Out of county participants --7 School resource officers --21 Other first responders (including BLET students) --82 Since its inception in 2008, Sandhi ll s Ce nter has cosponsored 66 CIT classes, and graduated nearly l ,3SO participants . We embrace the philosophy that CIT has many benefits, including: Reduced injury rates am o ng officers and people with mental illnesses. Reduced criminal justice system costs and the need for additional crisis resources. In creased referral rates and reduced arrest rates among people with behavioral health challenges. Improved collaboratio n between law enforcement and agencies. A reduction in myths and stigmas associated with mental illness. Appropriate face-to-face interactions between first responders, people with mental illness and their families. Photo credit: Kellie Moran, Sandhills Center Justice Systems Clinical Liaison. Hoke County Sheriff's Deputy Mark Davies and K-9 Officer Rocky participated in CIT training in August 2018. 10 041519a HCBOC Page 84 11 CONTINUING THE OPIOID FIGHT By joining with community partners and expanding the services that are delivered by our provider network, Sandhills Center continued its efforts to raise awareness and expand treatment options for opioid misuse. In February and March 2018, Sandhllls Center collaborated with the Harnett County Sheriff's Office, Daymark Recovery Services, local pharma- cists and Harnett County Schools to present opioid prevention assemblies ·· entitled 7he Face of Opioid Abuse··· in five Harnett County high schools. About 5,500 students learned that opioid addiction can affect anyone, and that addiction o~en starts with prescription pain medications for sports injuries and routine dental procedures. We believe that raising awareness in the youth population will inform a new generation about the dangers of opioid misuse. Sandhills Center also has funded an expansion of the number of providers offering Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT). Suboxone administration was expanded through a pilot program that requires MAT providers to adhere to an integrated, evidence-based practice model that includes a continuum of care plan, concurrent behavioral therapy and U.S . Drug Enforcement Administration compliance. Sandhills Center believes that taking a variety of approaches to the opioid crisis can be part of the solution. Preparing young people to understand the seriousness of addiction is one avenue, and evidence-based medical efforts such as MAT are another. SANDHILL$ CEN'tER 24/7 CALL CENTER 1 -800-2 56-2452 Admin i st rative Office s m a i li ng address: P.O. Bo x 9 Wes t End , NC (910) 6 7 3 -911 1 www .SandhillsCenter.org ·. ~ .... r ---.. ,.,----.... r urac ) ~~) { urac ) ~ \...._..., ACCREDITED ACCREDITED ACCREDITE D tM#Ht.lWIII" """"c .. c .... ---E...,_or..vt QOII ,...,..05,,91/'lOlt -., ...... ot.1)1,.1' Sandhllls Center is fully accredited by URA( In t he areas of Health Network, Health Call Ce nter, and Health Uti l izatio n Management, which ensures that our members receive hig h-q uality service . We make su re that you receive the attention and care yo u deserve while protecting your privacy. 041519a HCBOC Page 85 SAND HILLS CENTER QUARTERLY COMMUNI Y REPORT JANUARY 2019 041519a HCBOC Page 86 LEADERSHIP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Victoria Whitt BOARD MEMBERS Chair Thad Ussery Vice Chair Commissioner Kay Cashion Secretary Michele Weatherly Anson County Commissioner Ross Streater Priscilla Little Guilford County Commissioner Kay Cashion Dixie Branch Gart Evans Carlos Townsend Harnett County Commissioner Joe Miller Bill Larrison Hoke County Commissioner Harry Southerland Shirley Hart Lee County Commissioner Kevin Dodson Walter Ferguson Montgomery County Commi ssioner Anthony Copeland Carol Whitaker Moore County Commissioner Otis Ritter Matthew Rothbeind Randolph County Commissioner David Allen Mazie Fleetwood Leann Henkel Richmond County Thad Ussery Michele Weatherly Provider Council Representative Jerry Earnhardt Hospital Representative Vacant 02 041519a HCBOC Page 87 A MESSAGE FROM THE CEO EDUCATION IS A PRIORITY Each year, Sandhills Center conducts a thorough evaluation of the training and educational needs of our staff, provider network, members and their families, and our stakeholder commun ity. We cons i stent ly reflect on ways for providers and agencies to make continued improvements in their approach to service delivery . We also want to ensure that families are equipped with the latest informational resources and support so that they are better prepared to take on everyday challenges. Sandhills Center collects valuable feedback about educational needs through surveys, committees and community collaboratives . We also pay careful attention to legislative i nitiatives that warrant the development of important technical assistance programming . In this report, we highlight a few educational resources that demonstrate Sandhills Center's strong desire to invest in public outreach and activities that strengthen our communities : QPR train-the-trainer instruction for provi d ers , staff and agency repre - sentatives for the prevent ion of suicide . Our Family Support and Community Collaboration partnership with North Carolina Families United . Health Information Exchange training for prov iders related to the new NC HealthConnex integrated care data-sharing re source . Sandhills Center encourages network providers and stakeholders to actively participate in activities such as these . A complete calendar of events is regularly updated on our website --www.SandhillsCenter.org . Family support and training opportunities are offered throughout the year in our region which encompasses Anson , Guilford , Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore , Randolph and Richmond coun t ies . We look forward to your participation . Victoria Whitt, Chief Executive Officer Sandh i lls Center 041519a HCBOC Page 88 SANDHILLS CENTER SPONSORS HIE TRAINING FOR PROVIDERS Sandhills Center has embraced the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services' strategic plan to improve healthcare through "an innovative, whole-person, well-coordinated system of care, which addresses both medical and nonmedical drivers of health , and promotes health equity ." Part of the plan involves implementation of the new NC HealthConnex Health Information Exchange (HIE). Providers of Medicaid behavioral health and I/DD services and supports are required to connect and submit data to NC HealthConnex by June 1, 2019, if they are to continue receiving payments for the Medicaid and -~~·s,11,,, state-funded services they provide. We recognize that the new HIE is intended to improve whole-person health- care quality, enhance patient safety, boost outcomes and reduce overall healthcare costs by making health data available to participating providers . To prepare our provider network for the changes, Sandhills Center sponsored two three-hour training sessions entitled, "Connecting to HIE and the 1115 Waiver: What Providers Need to Know." The sessions were held Oct. 18 in Randolph County, and Nov. 1 in Richmond County . Nearly 200 ,providers attended the sessions conducted by Tara Larson , Vi ce President of Healthcare Policy for Cansler Collaborative Resources Inc. The sessions covered the following topics : An overview of NC HealthConnex and legislative requirements. A status update on the HIE Behavioral Health/lDD Implementation Work- group. The relationship between the HIE and 111 5 Medicaid Waiver Standard Plans and Tailored Plans . Strategies for agency planning and change management steps for success- ful HIE and data analytics implementation. How and why the HIE and data analytics are necessary for value-based purchasing. Lessons learned by providers who have successfully connected to the new HIE. More information can be found on our website --www.SandhillsCenter .org . We believe that using data through the modernized HIE will assist organiza- tions to successfully manage their business strategies . The new HIE will help identify trends and outliers easily and proactively, rather than reactively . It will allow p roviders to see data that will guide process improvements. It also will help track total cost versus outcomes, identify areas to target resources, and integrate providers into the overall health systems through- out the nine-county region . 041519a HCBOC Page 89 ~ MEMBERSHIP ' PROMOTING FAMILY EDUCATION, COLLABORATION Through the Family Support and Community Collaboration program, we encourage families and children to reach their full potential by connecting them with important learning opportunities . The program is a partnership between Sandhills Center and North Carolina Families United . Five family support advocates are assigned to the nine counties within the Sandhills Center region . The advocates are knowledgeable about services and supports that are available in their geographic areas . The program strives to support, empower and educate families of children with emotional, learning or behavioral challenges . Our advocates provide families with information about community and Sandhills Center resources . They also offer brochures pertaining to common mental health or substance abuse issues . The advocates regularly facilitate support groups tailored to the needs of grandparents , foster parents, families, youth or parent groups . Families are afforded opportunities to share concerns and learn from each other, and presenters are invited to speak about topics of interest. Some support groups are formed in partner- ship with Departments of Social Services and other child-serving agencies . Advocates support families by preparing them for contacts with local agencies, schools and providers. In this role, they attend Individualized Education Plan or Child and Family Team meetings with parents . The Family Support and Community Collaboration program recognizes that families are best served when agencies work together, share information, identify service gaps and solve problems around family needs . To accomplish this, advocates attend partner-agency team meetings that focus on diverse areas such as juvenile crime prevention programming, child fatality reviews, social services community child protection teams and substance abuse task force meetings. The advocates speak on behalf of families, facilitate collaboration and educate agencies about Sandhills Center resources . Advocates regularly participate in community health fairs and events to share information about the program and Sandhills Center. In addition, advocates facilitate free workshops that address topics such as child trafficking, suicide awareness , substance abuse , autism, stress management and parent resiliency. Events are publicized via e-mail and the calendar pages on the Sandhills Center website . Sandhills Center is committed to linking our member families and child-serving partners with valuable educational programming and other resources within their neighborhoods and communities . 041519a HCBOC Page 90 ~ y SUICIDE-PREVENTION TRAINING OFFERED Sandhills Center recently sponsored a train-the-trainer session that certified 1 5 QPR Gatekeeper instructors from Guilford, Harnett, Montgomery and Richmond counties within the Sandhills Center region. QPR stands for Question , Persuade and Refer -three steps that participants can learn to help save lives from suicide . Just as people trained in CPR and the Heimlich maneuver help save thousands of lives each year, people trained in QPR learn how to recognize the warning signs of a suicide crisis and how to question , persuade and refer someone to seek help. QPR is listed on the National Registry of Evidence-Based Practices and Programs. More than 18,000 people have been trained and certified as QPR Gatekeeper Instructors in the United States and abroad. The QPR Gatekeeper instruction was held at Randolph Community College on Dec. 4, 2018 . Following the training, participants have agreed to teach a minimum of three 2-hour QPR Gatekeeper training sessions annually in part- nership with Sandhills Center. Sand hills Center currently offers a segment of QPR within its 40-hour Crisis Intervention Team training for law enforcement and other first responders . The one -day QPR Gatekeeper train-the-trainer program was an important addition to the community and provider education repertoire that already is available within the Sandhills Center region . Last year , for example, Sandhills Center collaborated with the NC Department of Health and Human Services and the University of North Carolina School o f Social Work to sponsor a 40-hour Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) train-the- trainer program. MHFA in the Sandhills Center region has produced 12 new instructors who have facilitated training. As a result , about 600 individuals from all nine Sandhills Center counties have earned MHFA certification since January 2017 . Those who have earned MHFA certification have included staff from the Corrections Division (as part of a larger statewide initiative), local governments , Departments of Social Services , health care facilities, universities , network providers and nonprofit agencies . Sandhills Center will continue to build on the successes of the MHFA and QPR Gatekeeper programs . Our commi t ment to this effort demonstrates our strong desire to invest in public outreach and educational activities that strengthen our communities . A photo of the QPR Gatekeeper training clas s can be found on page 8 of this report. 041519a HCBOC Page 91 FINANCIALS 1 .6 Revenues Medicaid Service Contracts $235,192,635 70.4% State, Federal Service Funds and Medicaid Flow 28,255, 1 00 8.5% Co u n t y Ge n e r a l and O t he r Loca l 12,016,665 3.6% CD rearm t Plan r ... g Adm n strdt1 m d nd MH '-A fr tmP t Pl n 1 nq 8,587,477 2.6% Medrcard Adm1nr strat1on General and LME Admin1s t r at ion 15,608,693 4.7% Medicaid Reserve Funds 5,279,372 1.6% Fun d Balance 29,357,649 8.6% TOTAL $334,297,591 100% 1. 7 0.2 0.4 \ Expenses Contracts $299,707,9 3 1 89 .6% Pe r so n nel 27,185,863 8.1% Materials and Supplies 436,787 0.2% Cu r rent Obl igations 5,554,864 1.7% Fr 11 r ., dn prt I 1,412,146 0.4% TOTAL $334,297,591 100% 07 041519a HCBOC Page 92 ~ -;.._• --~--r •. .:. SAND HILLS CENTER Sandhills Center assures that people in need of assistance h ave access to quality mental health , intellectual/developmental disabilities and substance use disorder services in the central North Carolina counties of Anson , Guilford , Harnett, Hoke, Lee , Montgomery, Moore , Randolph and Richmond . 24-HOUR CALL CENTER 1-800-2 56-24 52 TTY: 1-866-51 8-6778 VISIT US ONLINE www .Sand hi 11 sCenter.org FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL ONLINE BEHAVIORAL HEAL TH SCREENING AND RESOURCES www .Sand hi I lsCenterAcces s2Care.org Sandhills Center QPR training , November 2018 Sandhills Center is nationally accredited. -.. ..,._ ~. ~---. < -~ --- ,r---", e ) ACCREDITED "-aid'I NHwcNI, C...,..06.1>11:0tt ·"'. ;:-·-- .~:.:"'; .. :.....:·--~·--· "" ---... V ,-., ,.~, ,r ' ( ' f urac) t urac) "'-...._....rJ ~~..,.,,,I ACCREDITED ACCREl>ITED -""'-........ """' .... l •-""OS.'0111011 -........ cs,ov,o,. 08 041519a HCBOC Page 93 Harnett County Sandhills Center has representation on the following committees/task forces : Harnett County Children's Collaborative Child Fatality Taskforce/Community Child Protection Team Community Care of North Carolina Collaborative-CCPGM Crisis Collaborative Crisis Solutions Committee , NAMI DOJ/RDT Committee Meetings Juvenile Crime Prevention Council UCPC) Local lnteragency Coordinating Council (LICC) Veteran's Treatment Court Region 7 Continuum of Care School Health Advisory Council Schools Partnership/Sheriff Community Development/Education Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) County employees trained Corrections staff trained MHFA classes are available for staffs of all other government municipalities and agencies, nonprofit organizations, and faith communities Harnett Co Schools (HCS) How to help children through grieving process (Harnett Co Schools student support staff) Self-care and Stress Management Currently working to schedule suicide assessment tool training to all district student support services staff (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale-C-SSRS) (overview sheet submitted) Training partners: Sandhills Pediatrics Training includes : bringing in community-based mental health providers that already work with the schools to introduce them to the new assessment tool the schools are switching to 041519a HCBOC Page 94 SHC staff recruited HCS for participation in the statewide School Mental Health Initiative Phase II: Regional Networks (Harnett is part of the North Central Regional Network) Future initiative: will offer QPR suicide prevention training to all school personnel (by school to include teachers and other staff), exploring prevention program for students Substance Use/Opioid Response 2018 partnered with Harnett Co Sheriff's Office to create one hour opioid learning session for high school students SHC staff recruited appropriate committee members and content experts Over 3500 students were exposed to the information Before and after questionnaires showed an increase in understanding of the connection between opioids and heroin that did not exist prior to the sessions 2019 working with Harnett Co Sherriff's Office to develop community programs to address opioid crisis in Harnett County HRSA 10-County Planning Committee grant/working with Harnett Co Sheriff's office and First Health to include Harnett County in grant-funded program -Grant obtained by First Health's Community Services dept. o SHC provided letter of support for grant application and are consortium partners 2019 areas of focus to include: Establishing first of three certified Peer Support Specialist team (in progress) -Creating a continuum of care to identify gaps in treatment -Tracking system for referrals to recovery programs Developing an education tool for at-risk individuals Establishing a Rapid Overdoes Response teams Harnett County Child Advocacy Center (CAC) Pamela staff served on development team to help establish CAC in Harnett Co /opened Nov 2018 Inclusion Collaborative (LICC) SHC member Miscellaneous Working to add Sharon Wilson (Daymark) to appropriate committee agendas for overview of new Facility Based Crisis Centers (throughout catchment) Provide access to services and MH crisis information (Posters and Streaming PowerPoint) to various agencies: DSS, Health Dept., library, Campbell University Available in Harnett Co DSS 041519a HCBOC Page 95 Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Training Harnett County held its third Crisis Intervention Team training class the week of Nov. 5, 2018. Thirteen officers representing the Harnett County Sheriff's Office, Lee County Sheriff's Office and the Dunn Police Department participated in the 40-hour class. The topics covered included mental illness, substance use, intellectual and developmental disabilities, legal issues, suicide prevention, medications and de-escalating crisis situations. The students met individuals and families with lived experience, and visited a local provider to speak with people who are receiving services. Lt. Scott Jeffries of the Harnett County Sheriff's Office hosted the class. In addition to Sandhills Center, CIT in Harnett County is cosponsored by NAMI - Cumberland, Lee & Harnett, Central Carolina Community College, Good Hope Hospital, Harnett Health, and the Harnett County Sheriff's Office. 041519a HCBOC Page 96 Agenda Item _ _,_g __ HARNETT COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 108 E. FRONT STREET LILLINGTON, NC 27546 910-893-7525 HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA FAX 910-893-2793 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HARNETT COUNTY NORTHWEST AREA PLAN A public hearing will be held by the Harnett County Board of Commissioners in the Assembly Room of the County Administration Building located at 420 McKinney Parkway in Lillington, NC at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 2019. The purpose of this hearing is to hear the views of the residents of Harnett County on the proposed New Harnett County Northwest Area Plan. Information may be viewed at the Harnett County Planning Office, 108 E. Front St., Lillington, NC during regular business hours of 8:00am-5:00 pm, Monday through Friday at http://www.hamett.org/planning/current-petitions.asp Harnett County Northwest Area Plan-Harnett County Development Services & Stewart, Inc. request adoption of the proposed new Harnett County Northwest Area Plan. The purpose of this small area plan is to provide a framework to guide appropriate development within a high growth area while maintaining the rural character, environmental quality, and enhancing livability of the area. THE PUBLIC IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS REQUEST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON DISCUSSION, DEBATE AND PRESENTATIONS FROM OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS AT THE FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. THE DAILY RECORD: Run Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 & Friday, April 12, 2019 Please Bill: Hamett County Development Services. PO Box 65 Lillington, N.C. 27546 Questions regarding this ad should be directed to Teresa Byrd at 814-6416 or 893-7525 Thank you 041519a HCBOC Page 97 Board Meeting Agenda Item Agenda Ite __ m _____ ....JlgL--.: MEETING DA TE: April 15, 2019 TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Northwest Area Land Use Plan REQUESTED BY: Development Services/ Mark Locklear REQUEST: Hamett County Development Services & Stewart, Inc. request adoption of the proposed new Northwest Area Land Use Plan. The purpose of this small area plan is to provide a framework to guide appropriate development within a high growth area while maintaining the rural character, environmental quality, and enhancing livability of the area. Additional Information: On March 4th, the Hamett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval based on compatibility with Hamett County regulatory documents and would promote public health, safety, and general welfare of the County, as well as maintain orderly and compatible land use and development patterns that encourage environmentally responsible development practices. Per discussions at the April 15th County Commissioners meeting, attached are several land use map options for review at the April 9th work session. FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: C:\Users\gwheeler\AppData\Local\Microsoft\ Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\OZMK66X9\NW LUP _ CC agenda form .docx Page l of I 041519a HCBOC Page 98 e,, :\ Harnett '(~ COUNTY REQUEST FORM Planning Department 108 E. Front Street L rlORTH CAROLir;i P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546 Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793 Planning Board: March 4, 2019 County Commissioners: April 15, 2019 Applicant Information Applicant: Name: Harnett County Development Services Address: PO Box 65 City/State/Zip: Lillington, NC 27546 Type of Change (gJ New Addition (gJ Revision Adoption of the Northwest Area Land Use Plan Proposed Text: See Attachments Reason for Requested Change: This planning effort built on policies in the 2015 Comprehensive Growth Plan and focused on balancing the rural character of the area while accommodating growth and determining infrastructure needs . The final outcome of this plan will be a revised land use plan to guide rezonings and recommendations that will guide public and private investment decisions for years to come. Objectives and strategies focus on preservation of community character. reducing sprawl. maximizing existing infrastructure. evaluating transportation and recreation opportunities and needs. considering environmental impacts. and improving the quality of life for Harnett County. The plan & a comment survey can be found he re: http://www. harnett.orq/planni nq/long-range-planni ng .asp "2018 North West Area Plan" Planning Board Results & Comments: On March 4th, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the Northwest Area Land Use Plan. Below are the member comments ... Kathy Wood • Liked the Plan. Page 1 of 2 041519a HCBOC Page 99 Everett Blake • Liked the Plan . • It seems evident that this Plan will help with the growth pressures that western Harnett experienced without such a tool. • Non-residential growth will come, and probably will upset some existing residents ... example rezoning process, etc. • Agrees that higher design/ development standards are need and potentially expanded to other areas of the County . • Continu i ng effort to accentuate Parks & Recreation and natural resources of Harnett County . • Extending sewer towards the Duncan area will probably be a benefit for future growth . Cris Nystrom • Like the idea that Agriculture was a focus and maintain a rural character was emphasized. • Increase the "bare minimum" for residential standards is a good idea, as most developers will go above this basel i ne just due to competition & market demands . • Sales leakage has to stop! Quality of life in Harnett should draw folks, commercial businesses, and industry to this county. Stanley Price • Liked the Plan and appreciated the efforts. Teresa H. Ratcliff • Liked the Plan . • Wanted to ensure Campbell University was involved and stays involved with County undertakings, etc . Suggested Statement-of-Consistency: (Staff concludes that...) As described within the document, the proposed NW Area Land Use Plan is compatible with Harnett County regulatory documents and would promote public health, safety, and general welfare of the County, as well as maintain orderly and compatible land use and development patterns that encourage environmentally responsible development practices . Therefore, it is recommended that this Plan be APPROVED . Page 2 of 2 041519a HCBOC Page 100' j~· ,, .I ... ~ ... \.,· ¥ ~-~ z '· l~ ' Agricultural and Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential In-Town Residential Rural Center Commercial Mixed Use Town Center 041519a HCBOC Page 101~ \ j\ '60f<•""'"' .., '\ '6 Parks and Conservation Agricultural and Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential In-Town Residential Rural Center Commercial Mixed Use Town Center 041519a HCBOC Page 102FUTURE LAND USE ~ . --. . ' -----------------------, ---· 0 0 0 PROTECTED AREAS Parks and other forms of protected open space, including large conservation easements ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS Environmentally sensitive areas, Including floodplains and areas located in the Conservation Overlay Zoning District. Primary uses in these areas would be open space, forestry, and agriculture. AGRICULnJRE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL Primarily agricultural and forestry uses with some rural residential areas. These areas are located outside of existing and future service areas and rely on septic systems for wastewater treatment They have a limited road network and In some cases lie within High Quality Watershed or Water Supply Watershed areas. The lack of utility and transportation infrastructure, the established low density development pattern and ongoing agricultural activities in these areas contribute to their rural character. This character can be enhanced by encouraging only low intensity uses, single family residential up to one unit per acre and context sensitive rural design. Smaller lots would be permitted as part of a Rural Cluster Development, which would Include 40% open space, and a maximum number of 20 lots per development. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Single family detached residential Intended to remain predominately suburban in character and provide for low density single-family residential development on lots smaller than those In Rural Residential areas. Gross densities of 1-2 dwelling units per acre depending on utilities, soils, and character of adjacent development Smaller lot sizes would be permitted as part of a Conservation Development, which would also Include 40% open space to preserve sensitive environmental areas, and provide buffers and meaningful open space. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Located In areas served by current or planned utilities, medium density residential permits a mix of housing types including single family detached homes, smal~lot homes and patio homes. Gross densities of up to 3 dwelling units per acre. Smaller lot sizes would be permitted as part of a Conservation Development, which would also include 40% open space to preserve sensitive environmental areas, and provide buffers and meaningful open space. 0 0 0 0 IN-TOWN RESIDENTIAL Compact residential with a mix of housing types including single family detached homes with average lot sizes, smalHot homes and patio homes that are complimentary of the existing historic residential development of nearby towns and crossroads communities. Gross densities of up to 5 dwelling units per acre. Located In areas served by current or planned utilities and In areas near the extra-territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of towns. Additional housing types (including townhomes and apartments) and higher densities may be appropriate as part of planned developments or near Development Nodes. RURAL CENTERS Small scale commercial centers. The exact location and extent of the Rural Centers will be market driven, however, the non-residential footprint will usually be less than 50,000 square feet in these areas. Building should mimic historical scale and architectural details. Residential includes smaller lot homes, patio homes and some small-scale attached products (such as townhomes or quadplexes). COMMUNITY MIXED USE These areas are meant to be nodes or activity centers for growing areas in the County. They are located near concentrations of existing or planned residences, and areas with access to major thoroughfares and utilities. These areas Incorporate commercial uses including grocery stores, retail establishments, restaurants and services. Office, cMc and Institutional uses should complement commercial uses. Higher density residential including small lot single-famlly, townhomes and apartments should be located in close proximity to shopping and service destinations and complimented by pedestrian facilities to provide more walking opportunities to Internal and external destinations. The exact location and size of nonresidential areas will be dependent on market conditions. EMPLOYMENT MIXED USE These areas are located along major thoroughfares and include prime locations for economic development opportunities. Uses encouraged in the Employment Mixed Use areas include but are not limited to industrial, warehouse, office, research and development, tech-flex, medical, energy and distribution. Residential development is appropriate only when not In conflict with existing or future industry or commercial uses. 041519a HCBOC Page 103Proposed Land Use Map: inset of Chalybeate Springs Rd & Purfoy Rd area Drake Landing • CURRIN Ro ;'9'_>: \ \ Previous DRAFT Land Use Map: inset of Chalybeate Springs Rd & Purfoy Rd area rake Landing • ' ' ' 041519a HCBOC Page 104 C, C: ·c 0 N C, C: ;:: II> '>< w 041519a HCBOC Page 105 HARNETT COUNTY NORTHWEST AREA PLAN ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 041519a HCBOC Page 106 ADVISORY COMMITTEE Angie Stewart Barry Blevins Brian Haney Carl Davis Chris Prince Debbie Taylor Everett Blake Glenn McFadden Gordon Springle Greg Burns Jimmy Riddle Lew Weatherspoon Nick Dula Paula Stewart Philip Culpeppe r Richie Hines Sean Johnson Shelby Powell Steve Ward Walter Weeks COUNTY COMMISSION Gordon Springle, Chairman Howard L . Penny, Vice-Chairman Abe Elmore Barbara McKoy Joe Miller STAFF TEAM Mark Locklear Jay Sikes Landon Chandler David McRae Coley Price CONSULTANT TEAM Stewart Kimley -Horn WSP ADOPTED BY HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DATE r:_ ~ Harnett ~(~ COUNTY ~ NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR HARNETT COUNTY BY Kimley >>>Horn '''I> STEWART Grow Harnett County 041519a HCBOC Page 107 1 A.B..O.LJ.T TH E . .Pk.AN PLAN PURPOSE RELEVANT PLANS PLANNING PROCESS 1 2 .F.RA.MIN.G .. TH .1= .. P..~A.N .......................................................................... . 7 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ECONOMIC AND LAND USE TRENDS INFRASTRUCTURE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY INPUT SWOT ANALYSIS 3 P~AN . .F..R.A.M.1=.W.0.RK ... ······································ ............................. , ....... 4.1 4 OVERVIEW FUTURE LAND USE CONCEPT LAND USE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION UTILITIES NAIV..R.A .L.. Rl=.$0.lJ.RC:.~$. ANP .OP£:N .$.P.AC:£: . . <.:.OQ.RP .1NAI1.0N .I.M .P .~.~M .~N TAT '-9.N .. $.Tf=.P$... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................. 4. ~ Harnett County Northwest Ar ea Plan : ii 041519a HCBOC Page 108 ••••••••• • ABOUT : • ,THE • • : PLAN -- 041519a HCBOC Page 109 In 2015, Harnett County undertook a Comprehensive Growth Plan that established goals and strategies to improve Harnett County's quality of life and competitive po- sition in the region . The purpose of the Harnett County Northwest Area Plan is to build on the Comprehensive Growth Plan and create a more detailed guide for the northwestern portion of the county, including the northern portion of Lillington and western portion of Angier, even though these areas are incorporated. This plan will serve as a framework for accommodating growth and development while maintain- ing rural character, environmental quality, and the livability of the area. The study area is predominantly rural in character, with many working farms and timber lands, historic crossroads communities and small scale residential, industrial, and commercial development. However, this rural character is under pressure from the residential growth emanating from communities to the north, specifically the rapid growth of Wake County and Fuquay-Varina. Northwest Harnett County has experienced unprecedented growth over the past five years and will continue to for the foreseeable future. The Northwest Area Plan provides a roadmap for how to manage that growth so that the community benefits from change while also pro- tecting the characteristics and qualities that the community values. / CHATHA( CO. ' ~-- LEE co.> \ l STUDY AREA --------------HARNETT COUNTY ---...112 .... ·--...... Harnett County Northwest Area Plan : 1 041519a HCBOC Page 110 -=-·- -..... , ... -- ,. ' ... • -~ ... ... 2 Grow Harnett County ··,... ,. ... . .... ·"' ....... ........... TOWN OF LILLINGTON The northern part of the Town of Lillington is in the study area boundaries. Lillington's Comprehensive Plan anticipates commercial and institutional growth north of the Cape Fear River centered on the intersection of NC 210 and US 401 and Brightwater a mixed-use business center that currently houses Central Harnett Hospital. In addition, the plan shows planned green spaces located on both sides of the Cape Fear River and potential residential development north and south of US 401 east of NC 210. TOWN OF ANGIER The western portion of the Town of Angier is located within the study area boundaries. Angier's Comprehensive Plan includes the fol lowing future land uses that could impact the study area: • Medium density residential growth (R -10 zoning (10,000 square foot lots) with water + sewer) • Commercial corridor along NC 55 • High density residential (R-6 zoning (6,000 square foot lots) w it h water + sewer) • Planned new connector road on west side of town TOWN OF FUQUAY-VARINA Fuquay-Varina's Comprehensive Plan projects that the Town's popu lation will triple if current growth trends continue. In anticipation of this growth. the Town is expanding its Extra Territorial Jurisdiction south to the Wake-Harnett County line, directly adjacent to the study area . Planned land uses impacting the study area include:: • Large Lot: 2 dwelling units per acre • Small Lot: 2 -6 dwelling units per acre • Mixed-Density: 4-8 dwelling units per acre 041519a HCBOC Page 111 COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH PLAN Harnett County's Comprehensive Growth Plan , adopted in 2015, establi s hed a vision and goals for County-wide issues. The plan focuses on fi v e themes: Land Use, Econom ic Devel opment, Utilities, Natural Resources, and Transportation . The Northwest Area Plan bu ilds on and refines the county -wide goals as it relates to the this portion of the County. The Future L and Use Map that is included in this p lan is meant to clar ify and refine some o f the recommendations in the Comprehens ive Growth Plan based on further study and public input in the Northwest Area . UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE Harnett County's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) sets the regulations for development in the county. Recently, the County has updated their standards for certain t ypes of residential development to require curb and gutter, sidewalks, and street trees in more situations. These changes are intended to promote high quality development and ensure future pedestrian connections. SOUTHWEST AREA STUDY Harnett County is one of multiple counties and municipalities included in the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's (CAMPO) study of regional growth and transportation networks. As part of thi s ongoing study, CAMPO will project future growth and put forth recommendations of how the transportation system can accoml!lodate this growth. This regional look will be critical to understanding the cross-county travel patterns and transportation needs of study area residents. T GI • , ·-~ ,_ . ..... : - ..;., . :-, '*, , -~:_--~.:~ . -:'_ ~'·.I, ·-s, \ 'I _. ~ I --·~~ '~,-,._ ·-1.1@ \ \ \ t • ,..> '-- I I . I . . .. I " . . . , ... '"' ~ ... !,...-U 1 • I ---. "'* •• --1 -"' . ... •• -;,I:. ~·--•_•~_~_u_,_M--~_.u_M•_"~_'·_••~_•~-'-"------------.I , _____ --J Harnett County Northwest Ar ea Plan : 3 041519a HCBOC Page 112 PROJECT PHASES The planning process that led to the development of the Harnett County Northwest Area Plan was divided into four phases. The first phase began in May of 2018 and focused on project initiation including data collection, review of existing plans for both the County and neighboring municipalities, a kick-off meeting with County staff, and interviews with key stakeholders. The second phase included steering committee meetings, a tour of the study area , analysis of constraints, economic opportunities and infrastructure needs, as well a public meeting and online survey. During the third phase a draft future land use map was created along with concepts for small areas and draft strategies, wh ich were reviewed and adjusted through two steering committee meetings. All information was stored and shared on the Development Serv ices's website to encourage participat i on and understanding. The adoption phase of the process occurred during ___ of 2019 and included developing implementation steps and review and adoption of the plan by the Planning Board and County Commission. SCHEDULE May -June 2018 4 Grow Harnett County Inventory Assessment Mapping Land Use Suitabilit y 041519a HCBOC Page 113 PLANNING PROCESS ............ , ........ "'"' .... ., ........ ·- Future Land use 1 nfrastructure Concept Plans Draft Plan Sept .• Jan. 2018 Implementation Strategies Final Document Adoption Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 5 041519a HCBOC Page 114 ••••••••• • FRAMING : • THE • :PLAN • • • • - 041519a HCBOC Page 115 Over the past year there has been an increase in new residential development m the study area . The Northwest Area Plan is informed by both quantitative analysis and quali- tative input from the community. There is a common theme in all of the in- formation collected during this p lanning process: change. Northwest Harnett County has experienced tremendous growth over the past decade, and will continue to change in the future. This chapter incl udes information on chang- es to the area's population and demographics, economic and land use trends, and infrastructure and natural resources. It incl udes community input gathered throughout the plan development process. It outlines recent accomplishments and identifies key issues that need to be addressed through county-led initia- tives and through cooperation with municipalities and private entities. Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 7 041519a HCBOC Page 1168 Grow Harnett Co unty DEMOGRAPHICS Proximity to Raleigh, the Research Triangle Park via US 401 , and the new Triangle Expressway are driving a rapid expansion of residential demand in Northwest Harnett County, bringing with it both opportunities and challenges. The population of the study area has grown by 50% between 2000 and 2017. This is a net increase of 743 homes and 1,775 people. The area's current population is 16,252 (Source: Esri) and is projected to grow by over 18,000 people by 2038 according to population projections produced by the Triangle J Council of Governments. The population of the study area is older than Harnett County on average, but in line with North Carolina and US median age, and has roughly half the poverty rate of the county as a whole (9.9% v 18.3%). The study area is attractive to families looking for a semi-rural setting close to the job centers in Wake County and RTP. It is also home to older people living in a mix of higher-value and affordable homes. AGE AND INCOME STUDY AREA HARNETI COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES 37.7 33 38.3 MEDIAN AGE MEDIAN AGE MED IAN AGE MEDIAN AGE 9.9% 18.3 % 12 .4 % PERSONS BELOW PERSONS BELOW PERSONS BELOW PERSONS BELOW POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINE HOUSING UNIT GROWTH (2000-2017) 7,000 6,000 S,000 4,000 3,000 2.000 1,000 0 2000 2010 2017 Source: Esn 041519a HCBOC Page 117 LAND USE The majority of land in Northwest Harnett County is used for agriculture or silviculture, and lends the area a rural character that is valued by the community. However, a substantial majority of land value is derived from single family residential land uses. Balancing these two uses -agriculture and residential -is one of the defining challenges of future growth in the area. Commercial and industrial land uses make up only 2.2% of the land area in Northwest Harnett County, yet they make up over 10% of the property value. In addition, a 2011 Cost of Land Use Fiscal Analysis conducted for the Fort Bragg Regional Alliance showed that retail, office and industrial land uses result in more net fiscal benefits than average or low value residential land uses. ' EXISTING LANO USE -OPEN SPACE ; PARK: CEMETERY \ •AGRICULTURE RURAL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME MULTI-FAMILY -COMMERCIAL; OFFICE • INSTITUTIONAL , -INDUSTRIAL Context Qstudy Area L..County Municipalities ClAngierETJ . : Schools r.--, ) 1); ~ _,_ "" .. I E>-.isting Land Use (Acreage) Existing Land Use (Value) \,,.,,,,. f · l'T" • R· .a, •11! Park, Open Sp11ct; or Cemelt'fV, 3 O'- Multi Family Rts,dential, o 1"- ln)11to 1tonal, Ofhc:•. Co mme,cial 26% Mul1t F,tmaly lrtthlUIIOn.tf, Re sident1.tl, 1 O" Off ,ct'; Commert1.iJI 121% Ag11cul1 u rt; Agtl(Ultu,;al Rl' .. tdent.al; rore~t rv, 14 8% Park .Open Sp.xe;o, CNnl'tery O 9" Source: Harnett County Tax Parcel Records / / ~I- , I I .' ' .. Harnett County Northwest Area Plan : 9 041519a HCBOC Page 118 HOUSING AND RETAIL MARKET Residential closings in Northwest Harnett County have increased steadily over the last three years. In 2015 there were 290 residential closings. In 2017 there were 419 . And 2018 closings are on pace to met or exceed the 2017 figure. The scale of res idential developments is also increasing. Smaller subdivisions were common in the past , but more recently the developments being proposed include larger tracts of land and hundreds of homes. Median sales price of homes in the study area has increased to nearly $240,000 in the first half of 2018. The median sales price in the study area has increased more rapidly than in the county as a whole. The types of housing in demand is also changing. Since 2015 homes sold in the study area have been overwhelmingly single family detached homes, although many recent proposals include smaller lots that are meant to meet market demand and capitalize on available sewer in the Neills Creek basin. There is an emerging demand for rental options, especially from Campbell University which has over 2 ,000 graduate students. Many of these students current ly live in Fuquay-Varina due to apartment a v ailability. Even with m o r e peop le li v ing in Northwest Harne tt County retail and restaurant opti o n s are limited. T here is sub stantial retail leakage espec ially in General Merc handise Stores, Gas Stations, and Re staurants & Bars. Many residents travel north into Wake County to a c cess shopping and dining options. The thoughtful development of commercial centers close to clusters of current and future re sidential development could provide amenities to Harnett County residents , shorten trips, and stre ngthen the tax base. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 10 . Grow Harnett County Planned Sub divisions as of summ e r 2078 Source: Harnet t Co Development Services 041519a HCBOC Page 119 LAND USE AND ECONOMIC TRENDS -................... .., .................. ·- EMPLOYMENT There are ove r 2,600 jobs within the Northwest Harnett County study area, with Healthcare/Educational Services, Construction, Manufacturing, and Professional/ Management sectors being the largest employers (Source: Census on the Map, 2015). Campbell University is just to the east of the study area and has 850 full time faculty and staff. Smart investments in transportation and utility services could encourage new industrial uses and a more diverse spectrum of commercial uses and bolster the employment base in the community. Sections of the study area , particularly along the US 401 corridor, are suitable for industrial development as shown on the Industrial Suitability map bel ow. Access to US 401, a railroad, the Triangle Expressway, Research Triangle Park, RDU Airport, Ra leigh, Durham , and Chatham County's Moncure Megasite are factors that could lead to more businesses in the area. \ A ... ,,, ... ~·-_,. t -~ ~(lt;J ·-~ ,. Construction Manufacturing Agriculture/Forestry Re tail Trade Transporta t ion, Warehousing, Utilities Informa tion Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Professional. Scientific, Management Education, Health Care. Social Assistance Arts, Entertamment, Accomodation, Food Other Services -I / I soo . .\~' 1000 1500 Area Employment Source. US Census • ' '-CJ s tudy Area D Extraterrttonal Junsdicti -Deountv /1 \ I I I ,, ", \\' __ ...... I \ •' \-~ ! Roads Natu, .. 1 Featu res I -Lake Rive rs (Local) Land Supply Utilized or Pending Industrial Suitability -High ·- '"-..,__ ~, CC] ··~ .. . \_ This map shows areas that are suit able for industrial development in dark green. It was created based on a GIS analysis of environmental and economic factors contributing to site selection decisions. Harnetl County Northwest Area Plan : 11 041519a HCBOC Page 120 Planned alignment of Angier Shallow Bypass 2,456 People live outsid e of th e county and work within th e county TRANSPORTATION The study area is served by a sparse network of rura l roads and a few state highways . Primary routes are US 401 and NC 210; both running roughly north- south into Wake County. NC 55 passes through the Town of Angier on the east side of the study area and NC 42 travels through the Duncan community in the northwest. These larger roads are supplemented by smaller local east- west routes (Rawls Church Road, Chalybeate Spri ngs Road, Harnett Central Road and others), and a series of "farm to market" roads built on ridge-lines that form large areas without road connec t ions. Many of these "country blocks" have road connections 1 or 2 miles apart. As the population of the study area increases and more people use existing roads for commuting and fulfilling everyday needs road connecti ons and en hancements wi l l be needed to maintain mobility and emergency access. Creation of a secondary network of local, interconnected streets through cooperation with the private development community and pursuance of improvements on state maintained roads will be necessary to help ameliorate congestion and improve access to services. Several transportation studies and planned investments will impact the study area: Angier Shallow Bypass-this at-grade limited access road is planned on the western edge of Angier as a funded State Transportation Improvement Project and will provide additional north-south capacity in the vicinity of Angier. Southwest Area Study-The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) i s studying southern Wake County and northern Harnett County to anticipate future transportation improvements needed in this rapidly growing area. Sandhills Regional Bike Plan-The Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organizati on (FAMPO) in coordination with NCDOT and local governments i s studying ways to enhance bicycling options in a five-county region, including Harnett County. 6,353 Peopl e live in the county and work out side of the co unty Nearly 94% o f resi dent s that li v e inside t h e NW H a rnett County Area work o uts ide of the are a . Source. Census On the Map 12 Grow Harnett Coun ty 041519a HCBOC Page 121 PUBLIC UTILITIES Harnett County operates as the primary water and sewer provider in the study area. The Town of Angier and the Town of Lillington also provide water and sewer to customers within their respective city lim its. County water service is widespread with significant capacity along US 401 and NC 210. Many of the more rural areas of the county have water se rvice, but limited capacity in lines. County owned gravity-fed sewer service extends up the Neills Creek basin, and capacity exists to serve areas anticipated for development along US 401 and east to NC 210 . Care must be taken to ensure that the development requirements i n the portion of Harnett County served by utilities anticipate smaller lots from larger area subdivisions. Cooperation is needed on the border with Angier to support a growth pattern via utility policies that is mutually beneficial to the county and the town. The extension of utilities can also be viewed as an economic development tool, and serve industrial and commercial development. There are industrial opportunities along US 401 and historic railroad stops , such as Chalybeate Springs, where the extension of utilities can support job creation as well as more compact development in a tight node. PUBLIC UTILITIES / Harnetl County Northwest Area Plan 13 041519a HCBOC Page 122 SCHOOLS AND EMERGENCY SERVICES There are 5 publi c schools in the study area . Lafayette Elementary has exceeded the capacity of the main buildings and is relying on mobile classrooms (based on 2016 data ). Harnett Central High and Middle are over capacity as well. New housing and increasing population w i ll lead to more demand for schools . For ev ery 1,000 new households that move to Harnett County, roughly 470 new students may need to be accommodated in the schools system (based on a student generation rate of 0.47 students per household). School capa c ities in the study area vary but understanding implications of residential growth and reserving land for schools in advance will be a need in the near-to mid-term in the study area. The study area is covered by fire and EMS stations near the crossroads of Christian Light Road and Revels Road, Angier and Lillington. Response times and corresponding insurance rates are lower along US 401 and west of NC 210. Call volume has been increasing and there will likely be a need for additional fire- fighting capacity as the area along US 401 increases in population . The railroad and sparse road network is a barrier to improved response times. An additional fire station in the vicinity of Chalybeate Springs at some point in the future would improve coverage, especially on the west side of Neills Creek . Maintain i ng roadway capacity on US 401 will also be important as it is an evacuation route for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant 10-mile Evacuation Zone. Fire Sta~ 0t EMS \aS!UdyAm c:]County h I c:::J Ang,..eT J Q Munopebt>H -/t I ,._ • --8 Emecg,e nc;y Mana~t Areas Shearon Hams Evite Zone 10t'nl Tran5portltk>n -lnte<5.ta te. Poma,y Higttway G -State and County Highways Roods Rawo,,d Natural Features -l·~· Rivers (Locat) -ManagedA,ea> Relativo Reaponse T•me Srwter /L. Longe< .,c: , .... \. I --- 14 Grow Harnett Cou nty J) ,\'-- _..-'' I I I I ' I •• i -:.,, / .. ,.. 041519a HCBOC Page 123 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE There are three existing parks in the study area . Jack Marley Park, owned by the Town of Angier is a 33- acre park with a pond, walking trail, two playgrounds, basketball court, tennis court, and three sports fields. Neills Creek Park is owned and maintained by Harnett County and occupies 25 acres adjacent to Harnett Central High School. The park includes six tennis courts, two softball fields, a concession building with a storage room and restrooms, and an open/activity field. The northern portion of Raven Rock State Park is also located in the study area which includes 1,426 acres, a parking area , and hiking and equestrian trails. The Harnett County Parks Master Plan identified the need for land acquisition for additional parks in under- served areas. The plan called for the creation of two district parks in the northwest Harnett County study area. Government Complex Park is a proposed Harnett County park that is to be built within the Town limits of Lillington near the Cape Fear River on the northwest side of US 401 / NC 210. Phase One of the master plan includes a parking area, paved walking trail, fishing pier, soccer field, multi-purpose fields, boardwalk, and wildlife observation deck. The County has also acquired land near the intersection of Revels Road and Oakridge River Road that could be used for a park and/or a convenience/recycling center. The Parks Master Plan also recommends the construction of 36 miles of greenway trails by 2030 and five blueway access points on the Cape Fear River. The recently completed Harnett County Parks Master Plan has six overarching goals: 7. Develop the Cape Fear River as a blueway I river walk to stimulate econornic vitality 2. Connect co1nmun1ties, parks, attractions, destinations, and civil facilities through a greenway trail system. 3 . Enhance recreatJOn opportunities in under-served areas of Harnett County 4. Accornmodate a balance of passive and active recreational opportunities that enhance quality of place and target users of all ages and ability levels. 5 Grow the types and frequency of recreatJOnal programs offered to Harnett County citizens. 6 Manage ex1sttng fact!it1es efficiently and propose new facilities with few barriers to entry (financial, environmental, social). Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 15 041519a HCBOC Page 124 River view from the cliffs at Raven Rock State Park :;,;, , / LEE 9 t?J n A .ft,,. .• - ··~---~,:.~ 4 16 Grow Harnett County NATURAL RESOURCES Northwestern Harnett County features rolling h i lls covered i n forests and fields . It marks the transition between the piedmont region and the sandhills, and features the topography of the former and the sandy soils of the latter. Traditionally the area has had a small, dispersed population. The flatter uplands have been ut ilized for agriculture and the more steeply sloped hillsides that lead to streams have been utilized for forestry. Streams flow from north to south , flowing into the Cape Fear River, a drinking water source for the region and a planned blueway. Many of the streams in the study area are designated as High Quality Waters. These waterways are designated in order to protect rare examples of excellent macro-invertebrate and fish communities. The High Quality Waters designation by the State of North Carolina adds restrictions to development in an effort to protect water quality. These restrictions include limiting density and requiring additional stormwater control measures. There are many designated Natural Heritage Natural Areas and documented Natural Heritage E lement Occurrences in the study area. Many are located along the Cape Fear River. Large, forested floodplains extend l ike green fingers northward, help p rote c t water quality, and could be part of a netwo rk of green space and trails if preserved in tandem with development. ,. . CI E ___ _ ' CETJtl , .~14,M t=)couni, Natura1 Futurn ,· .. ..... " ... -P1t1kS and Ma naged ArHS ~", s,- -., .. \ ~ f2'A =~~11Pateti. --N.»Jl'-1 ........ .t06 Naitut61 N'Ht Na111t~~OOE~ ·- Lend Cover "-• OtoduOW FOIHt ~f~N . -[YWQf.,r Ortl? . -==•ffiSWood) \\\ ~, 1 041519a HCBOC Page 125 AGRICULTURE During the course of the planning effort, preservation of farmland, open spaces and heritage lands was one of the most frequently stated desires of the study area community. Open fields on rolling terrain are signature features of the landscape of the northwest part of Harnett County, which is described by some as the "Hills of Harnett". In addition to being a community value. agricultural and forestry production is a substantial asset to the Harnett County economy. Harnett County ranks 14th in the state in cash receipts. Cash receipts for agricultural products totaled over $201M in 2015 (Source: USDA). Major crops include chickens, cotton, hay, and tobacco. There are 30,000 acres of forest in the study area (59% of land area) and timber harvested from Harnett County resulted over $5,000,000 in revenue to landowners in Harnett County in 2016 (Source: NCSU College of Natural Resources). Maintaining agricultural lands, timber operations, and other elements that contribute to the rural character that draws people to the county will be a challenge in the coming years given the development pressure extending southward from the Triangle region. .rffl 3/ 36 3 DESIGNATED NATURAL HERITAGE NATURALAREASAND 36 RARE SPECIES OCCURRENCES IN STUDY AREA 5 500 ACRES o r PARKS AND PUBLIC LAND IN STUDY AREA 37,900 ACRES OF FARMS AND FORESTRY OPERATIONS GREENWAYS AND MULTI-USE PATHS -10 MILES 30+ MILES OF GREENWAYS AND TRAILS COMPLETE • ~ OF GREENWAY$ AND TRAILS PLANNED IN THE STUDY AREA Key natural resources. agricult ural and recreation/open space statistics for the study area Drakes L anding is an important agri-tourism destination within the study area Harn ett County Northwe st Area Plan : 17 041519a HCBOC Page 126 ONLINE SURVEY We want to hear from you! Tell us what y ou'd ti ke lo see In NW Hamett County Take the Survey al: WWW SU (YC YOJODktY comh/nwhomethurv t Y li:l leam More at the Project Website: 1§3 WWW bmnd qq/plgnnlng/long:f909t·pfg,ok!e SDP A survey was conducte d during the development of the Northwest Area Plan. Over 330 responses were received. WHAT WE HEARD The Small Area Plan was developed through a process that included significant community input and regular communication with staff and steering committee members. Through stakeholder meet- ings, a publ ic workshop, steering committee meetings, online and paper surveys , and discussion with staff, this plan was guided by the Northwest Harnett community and reflects their goals and priorities. A lthough the Plan will be adopted by the County, the input received during the process was representative of the issues and needs of the whole study area , which includes portions of the Town of Ang i er and the Town of Li l lington. As such, Harnett Coun t y and partner municipal- ities wil l benefit from ongoing collabor ation in the study area. Common themes of feedback from the steering committee and public participants include: Preservation of farmland, open spaces and heritage lands Concern about the negative impacts of growth (school crowding, traffic, d e mand for services, etc.) Support for small-s cale commercial growth (esp. along US 407) Support for job growth on 407 corridor and the Brightwater Sci- ence and Technology Campus area, as long as traffic is managed Pre ference for rural, larger-lot developm e nt or conservation design in new subdivisions An overwhelming majority of respondents (72%) wanted more un- disturbed natural areas in new developments Farms, working agricultural lands, areas important for water qualitY, and mature forests were identified as areas that should be pre - served Responses to the survey 1nd 1cated that residents preferred high -qualit y commercia l areas with relatively small footprint. architectural details. and amenities. Many mentioned that they would like a grocery store and gas station 18 : Grow Harnett Coun ty 041519a HCBOC Page 127 Above : Residents of the study area attended an open house 1n August at the Northwest Harnett County Fire Department. Top Right: Farmland Preservation. School Crowding, Traffic and Intensity o f Land Uses were ranked high as concerns by responses to the study area . Right: When asked about what they value survey respondents mentioned the country setting, rural community, farms and the quiet nature of the northwest part of the count y. COMMON CONCERNS e ~ Farmland ~ Preservation /. 7 School Crowding EiJw., ~ Traffic 1\I 7 Intensity of land uses country farms proximity .. smallt~;ttiuial quiet Attendees at the public meeting and survey responses indicated a strong preference for ve1·y low density development (such as the rural subdivision on the left above) and neighb o rhood desig n s that incorporate meaningful green spaces in the form of common areas. yards. or agriculture preservation. Many participants noted a strong dislike for images of conventiona l s ubdiv1s1ons with limited greens pace . Harnett County Northwest Area Plan : 19 041519a HCBOC Page 128 STRENGTHS I WEAKNESSES I OPPORTUNITIES I THREATS The steering committee identified community assets and challenges through a SWOT assessment exercise. \. 20 : Grow Harn ett County STRENGTHS • Proximity to Research Triangle Park and Wake Co. amenities • Access to future Chatham County's Moncure Megasite • Available utilities and opportunities • Sewer -towns and 401 • Water on all major corridors • Lower cost of living (relative to Wake Co.) • Tightly knit, involved community • Capable workforce • Rural character, natural resources • Cape Fear River • Raven Rock State Park • Quality of life -"Harnett Hills" • Good access -US 401, NC 210, NC 55 • Rail lines -access for industrial uses • Good government leadership • Proactive growth management • Lafayette Elem. School (ranked highest in Harnett County) WEAKNESSES • Retail leakage to Fuquay-Varina • Lack of non-agricultural industrial/commercial uses • Traffic congestion • Lack of high speed internet/broadband access • No natural gas (except Angier) • Environmental constraints • Watershed Protection Overlay, High Quality Waters • Increasing demand on EMS • Pace of growth, and impacts on taxes + infrastructure • Growth straining schools, roads, emergency services • Perceived lack of quality schooling • Balancing capacity • Need for legislation and a partner (the state) to provide last mile internet connection • Limited connections to the south across the river 041519a HCBOC Page 129 OPPORTUNITIES • Transportation-two bridges + highways • Raise development standards + amenities • Get high quality growth • Health industry cluster • Eco-tourism/ agro-tourism -Ravens Rock State Park, Drake's Landing, and future parks • Use the residential demand to ask for better development • Mix of residential types • Supply chain -2nd tier industries/growth • Proximity to megasites • EMS volunteer recruitment • County partnering with towns • Infrastructure, amenities. • Voluntary agriculture districts and programs • Targeted, localized infrastructure investment to grow jobs • High speed internet extension to spur economic growth • Medical corridor THREATS • School capacity • Pace of residential growth • Loss of farmland and rural character • Lower qua lity residential development is being relegated to Harnett Co. • Generational succession -land sales and farm fragmentation • EMS/Fire/Police coverage in high growth areas • Services are stretched thin • County stretched to provide municipal-style service s • Residential uses crowding out the potential for industrial/ job-creating uses. Harn ett County Northwes t Area Pl an 21 041519a HCBOC Page 130 • PLAN • ••••••••• • • • • • ~ FRAMEWORK • • • • • • • • • • • 041519a HCBOC Page 131 FIVE KEY THEMES The Northwest Sma l l Area Plan's recommendations are organized around 5 topics: LAND USE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION UTILITIES OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NATURAL RESOURCES LAND USE UTILITIES ..... • TRANSPORTATION Harnett County Northwest Area Plan : 23 041519a HCBOC Page 132 The Future Land Use Map for Northwest Harnett County builds on and refines the County's 2015 Comprehensive Growth Plan land use map. Building off of the plan framework components outlined in Chapter 2 Framing the Plan , the Future Land Use Map encourages a land use pattern that protects rura l heritage, agricultural uses and natural resources. The western portion of the study area is planned for Agricultural and Rural Residential, as well as Parks and Conservation. This reflects the predominant existing land uses of this part of the County, and encourages these uses to continue. The plan also tries to add additional guidance on how to steer growth to where it can be supported by infrastructure. It concentrates the majority of residential and commercial use along the 401 corridor, within the Neil ls Creek area and near adjacent municipalities. It also supports nonresidential growth in strategic locations and builds on existing employment centers and where there is adequate current or planned transportation infrastructure, access and utility service. In addition to supporting the ideas mentioned above, the Northwest Area Plan Future Land Use Map advances existing Comprehensive Plan goals including: 24 Grow Harnett County Promote and maintain the rural character and agncultural economy of the County • Improve the aesthetics of urbanizing areas • Encourage growth where infrastructure exists 041519a HCBOC Page 133 Note. land with in municipalities shown for display purposes only, consult Angier and Lillington planning documents fo r land use policies for t h ese are as · \ '·· • /' . , l:!. ff 1'f.Vfls It() <? i ! i ~ Parks and Conservation Agricultural and Rural Residential Low Density Resident ial Medium Density Residential In-Town Residential Rural Center Commercial Mixed Use -Town Center -Employment M ixed Use Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 25 041519a HCBOC Page 13426 : Grow Harnett County PARKS AND CONSERVATION Parks and other forms of protected open space, including large conservation easements. Also includes environmentally se n sitive areas, including floodplains and areas located in the Conservation Overlay Zoning D istrict. Primary uses in these areas would be open space, forestr y, and agriculture. AGRICULTURE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL Primarily agricultural and forestry uses with some ru ra l r esidential areas. These areas are located outside of existing and future utility service areas and rely on septic systems for wastewater treatment. They have a limited road network and in some cases l ie within a High Quality Watershed or Water Supply Watershed area. The lack of utility and transportation infrastructure, the establ ish ed low density development pattern and ongoing agricultural activities in these areas contribute to their r ural cha ra cter. This character can be enhanced by encouragin g only low intensity u ses such as agriculture and su pport i ndustries, very low density single fami ly residential (up to one dwelli ng per acre), and context sensitive ru ra l design. Smaller lots would be permit ted as part of a Rural Cluster Deve lopment , which would include 4 0% open space, and a maximum number of lots per development. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Single family det ached residenti al intended to remain predominately suburban in character and provide for low density single-family re sidential development on lots small e r than those in Agric ul ture and Rural Residential a r eas. Gross densities o f 1-2 dwell ing units per acre depending on zoning, utilities, soils, and c haracter of adjacent d eve lopment. Smaller lot sizes would be permitted as par t of a Co mpatibility D evelopment, which would also include a higher amount of open space to preserve se nsitive environmental a reas. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Located in areas served by c urrent or planned utili ties, med ium density residentia l permits a mix of housing types inc luding si ngle fami ly detached homes, small-lot homes and patio homes. Gross densities of 1-3 dwelling units per ac re depending on zoning, utilities, natural features and adj acent development. Smaller lot sizes would be permitted as part of a Compatibility Developmen t, which would also include a higher amount of conserved open space to p r eserve se n sitive environmental areas. 041519a HCBOC Page 135 IN-TOWN RESIDENTIAL Due to proximity to towns and potential for municipal services, these areas are suitable fpr residential developments with a mix of housing types including single family detached homes with average lot sizes, small-lot homes, and patio homes that are complimentary of the existing historic residential development of nearby towns. Gross densities of up to 5 dwelling units per acre. Located in areas served by current or planned utilities and in areas near the extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of towns. Additional housing types (including townhomes and apartments) and higher densities may be appropriate as part of planned developments or near Development Nodes. RURAL CENTERS Small-scale commercial centers and nonresidential activity areas. The exact location and extent of the Rural Centers will be market driven, however, the non-residential footprint will usually be less than 50,000 square feet in these areas. Buildings should mimic historical scale and architectural details. Residential uses include smaller lot homes, patio homes, and some small-scale attached products (such as townhomes or quadplexes), where appropriate. COMMUNITY MIXED USE These areas are meant to be nodes or activity centers for growing areas in the county. They are located near concentrations of existing or planned residences and areas with access to major thoroughfares and utilities. These areas incorporate commercial uses including grocery stores, retail establishments, restaurants and services. Office, civic and institutional uses should complement commercial uses. Higher density residential including small lot single-family, townhomes, and apartments should be located in close proximity to shopping and service destinations and complimented by pedestrian facilities to provide more walking opportunities to internal and external destinations. The exact location and size of nonresidential areas will be dependent on market conditions. EMPLOYMENT MIXED USE These areas are located along major thoroughfares and include prime locations for economic development opportunities. Uses encouraged in the Employment Mixed Use areas include but are not limited to industrial, warehouse, office, research and development, tech-flex, medical, energy, and distribution. Residential development is appropriate only when not in conflict with existing or future industry or commercial uses or focal development areas. Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 27 041519a HCBOC Page 136 RECOMMENDATION 1 Protect rural character, working agriculture, and water quality in rural areas 1.1: [)iscourage rezonings to higher density residential districts in Agriculture and Rural Residential (ARR) Areas Zoning in the Agricultural and Rural Residential area in the Northwest Harnett County Study Area is predominantly RA-40 and RA-3 0. Allowing rezonings to high density districts or approving large-scale Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) could have a negative impact on agriculture and impact water quality Strategic down-zoning should also be considered 1.2: Modify zoning and development standards and create incentives to encourage low density development and discourage inappropriate density in rural areas Many of the prime agricultural lands in the study area are located on relatively flat hilltops between steep stream corridors. These areas generally have good soils but are accessed via a sparse rural road network. Discouraging large-scale development in these areas and encouraging well-designed residential that fits in to the landscape should be a priority of updated regulations. Implementation Strategies: 28 : Grow Harnett County Modify th e Compatibility De sign section of th e Un ified Devel opment Ordinance (UDO) that specifies context-se nsitive deve lopment options in the Agricultural and Rural Resid e nti a l areas on the Future Land U se Plan and allow these options throughout the Northwest Area. • Add a Rura l C l uster Option to the UDO that all ows a sma ll-scale minor subdivision o p tion with flex i b le standards to encourage innovative neighborhood design that f it s Jrdio11 I.J.J. i (.r;,,IJ><lltb,b!) l >,u.~· ( on,.pt Tab!, 2~,1(1U w11t IIW'l<l'"'-""IN' ,w "' -... mr .,. ,. ,... '" ,, ... .., "' I '-'' "' "· .. .. 041519a HCBOC Page 137 within a rural context. • Design Criteria for a Rural Cluster Option could include: • Maximum gross density of 1 dwelling units per acre (DUA) or less • Maximum of 20-30 lots and minimum size of property (i.e. 20-30 acres) • 10,000 square foot lot minimum • No public water or sewer requirement, but consider allowing off-site septic • Open Space Requirements & Standards • 30%-40% Open space with 10% minimum uplands • Emphasize natural / passive open space • Require stream and wetland buffers of 100 feet or more • Home Owner's Association (HOA) to assume maintenance / responsibility requirements of common open space • Rural street standards • Swale section, 20' of pavement • Private streets allowed if built to County/ NCDOT Standards 1.3 : Protect working agricultural operations through site design The desig n details of new developments have the ability to mitigate the visual and environmental impacts that can occur when rural homesteads and farms are replaced with subdivisions. Modern agriculture is an industr ial employment use. Respecting existing agricultural operations through site design can reduce c onflicts in the future between new resi dents and existing and fu t ure farmers. Implementation Strategies: • Consider requiring or incentivizing working farmland buffers for subdivisions with lots smaller than 25,000 square feet in or adjacent to agricultural areas, especially those enrolled in the Present Use Value (PUV) program or Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VAD). Huntersville Harnett Cou nt y Northwes t Area Pl an 29 041519a HCBOC Page 138 • Consi der r equ i ri ng a p eri meter buffe r a nd/or ad dit iona l b u ild i n g setback for n ew develop men t located near worki ng fo r est ry, f arm o r a g rito u rism ope r a ti ons • For exampl e re quir e a la n d sca p e d buf f e r o r tree save b e tween p ote n tial co n fl icting u ses (i .e. - a 50 ft perime t e r buffer a nd/or 200ft setback between new r esident ia l dwelli ngs and e x i sti n g a gricul tu r al opera ti ons) • Prioritize the reservation of steep slopes, existing forest and other important natura l features as open space between new resident ial and potential conflicting uses 1.4: Protect water quality in High Quality Waters and Water Supply Watersheds via site design Portions o f Hector Creek. Avents Creek, Parkers Creek, Mill Creek and Coopers Branch are designated as High Quality Waters by the state of North Carolina. These streams are located west of US 407 and bordered by large forests that are in some places over a mile wide. Nearly all of the study area is located in a WS -IV water supply watershed as most streams drain to the Cape Fear River above the intake in the vicinity of Lilling ton. Protecting forests and limiting impervious surfaces will help safeguard these st reams from degradation that is common to mor e developed areas such as tributaries in Wake County. Implementation Strategies: Re quire and/o r incentivize protection o f ripari a n areas and tree canopy con se rvation in Compatibility Subdiv ision s • Consi der increasing stream b u f fer requ i rements fo r perenn ial stream s and/or requ i ring or incent ivizi ng prot ection of ri pa ri an areas along intermitt ent streams . • U pda t e UDO t o i n clude a defin it i on of priority conservat ion areas th a t includes r ipari an areas a n d st ands of matu re forest • Update Loc a l Watershed Prot ection Ordinance • Include density a n d d e sign criter ia for Hig h Qual ity Wa t ers that meet or exceed state requiremen t s • L ow Density Option: One (1) dwelli ng u n it per acre o r 12% bu il t u p on area • H i gh Densi t y Option: N o density li mit specified , but must u se NC D i v. Of Water Q u al ity, H ig h Q u ality Waters, High Density Option Sta ndard . • Updat e al l owance for c l u ster devel opmen t, if using t h e H igh Densi t y Opt ion, to meet o r exceed state require m e nts • Consider requiring add itiona l ripa r ian b u ffers a n d /or add in g m itigation or e n hancement opt ions t h at resul t s in a net benefit to the su b -watersh ed Requ ire stormwater b es t m anagement practi ces in Compatibility Subdivisions that meet or exceed state regulation s RECOMMENDATION 2 Increase standards for residential developments in the Low Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) areas 2 .1: Revise and clarify open space requirements and options for new development The forested hills and rolling agncultural fields of Northwest Hamett County are part of what makes the area attractive to new and existing residents. Preserving meaningful, usable open space as part of new development can be an amenity for new residents, help preserve the unique natural features of property and make a new neighborhoods fit more seamlessly into 30 Grow Harnett County 041519a HCBOC Page 139 the landscape. Accessible parks and open space included as amenities in new development can help share the burden of park infrastructure and land acquisition costs. Implementation Strategies: lncentivize quality open space and recreational facilities • Encourage or require new developments in the Neills Creek watershed to utilize a conservation design approach to subdivisions. • Allowances exist in the Compatibility Development options for smaller lots in Harnett Co unty Northwest Area Pl an 31 041519a HCBOC Page 140 exchange for high amounts of open space. Updates could be considered that include simplifying the options within the UDO and making a Conservation Design Option that is more attractive due to increased design flexibility or streamlined approval process . • Consider waiving all or part of the Recreation Fee-in-Lieu if recreation needs are addressed by new development. • Consider waiving half of the required Recreation Fee if land is reserved for a publicly accessible amenity, such as a park or greenway. • Consider waiving all of the required Recreation fee if recreation facilities are constructed and meet certain criteria. • Minimum criteria could include: • Inclusion of basic features (i.e. parking, an amenity, paths, etc.) • Public accessibility • Minimum sizes for parks and formal greenspaces • Minimum standards for sports fields • Minimum length for greenways or trails • Size or play structure requirements for playgrounds Revise and clarify open space requirements • Require all Compatibility Subdivisions to include some amount of high quality open space. • Currently a 5,000 square foot break in lot size is allowed if public utilities are available. This provides an incentive for smaller lots without increasing any design requirements. Requiring more open space in new developments with access to public utilities would be a better standard for the study area. • Define Primary and Secondary Conservation Areas (see Open Space & Natural Resource recommendations) and require identification of primary and secondary assets during development review process. • Improve standards for open space. Potential standards could include: • Require a percentage of open space to be outside of regulated features (i .e. floodplain, stream buffers and wetlands) • Dimensional and contiguity requirements (i.e. minimum size, >40-50% connected) • Revise "Open Space, Usable" definition (currently in PUD but not in Compatibili t y Dev.), include undisturbed, natural areas , parks, greenways • Minimum% of active or improved • Access requirements , ownership and maintenance responsibilities • Deed restriction if open space maintained by HOA (preferred) • Exceptions (i.e. trails, utilities, stormwater detention if naturalized) 2.2: Update standards for sidewalks, curb and gutter, street trees, perimeter buffers, on-street parking and loading in Low Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) areas Small scale, low-density subdivisions fit well in rural areas, but larger-scale subdivisions with smaller lots have a greater impact on adjacent properties. genera t e more storm water and may need higher standards to safeguard property values of nea rby properties. Implementation Strategies • Standardized thresholds for sidewalks, curb and gutter, street trees, perimeter buffers, on-street parking and loading • Consider simplifying options and adding a threshold related to the size or scale of subdivi s ion 32 Grow Harn ett County 041519a HCBOC Page 141 • Consider allowance for substitution of a defined amount o f sidewalk for an 8ft multi-use path in in stances where a similar connection between origins and destinations is made, or i f it f u rthers a regional or local greenway sys t em. • Requ i re perimet er buffer when n ew residential subdivisions are located adjacent to lower densit y resident i al and agricultural uses • Provi de an option for lots with widths > 60' as part of a Planned Unit Deve lopments but requ i re rear-loaded lots for lots narrower t han 50'. • Consider requirements for on-street parking on local and co llector str eets with lots smal le r than 1/4 acre. RECOMMENDATION 3 Increase standards for commercial development 3 .1: Promote quality commercial and retail development at well-located sites. M1nim1zing the amount of parking between new commercial buildings and the main road. and the use of high quality materials and transparent facades can r esult 1n better gateways into Harnett County along US 401 and NC 210 Strategically locating commercial development can reduce tra ffic and help build the non-residential tax base in the study area. I mplementation Strategies • Encourage commercial a nd retail developm e nt at Commerci al Mi xed Use and Rural Centers lo cated on the Future Land Use Map. Promote context-sensitive site design by creating a Highway Overlay District simila r to the NC 87 Overlay that specifies design criteri a fo r new commercial development along US 401 and NC 210. • Thi s overl ay could specify bui l ding orientat ion, placement of par k i ng, a "buil d -to" line that fact ors in highway expansion, architecture standards, cross-access, landscaping, and screening requ ir ements. Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 33 041519a HCBOC Page 142 RECOMMENDATION 4 Preserve opportunities for non-residential development 4 .1: Encourage industrial, distribution and office development in Employment Centers located on the Future Land Use Map. Three Employment Mixed Use areas are identified on the Future Land Use Map. These areas are located on major roads and have access to rail lines. They also are not located near any existing residential subdivisions. Preserving these sites for future employment bearing uses, improving visibility of these sites and access to infrastructure is a primary goal. Implementation Strategies • Su p port rezon ings that a re con sist e nt with th e Futu re Land Use Map • Support rezoni n gs of land within Empl oyment Mixed Use areas to office/institut ional, commercia l, ligh t industrial and industrial. • Discourage rezonings that accommodate large-scale residenti al subdivisions within Emp loyment Mixed Use areas that could lead to conflicts with existing o r future nonresidentia l development. 4.2: Encourage commercial development including retail, services, restaurants, and offices in areas designated Town Centers , Commercial M ixed Use , and Rural Centers on the Future Land Use Map. Growth of the existing commercial centers in the Town of Angier and the Town of Lillington is supported as well as smaller-scale commercial development at key intersections and in Rural Centers. Harnett Central Hospital i s one of the anchors of Brightwater Science & Technology Ca mpus. a mixed-use medical. retail and business par k in Lill ing ton . 34 Grow Harnett Cou nty 041519a HCBOC Page 143 RECOMMENDATION 5 Support existing industries and recruitment of new businesses in Northwest Harnett County 5.1: Support recruitment and marketing efforts . North west Harnett Coun ty has a solid employment base and available land in key sites and along ma1or highways that can be focus areas in county-wide economic development strategies. Natural resources s uch as the Ca pe Fe ar River and Raven Rock State Park can also be a draw for tourism. Implementation Strategies • Support recruitment efforts targeted at finding new tenants for e xisting bus ines s and industrial parks • Br ightwater Mixed Use Business Campus • Tri-Sout h Industrial Park • Develop additional mar.keting materials in support of economic d evelopment in Northwest Harnett County • Hi ghlight available sites on the Harnett Economic Development website • Support the development o f marketing collateral for the Cape Fear River and Raven Rock State Park in cooperation with the Dunn Area Tourism Authority 5.2: Improve access to and provision of services for potential economic development opportunities. Many sit es along US 4 07 have great access to the Tnangle Region. Impr oving cross- access to undeveloped properties may help preserve capacity of the highway lmprovmg access to s e wer may make mdu stnal and c o mmercial sit es more marketabl~. Implementation Strategies • Evaluate and update sit e design and cross -access requirements for new businesses along major corridors to improve access to future development sites • Encourage a collector street network to be built incre mentally with deve lopment • Primary connections needed are parallel connect ions r unning north to south east and west of US 401 . These connections will open tracts of land for future deve lopment and improve resiliency of the road network 5 .3 : Preserve the viability of agricultural operations . Agriculture and forestry activities contribute significantly to the Harnett County economy Preserving the viability of these operations 1s important for cultural, economic and environmen tal reasons. Implementa tio n Strategies • Continue to require notification of new development within 1 mile of Voluntary Agr ic u ltura l Districts (VADs) about a c t ive farm ing operations. • Encourage participation in the Voluntary Agricultural District (VAD) program • Discourage expansion of sewe r service into areas designate d as Agric ultura l and Rural Residential on the Future Land Use Map west of US 401 • Promote context-sen sitive residential adjacent to working agricultural operati ons • Elements of context-sensitive residentia l include very low density dev el opment and buffering between new r esiden ti al an d existing agricu ltural operations Harn ett Coun ty North west Area Plan 35 041519a HCBOC Page 144 RECOMMENDATION 6 System Level Recommendations 6 .1 Plan for long-term roadway improvements Traffic m the study area is pro1ected to mcrease substantially by 2045, with Future Year volumes on US 4 07 of 22.400 cars per day These traffic estimates may be underestimated due to inaccuracies with future year model network and demographic project ions. Implementation Strategies: Re serve right-of-way along key corridors that is sufficient to accommodate future roadway im p rovements and new collector street connections. • US 401 a n d NC 2 10: 120 F eet of right-of-way shoul d be r eserved a long these maj o r highways in order to accommodate an even tual wideni ng to 4 lane boulevards • 100ft of right-of-way should be r eserved along Piney-Grove Wilbon Road for a futu re widening to four lanes • Other fu t ure impr ovements t hat are recommended include wi d en in g of roads to three lanes and collecto r streets shown on the map on the next page. 70 -80' of right-of-way is recommended fo r al l roads in orange (not mentioned above) and new location co ll ector streets. 60' or right-of-way is r ecommended for new local connec t ions shown i n yellow on the map on page 38. 6 .2 : Coordinate with CAMPO on updates to the regional travel demand model to better reflect roadway improvement plans and land use trends. The long-term plans for US 407 and land use trends in Northwest Harnett County have evolved since the last reg,onal transportation plannmg effort. Updates to the model network and population and employment forecasts should occur to make sure traffic forecasts are as accurate as possible. Implementation Strategies: • Corre c t trave l model network prior to th e next Me tropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) • Remove the new US 401 location and properl y reflect the Angier Shallow Bypass t hat i s plann ed. • Update soc io-economic data to reflect land use trends. Previous housing forecasts do not adequatel y reflect the location of development proposals. For ins t ance more devel opment wi l l be load ing on US 401 th at is antic i pated in the current model. 6.3: Utilize recommendati ons in the Comprehensi ve Transportation Plan during development review and update regularly to include and refine based on recommendations in recent plans. The Harnett County Comprehensive Transportation Plan was adopted in 2076 and amended in 2077 Updates to the plan should be made to reflect more recent planning efforts such as the NW Harnett Area Plan and the CAMPO Southwest Area Study Implementation Strategies: 36 Grow Harnett County Ensure that the CTP is incorporate d into zoning and development reviews, and that right of way is re served and/or d e d icated at the time of development 041519a HCBOC Page 145 Require new development to leave adequate room for future rights of way and widening by prohibiting the placement of code-required development components (such as septic fields, landscaping, signs, park ing and build ings) wi th in planned rights-of-way. 6.4: Update policies and standards related to street design and improvements required with development. Implementation Strategies: • Amend tables, associated requirements and codes in the Unified Development Ordinance • Update standard street sections for all street types, including those associated with cluster development. • Require Traffic Im pact Analysis (TIA) for devel opments t h at generate 100 or mo r e peak hour trips, or 1,000 average d aily trips (based on most current ITE trip generation manual ). • Turn lanes (left turn and right deceleration lane) with appropriate st acki ng sha l l be required for any subdi v i sion o r d evelopment proj ect that creates the equivalent tra ffic at a singl e access point of: • 20-30 sing l e f ami ly homes. • Right-of-way for turn lanes shall be dedicated at e ither subdi vi sion platti ng or a s a condition of final si t e plan app roval of the portion o f the project that generates the ne ed for the dedi ca t ion. • Cons ider implementing a fee-in-lieu structure for improvements • For project s that genera te less tha n the amount above, they sha l l provide f ee-in - lieu to the Cou n ty for t h eir proportional sh are of a turn l ane cost s. • The County coul d hol d and then provide that fee to the next dev e loper that triggers t he construction of the turn lane. Fee is due at time of plat o r as a conditi o n of fi nal site pl an approval. • Fee-in-li e u of construction may be an option, at County and N CDOT discret ion. RECOMMENDATION 7 Priority Roadway Improvements 7.1 Support incremental improvements along US 401 Current traffic volumes on US 407 do not necessitate a four lane road. but as new residential development occurs intersection improvements and a road widening will likely be necessa1y Implementation Strategies: Intermediate Intersection Improvements should be studied at the following locations along US 401 at Piney Grove Wilbon Road, Rawls Church Road and Chalybeate Springs Road Prioriti ze US 401 no rth of Chal y beate Springs for future widening to four lanes Roadway Recommendations Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 37 041519a HCBOC Page 146 7.2 Support the widening of Rawls Church Road and Purfoy Road to three lanes It is anticipated that Rawls Church Road and Purfoy Road will provide key connections between US 401 and Angier and from Harne/t County to Fuquay Varina and eventually the Southeast Extension of 1-540. This would include a new location connection to Kennebec Road and the near term study of key intersections. 0~ j " 41-<,: ; ~''t"'.., .,_... ~ .,•"' {",.r, 'Note new location collector street s are f o r p reliminary planning purposes only Roadway connections and/ or right-of-way rese rvation t o be required only if land is developed • with a major subdivision. Exact alignme n t s to be determined t hrough // future study and coordina tion with f development. Roadway Recommendations W,cen1ng • • • • • • New Loc.abon Thotoughfare .. •. . . New l ocal.., "'-COIJeCIOo / M inor Thotoughf..ve ·-~·-· New LocabOn CoAeetOf Strttl D Propo&ed lnttrcha• a P rc>pc)Wd G riide Sep1irabon • Potential Intersecti on ProJect Context Study Area M unk:ipal Ltm its LJ LlllingtonET J LJ ETJ Parks and Open Space --Railroad Roadway recommendations incl ude intermediate intersection improvements, f utu re widen ing of r oadways and new col lector and local road connec tions that are meant to be compl eted in tandem with development. 38 Grow Harn ett Cou nty 041519a HCBOC Page 147Roadway Recommendations Page Intentionally Left Bl ank Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 39 041519a HCBOC Page 14840 Grow Harnett County RECOMMENDATION 8 Encourage new development in areas well served by water and sewer infrastructure and/or town services 8 .1: Discourage rezonings to higher density residential districts in Agriculture and Rural Residential (ARR) Areas 8.2: Encourage new subdivisi ons in the Neill's Creek basin to connect to county water and sewer service. Implementation Strategies: • lncentivize water and sewer connections and quality development via Compatibility Development regulations 8 .3: Encourage annexation and utility connections in and near Extraterritorial areas of the Town of Angier and the Town of Lillington Implementation Strategies: • Encourage connections to County owned infrastructure if capacity exists • Allow for connections to Town of Angier infrastructure for new development located north of Chalybeate Springs Road (In Town Residential area on FLU Map) 8 .4 : Consider a partnerships to extend utility service to potential commercial and industrial areas Providing sewer service to Chalybeate Springs and North 407 as well as exploring partnerships to serve the NC 42/Duncan Area would support land use and economic development goals. Implementation Strategies: • Pursue grants and/or consider a public-private or public-public partnerships to 041519a HCBOC Page 149 extend utility service to potential commercial and industrial areas • This may include determining locations of future gravity mains in sub-basins. devel oping cost share estimates for future developments and supporting the acquisition of strategic sewer easements. • Consider additiona l economic development opportuni ties when partnering with schools to provide a utility solutions for new schools • Public acquisition of prime industrial candidate sites cou ld assist with securing grant funding . RECOMMENDATION 9 Maintain and improve the efficiency of public services 9 .1 Plan for efficient sewer provision in the Neills Creek basi n. Implementation Strategies: Regularl y revise fee structure, connection and reimbursement policies to assure adequate levels of utility service and maintenance of assets. • Continue to pursue public/private cost shares and developer agreements for reimbursement of infrastructure investments that serve additional development. Discourage new pump stations for residential development in the Hector Creek stream basin south of Rawls Church Road and west of US 401 Update utility agreements with Angier and Lillington and Fuquay Varina to reflect future utility service areas 9 .2: Improve fire and EMS service along US 401 RECOMMENDATION 10 Ensure stormwater regulations are enforced 10.1 Increase staff capacity and coordination with state officials to ensure stormwater regulations are enforced The scale and densi ty of develo pment that 1s being proposed may require tncreased capacity to ensure stormwater facilities are designed, bwlt and main t ained adequately RECOMMENDATION 11 Collaborate with Harnett County Schools 11.1: Determine future needs and identify target locations for schools in growth areas 11.2: Discourage the location of new schools in the Agricultural and Rural Residential area on the Future Land Use map and within the 10 mile evacuation zone of Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. Implementation Strategies: Consider updates to Planned Unit De v e lopment re quirements in th e Unified Development Ordinance to include criteria for re se rvation of school sites. Harnet t Cou nt y Northwes t Ar ea Pl an 41 041519a HCBOC Page 15042 Grow Harnett Coun ty RECOMMENDATION 12 Consider strategic acquisition and development of new park facilities 12.1: Improve access to parks and recreation options in Northwest Harnett County Implementation Strategies: • Develop recently acquired parkland near Revels Road and Oakridge River Road as park. Partner with Harnett County Schools to locate a new park as part of or adjacent to any new schools sites located between Hector Creek and Neills Creek. Acquire land for and develop at least 2 blueway access points along the Cape Fear River northwest of Lillington. • Preserve open space along Avents Creek as part of new development, through partnerships with landowners, land trusts and North Carolina State Parks . 12.2: Implement policies and work incrementally toward a Neills Creek "Thread"- -a series of trails and greenways that parallels Neills Creek. Implementation Strategies: Require greenway easements or joint sewer and greenway easeme nts as part of new developm ents in locations shown on the Proposed Greenways & Trails map on page 43. • Floodpla in ar eas sh ou l d be ded i cated for futu re greenways, add i tionally '\_ G-ccf\w:i~ o, : T,~:I Priority Conservation Area I I I Secondary Development Zone Primary Development Zone J 041519a HCBOC Page 151 major creeks (i.e. Nei l ls Creek) should have a m i nimum of a 100ft g reenw ay easement from op of bank dedicated to the county • If outside of floodplain, greenway easements should be 30ft, j o int greenway a n d sewer easements should be 50ft • In the vicinity of stream crossings larger easement are preferab le in order to adju st trail al i gnment and cross stream at a perpendicular angle. • Encourage new developments to build pedestrian connections to planned greenways. RECOMMENDATION 13 Encourage high-quality, accessible open space in new residential development 13.1: Revise and clarify open space requirements and options for new developments See recommendations on page 30. 13.2 Prioritize the preservation of primary and secondary conservation areas Current regulations encourage the preservat ion of open space. howeve,: there is little guidance to specify whal types of open space should be preserved. Defining prima1y and seconda,y conservation areas can result in the reservation of higher quality open space. Implementation Strategies: • Define primary and secondary conservation areas • These should include priorities expressed during this planning effort inc lu d i ng those features t h at protect rural c h aracter and help to preserve water quality. • Primary and secondary conservation areas can be specified in the Unified Dev elopment O r d i nance and should include: • Primary conservation areas cou l d include: Floodplains (100 and 500 year), r iparian areas (up to 300ft on each side of streams), and mature forests, farms and working lands, and future greenway corridors • Seconda r y conservation areas cou l d include: Steep slopes, sceni c views. more formal parks. sports fields, p laygrounds. historic structures, land adjacent to co n served areas and heritage trees • These areas should be required to be identified during the development re vi ew process. A defined percentage of primary conservation areas should be preserved first. if present, then secondary conservation areas can count tow ards open s p ace ded icati o n r equi remen ts. RECOMMENDATION 14 Prioritize Protection of Stream Buffers 14.1: Prote ct stream buffers. Trees and vegetation along streams helps to protect water quality by filtering sedimentation and other pollutants out of stormwater run-off Curren t ly 64% of land withm 300ft of USGS blue-line streams is covered in forest. Preserving these forests can help maintain water quality Implementation Strategies: • Consider increasing stream buffers requirements or incentivize protection of riparian areas • Stream buffers of 100ft are recommended on Perennial streams, due to potential presence of rare species • Stream buffers of 30-SOft are recommended on Intermittent streams Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 43 041519a HCBOC Page 152 Name of Trai l f Harn ett Cross County Trail 0 Raven Rock r Ramble 0 Angier Loop Trail I 0 Angier - Dunn Trai l I • A vents Creek Greenway 0 Cape Fea r River Trail f Campbell Campus Connector 0 East Buies Creek I Greenway 0 Lafayette Trail I 0 Central Schools I Connector Trail • us 401 /Rawl I Church Connector GREENWAYS AND TRAILS The following table and map on the opposite page shows proposed greenway trails in NW Harnett County along streams (riparian areas), sidepaths along roadways , as wel l as connections to key upland destinations along those corridors. Primary Primary Distance Descripti o n/ Key Points of Interest Corridor Tra il Type (Approx) Neills Creek Riparian 10.3 miles Multi -use path connection between Cape Fear (WS-IV) River outside of Lillington to East Angier where the trail will ultimately connect to the Wake County Greenway System th rough Fuquay Varina. Old Highway 421 Riparian 16 .5 miles Creates a primary recreation route between / Camels Creek / (WS-IV), Raven Rock State Park and the Cape Fear Ri ver Poorhouse Creek Sidepath through Lillington along Camels Creek, US 421 and Poorhouse Creek . NA Independent 1.9 miles Multi-use path linkages between NC 55 sidepath on N Raleigh St and the Harnett Cross County Tra il. The two trail s complete a r ecreational loop i n NE Angier using the Cross County Trail and Angier-Dunn Trail. NC 55 Sidepath 14 .1 miles Multi-use path linkage between Angier and Coats along NC 55 and to the Dunn-Er wi n Rail Trail. Connects community destinations to central business districts . Avents Creek, Riparian 6.6 miles Multi-use path lin kage between the northern e nd of Hors e Branch (WS-IV; Raven Rock Sta te Pa r k and the Wake Cou nty Line HOW; C) near Duncan. Due to the potentia l connection with Bridle Trails at Avents Creek Access Area in Raven Rock State Park, equestrian use could be considered on portions of this trail. Cape Fear River Riparian 10.3 miles Multi-use path connection along the Cape Fea r (WS-IV) River. Conne c ti on to downtown Lillington , Raven Rock State Park. and Chatham County. (Note : Planned route/length does not include connection through Raven Rock State Park) US 421/N Main St Sidepath, 5.4 miles Mutli-use path connection between Campbell Independent U niversity and downtown Lillington along US 421 and N Main St East Buies Creek Ri parian 5.0 miles Multi U se Path connecting US 421 to NC 55 a long (WS -IV) East Buies C r eek. CW Matthews Rd Independent 1.3 miles Multi-use path connection to Lafayette El ementary School f rom the Harnett Cross County Trai l Harnett Central Sidepath, 2.8 miles Multi-u se path connection from Harnett Cross Rd / Dry Creek Riparian, County Trail t o Harnett Centra l Middle, Harnett Independent Central High and North Harnett Primary School and Neills Creek Park New Collector Riparian. 7.0 miles Mult i -use path connection between Lafayette Trail, road parallel Sidepath Rawls and the Town of Angier to US 401 and Rawls Church Rd 44 Grow Harnett County 041519a HCBOC Page 153 The map shows the proposed greenway trails in NW Harnett County along streams (riparian areas), sidep aths along road- ways, as well as connections to key upland destinations along those corridors. PROPOSED GREENWAYS AND TRAILS MAP a• Proposed Greenway J Dral<o landing CJstuOyl\tea • D Ex~aremlonal JurosdlCIJOns \ tETJsJ MunK.tpaltt.es Seh00l1 0County Natural Feal\ltel •L•k• Parks and Managed Neas Streams FlooOpla n / 1 CH ~THl .. ~::.: l -~~c..,e,, ... -..-; .. ~: LEE ...,_ NW Harnett greenw ay s are proposed to connect to the Wake County Greenway Sys t em •• .# • • 0 .. •••• • • -v..-. . ' • • \ .. . ... ... fl I ' (. -,. , ,, ...... \ /1 : \ ...... _ ·\· ,, --~-j . \ ~·· \ -~ Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 45 041519a HCBOC Page 154 GREENWAYS AND TRAILS Greenways provide excellent chances to preserve agricultural land, create recreational opportunities, and protect natural resources . Delineating greenway corridors ensures that access is maintained in areas that are suitable for conservation and recreation. It is easier and cheaper to reserve greenway corridors before property is developed. After land is subdivided and sold for development, this process can be more difficult. Trail Width Where a paved trail ~urface i s provided, 10-feet is the recommended minimum trail width. The trail should have a 2' level clear zone on each side of the trail between the traveled surface and any obstructions such as trees, walls , or fences. This trail cross-section is adequate for most moderately used trails shared by bicyclists and pe- destrians. Where there is heavy use by multiple user types, 12-feet is the recommend- ed minimum width because it allows more space for trail users of all ages and abilities to share comfortably, and more space for trail users to pass. Alternatively, a sepa rat e track (5 feet minimum) can be provided to separate bicyclists from pedestrians. In these areas, the pedestrian zone should be placed closer to the scenic or natural amenity. Sidepath Trails Along roadway s, the recommended separ ation is 6.5 feet (<25 mph) but may widen to 24 feet(>= 55mph) at road crossings. Wherever possible, the sidepath should be de - signed to provide a natural buffer of trees and native plantings between the trail and the roadway. A high-visibility marked crosswalk with warning signage may be appropriate at side- path crossings with low motor vehicle speeds, volumes and clear si ght lines. Additional crossing enhancements may be necessary on high speed and high-volume roadway s. SOURCE· SMALL TOWN AND RURAL MULTIMODAL NETWORKS GUIDE, rHWA 46 Grow Harn ett Co unty 041519a HCBOC Page 155 Median islands are beneficial to break up the crossing into two parts on roadways with three or more travel lanes or those that have higher volumes and speeds . Median islands particularly bene- fit people who may travel slower, such as c h ildren, older adults, and people with disabi lities. Greenway Easements T he land acquired for a greenway, whatever its acquisition method , must be wide enough to accommodate the construction and main- tenance of the trail. In most cases it will be desirable to have a cor- ridor wide enough to preserve natural vegetation , provide a scenic route for trail users, provide a buffer to nearby developments, avoid obstacles and preserve stream buffers . Several factors contribute to increased corridor w i dths of stream-associated greenways. These include utility obstacles (i.e. poles, towers, manholes) and environmenta l conditions (100-year floodplain, steep slopes, and wetlands). While sewer easements typically range in width according to the size of the line, it is best practice in places where greenways are proposed al ong sewers to dedicate a joint easement of 50 feet in width for both sanitary sew- er and greenway use. This allows the trail to stay out of the wettest parts of the corridor, avoid manholes, provide space for boardwa l ks and bridge structures but still allows the trail to take advantage of areas where clearing has already occurred to minimize environ- mental impacts. Where easements can provide do u ble duty, they should , provided they don't interfere with the utility or function of the uses. In riparian areas, it is best practice to include the stream buffers and 100-year floodplain in the greenway easement. The first 30 feet from the top of the stream bank (area nearest the stream) should remain undisturbed. In key places the width of the ease- ment may need to be as wide as 100 feet in order to accommodate in areas where the trail routes to the narrowest points of creeks, drainage areas or waterways for cost savings on bridges and boardwalks or in areas where steep slopes could require switch- backs. This also permits space for minor relocations of the trail in the future in case of erosion or need for stream bank resto- r ation . Sidepath at Way ne Community College i n Gol dsboro, NC Horizontal Clearance Shared Use Path Shoulder 2 ft (o.6 m) 2 ft (o.6 m) 10-12 ft (3.0-3.6 m) Harnett County Northwest Area Plan . 47 041519a HCBOC Page 156 ••••••••• • IMPLEMENTATION .,.,. • • • • i STRATEGIES • • • • • • • • • • • 041519a HCBOC Page 157 Implementation Tasks Summary Task Task Description Responsibility Timeframe IS1 Formally adopt the Future Land Use Map and policy recom-Local government planning staff Short-term mendations, update the Future Land Use Map in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan , and utilize when co n sidering rezoning req uests in the area covered. IS2 Coord inate with schools to identify schoo l sites near growth areas . Devel opment Services staff in co-Mid-term ordination with the cou nty schoo l board IS3 Pursue intermediate and long-term roadway improvements Developm ent Services in cooperation Mid-to along US 401 and other priority corridors with CAMPO long-term IS4 Update local land use regulations (Unified Development Ordi-Deve lopment Services Short-term nance) to be co n sistent with this plan. Specific tasks include: • New ARR Compatibility Development Design Options Table I Add Rural Cluster Option • Update open space requirements, standards and options • Require working farmland buffers for subdivisions with small lots • Standardize thresholds for transportation improvement s, sidewalks, curb & gutter and other design criteria IS5 Improve the quality commercia l development design in the Development Services in coordi -Mid -term study area along US 401 and NC 210 by adopting an highway nation with other departments overlay district. IS6 Consider a UDO text amendmen t s and feasibility studies to advance Development Services in coordi -Short-term greenways and trails nation with Parks and Recreation • Require reservation of greenway easements according to greenway plans • Conduct additional feasibility studies for priority greenway and trail corridors (i.e. Neil/s Creek) IS7 Update UDO as needed to encourage cross access and completion of Development Se rvi ces in coordi - Short-to collector street connections nation with other departments mid-term IS8 Require and/or incentivize p ro tectio n of riparian areas and Development Services Mid -term tree canopy conservation. • Consider increasing stream buffer requirements for com - patibility subdivisions • Update UDO t o define priority conservation areas • Update Local Watershed Protection Ordinance IS9 Pursue gran t s and/or consider a public-private partnerships to extend Development Se r vices in coord i -Mid-term utility service to potential commercial and indu strial areas nation with other departments IS10 Improve fi re and emergency service coverage in th e Neills Creek area Harnett County Emergency Man -Mid-term agement IS11 Develop additional marketing materials in support of economic Harnett County Eco n omic Mid -term development in Northwest Harnett Cou nty Development, Parks and Re creation in cooperation with Dunn Area Tourism Authority IS12 Increase staff capacity and coordination with state officials to ens ure Development Services in coordi -Mid-term stormwater regulations are enforced nation with other departments Harnett County Northwest Area Plan 49 041519a HCBOC Page 158 041519a HCBOC Page 159 Contents Priority Transportation Project Sheets • Overview Map • us 401 • Rawls Church Road • Purfoy Road Harn ett County Nor thwest Area Pl an 51 041519a HCBOC Page 160 Fuquay-Varina ..... , ....... ( \ \ ! ) \ I ' J ' ? i , / I • ' ----1.takl ., 041519a HCBOC Page 161 ~ProJ:ect ID I N~~{r. ~' ;·. . ... ·: ,:-.· :.-. -. . . -~ ')P,1 ·1 US -,401 1NORTH" -. _..,. "lilc /-~ -,.,•) ,•~/'-....... \.,,._-\-••W.t-_. ~•••• \''1.~ \ •..,.4_,~ _ _..... • .... _,.,,. • • • • ..,.,.,~ Extent: Harnett County Line to Chalybeate Springs Rd Improvement Type: Widen ing Length: 2.8 miles Probable Cost Estimate: $56,241 ,900 (from Fuquay - Varina to Lillington UPD -7 .5 miles) per CAMPO 2045 MTP • Cost Estimate for this portion: $20,996,976 Existing and Future Conditions • Existing CTP Class : Minor Thoroughfare • Future CTP Class : Boulevard • Travel Lanes (Existing/ Proposed): 2/4 • Existi ng Volume (2018): 15 ,700 o From existing counts grown to 2018 • Projected Volume (2045): 22,400 o Notes : Projected volumes from the Triangle Regional Model • Existing Right-of-Way : 60 Feet • Future Right-of-Way : 120 Feet Previous Planning : • 2011 Harnett County CTP -Widen to four lane section • Southwest Area Study (2012) -Widen to four lane section • US 401 Corridor Study -increase capacity, i ncrease safety and reduce travel time (not funded and studies have concluded for the time bei ng ) Context and Need: Recommended to be upgraded to improve safety and handle expected growth in the county . There are many economic development opportunities along US 401 and improving this section will provide adequate capacity for forecasted growth. Potential Intermediate Improvements/ Next Steps: • Intermediate improvements : o Piney Grove Rd: Peak hour signal warrants are met, recommend installing traffic signal if full signal warrants are met . o Rawls Church Rd : Add a right turn lane to westbound Rawls Church Rd with 200' storage. Cost Estimate : $117,000 o Chalybeate Springs Rd : Add a right turn lane to westbound Chalybeate Springs Rd with 200' storage . Cost Esti mate : $117,000 o Convert US 401/Chalybeate Springs Road and US 401/Rawls Church Road i ntersections to traffic signal controlled intersections • Next Steps : o Widen US 401 to four lanes . Study potential cross-sect ion and consider multi-use path north of Chalybeate Springs on US 401 or as part of a "backage" collector street. o Consider widening Piney Grove Road (current volume : 7,200; future volume : 24,300 ) o Add additional northbound left turn bay on US 401 at Piney Grove Road 041519a HCBOC Page 162 Project ID I Name P2 I RAWLS CHURCH RD Improvement Type: Widening and New Location Length: 4 .0 miles (3 .3 miles of widening , 0. 7 miles of new location) Cost Estimate: $27,255 ,022 per CAMPO 2045 MTP • Proportion for wi dening : $22 ,485,393.15 • Proportion for new location : $4,769,628.85 Existing and Future Conditions • Existing CTP Class : Minor Thoroughfare • Future CTP Class : Minor Thoroughfare • Travel Lanes (Existing/ Proposed): 2/3 • Existing Volume (2018): 2,600 o From existing counts grown to 2018 • Projected Volume (2045): 7,100 o Notes: Projected volumes from the Triangle Regional Model o 3% growth = 5,600 • Existing Right-of-Way : 60 Feet • Future Right-of-Way : 90 Feet Previous Planning: • 2011 Harnett County CTP -Upgrade to two 12-foot lanes with 2-foot paved shoulders • Southwest Area Study (2012) -Widen existing portion to four-lane section, four-lane new location section Context and Need: Recommended to be upgraded to improve safety and increase capacity to accommodate additional traffic traveling east/west and improve access between US 401 and the Town of Angier including NC 210 and NC 55. Potential Intermediate Improvements / Next Steps: • Intermediate improvements: Convert Rawls Church Road/Purfoy Road intersection to traffic signal controlled • Next Steps : Widen Rawls Church Road tci a two-lane road with a continuous two-way turn lane and wide paved shoulders. Consider a multi-use path on one side of roadway to facilitate east- west pedestrian and bicycle travel. 041519a HCBOC Page 163 Extent: Harnett County Line to Chalybeate Springs Rd Improvement Type: Widen i ng Length: 1.8 miles Cost Estimate: $35,773,795 (from Holland Rd in Wake County to Chalybeate Springs Road -4 .12 miles) per CAMPO 2045 MTP • Proportional Cost Estimate : $15,629,328 Existing and Future Conditions • Existing CTP Class: Minor Thoroughfare • Future CTP Class : Minor Thoroughfare • Travel Lanes (Existing/ Proposed): 2 / 3 • Existing Volume (2018): 3,000 o From existing counts grown to 2018 • Projected Volume (2045): 13,200 o Notes: Projected volumes from the Triangle Regional Model o The model includes US 401 on a new location, which will no longer be completed. Volume from this road was shifted onto Purfoy Road. o 3% growth == 6,700 • Existing Right-of-Way: 60 Feet • Future Right-of-Way : 80 Feet Previous Planning: • Southwest Area Study (2012) -Widen to fou r lane secti on Context and Need: Recommended to be upgraded to improve safety and increase capacity to accommodate additional traffic t raveling east/west and improve access to to Fuquay-Varina and the Southern Expressway (l-540). Potential Intermediate Improvements / Next Steps: • Intermediate improvements: Consider converting Chalybeate Springs Road /Purfoy Road intersection to traffic signal controlled • Next Steps : Widen Purfoy Road to two -lane road with a two-way turn lane and wide paved shoulders . 041519a HCBOC Page 164 NC42 p \ Cokesbury ~; . ~J rake Landing -~ . ~ "'~ ~~ i Parks and Conservation Agricultural and Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential In-Town Residential Rural Center Commercial Mixed Use -Town Center Employment Mixed Use 041519a HCBOC Page 165 Harnett COUNTY NORTH CARO LINA A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE NORTHWEST HARNETT AREA LAND USE PLAN www.harnett .org WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of Harnett County have previously adopted multiple Ordinances and documents for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the county residents; and WHEREAS, this Plan was adopted under authority granted by the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina, particularly G.S. 153A-340; and WHEREAS, the UDO contains provisions for amending said ordinance and those provisions have been followed; and WHEREAS, Hamett County staff has made the draft Plan available to the public and solicited comment from the same through general public information sessions, stakeholder groups, and committees; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HARNETT COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA hereby adopts the "Northwest Hamett Area Land Use Plan" as indicated in "Attachment". "Attachment" is filed with the in the Clerk to the Board's Office. Duly adopted this 15th day of April, 2019 and effective upon adoption. HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Gordon Springle, Chairman ATTEST: Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board stron g roots • new grow th 041519a HCBOC Page 166 Agenda Item __ g.......___ HARNETT COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 108 E. FRONT STREET LILLINGTON, NC 27546 910-893-7525 FAX 9I0-893-2793 ....................................................................................... ~ ...................................... . HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE A public hearing will be held by the Hamett County Board of Commissioners in the Assembly Room of the County Administration Building located at 420 McKinney Parkway in Lillington, NC at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 2019. The purpose of this hearing is to hear the views of the residents of Harnett County on the proposed zoning change. Information may be viewed at the Harnett County Planning Office, 108 E. Front St., Lillington, NC during regular business hours of 8:00am-5:00 pm, Monday tluough Friday or online at http://www.harnett.org/planning/current- petitions.asp. Proposed Zoning Change: Case# PLAN1903·0001; Landowners/Applicants: Travis Scott Wester; 21.42 +/-acres; Pin #'s 0661-26-0949.000, 0661-16-6990.000, 0661-16-6469.000, 0661-16-6234.000; From RA-40 to RA-30 Zoning District ; NC Hwy 210 North; Neill's Creek Township. THE PUBLIC IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS REQUEST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON DISCUSSION, DEBATE AND PRESENTATIONS FROM OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS AT THE FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. THE DAILY RECORD: Run Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 & Friday, April 12, 2019 Please Bill: Harnett County Development Services PO Box 65 Lillington, N.C. 27546 Questions regarding this ad should be directed to Teresa Byrd at 814-6416 or 893-7525 Thank you 041519a HCBOC Page 167 Board Meeting Agenda Item Agenda Item __ 9 __ _ MEETING DATE: April 15, 2019 TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Change: Case# PLAN1903-0001 REQUESTED BY: Development Services/ Mark Locklear REQUEST: Landowners/ Applicants: Travis Scott Wester; 17.34 acres; Pin #'s 0661-26-0949.000, 0661- 16-6990.000, 0661-16-6469.000, 0661-16-6234.000; From RA-40 to RA-30 Zoning District; NC Hwy 210 North; Neill's Creek Township .. Development Services staff reommends this rezoning request be APPROVED. The requested rezoning to RA-30 would not have an unreasonable impact on the surrounding community and will maintain the public health, safety, and general welfare based on the existing residential uses and the County's Land Use Plan. On April 1st, the Hamett County Planning Board voted 5-0 to recommend approval of this of the application based on surrounding residential uses, adjacent identical zoning disctricts, as well as overall compliance with the Land Use Plan. No one spoke in opposition. FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: C:\U sers\gwheeler\AppData\Local\Microsoft\ Windows\IN etCache\C ontent.Outlook\OZMK66X9\ Wester_ CC agenda fonn.docx Page 1 of 1 041519a HCBOC Page 168 e,_\Harnett '(~ COUNTY L llORTH (AROLI/:A REZONING STAFF REPORT Case: PLAN1901-001 Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services jsikes@harnett.org Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278 Planning Board: April 1, 2019 County Commissioners: April 15, 2019 Requesting a Rezoning from RA-40 to RA-30 Applicant Information Owner of Record: Name: Travis Scott Wester Address: 3631 NC 210 N City/State/Zip: Lillington, NC 27546 Property Description Applicant: Name: Travis Scott Wester Address : 3631 NC 210 N City/State/Zip: Lillington, NC 27546 PIN(s): 0661-16-6990, 0661-16-6469, 0661-16-6234, & a portion of 0661-26-0949 Acreage : 17. 34 Address/SR No .: NC 210 N ------------------------------- Township: D (01) Anderson Creek D (02) Averasboro D (03) Barbecue D (04) Black River Page 1 of 6 D (05) Buckhorn D (06) Duke D (07) Grove D (08) Hectors Creek 3155 • .n2a D (09) Johnsonville D (10) Lillington [gj (11) Neill's Creek D ( 12) Stewart's Creek D (13) Upper Little River \ STAFF REPORT 041519a HCBOC Page 169 Site Description: Site is currently vacant, farmland . Surrounding Land Uses: Area land uses consist of individual single-family residences and agricultural land . Services Available Water: [g]Public (Harnett County) 0Private (Well) D Other: Unverified Pag e 2 of 6 Sewer: D Public (Harnett County) [g] Private (Septic Tank) 0 Other: unverified Transportation: Annual Daily Traffic Count : "' 11,000 on Hwy 210 Site Dista nces: good STAFF REPORT 041519a HCBOC Page 170 Zonin District Com atibilit 13 343 I ·• r:3179 L-----3155~ 1,/ '31a1 ,.-::3137 t!J 3;09' . ' 3228 Land Use Classification Com El tll~ Page 3 of 6 RA-40 Parks & Rec X X X X X (with CUP \ ZQNING BA:.J..Q Parks & Rec X Natural Preserves X Bona Fide Farms X Single Familt X Manufactured Homes, Design Regulated X Manufactured Homes (with CUP) Multi -Fa milt (with CUP) Institutional X Commercial Service (with CUP) Retail (with CUP) Wholesale Industrial Manufacturing RA-30 X X X X X (with criteria X (with CUP X (with CUP LAND USE MOR X X X X X X X X STAFF REPORT 041519a HCBOC Page 171 Site Photographs Site Across from the site Hw 401 & Matthews Rd Property across Hwy 401 Page4 of6 Site & Hw 401 N Hw 401 5 and ro erties across the Hw Property across Hwy 401 & northbound view STAFF REPO RT 041519a HCBOC Page 172 Evaluation ~ Yes ~ Yes ~ Yes D Yes ~ No The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding community is reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or harm to the community. REASONING: The impact to the surrounding community is reasonable, as the requested zoning district is immediately adjacent to other parcels in the area. The requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification . REASONING: The requested zoning to RA-30 is compatible with the overall land use classification of Medium Density Residential, as well as being within the Compatibility Development Target area. The MOR land use class could have flexibility with lot sizes and/ or be located in areas near a town's extra-territorial jurisdiction . The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare. REASONING: The requested zoning to RA-30 would maintain the public health, safety and general welfare due to the existing residential uses within the area. The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for reasonableness. REASONING: Due to the total acres within this request, the application does not need to be considered for Small Scale Rezoning. Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that. .. ) As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to RA-30 would not have an unreasonable impact on the surrounding community and will maintain the public health, safety, and general welfare based on the existing residential uses, identical zoning is adjacent, and compliance with the County's Land Use Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that this rezoning request be APPROVED. Additional Information On April Pt, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of application based on compatibility to the Land Use Plan and the existing RA-30 zoning in the area. *No one spoke in opposition . Page 5 of 6 STAFF REPORT 041519a HCBOC Page 173 Review Worksheets TRADITIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation unless: D Yes D No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories. D Yes D No B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small group. D Yes D No C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the property involved.) D Yes O No D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change. D Yes D No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices. 0 GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the public interest. 0 DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is unreasonable due to the following: D The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in appropriate complementary categories. 0 There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small group. 0 There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the property involved.) 0 There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change. D The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices. D The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning Page 6 of 6 STAFF REPORT 041519a HCBOC Page 174 Harnett COUNTY ·,ORTH ("/\RO L lN/, Phone: Fax: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Planning Department 108 E. Front Street P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546 Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793 Total Fee: Receipt: Permit: Ptq,n JQ03..-OCQJ Hearing Date: ______________ _ Fax: Acreage: Acres ---- Deed Book: --'-4--'<--0-=-~--Page : Plat Book: ____ Page: ___ _ Existing Zoning: D Conservation 0 RA-20M 0 RA-20R (J~A-30 ~A-40 D Commercial D Light Industrial D Industrial 0 Office & Inst'I Attachments Requested Zoning: D Conservation 0 RA-20M CJ].A-20R [!f"RA-30 0 RA-40 D Commercial D Light Industrial D Industrial D Office & Inst'I Township: D (01) Anderson Creek D {02) Averasboro D (03) Barbecue 0 ( 04) Black River D (05) Buckhorn 0 (06) Duke D (07) Grove D (08) Hectors Creek D (09) Johnsonville 0 .. J)O) Lillington !lf"(ll) Neill's Creek 0 ( 12) Stewart's Creek D (13) Upper Little River • Written description of property from recorded deed • Recorded map of property at scale of not less than one (1) inch = 200 feet • Explanation of why the zoning change is requested, addressing applicable portions of Article XII of the Zoning Ordinance Signatures The undersigned applicant hereby certifies that, to the hest of his or her knowledge and belief, all information supplied with this application is true and accurate: j ~~ 1,cw= (i\J~ Property Owner Signature 2 /)3j;20;7 Date' J };;£~~· ()"--- Au~ Agent Signature Page 1 of 2 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE 041519a HCBOC Page 175 Harnett Co. Planning Dept. P.O . Box 65 Lillington, NC 27546 Gentlemen: Re: Zoning change for property on NC 210 North Pin #'s 0661-16-6990, 0661-16-6469, 0661-16-6234, and 0661-26-0949 I am requesting that the above parcels be rezoned from RA-40 to RA-30. My property on the west side of NC 210 is zoned RA-30. The northern portion of the tract in question is already zoned RA-30 . My neighbor to the north (John W. Johnson Pin #0661-27-0328 .000) is zoned RA-30. Rezoning this portion to RA-30 will make all of my property zoned continuously. Sincerely, Travis Scott Wester 041519a HCBOC Page 176 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Re-Zoning from RA-40 to RA-30 Travis Scott Wester All that tracT or parcel of/and lying in Neill's Creek Township, Harnetl Counly. North Carolina and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning al a point in the centerline of NC HWY 210 North said point being the common corner o_f Travis Scotl Wester as described in Deed Book 408, Page 393 and Brooks E. .Johnson as described in Deed Book 1242, Page 732 both of the Harnelf Counly Registry, said point being.further described as being located North 89 degrees OJ minutes 42 seconds West for a dis/once of 32.10 fee/from an existing rail road in the common line of said Wester and Brooks near the eastern margin of NC HWY 210 Norlh and runs thence along the centerline of NC HWY 210 North the flowing courses and distances: Norlh 09 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East for a distance of 143. 98 feet to a point: North 08 degrees 58 minutes OJ seconds East for a distance of 105. 17 feet to point; North 09 degrees 12 minutes 07 seconds Em;1 for a distance of 102.46 feet to a point: North 09 degrees O 1 degrees 49 seconds East for a distance of 98. 76 feet to a point; North 08 degrees 39 minutes 58 seconds East for a distance of 100.63.feet to a point; North 09 degrees 02 minutes 52 seconds East for a distance of 204.86 feet to a point; North 09 degrees 13 minutes 14 seconds East for a distance of 17 3 . 10 feet to a point, said point being a corner with .John Williams Johnson and Amy Jones Johnson as described in Deed Book 13 28, Page 468. Deed Book 1328, Page 471 and Map Number 99-57 all of the Harnett CounTy Registry: THENCE leaving the centerline of NC HWY 210 North and along the southern line ofsaid Johnson South 80 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East for a distance of 249. 62 feet to an exisling iron stake; THENCE continuing along the line of said Johnson Norlh 50 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds East for a distance of 602. 98 feet to an existing iron pipe, said point being the common corner of said Johnson and Lola Tucker Coats as described in Deed Book 552. Page 138, Deed Book 990. Page 516 and Plat Cabinet "D ", Slide l04B; THENCE continuing along the western line and past the corner o_f said Coats South 02 degrees 24 minutes 10 seconds West/or a distance of 1281 .18/eet to a point in the northern line of said Johnson; THENCE along the northern line of said Johnson North 88 degrees 11 minutes 44 seconds West for a distance of 120.71 feet to a point; THENCE continuing along the line of said Johnson North 89 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West for a distance 681.29 feet to the Point and Place of BEGINNING. Toge/her with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. I Said easement contains 17.341 Ac. Total (16. 702 Ac. Net) more or less. The foregoing description was prepared by: Stancil & Associates Professional Land Surveyors, P.A. C-0831 98 East Depot Street P. 0. Box 730, Angier, N.C. 27501 Pholle: 9/9-639-2133 Fax: 919-639-2602 Jlancils11rve1@gmail.com LHNC1181\REZONING BOUNDARY .DOCX 041519a HCBOC Page 177Agenda Item ___.I'---=-( ---! Harnett County Veterans Services Activities Reporting Form Month/Year March 2019 Request For Service Tracking Correspondence Claimant Written Action Taken (Telephone and In-Person) Out Status -a, Q. 0 ~ 'i4 C E 0 J C ·u; ... G> 0 .2 0.. C LL iii 0 c Cl) c "C ca Ill LI. 0 0.. C Cl) .5 ::s u ~ .. I 0 ca c. 0 C e Cl) Cl> ca z C :C G> C .s:. E Cl) 0 1A .2 le <'.J~ C 0 u C C "C ~ .c ca C 3: Q, Cl) I ii -111 Q. e ·ca QI ... ca ... 0 Q. ca -G> ... 0 di Cl) U 0 .s:. G> 3 = Cl> G> G> E u G> .. ~ 'C: .c -'ti 5 > u Q. ::s .c t:: C Cl) DATE NAME ! GI ::s I !t 0 ~ ~ Cl) 0 Q Q. ~~ 0 QI :i z 0 w 0 u d zm 1 455 9 57 14 86 37 112 11 12 21 31 6 2 19 30 2 3 GW-21 VN-43 5 OIF-43 6 K-1 7 PT-2 8 W\/1111-2 , ______ 9 ,&. ~ . / -----ff .I .~ 10 ~ --1 /~ --11 Eric Truesdale 12 Harnett County Veterans -13 Officer -14 -Walk In: 135 -15 Walk In Front Desk: 39 -16 Phone Calls: 455 -17 Outreach : 57 18 Total Contacts: 686 -19 -20 -Total 455 9 57 14 86 37 112 11 12 21 31 6 2 0 19 30 041519a HCBOC Page 178 Harnett County Department of Public Health Activities Summary July 1, 2018 -June 30, 2019 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Front Desk -Check-in Annointments 964 1197 886 1255 1071 923 1178 1069 Health Clinics Adult Women Wellness Clinic 4 3 2 2 4 1 2 2 Care Coordination for Children (CC4C) 241 258 241 150 158 185 210 207 Child Health -Sick Clinic 75 85 87 127 131 118 175 142 Child Health -Well Clinic 77 165 115 104 96 71 71 86 Countv Emoloyee Health Clinic 138 145 94 145 136 152 190 219 Family Plannina 157 168 113 177 144 122 175 145 Immunizations 171 265 555 1628 370 184 250 213 Maternitv (Prenatal Clinic) 227 184 144 166 221 189 237 172 OB Care ManaQement <OBCM) 116 122 113 97 75 68 73 120 Postoartum Home Visits 20 11 11 23 28 18 19 22 Refer/Receat Pao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STD Services 112 107 77 99 86 81 101 89 TB Services 178 220 124 153 101 88 124 113 Welcome Baby Home Visits 22 11 12 23 28 19 21 22 Total Services 1538 1744 1688 2894 1578 1296 1648 1552 Reportable Disease Cases Tuberculosis 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HIV -(Quarterly report) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIDS -(Quarterlv reoort) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SYPHILIS -(Quarterlv reoort) 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 OTHER STD's 52 50 32 40 55 21 32 47 Other (salmonella, camovlobacter, etc) 13 1 2 1 1 5 2 2 Total Services 68 51 35 41 56 26 37 50 Health Education Outreach 308 479 256 694 556 359 562 517 Laboratory Clients 841 786 505 763 702 649 815 884 Laboratorv Testa 1346 1347 941 1340 1247 1103 1347 1325 HIV Testa 161 157 90 172 216 114 141 134 WIC Active Participation 2934 3150 3174 2876 2809 2784 2751 2662 Vital Statistics Births In Countv 49 44 36 55 43 45 43 39 Births Out of Countv 111 133 135 144 110 138 113 123 Deaths 57 72 49 68 67 63 59 58 Environmental Health # of lmcrovement Anns Confirmed 17 24 28 23 28 42 71 90 Number of Permits Issued 36 41 24 45 31 47 56 50 Number of Completions 41 50 19 54 54 16 34 55 Number of Existina Permits 52 31 15 35 19 14 34 19 Reoair Permits Issued 3 3 3 11 11 2 5 2 Permits Denied 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 Food and Lodaina Establishments lnsoect'd/Reinspected 55 86 66 84 60 68 91 72 Visits / Critical Voliations Verfication 59 51 31 45 23 10 32 27 Private Water Suoolies Aoolications Received 21 17 7 11 10 5 23 13 updated 04/05/2019 Agenda Item _ ...... f ..... ( __ Mar Apr May Jun troTAI AVG. 1014 9557 1061 .9 4 24 2.6667 212 1862 206.89 165 1105 122.78 82 867 96.333 180 1399 155.44 119 1320 146.67 189 3825 425 193 1733 192.56 123 907 100.78 27 179 19.889 0 0 0 101 853 94.778 109 1210 134.44 27 185 20.556 1531 0 0 0 15469 1718.8 0 3 0.3333 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0.6667 76 405 45 12 39 4.3333 89 453 50.333 273 4004 444.89 758 6703 744.78 1230 11226 1247.3 139 1324 147.11 23140 2892.5 43 397 44.111 107 1114 123.78 58 551 61.222 83 406 45.111 69 399 44.333 35 358 39.778 28 247 27.444 11 51 5.6667 0 3 0.3333 84 666 74 48 326 36.222 10 117 13 041519a HCBOC Page 179 1 E 51XX 52XX 53XX 54XX 58XX 61XX 62)()( 63)(){ 64)()( 65XX 66XX 67)0( 68XX 69XX 72XX E Total R 31XX 32)()( RTotal 2 E SlXX 52)()( 53)()( 54XX ssxx 58XX 61XX 62XX 63XX 64XX 65)()( 66XX 67XX 68XX 69)()( 71XX 72XX 81)()( E Total R 41)()( 44XX 49XX RTotal 3 E 51)()( 52XX 53XX 54XX 58XX 61XX 63XX 6SXX 66XX 81)()( 82XX ETotal R 36XX RTotal 4 E 65)()( 69)()( 90XX Hamett County Schools Flnanclals January 31, 2019 Re.uler lnstructl0/15 Services .Spacial Populations Services Alternative Pro11rams and Services School Le•dershlp Sen,tces School-8-sed SuDDOrt Services Suooort and Development Services Soetlal Pooulatlan Sunnnrt end Develaom!nt Services Alternative ProllnlmS and Services Suooort ,nd Development Services TechnalollV Sunnnrt Services Operatlonal Suooort Services Flnanclal and Human Resource Services ActOUlltabllltv Semces Svstem-Wlde Pupll Support Services J>oncv; leadel'lhlp and Public Relatlons Services Nijtrltlon Services State Public School Fund Revenue Other State Alloutlons for Current Ooeratlons R11ular Instructions Sel'Ylcts Special Popul1tlons Services Afternltlve Pro11111ms and Services .. ., --···-·· . ---------~--- School Leadership Sellllc:es Co-CUrrlcular Services Schoof.Based Suooort Services Suooort and Develooment Services Special Populatlon Support and Development Services Alternauve Programs and Servkes Suooort and Develooment Servlcu TechnoloAY SUPDort Services Operatlon1I Suooort Services Flnandal and Human Resout1:e Services AccountebllitY Services System-Wide Pupil Support Sl!fVlces Pollev, l.f!adershlp and ·Publlc Relations Servlcu Community Services Nutrition services Pevments to Other Govemmental Units t.ocal sources General Local Sources· Unrestricted · Soeclal Revenue Services ReRUlar Instructions Services Speclal Populations Servlcff Alternative Programs and Services SC:hool Leadershlo Servlees Sl:hool-Based Suonort Services Support and Oevelopment services Alter.naUve Prt>ffams and Services Supoort and Development Services Operatlonal SuDDOrt Servlcu Flnanr;lal and Hum•n Resource Servlca Payments to Other Govemmental Units Unbudmed Funds Revenua from Federel Sources -Restricted Grent.l (Received throullh DPI) Operational SUJ>Port Services PollcY, llladershlp and Public Relations Services Caoltal Outlav .. Agenda Item _ _./ __ , __ $78 576 654.01 $41,969,777.50 $36,606.876.51 $13 445.574.54 $7,344,889.75 $6,100,684.79 $4,284,958.16 $2,243,361.18 $2.041,596,98 $8 634,226.75 $4,949,540.19 $3 684,68656 $10,645,970.93 $5 321 262.75 $5,324,708.18 $546745.89 $327,529.45 $219,216.44 $797 595.00 $423,666.43 $373.928.57 $29,993.00 $341.76 $29,651.24 $119S 917.00 $672,579.58 $523,337.42 $10,918,643.07 $6,087 360.31 $4,831,282.76 $1,385,258.00 $770300.80 $614,957.20 $136 784.00 $84,622.80 $52,161.20 $96,800.00 $40130.45 $56,669.55 $842,018.00 $487687.56 $354,330.44 $222 080.00 $193,725.23 $28,354.77 $131,759,218,35 $70 916 775.74 $60,842,442.61 ($129,929,14355 1$59 760,858.81 ($70,168,284.74 ($1,830,074.80 $0.00 1$1.830 074.80 ($131,759,218.35 1$59,760,858.81 ($71,998,359.54 $5 673,705.00 $2 479 833.10 $3,193 871.90 $1,093,431.00 $505,460.25 $587970.75 · $246,670.00 $81,30952 $165,360.48 . $1 2B6 845.00 $587 894.32 $698,950.68 $885,139.00 $427,658.91 $457.480.09 $646195.30 $340,082.20. $306,113.10 $833,527.00 $466,769.99 $366 757.01 $262,306.00 $145,563.59 $116 742.41 $3,765.00 $680.96 $3,084.04 $201180.00 $65583.74 $135,596.26 $11,927 727.00 $6 413,045.45 $5514,68155 $1,393,575.00 $437,004.48 $956,57052 $132,616.00 $67,714.40 $64,901.60 · $290.020.00 $140658.22 $149,361.78 $952,137.00 $456,136.67 $496,000.33 $5102.00 $1,866.85 $3,235.15 SS,839.00 $299.68 SS539.32 $635,000.00 $322,581.04 $312,418.96 $26,474,779.30 $12,940,143.37 $13,534,635.93 1$23,464, ng.30 1$13 733,878.05 ($9 730,901.25 ($260 000.00 ($131,263.66 ($126,736.34 ($2,750,000.00 $0.00 1$2 750,000.00 ($26,474 779.30 1$13,865,141.71 {$12,609,637.59 $1 561 488.95 $730 596.SS $630,892.40 $3 334,254.18 $2126 079.27 $1 208,174.91 $6 192 264.64 $2 746,nB.67 $3 445 485.97 $6,000.00 $1,089.32 $4910.68 $592,423.09 $204,311.02 $388,112.07 $17 635.28 $1,312.17 $16,323.11 $306,951.10 $165,89355 $141057.55 $4,000.00 $643.10 $3,356.90 $43 410.05 $30023.93 $13,386.12 $638.129.86 $180,832.60 $457,297.26 $1,293,688.78 $0.00 $1,293 688.78 $13.990 245.93 $6,187,560,lB $7,802,685.75 ($13,990,245.93 · ($5 009 100.66 ($8 981,145.27 {$13 990 245.93 ($5,009 100.66 ($8,981,145.27 $2,255,768.66 $41,493.63 $2 214 275.03 $9 736.00 $9,736.00 $0.00 $3 848174.58 $2,405,147.61 $1,443 026.97 041519a HCBOC Page 180 93XX $972132.00 $0 .00 $972,132.00 E Total S7 085,811.24 S2 456,377.24 $4,629 434.00 R 32XX Other State Allocations for Current Ooeratlons ($11,375.05 ($11,:H5.05 $0.00 34XX State Allocatlons Restricted to Capita! Outlays IS1 172 858.001 $0.00 ($1,172,858.00 41)()( local Sources General ($1,021,528.00 $0.00 ($1,021.528.00 44)()( Loni Sources· Unrestricted ($129.61 ($493 .891 $364.28 48)0( Local Sources • Restricted !S4.787,806 .58 ($3,815,674.58 ($972,132.00 49)()( Special Revenue Services ($92,114.00 $0.00 ($92114.00 R Total 1$7.085.811.24 ($3 827.543 .52 ($3,258,267.72 5 E 72)0( Nutrition Servtces $10,249,583.00 $5,074,163.54 $5,175,419.46 81)()( I Pavments to Other Govemmentel Unlt.S $780,000.00 $195000.00 SS85,000.00 ETotal $11 029.583.00 $5 269,163.54 $5,760,419.46 R 38)()( Other Revenues from ~deral Sources -Restricted Grants ($8 ,141,583.00 ($3,799,713 .99 ($4,341 869.01 43XX Lotal Sources • Revenues 1$2 288 100.00 ($925,307 .so ISl,362,792 .20 44XX Local Sources -Unrutrlcted ISS2000.00 IS52.339. 79 $339.79 48XX Local Sources -Restricted ($2 .900.00 $0.00 ($2,900.00 49)()( Soedal Revenue Service$ ($545,000.00 $0.00 ($545,000.00 R Total ($11 029.583.00 ($4, 1n ,361.58 1$6,252,221.42 7 E 51)()( Re11Ular hlStrvdlons Services $215,167.17 $73 9.S0.18 $141,216.99 S2XX Soeclal Populations Services $2 500.00 $1244.80 $1,255.20 53XX Alternative Programs a11d Services $24 785.97 S13 639.84 $11,146.13 54XX School Leadership Services $24 000.00 $10,317.81 $13,682.19 ssxx Co-Currlculer Services $22,240.76 $8,132.60 $14,108.16 SBXX Schoo l-eased Support Servk:es $6,262.00 $0.00 $6262.00 65)()( Operatlonal Support Services $2,000.00 $1.885.50 $114.50 ETotal $296 955.90 $109,170.73 $187 785 .17 R 41XX Local sources General ($286 300.90 ($169,222.81 ($117 078.()9 44)()( Local Sourtt1s • Unrestricted {$1,000.001 {$1176.381 $176.38 49XX Snectal Revenue Services ($9,655.00 $0.00 ($9,655.00 RTotal {$296 955.90 ($170,399.19' ($126,556.71 8 E S1l<X Regular Instructions Services $3 218 885.02 $1,068,743.99 $USO 141.03 52XX Soeclal Pooulatl(ins services $871,596.87 $184,872.52 $686,724.35 53XX Alternative Programs and Services $1,3n,140.69 $762,499.12 $614,641.57 54XX School Leadership S!!rvlces $489 790.31 $69,049.17 $420741.14 ssxx Co-C:Urrlcular Services $67,535.93 $57,887.84 $9,648.09 S8XX Schoof.Based 5uPPOrt Services $501467.14 $241259.87 $260207.27 61XX Support and Develooment Services $53,667.92 $13,199.22 $40468.70 62)()( Special Population Support and Develooment Services $2,500.00 $488 .62 $2,01138 63XX Altl!mative Prouems and Services Suooort and Oevelooment Setvlces $59.540.46 $32,977.91 $26,562.55 64)()( Technoloav Support Services $753,314.96 $378,391.39 $374,923.57 6SXX Operatlonel Suooort Servtc:es $1 ,644,105.39 $530,929.56 $1,113 175.83 66)0( Flnanctal end Humen Resource Services $127,690.09 $1,550.09 $126140.00 69XX Pollcv. letdershlo and Public Relations Services $6.SS8.53 $6,404.48 $154.05 71XX COmmu111tY Services $52,334.00 $51,200.83 $1,133.17 72XX Nutrltio.1 Services $169,996.58 $130799.68 $39,196.90 84XX lnterfund Trtnsfers $65,000.00 $65000.00 $0.00 E Total $9 461,123.89 $3,595,254.29 $5,865.869.60 R 32XX other State Allomlons for Current 0Peretions ($2,055,347 .33 ($1,189,327.28 ($866 020.05 37)()( Revenues from Federal Sources • Other Restricted Grants ($1,989,228 .69 {$1,735,375.51 1$lS3,853.18 38XX Other Revenues from Federal Sources • Restricted Grants ($275,000.00 ($141 ,915 .26) ($133.084,74 42XX Local Sources -Tuition and Fees ($15 921.22 ($15,921 .22 $0.00 44XX loClll Sources • Unrestricted ($483,503.96 ($440,511.00 ($42,992 .96 48XX l.ol:al Sources -Restricted 1$S69 705 .69 ($569,705.69 $0.00 49XX Soedal Revenue Services 1$4,072,417.00 $0.00 ($4,072,417 .oo RTotal ($9,461,123.89 ($4,092,755.96 ($5,368,367.93 041519a HCBOC Page 181 Harnett County Schools General Fund Balance Report January 31, 2019 Funds Local Public Schoof Fund 2 Capital Outlay Fund 4 Dunn District Tax Fund 7 Total Unassigned Fund Balance $3,005,227.00 $0.00 $298,366.00 $3,303,593.00 041519a HCBOC Page 182 Type of Purpose Fund Account Code 1 E SlXX 52XX S3XX 54XX 58XX 61XX 62XX 63XX 64XX 65XX 66XX 67XX 68XX 69XX nxx 81XX E Total R 31XX 32XX R Total 2 E SlXX 52XX 53XX 54XX S5XX SBXX 61XX 62XX 63XX 64XX 65XX 66XX 67XX 68XX 69XX 71XX 72XX 81XX E Total R 41XX 44XX 49XX R Total 3 E SlXX 52XX 53XX 54XX SBXX 61XX 63XX 6SXX 66XX 81XX 82XX E Total R 36XX R Total 4 E 65XX 69XX 90XX 93XX ETotal R 32XX 34XX 41XX 44XX 48XX 49XX Harnett County Schools Financials February 28, 2019 Desalption Regular Instructions Services Soecial Populations Services Alternative Programs and Services School Leadership Services school-Based Support Services Supoort and Development Services Special Population Supoort and Development Services Alternative Pro•rams and Services Support and Development Services Technology Support Services Operational Supoort Services Financial and Human Resource Services Accountability Services System-Wide Puoil Sunport Services Policy, Leadership and Public Relations Services Nutrition Services Pavments to Other Governmental Units State Public School Fund Revenue Other State Allocations for Current Operations Regular Instructions Services Special Populations Services Alternative ProRrams and Services School Leadership Services Co-Curricular Services School-Based Support Services Support and Development Services Special Population Suoport and Development Services Alternative Programs and Services Support and Development Services TechnoloRV Support Services Operational Supoort Services Financial and Human Resource Services Accountabilitv Services System-Wide Puoil Suoport Services Policy, Leaders hip and Public Relations Services Community Services Nutrition Services Payments to Other Governmental Units Local Sources General Local Sources -unrestricted Specia l Revenue Services Regular Instructions Services Saecia l Populations Services Alternative Programs and Services School Leadershio Services School-Ba sed Sunnnrt Services Support and Oeveloament Services Alternative Pr011rams and Services Support and Development Services Operational Suooort Services Financial and Human Resource Services Payments to Other Governmental Units Unbudgeted Funds Revenues from Federal Sources -Restricted Grants (Received through DPI) Operational Suaoort Services Policv, Leadership and Public Relations Services Caoital Outlay Other State Allocations for Current Operations State Allocations Restricted to Capital Outlays Local Sources General Local Sources -Unres tricted Local Sources -Restricted Special Revenue Services 1temalnln1 Current lud&et Year-to-Date a.1ence $78,506,654.01 $48,570,817.58 $29,935,836.43 $13,445,574.54 $8,495,043.61 $4,950,530.93 $4,204,958.16 $2,517,444.54 $1,687,513.62 $8,649,845.75 $5,673,799.63 $2,976,046.12 $10,668,980.93 $6,301,936.67 $4,367,044.26 $546,745.89 $375,147.98 $171,597.91 $797,595.00 $492,042.11 $305,552.89 $29,993.00 $341.76 $29,651.24 $1,258,432.00 $778,148.42 $480,283.58 $10,971,148.07 $7,048,152.62 $3,922,995.45 $1,395,258.00 $881,837.82 $513,420.18 $136,784.00 $95,907.41 $40,876.59 $96,800.00 $45,038.83 $51,761.17 $852,018.00 $574,667.50 $277,350.50 $222,080.00 $200,618.67 $21461.33 so.oo ($18,225.66) $18,225.66 $131,782,867.35 $82,032,719.49 $49,750,147.86 ($129,952,792.55) ($82,047,852 .86) ($47,904,939.69) ($1,830,074.80) $0.00 ($1,830,074.80) ($131,782,867.35) ($82,047,852.86) ($49,735,014.49) $5,673,705.00 $2,693,523.51 $2,980,181.49 $1,093,431.00 $535,809.32 $557,621.68 $246,670.00 $84,721.26 $161,948.74 $1,286,845.00 $655,573.60 $631,271.40 $885,139.00 $563,994.24 $321,144.76 $720,077.86 $428,132.43 $291,945.43 $833,527.00 $522,205.75 $311,321.25 $262,306.00 $164,938.22 $97,367.78 $3,765.00 $680.96 $3,084.04 $201,180.00 $73,056.65 $128,123.35 $11,927,727 .OD $7,412,010.01 $4,51 5,716.99 $1,393,575.00 $486,538.80 $907,036.20 $132,616.00 $77,096.33 $55,519.67 $290,020.00 $164,362.36 $125,657.64 $952,137.00 $538,638_39 $413,498.61 $5,102.00 $1,963.13 $3,138.87 $5,839.00 $299.68 $5,539.32 $635,000.00 $373,915-76 $261,084.24 $26,548,661.86 $14,777,460.40 $11,771,201.46 ($23,538,661.86) ($15,730,679.16) ($7,807,982.70) ($260,000.00) ($132,757.66) ($127,242.34) ($2,750,000.00) $0.00 ($2,750,000.00) ($26,548,661.86) ($15,863,436.82) ($10,685,225.04) $1,561,57S.Q7 $854,960.81 $706,614.26 $3,334,254.18 $2,433,283.04 $900,971.14 $6,l9S,264.20 $3,229,574.93 $2,965,689.27 $6,000.00 $2,085.32 $3,914 .68 $593,515.70 $233,446.14 $360,069.56 $17,635.28 $1,312.17 $16,323.11 $306,951.10 $186,014.08 $120,937.02 $4,000.00 $2,903.65 $1,096.3S $43,410.05 $35,760.98 $7,649.07 $638,037.25 $119,457.69 $S18,579.56 $1,289,603.10 $0.00 $1,289,603.10 $13,990,245.93 $7,098,798.81 $6,891,447.12 ($13,990,24S .93) ($7,103,669.84) ($6,886,576.09 ) ($13,990,245.93) ($7,103,669.84) ($6,886,576.09) $2,255,768.66 $41,493.63 $2,214,275.03 $19,736.00 $9,736.00 $10,000.00 $3,838,174.58 $2,610,303.15 $1,227,871.43 $972,132.00 $0.00 $972,132.00 $7,085,811.24 $2,661,532.78 $4,424,278.46 ($11,375.05) ($11,375.05) $0.00 ($1,172,858.00) $0.00 ($1,172,858.00) ($1,021,528.00) $0.00 ($1,021,528.00) ($129.61) ($564.92) $435.31 ($4,787,806.58) ($3,815,674.58) ($972, 132.0D) ($92,114.00) $0.00 ($92,114.00) 041519a HCBOC Page 183 R Total ($7,085,811.24) ($3,827,614.55) ($3,258,196.69) 5 E 72XX Nutrition Services $10,249,583 .00 $5,842,915.14 $4,406,667.86 SlXX Payments to Other Governmental Units $780,000.00 $195,000.00 $585,000.00 E Total $11,029,583 .00 $6,037,915.14 $4,991,667.86 R 32XX Other State Allocations for Current Operations $0.00 ($13,800.04) $13,800.04 38XX Other Revenues from Federal Sources -Restricted Grants ($8,141,583 .00) ($4,615,974.09) ($3,525,608 .91) 43XX Local Sources· Revenues ($2,288,100.00) ($1,174,029.35) ($1,114,070 .65) 44XX Local Sources -Unrestricted ($52,000.00) {$57,018 .95) $5,018.95 48XX Local Sources -Restricted ($2,900 .00) $0.00 ($2,900.00) 49XX Special Revenue Services ($545,000 .00) $0.00 (SS45 ,000.00) R Total ($11,029,583.00) ($5,860,822.43) ($5,168,760 .57) 7 E SlXX Regular Instructions Services $215,167.17 $78,218.52 $136,948 .65 52XX Soecial Pooulaf1ons Services $2,500.00 $1,244.80 $1 ,255 .20 53XX Alternative Programs and Services $24,785.97 $17,099.42 $7,686.55 54XX Schoo! leadership Services $24,000.00 $10,317.81 $13 ,682.19 ssxx Co-Curricular Services $22,240.76 $9,481.92 $12,758.84 58XX School-Based Support Services $6,262 .00 $0.00 $6,262 .00 65XX Operat'1onal Supoort Services $2,000.00 $1,885.50 $114.50 E Total $296,955.90 $118,247.97 $178,707 .93 R 32XX Other State Allocations for Current Operations $0 .00 {$8,392.03) $8,392.03 41XX local Sources General {$286,300.90) ($245,362.01) ($40,938.89) 44XX Local Sources -Unrestricted ($1,000 .00) ($1,345.57) $345.57 49XX Special Revenue Services ($9,655 .00) $0.00 ($9 ,655.00) R Total ($296,955 .90) ($255,099.61) ($41,856.29) 8 E 51XX Regular Instructions Services $3,301,323.86 $1.195,683.12 $2,105 ,640.74 52XX Special Pooulations Services $871,970.59 $205,204.49 $666,766.10 53XX Alternative Programs and Services $1,455,596.37 $897,993.73 $557,602 .64 54XX School Leadership Services $496,687.07 $71,938.64 $424,748.43 SSXX Co-Curricular Services $68 ,981.79 $62,262 .38 $6,719 .41 saxx School-Based Support Services $503,921.80 $309,539.10 $194,382. 70 61XX Support and Development Services $61 ,937.92 $16,305 .17 $4S,632 .7 5 62XX Special Population Support and Development Services $2,500.00 $538.62 $1 ,961.38 63XX Alternative Programs and Services Support and Development Services $59,540 .46 $37,157.73 $22,382.73 64XX Technology Support Services $588,314 .96 $378,803.75 $209,511.21 65XX Operational Support Services $2,244,668.47 $609,020.46 $1,635,648.01 66XX Financial and Human Resource Services $127,690.09 $1,550.09 $126,140.00 68XX System-Wide Pupil Support Services $250.00 $50.00 $200.00 69XX Policy, leadership and Public Relations Services $6,558.53 $6,454.48 $104.05 71XX Community Services $77,334.00 $57,987.47 $19,346 .53 72XX Nutrition Services $180,319.53 $139,638.96 $40,680.57 84XX lnterfun d Transfers $65 ,000.00 $65,000.00 $0.00 90XX Capital Outlay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 E Total $10,112,595.44 $4,055,128.19 $6,057,467.25 R 32XX Other State Allocations for Current Operations ($2,055,569 .09) {$1,445,544.28) ($610,024.81) 37XX Revenues from Federal Sources -Other Restricted Grants 1$1,989,228.69} {$1,735 ,375 .51) ($253,853 .18) 38X X Other Revenues from Federal Sources· Restricted Grants ($275,000.00} {$166,023.51) ($108,976.49) 42XX Local Sources · Tuition and Fees ($15,921.22} ($15 ,921.22) $0.00 44XX Local Sources -Unrestricted ($566,272.90) {$501,948.57) ($64,324.33) 48XX Local Sources -Restricted ($1,138,186.54) ($583,186.54) {$555,000.00) 49XX Special Revenue Services ($4,072,417.00) $0.00 ($4,072,417.00) R Total ($10,112,595.44) ($4,447,999.63) ($5,664,595.81)