HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE_ AMT-Sprint _ Harnett County 17-50042550 _ 174 Brinkley Hill (2)Good afternoon, Katie. There will be a land use permit that is needed.
Usually people will pay with a credit card and then I email the receipt
and permit to them. The cost of the permit is $25.00. I will be out of
the office next week, so if you need to have it processed then, one of
the ladies listed in this email can help you.
Thank you,
Donna M. Johnson
Project Coordinator/Customer Service Rep.
Dept. of Development Services
Central Permitting Division
108 E. Front St.
PO Box 65
Lillington, NC 27546
910-814-6431 (Office)
910-893-7525 Option 2/3 (Main)
From: Jay Sikes
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:47 PM
To: katie@bluewavedeployment.com
Cc: Donna Johnson <djohnson@harnett.org>
Subject: RE: AMT-Sprint / Harnett County 17-50042550 / 174 Brinkley
Hill
Hi Katie.this application has been approved and attached is its
approval letter.
Your app number is 17-50042550, and Donna can help if any other permit
is needed.
Thank you & have a nice wknd,
Jay Sikes, CFM
Manager of Planning Services
Harnett County Development Services
108 E. Front St
PO Box 65
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-7525, x4
910-814-6418
910-814-6459 (fax)
www.harnett.org/planning <http://www.harnett.org/planning>
From: Jonathan N. Edwards, P.E. [mailto:Jon@CityScapegov.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:13 AM
To: katie@bluewavedeployment.com <mailto:katie@bluewavedeployment.com>
Cc: Jay Sikes <jsikes@harnett.org <mailto:jsikes@harnett.org> >;
'Elizabeth Herington-Smith' <elizabeth@cityscapegov.com
<mailto:elizabeth@cityscapegov.com> >
Subject: AMT-Sprint / Harnett County 17-50042550 / 174 Brinkley Hill
Katie,
We are reviewing the subject application for equipment upgrades and
there appears to be some discrepancies in the structural analysis. This
makes the application incomplete. As you know, we are adding equipment
to a tower that is shown to be currently loaded to 104.4%. The new
analysis indicates 97.6%. When compared to the last structural
analysis (which is attached to this email), some equipment is either
different or at different heights:
1. Most of the listed equipment is shifted up or down a few feet.
While this is likely a wash in loading, please explain the reasoning for
the elevation changes.
2. In the 2016 analysis, T-Mobile removed three CellMax CMA
antennas and added three Ericsson AIR 21 antennas, but the former are
still shown on the latest (2017) analysis.
3. The 2017 analysis also shows the removal of six coaxial feed
lines. While this may be the case, this removal is not shown on the
plans you provided. Please confirm if these are being removed with this
application or if they were already removed in the past and the
structural analysis is making the correction at this time.
Please provide some insight to these questions so that we can continue
our review.
Regards,
Jon
Jonathan N. Edwards, P.E. | Principal Engineer
Atlanta, GA
o: 561.558.2808 | d: 678.747.9900
Please consider the environment before printing