HomeMy WebLinkAbout091316wsa Agenda Package091316wsa HC BOC Page 1
9:00 am
9:15 am
9:45 am
10:00 am
Harnett County Board of Commissioners
Work Session
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
9:00 am
Public Hearing: Proposed Zoning Change: Case# RZ-16-306
Landowner/Applicant: Hunters Grant, LLC I Benton Dewar, PLS; 0.6 +/-acres
(out of a 262 acre tract) Pin# 0632-56-8360; From Conservation to RA-30; Off
the Intersection of SR# 1412 (Christian Light Road) & SR# 1424 (Jackson
Road); Buckhorn Township, Development Services Director Mark Locklear
Discussion regarding negotiation of the lease term and amount for the Mamers,
Bunnlevel, and Buckhorn convenience sites, County Engineer Amanda Bader
NCACC Legislative Goals, Community and Government Relations Director
Brian Haney
County Manager's Report:
1) Update on 2016 NASPHV Rabies Compendium: Proposed Model Board
of Health Rule
2) September 19, 2016 Regular Meeting agenda review
10:15 am Closed session
11 :00 am Adjourn
091316wsa HC BOC Page 2
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: September 19, 2016
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Public Hearing-Proposed Zoning Johnny Faircloth
REQUESTED BY: Mark Locklear, Director of Development Services
REQUEST:
Public Hearing:
Proposed Zoning Change: Case# RZ-16-306
Landowner/ Applicant: Hunters Grant, LLC I Benton Dewar, PLS; 0.6 +/-acres ( out of a 262
acre tract) Pin # 0632-56-8360; From Conservation to RA-30; Off the Intersection of SR #
1412 (Christian Light Road) & SR# 1424 (Jackson Road); Buckhorn Township.
The Planning Department Staff recommended approval of the request to rezone .64 acres
from Conservation to RA-30. Staff concluded it would not have an unreasonable impact on
the surrounding community since the proposed site would be outside of any know
environmentally sensitive areas.
After a discussion about topography & FEMA floodplain location, as well as questions
pertaining to future development, on September 61h the Hamett County Planning Board voted
unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of this Rezoning application.
The Planning Board also asked staff to explore opportunities for different options to
determine the Conservation boundary to ensure they are correct and that the best available
data is being used.
FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
C :\Uscrs\gwhecler\AppData\Local\Mi crosoft\ Wi ndows\!NetCachc\Content. Outlook\ TPTEQCL V\09CCAgendaF onn 16 _Hu
nters Grant.doc Pa ge I of I
091316wsa HC BOC Page 3
Harnett
COUNTY
REZONING STAFF REPORT
Case: 16-306
Jay Sikes, Manager of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board: September 6, 2016 County Commissioners: September 19, 2016
Requesting rezoning from Conservation to RA-30
Applicant Information
Owner of Record:
Name: Hunters Grant, LLC
Address: 219 Queensferry Rd
City/State/Zip: Cary, NC 27511
Property Description
PIN(s): 0632-56-8360
Address/SR No.: Jackson Rd (SR 1424)
Township:
0 (01) Anderson Creek
0 (02) Averasboro
0 (03) Barbecue
[8J (OS) Buckhorn
0 (06) Duke
0 (07) Grove
Applicant:
Name: Ben Dewar PLS
Address: 5920 Honeycutt Rd
City/State/Zip: Holly Springs, NC 27540
Acreage: .64
[8J (09) Johnsonville
0 (10) Lillington
0 (11) Neill's Creek
out of
262
total
0 (04) Black River 0 (08) Hectors Creek 0 (12) Stewart's Creek
0 ( 13) Upper Little River
acres
Page 1 of 6 STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 4
ite Description: Most of the area is currently
acant and wooded.
Per the U.D.O., The purpose of the
~onservation District is to encourage the
lnreservation of and continued use of the land
or conservation purposes in its natural state,
nd to prohibit intrusive development of the
land in areas with alluvial soils, perennial
treams, may contain wetlands, or that may be
ubject to flooding
his Conservation District is determined to be
measured, linearly, 500 ft. from the normal
dge of the Cape Fear River.
urrounding Land Uses: Surrounding land uses
nclude undeveloped land and an occasional
i-T""li!IM_..~ingle-family residence.
Aerial Photograph
Services Available
Water:
~ Public (Harnett County)
D Private (Well)
D Other: Unverified
Sewer:
D Public (Harnett County)
D Private (Septic Tank)
D Other: unverified
Zoning District Compatibility
Page 2 of 6
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count:
N/A
Site Distances: Good
The following is a summary list of general uses,
for actual ermitted uses refer to the Zonin Ordinance.
Parks & Rec
Natural Preserves
Bona Fide Farms
Sin le Famil
Institutional
Commercial Services
Retail
Wholesale
Industrial
Manufacturin
CURRENT REQUESTED
CONS RA-30
x x
x x
x x
X* x
x
x
single family residences that utilize public water &
sewer can reduce the Cons buffer by 50%
STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 5
Parks & Rec
Multi-Family
Institutional
Commercial Services
Retail
Wholesale
Industrial
Manufacturin
Future Land Use Map
Elevation info
Page 3 of 6
ZONING
RA-20M
x
x
x
x
x
x
LAND USE
A&RR
x
x
x
x
x
x
STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 6
.
FEMA I 00 yr floodplain location
Additional Information
On September 6th, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of
this Rezoning application based on topography & preservation of any known environmentally sensitive
areas. The Planning Board also asked staff to explore opportunities for different options to determine the
Conservation boundary to ensure they are correct and that the best available data is being used.
Evaluation
cg] Yes O No
cg] Yes O No
l2J Yes O No
O Yes f2J No
Page4 of 6
The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the s urrounding community is
reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or
harm to the community.
REASONING: The impact to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding
community is reasonable . The existing zoning district of Conservation is to protect the
natural environment as well as citi zens and their property from flood hazards.
However, the area requested to be rezoned is not located within any flood hazard area
or noted wetlands, and should cause no harm or inconvenience to the community .
T he requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification.
REASONING:
The requested zoning is compatible with the existing land use classifications of
Agricultural & Rural Residential and Environmentally Sensitive Areas by using this area
for an intended purpose of a single family residence without disturbing any
environmentally sensitive areas.
The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare.
REASONING:
The area that is being requested does not lie within a flood hazard area or delineated
wetlands and will not interfere with the remaining conservation area. T hus the request
to rezone a very small portion of the conservation area will maintain the public health,
safety and general welfare.
The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for
reasonableness
REASONING: This r equest does not need to be evaluated for a small scale rezoning,
because the area requested to be rezoned abuts RA-30 zoning.
STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 7
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that ... )
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to RA·30 is compatible with Harnett County regulatory
documents and would not have an unreasonable impact on the surrounding community and will enhance
the public health, safety, and general welfare for the reasons stated in the evaluation. It is recommended
that this rezoning request be APPROVED.
Site Photographs
l .Access to site 2.Site & ridge
3.Topo change along the side of site 4.Topo change in front of site
Page 5 of 6 STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 8
5.Site looking away from ridge 6. Property Driveway
Standards of Review and Worksheet
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners concerning each
proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning Board concerning zoning
districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation unless :
O Yes
O Yes
0Yes
O Yes
D Yes
0No
D No
0No
O No
D No
A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets
district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the
property involved.)
0. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially
and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning
practices.
O GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on Al! of the above findings of fact A-
E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the public interest.
O DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest and is
unreasonable due to the following:
O The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
O There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small group.
D There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new district designation is
assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district requirements, and not
merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the property involved.)
D There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and
adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
D The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
O The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning
Page 6 of 6 STAFF REPORT
091316wsa HC BOC Page 9
t· .. -·-., i
I . ,:...-t,f.,; -.,., .. ' ·~ ---~ , ..... · ,,_ . . ._· (,: ... ' -·,
• " ... • ' • \ ., ,(l ~ •
.., . ::1~~l
Harnett
COUNTY
~· • ' i I l ~ b
Phone:
Fax:
AIP'fP>lJrCATXO FOR ZONX G CHANGE
Planning Department
108 E. Front Street
P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793
Total Fee:
Receipt:
Permit:
Hearing Date:
Applicant:
Na me: f!k,Lfrv).) lk.YvAf!: ,-;t>
Address: 5~ 20 +fi;eiLLrrt
City/State/Zip: '$j;J:'I' ~ti.et~ N?2-t54q
E-mail: ~( '4 C:~-r, I ·Lon
Phone: q/q · fj.6(3. V/4q
Fax: 1
Property Description +ct~ ·/J ;
PIN(s): ~--~06,2-5~~:,~.al!I Acreage: 2.{;,2.. Acres{V.UJa.c f; be .J)
Address/SR No.: tfvl1t. "5R. J4LZ .).. ~ls /4-24-r~e-~ ·
Directions from Lillington: tSo TO tlJTx', p~ '5otffl·I oAJ SR. 142.4 f2r cJ.1-J I sr >D.'L
D 12;.JiE .. _ ~---
Deed Book: ]24.J
Plat Book: ___2_ __ _
Existing Zoning:
9 ~f:onservation
.. D RA-20M
O RA-20R
O RA-30
O RA-40
O Commercial
O Light Industrial
D Industrial
D Office & Inst'I
Attachments
Page: "'3 qo --
Page: ___L.t.z'.8_ __
Requested Zoning:
O Conservation
O RA-20M
O RA-20R
]2J'RA-30
O RA-40
O Commercial
O Light Industrial
D Industrial
O Office & Inst'I
Township:
0 (01) Anderson Creek
0 (02) Averasboro
0 (03) Barbecue
0 (04) Black River
B.{05) Buckhorn
0 (06) Duke
D (07) Grove
0 (08) Hectors Creek
0 (09) Johnsonville
0 (10) Lillington
0 (11) Neill's Creek
0 (12) Stewart's Creek
0 (13) Upper Little River
• Written description of property from recorded deed
• Recorded map of property at scale of not less than one (1) inch= 200 feet
• Explanation of why the zoning change is requested, addressing applicable portions of Article XIV of
the Zoning Ordinance
Signatures
The undersigned applicant hereby certifies that, to the hest of his or her knowledge and belief, all
information supplied with this application is true and accurate:
----
Property Owner Signature Date
~ / -..~-i?~ .f~~,1/~5
Authorized Agent Signature
M'ENr-
Date
Page 1 of 2 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
091316wsa HC BOC Page 10
Reauirements for Consideration
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
2.1 The proposal will place all property similarly situated tn the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
2. 2 There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the individual or small
group.
2. 3 There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district classification
would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new district
designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it meets district
requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of the property
involved.)
2.4 There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be materially and
adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
2.5 The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning practices.
Page 2 of 2 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
091316wsa HC BOC Page 11
7129r.2016 Gm ail -Apphcahon for Zcx,mg Charge at Hunter's Grant. Harnett Coonty
M Gmail Benton Dewar <bentondewar@gmail.com>
Application for Zoning Change at Hunter's Grant, Harnett County
1 message
jack.clayton@wellsfargo.com <jack.clayton@wellsfargo.com>
To: bentondewar@gmail.com
Cc: jack.clayton@wellsfargo.com
Mon. Jul 25, 2016 at 6:49 PM
Ben. here is my best shot at a write up for the Application for Zoning Change. The signed application is attached.
2.1 Property is 260+ acres purchased 18 months ago by John/Celia Linderman and Jack/Mary Clayton to maintain as a
farm and forest land. We have a total of 5 sons. all Eagle Scouts, so we want to place to hike and hunt that will never
be developed. We plan to build 2 homes on the land. The house we are requesting the rezoning for is 60' above the
river and outside of the flood plain but in the 500' conservation easement from the river edge. We are requesting to
change the zoning for the home site to RA30. Only .5 acres of the 10 acre RA30 tract is in the conservation easement
and the house will be 400' from the river edge and over 500' from the center of the Cape Fear River. Any other property
outside the flood zone at an elevation of 60' above the water level will have the same opportunity.
2.2 The house site is on a knoll which allows for a walk out basement given the steep slope of the land at this point.
We plan to use this 40'X30' basement room for meeting space for Scout troops (Clayton is the past President of the
Occoneechee Council and actively involved in Scouting) and other leadership training. We will also build at another
location a shelter for the Scouts to use when camping on the property and have already built 2 miles of trails for the
Scouts/church groups to use.
Both owners have held talks with the Sandhills Conversation Trust about placing a Clean Water Easement and a
Conservation Easement on 200+ acres of the land. Clayton is on the board of the Triangle Land Conservancy and
serves on the TLC Conservation Strategies Committee. He was recognized as the Corporate Citizen of the Year in 2015
by the NC Land Trust and has hosted fund raisers at their home for land conservation . The clear benefit for rezoning
this .5 acres will be access for Scouters and 200 more acres placed under conservation.
We have also agreed to let the Harnett Volunteer Fire Department access our road and the property down at the river to
enter the Cape Fear River for rescue operations. They have made a proposal for funding for the boat access to the river.
2.3 This land is 260 acres and heavily wooded so there would be no impact on others in the area.
2.4 The character of the neighborhood will remain the same with this zoning change and 9.5 acres of the RA30 zone is
outside the Conservation Zone. Our purpose in buying this land was to have it continue into future generations as a
quiet retreat and not be developed commercially.
2.5 This plan is in accordance with the Conservation Plan developed by Unique Places when we acquired the land. Our
goal was to create a farm with 10 acres of crops and 25 acres of long leaf pines (already cleared and will be planted this
fall}. We engaged Unique Plans to ensure we had a good long term plan for the property.
Jack Clayton
Executive Vice President
Regional President
Wells Fargo
Piedmont East Region[ 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600 I Raleigh, NC 27601
Tel 919-881-6447 I Cell 919-345-7975
I d ~, In , tri n 'Cll ,'.,·i l"'f arq 'L ,111
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to
receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation .
.... ; 20160725175801923_0001.pdf
,_j 59K
091316wsa HC BOC Page 12
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
MEETING DATE: September 19, 2016
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Lease Terms for Mamers Convenience Site
REQUESTED BY: Amanda L. Bader, PE, County Engineer
REQUEST:
Request approval to negotiate the lease term and amount for three convenience sites,
Mamers, Bunnlevel, and Buckhorn. This needs to be revisisted because of negotiations with
a new property owner and the County's exposure with investments on the leased sites.
1. New Property Owner: The property which is the current location of the Mamers
Convenience Site, Parcel ID# 13-0620-0200, has been transferred to a new owner, Raul
Berdusco . Since the property has been transferred, a new lease is required. Mr. Berdusco is
requesting an increase in rent from $2100 per year to $2400 per year . Mr. Berdusco is not
interested in selling the property. When asked about a five year lease, Mr. Berdusco
requested $2500 per year.
2. County's Exposure: We are investing in improvements for these sites such as power
services and pavement for compactor installations. Hamett County currently leases two
other convenience sites for $2100 per year. We are looking for a recommendation for a lease
amount and term. Should we continue to go year to year or should we look at a 5 year term
to minimize our exposue? A longer term lease seems to be the best option, but would
increase the lease amount for each site by $400 /year.
FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
C :\Users\gwheeler\AppData\Loca I\M i crosoft\ Windows\] N etCache\Content. Outlook\ TPTEQCL V\agendaform2016. doc
Page I of l
091316wsa HC BOC Page 13
Harnett County Legislative Priorities
February 1, 2016
Last year's priorities
Assist in Construction of Four Lane Highway from Harnett County into Wake County
Harnett County is the only county surrounding Wake County that does not have a four-lane highway into
Wake County. This has been cited as a significant barrier to economic development in Harnett County. A
four-lane highway into Wake County would have a significant positive economic impact on Harnett
County.
Authorize Counties to Operate Natural Gas as an Enterprise
Access to natural gas is a basic requirement for many industries and businesses looking for sites to
locate new facilities. Despite a massive population influx in western Harnett County, a lack of natural gas
has prevented the commercial and industrial growth that would normally accompany these increases in
population. Harnett County asks for the same authorization municipalities have when it comes to
expanding natural gas.
Expand Broadband in Rural Harnett County Communities
Many portions of Harnett County do not currently have access to broadband. This is another significant
barrier to economic growth in the county. Harnett County asks to be able to participate in developing
infrastructure and providing broadband to underserved areas within the county.
Authorize Use of Recreation Fees for Construction
Harnett County requests legislation that would grant the County the ability to use recreation fees, which
are currently received from new development in the county, for construction as well as land acquisition.
At present, counties can only use this revenue for land acquisition while municipalities are allowed to
use them for both construction and land acquisition.
Allow Harnett County to Establish a County-wide Tourism Entity
In last year's legislative session of the N.C. General Assembly, a bill was introduced that would have
created a tax district for all of Harnett County outside of the Averasboro Township that would allow the
Board of Commissioners to levy an occupancy tax of up to six percent for hotels, motels, inn s, tourist
camps and other similar lodgings, and to use these funds to establish a Harnett County Tourism
Development Authority, which would use at least two thirds of these funds to promote travel and
tourism with the rest going toward tourism-related expenditures in the district. This bill was not
successful, however this issue may be a legislative priority for 2016.
Allow Harnett County to establish an Agricultural Business District
Harnett County seeks legislation allowing it to partner with neighboring counties to establish a multi-
jurisdictional regional Agricultural Business District that allows for favorable taxation and incentives to
attract agricultural businesses to the region . Like several of its neighboring counties, Harnett counts
agriculture as its largest industry and seeks to partner with neighboring counties to enhance its
agricultural economy.
• Discuss Possibility of Expanding North Carolina's Ports to Assist with Exports
Allow Counties to use E-911 Funds for E-911 Needs Other than Equipment
Harnett County currently ha s E-911 funds which can only be used to purchase equipment, however the
county has fulfilled all existing equipment needs. Harnett County asks for the flexibility to use leftover E-
911 funds for personnel, training and other ne eds co nne ct ed to the use of E-911.
091316wsa HC BOC Page 14
Gina Wheeler
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Joseph Jeffries
Thursday, September 1, 2016 12:59 PM
Gina Wheeler
FW: NCACC Legislative Goals, training opportunities for counties
From: North Carolina Association of County Commissioners
[mailto:communications=ncacc.org@mail241.suw14.mcdlv.net] On Behalf Of North Carolina Association of County
Commissioners
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 12:23 PM
To: Joseph Jeffries <jjeffries@harnett.org>
Subject: NCACC Legislative Goals, training opportunities for counties
View this email in your browser
NORTH CAROLINA AssoCIATION
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
NCACC 2017-18 deadline for submitting
legislative goals approaching!
Every county is encouraged to participate in the NCACC Legislative Goals process
by submitting proposals to be considered . Submissions must be turned in v ia t he
on line form by Sept. 23. The NCACC goals setting process is open, inclusive and
deliberative and is designed to give all 100 counties a voice in developing the
Association 's legislative agenda .
1
091316wsa HC BOC Page 15
Keep the following in mind when submitting your goals:
• Review the 2016 NCACC Leg i slative Goals
Handbook for information on rules, procedures
and guidelines for the legislative goals adoption
process.
• Complete the goal proposal form at ncacc.org /legislativegoals and attach
supporting documentation.
• Goals may be submitted in any of the following formats: a resolution approved
by the Board of Commissioners, a letter from the Chairman of the Board on
behalf of the entire board, or a letter from an affiliate organization.
• The NCACC Legislative Goals Conference is scheduled for Jan. 12-13, 2017,
at the Raleigh Marriott Crabtree Valley. Hold the dates on your calendar!
If you have any questions about the process or help developing a goal, please
contact Ambe r Harris, NCACC Grassroots Coordinator.
NCACC seeking Annual Conference feedback
If you attended the NCACC's 109th Annual Conference in Forsyth County earlier this
month , we would love to hear about your experiences . The NCACC has created a
brief ur1 i ,:1( sur,1>-'\t for you to submit your thoughts and ideas about the event. Any
feedback you provide will help us improve our educational offerings.
Public-Private Partnerships for Revitalization
in North Carolina Communities
LO CAL ELECTED LEADERS
The Development Finance Initiative (DFI), a program of /
the UNC School of Government, has assisted more ~·~/ t1 e /ll I/
than 55 local governments in North Carolina build their t:/
2
091316wsa HC BOC Page 16
capacity to attract private investment into historic buildings, downtowns, and
distressed neighborhoods
During this interactive session led by DFI, participants will:
• Learn about DFl's pre-development process and how local governments can
poise themselves for private investment.
• Gain insight into the barriers that keep the private sector from tackling
challenging projects or entering into distressed areas.
• Hear about North Carolina case study redevelopment projects that have
relied on innovative financing tools, public-private partnerships, and
cooperation between units of government.
• Identify strategies to ready their communities for private investment.
• Learn how local governments across the state are approaching revitalization
projects through small group activities and discussion.
This workshop will be held at the North Carolina League of Municipalites' Annual
Conference. County officials can registe r here -please select the "NCACC
Members" option in the dropdown menu .The NCACC has a limited number of
scholarships available to county commissioners to cover the $95 registration fee for
LELA courses. To apply for a scholarship, please complete this online form prior to 5
p .m. on Tuesday, Oct. 18 . Scholarship recipients will be notified of their successful
application by Oct. 19.
Below is a list of upcoming workshops that will provide attendees credits through the
Local Elected Leaders Academy. Click on the title of each program to learn more.
Course or Program
Managing Conflict Effectively
De velopment Finance T oolbox
NC Rura l Assembly . Growing Better Together
Managing High Emot ion and Con tention in Publi c Hearings _
Capital Budgeting for Elected Officials
Engaging Women 1n Publ ic Service
Public-P ri vate Partnerships for Revitalization in NC Communities
3
Date(s)
Sept. 9 , 2016
Sept. 21-22, 2016
Sept. 26-27, 2016
Sept. 30, 2016
Oct. 7, 2016
Oct. 21, 2016
Oct. 25, 2016
Location
Chapel Hill
Ch a pel Hill
Cary
Greenville
Pittsboro
Raleigh
Raleigh
091316wsa HC BOC Page 17
RICHARD 0. BRAJER
Se,-r111orJ.·
DANIEL STALEY
[),r,,,-1r;r. Oivis1on o/ Pub!,,· Ht'ulth
Public Health
HE IA L TH A.ND HUMAN SERVICES
July 25. 2016
To : North Carolina Lu..:al Health Directors
Frnm : Carl Willi:ims, DV'.\1 . DACVPM , State Publi..: Health Veterinarian
!l.1aril yn Goss Haskdl , D\'M, MPH. Deputy State Puhlic Health Vcterinari ;in
SubJet·t: 2016 NASPHV Rabies Comprndium: Proposed ;\lodd Board of Health Rulr
The intent of this mcmu 1s to facilitate local health dcpanment aduption and implementilfiun ufthe new n;itiun;1I
guidance for postexposure management of dogs and cats published Mnrch l, 20 I() by the Nation;il Association of
Public Health Vet,;:rinarrnns (NASPHVJ in the Compendium uf Animal Rabie s Pre\ cntion and Control , 2016
(jittp :.· www. na sph u ,r ., IJQ!;nn1 c 11ts \J ASPH \' R:1biL'SLQl~1J)L'11dium .pdt'i.
The North Carolina Division of Public Health (DPHJ proposed legislation for the 2016 short session of the General
As sembly that would h:we amended G .S. I 30A-I 97 to adopt by rc:forence the postcxposure management control
measures for dogs and cats rn the 20 I 6 NASPHV rabies compendium . Unfor1unc1tely the legi slative proposal was
never introduced as a bi ll during the 20 I ti short session.
In lieu of an amendment tu the: statute, and to cnsun: tho:: force and dfci.:t of law in the adoption of the nt:w control
measurc:s, we rc:commend that the local board of health. or the entity that is acting as the board of he:ilth, adopt the
modd Board of Health rule below . Pursuant tu G .S . l 30A-39. ;i lo..:al board of health may, in its rules. ,1dupt hy
reference any code. standard, rule or regulation which has been adopted hy any agency of this State. another stale ,
any agency of the United St::ites or by a generally n:cognizt:d association. Copies of any material adopted by
re frn:ncc shall be filed with the rules .
Model Rulr fur Poste.xposurc ;\,lanagement of Dogs and Cats
Recummrnded by thl' NC Division off Public Health
This model mle for rnbics postexp~•surc management of dogs i,nd cats implements and particularizes the amhori ty
gi,·en to the local health director in (.i.S. I 30A-I 97 to cffrctin:ly and etfo:icntly protect the public's health utilizing
the most current science. Accordingly. the Board of Health adopts the n:commendations and
gu1dclincs for rallies postexpusure management of dogs and cat s specified by the N:itional Association of State
Public Health Veterinarians in the 2016 cdition of the Compendium of Animal Rabies Prewntion and Control ( Pan
J .8.5: Posrexposure Managemcnt). These pro\·isions of the Compendium shall be the rc4uired control measures
pursuant toG.S . 130A-!97.
Adoption of the 20 I 6 Rabies Compendium postexposure management control mt:asurc·s for dogs and cats as a Board
of Health rule would pro\·ide the kgal authority for local healtb directors to implement the new rabies control
mcasun:s and would align North Carolina 's control measures with current national recomrm:ndation~ and guidan ce.
The m:w control measures would likely result in fower dogs and cats cuthanized, shorter 4uarantinc periods (4
months rather than 6 months) and allow for more 45-day owner (at -home) ubscrvations for lapsed animals with
approprn1t1: dui.:unll'ntatiun. These changes reprcsi:nt signific~nt emotional and (estimated) finani.:ial benefits tu
animal owners (Table l ). If managed and monitored carefully by local health dcpanments, thesi: control measun:s
will maintain the srikty of public hen Ith in North Carolinc1
Thank you for your time and cittcntion to this imponant public hc ;ilth issue. If you ha\'c any 4u.:stions please contact
the Communici,blc Disease Branch i,t 919-733-3419.
Dcparrmenr o f Health und Hunwn Scr.'/Ccs . Divi si on of Pub h.: Heulrh
225 N . M cDowell Sr .. 1902 Mail 5'enice c~nt~r I Rui<'igh. N C 2769Q ·/902
9/9 iJJ 1301 T / 919 TJJ 1020 F
091316wsa HC BOC Page 18
1,
Table J. 2016 Rabies Compendium Changes for Postexposure Managcmenl of Dogs and Cats by Vaccination
Sl atus: A Comparison to § I 30A-l 97 and Projech:d Fiscal Impact to Pet Owners
Rabies Vaccination Status Current G .S . 130A·197 2016 Compendium Control 2016 Compendium Financial
of Dog or Cat Control measures measures Impact ..
1. Curmntll( Vacclnj!ted Provide booster dose of Immediate veterinary care w ith Equal to ex isting standard
rabies vaccine within five rabies booster dose within 96
·-,. days of exposure ($25.00) hours of exposure ($25.00+)
Owner observation 45 days.
2. Unva1.clnated A .) Euthanasia ($150.00) or A.) Euthanasia ($150 .00) or A.) Equal to exis ting standard
(Has never been B.) Immediate vaccination B.) Immediate veterinary care B.) 5 1200.00 less expens ive
vaccinated aga inst rabies) against rabies and place in w ith rabies vaccination within
si x month quaranline 96 hours of exposure and
($25.00 + $3600.00) place in four month quarantine
($25.00+ $2400.00\
3. Overdue with A.) Euthanasia ($150.00). or A .)NA A .) -$125.00 less expensive
ARl!rO(!rlate B.) Immediate rabies B.) immediate veterinary care than existing standard (does not
Documentation of prior vaccinatio n and place in srx with rabies booster dose wrthin include emotional cost of pet
rabies vaccination monlh quaranline ($25.00 + 96 hours of exposure . keep loss).
(at least one prior valid $3600.00) under owner observation for 8.) $3600.00 less expensive
rabies vaccination 45 days ($25.00+)
certificate)
4. Overdue with NO A .) Euthanasia ($150.00). or A .) Euthanasia ($150.00). or A.) Equal to existing standard
Documentation of prior B.) Immediate vaccination B ) Immediate veterinary care 8 .) $1200.00 less expensive
rabies vaccination against rabies and place in with rabies vaccination w1th1n C.) $554.00 more expensive
six month quarantine 96 hours of exposure and includes additional cost for strict
)L._ ($2 5 00 + $3600.00) place in four month quarantine quarantine unti l lab evidence
($25.00+ $2400.00). or finalized. Note this may obviate l he
C.) Immediate veterinary care need for either A or B above and,
and Prospective serologic while a new expense. is
' monitoring ($420.00) considerably less expensive than
r·~ 1) IF evidence of prior either A or B above
, f·. ' ,
vaccination then
·· .. : keep under owner
observation for 45
days
2) IF NO evidence of
prior vaccination
then manage as
unvaccinated
( category 2.
euthanize or 4
month quarantine) ·-
Nole: All costs are approximate. Tabk is not meant IU be all inclusive of a ll rccommendalions and costs bul
addresses the common situations with the most fiscal impact.
•consult Communicable Disease Branch {919-733-3419) for specific guidance. Recommendations may be subject
to change.
091316wsa HC BOC Page 19
AGENDA
HARNETI COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
Harnett County Health Department
307 Cornelius Harnett Blvd .. Lillington. NC
Regular Mee ting
September 15. 2016 7:00 p.m.
-Order of Business -
l. Call to order -Dr. Williams. Chairman
2. Announcements
3 . Consent agenda -(Action Item)
A. Minutes: Regular Meeting, July 21, 2016
Consent agenda items have been reviewed by the Health Director and are
recommended for approval by the B oard.
4. Consider additions and deletions to the published agenda
;:,. Public Comment -Period of up to 30 minutes for informal comments allowing 3
minutes for each presentation.
6. Appoint Nomination Committee -Dr. Williams, Chairman
7. ACO Update -John Rouse
8. Rabies Rules \vith public comment -(Action Item) -Mr. Rouse
9. Establish Fees -(Action Item) -Barbara Ross
IO.Accreditation Activities Report -,John Rouse
• Review of Operating Procedures
• Communicable Disease Repo rt -Donna Surles
• Workforce Development -Donna Surles
11.Health Director's Report and Program Reports -John Rouse, Jr.
• Financial Report -John Rouse
• Clinical Reports -Donna Surles
• Home Health -John Rouse
• Environmental Health -Graham Byrd
• Upcoming Events
12. Close d S e ssion
13 . New Business
14. Adjournment