Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032916wsa Agenda PackageHarnett County Board of Commissioners Special Session Tuesday, March 29,2016 9:00am 9:00am Vehicle Use Policy Discussion 9:15am Amend Municipality Ordinance, Animal Services Director Steve Berube 9:30am DNA Testing Funding Discussion 9 :45am County Manager's Update: -April4, 2016 Regular Meeting Agenda review -Review of procedures for Sheriffs event -LME/MCO update 10:15 am Closed Session 10:45 am Adjourn 032916wsa HC BOC Page1 - Harnett COUNTY ; I HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY Title: I Vehicle Use Policy: I I Policy#: I VUP 9-15 I Adopted Date of Last Date: Review : 1 0-19- 98 Table of Contents PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................................. 2 NO PRIVATE USE ...................................................................................................................................... 2 WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUTERS ........................................................................... 3 DRIVER QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 3 DRIVERS' LICENSE ................................................................................................................................... 4 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. .................................................................................................................. 4 REGISTRATION , TITLE AND TAGS ......................................................................................................... 6 RECALLS AND WARRANTY WORK ......................................................................................................... 6 VEHICLE OPERATORS & ASSIGNED CUSTODIANS ............................................................................. 6 ALCOHOL, DRUGS , TOBACCO AND FIREARMS PROHIBITED ............................................................ 6 PERSONAL VEHICLES USED ON COUNTY BUSINESS ........................................................................ 7 APPEARANCE ........................................................................................................................................... 7 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS, INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS .......................................................................... 7 VEHICLE INSPECTION CHECKLIST ........................................................................................................ 8 GAS STATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 8 PASSENGERS ........................................................................................................................................... 8 CELL PHONE ............................................................................................................................................. 8 DEFENSIVE DRIVING TRAINING ............................................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 APPENDIX C ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 032916wsa HC BOC Page2 PURPOSE Providing safe working conditions is essential to protecting the employees and assets of Harnett County ("County"). For the safety of County employees and the public, the County seeks to allow only employees with a safe driving history to operate County veh icles . The term "County vehicles " shall include all vehicles owned , leased or rented by the County . The purpose of the Vehicle Use Policy shall be to establish a policy on the use of County vehicles to ensure proper preventive maintenance procedures are being followed, that repairs are being handled correctly and cost efficiently, and that vehicles are being utilized correctly. The Vehicle Use Policy also addresses County employees' use of personal vehicles while conducting County business. The Board of County Commissioners delegates to the County Manager the authority to deviate from this Policy as the Manager deems necessary to serve the best interests of the County. In addition , use of Sheriff's vehicles for law enforcement activities shall be at the discretion of the Harnett County Sheriff. Any such deviation from this Policy or discretionary use of vehicles must, however, comply with applicable law. V iolation of the Vehicle Use Policy is subject to disciplinary action . NO PRIVATE US E The use of a County vehicle is governed by North Carolina General Statutes , the Internal Revenue Code and County policies. General Statute 14-247 states that "It shall be unlawful for any officer, agent or employee ... of a county ... to use for any private purpose whatsoever any motor vehicle of any type or description whatsoever belonging to ... any county ... " As this statute explains, "It is not a private purpose to drive a permanently assigned state-owned [County owned] motor vehicle between one's official workstation and one's home ... " Harnett County may assign employees the use of vehicles for commuting purposes , between work and home, when it is necessary for the performance of duties related to the delivery of essential services . The Department Head must approve the commuting arrangement and obtain the County Manager's approval before an assigned veh icle may be taken home . County employees who live outside the County will be allowed to commute in County vehicles if it is in the best interests of the County as determined by the County Manager. Once the commuting arrangement has been fully approved , the Department Head must notify the County Finance Department. Approved commuters are permitted the use of County vehicles assigned to them for : 1) travel between work and home (shortest, most direct route), or 2) to obtain meals and other work re lated necessities while on duty . County vehicles shall be used for official County business only . 2 032916wsa HC BOC Page3 WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUTERS The County of Harnett follows the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), located in IRS Publication 15-B, that requires the value of using a County vehicle for commuting to and from work to be taxed as income subject to Federal, State and FICA withholding requirements . Personal use for commuting: • The vehicle is owned or leased by the County . • The vehicle is provided to the employee for "official" government use. • The County requires the employee to commute in a County owned or leased vehicle due to a valid non-compensatory "official" government purpose. If more than one employee is required to commute in the same County owned or leased vehicle for an "official" government purpose , THEN the "Code" commuting valuation shall apply to each employee in the vehicle . Certain types of vehicles are specifically excluded from the "code " requirement of taxing the value of commuting in a County vehicle . These vehicles include all Sheriff's Department Vehicles, all Emergency Services Department Vehicles , any vehicle designed to carry cargo with a loaded gross vehicle weight over 14,000 pounds, dump trucks (including garbage trucks), flatbed trucks and "qualified specialized utility trucks" which is defined as any truck (not including a van or pick-up truck) specifically designed and used to carry heavy tools, equipment, or parts, if shelves, racks or other permanent interior construction have been installed to carry and store such items. A pick-up truck with only a toolbox attached is therefore not exempt. DRIVER QUALIFICATIONS Only County employees, or other individuals authorized by Risk Management to operate County Vehicles, who hold a valid North Carolina driver's license and who meet the following Driver Qualifications , shall be allowed to operate County vehicles or drive their personal vehicles while conducting County business : 1. Must not have a suspension or revocation of their driver's license within the last three years . 2 . Have at least one year of experience in the class of vehicle to be operated or have received proper training in the operation of the vehicle, as approved by the Departmental Safety Officer, prior to use . 3. Must meet driver's licensing requirements . 4 . Will not qualify for a company vehicle if, during the last 36 months , the driver had any of the following experiences : • Been convicted of a felony. • Been convicted of sale , handling , or use of drugs. 3 032916wsa HC BOC Page4 • Has automob ile insurance canceled , declined or not renewed by a company for reasons related to unsafe driving practices . • Has 12 or more points assigned to their driving record . Points are assessed by the Risk Manager for traffic convictions and automobile accidents occurring during business or personal use. All County employees are required to report any Driving While Intoxicated (OWl) arrest, or any other drug or alcohol related arrest while driving , whether on or off duty, to their Department Head and the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator. The employee's driving privileges will be suspended until final disposition by the courts . Failure to report the arrest will be considered a failure in job performance and/or personal conduct and shall be grounds for disciplinary action . The Risk Management & Safety Coordinator, or his or her designee, shall be responsible for securing motor vehicle records ("MVR Reports") for all employees at time of hire and for cause. MVR reports shall be secured every three years for employees either assigned a county vehicle or who drive any vehicle more than 10% of his/her work time. DRIVERS' L I CENSE Department Heads shall verify that all employees provide a copy of their driver's license to the Human Resources Department upon request. A visual check of the driver's license shall confirm the following : • Signature matches the individual. • Photo resembles the individual. • Description and address fits the individual. • The expiration date has not passed. • The license has been issued within the state of North Caro l ina . MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR All new County vehicles except Emergency Services vehicles , shall be delivered to the County Garage, and Garage personnel shall promptly forward to Facilities/Fleet Maintenance Department all papers transported with each vehicle. (The Emergency Services Administrative Staff handles the vehicle information for Emergency Services Department). The assigned custodians, department heads, garage personnel and the facilities maintenance personnel shall be responsible for ensuring that the state vehicle inspection is timely performed each year and that regularly scheduled maintenance (changing oil , checking filters , brakes, all fluids , belts, air pressure in tires, and any physical condition that may present problems later) is performed. Regularly scheduled maintenance shall be performed on the earlier of either six (6) months or 5 ,000 miles. All operators of County vehicles shall check the tires of the vehicles they drive to ensure that the tires have adequate tread and that the tire pressure is maintained in accordance with the vehicle 4 032916wsa HC BOC Page5 specifications . Any unsafe County vehicle shall be reported promptly to the appropriate Department Head and taken to the County Garage for repairs. All repairs involving incidents or accidents to a County vehicle shall be made through the Garage unless there is an emergency. No vehicles may be taken anywhere else for maintenance and/or repair unless appropriate County Garage personnel have referred them there. When the vehicle is brought to the Garage for repairs, the vehicle operator shall be required to fill out and sign a two part "Request for Repair Form " describing any problem with the vehicle . The Garage will keep one copy of the form to ensure that all necessary repairs shall be done, and the vehicle operator will return the other copy to his or her department. In the event that an emergency arises during evening , weekend or holiday hours, the driver of the vehicle shall be allowed to have emergency repairs completed to the vehicle . However, the driver must notify his Department Head and the County Garage on the next business day. For these situations, an emergency shall be defined as the breakdown of a critical vehicle (resulting from mechanic failure , an accident, or otherwise) where there is not another vehicle available for use . In the event that towing shall be necessary, the vehicle operator shall call the Garage and the Garage will notify the wrecker service. Damages to County vehicle shall be reported to the County Garage, which will make the final determination on required repairs. If Garage personnel determine that repairs are required and the damages had not been previously reported to the Garage, the repairs shall be charged back to the respective Departments as a Preventable loss. It shall be the responsibility of County Garage and Facilities/Fleet Maintenance personnel to establish a maintenance file on each County vehicle that will be used to maintain records to ensure that all County vehicles receive regularly scheduled maintenance. Each time repairs or maintenance are completed on a vehicle, a description of the work, the date, and the name of the mechanic who performed the work shall be entered into the appropriate vehicle maintenance file and in the maintenance software program installed in the Garage computer. Garage personnel shall also place a sticker on the inside of each vehicle they service that states the mileage and the service date for the next scheduled recommended service. It shall be the responsibility of County Garage personnel to maintain the vehicles according to the manufacturer's specifications. All repairs and/or maintenance shall be completed according to industry standards . It shall be the responsibility of the Garage personnel to check when servicing vehicles to see if the tires need rotating and or replaced. Garage personnel shall provide the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator with copies of any repairs involving vehicle accidents for submission to the insurer for claim recovery . 5 032916wsa HC BOC Page6 REGISTRATION, TITLE AND TAGS Department heads are responsible for ensuring that license tags of vehicles removed from service are sent to garage personnel to be turned into DMV. The receipt that DMV gives for the license plate being turned in will be placed in the file of that vehicle . All Harnett County vehicle titles shall be retained and filed in the office of Finance with the exception of community transportation van titles held by NCDOT. Garage personnel shall make available all vehicle information on particular vehicles when requested to help determine which vehicles might need replacing to the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator so that all County vehicle additions and deletions , once reported , will be included on the annual update of the Fleet Schedule for the insurance provider to ensure adequate insurance coverage. RECALL S AND WARRANTY WORK All manufacturers' vehicle recalls ("recalls") shall be submitted to the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator. The Risk Management & Safety Coordinator will notify the Garage of the recall. It shall be the Garage's responsibility to handle all manufacturers' vehicle recalls . Upon receiving a "recall" notice, Garage personnel shall contact the department head in the affected department and coordinate the taking of the vehicle to the appropriate dealership to have the "recall " repairs completed. Records of all recall repairs shall be placed in each vehicle's file and entered into the "Collective Fleet Software Program". Garage personnel shall also be responsible for coordinating all warranty work to be done on County vehicles . Copies of warranty work invoices shall be placed in each vehicle's file and entered into the maintenance software program . VE H I C L E OPERATORS & ASSIGNED CUSTODIANS All County employees who operate County vehicles or their personal vehicles while conducting County business are requi red to operate them in a safe and lawful manner in accordance with the motor vehicle laws of North Carolina and any other governmental entity having jurisdiction . Approved commuters are responsible for making sure the County vehicle assigned to them is parked safely and securely when parked at the employee's home. The vehicle must be parked so that it is visible to the public. ALCOHOL, DRUGS, T OBACCO AND F IREARMS PROHIBITED Possess ion , transportation , or consumption of alcohol or illegal drugs by anyone in a County vehicle is strictly forbidden , and no use of tobacco products via cigarettes, snuff, dips, chews , cigars , or pipes, or the use of devices or products that may be used to smoke or m imic smoking (including vaporizers , e-cigarettes, etc.) may be used in County vehicles. The possess ion of firearms or weapons, concealed or otherwise, is also prohibited in County vehicles except by sworn law enforcement officers . 6 032916wsa HC BOC Page7 PERSONAL VEHICLES USED ON COUNTY BUSINESS Individuals using personal vehicles on County business are required to carry the North Carolina statutory auto liability limits as evidence of financial responsibility. This is the primary insurance coverage for the employee's vehicle at all times , including when the vehicle is used on County business. These individuals are required to provide the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator with evidence of insurance upon request. Only private passenger vehicles may be used while driving a personal vehicle on County business. Exceptions may be allowed by the Sheriff for approved events. Refer to the County Travel Policy for uniform interpretation of payment or reimbursement for travel expenses pertaining to official travel and subsistence. APPEARANCE It shall be the responsibility of the employee to which a County vehicle is assigned , department heads, garage and facilities maintenance personnel to keep the vehicle in a state of cleanliness . County vehicles are a direct reflection on the County and as such should portray a professional appearance. TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS, INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS All County employees who are assigned a County vehicle or who drive any vehicle more than 10% of his/her work time are required to report any accident or other incident involving a County vehicle immediately, or as soon as possible, to their Department Head and the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator. In the event of an accident, the vehicle operator shall also: 1 . Contact the appropriate investigating agency, regardless of the extent of damages. 2. Not discuss the circumstances of the accident with anyone other than the investigating officer, the County's insurance carrier, or persons conducting an internal investigation. 3. Make no attempt to reach a settlement. 4. Get the name, address, and phone number of all involved parties and witnesses. 5 . Take photographs of the accident or incident scene if possible. A County Vehicle Incident Report Form shall be filled out in its entirety by the County driver immediately after the incident or accident, or as soon as possible , and sent to the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator. If a police report is prepared, the driver, Department Head , or the Department Head's designee is responsible for picking up a copy of this report and providing it to the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator. Failure to report traffic violations will be considered a failure in job performance and/or personal conduct and shall be grounds for disciplinary action. Fines imposed on a County employee for a traffic offense committed while on or off duty are imposed on the employee personally and payment thereof is the employee's personal responsibility. 7 032916wsa HC BOC Page8 The Risk Manager & Safety Coordinator shall ma intain reports of vehicle accidents and d istribute to the Department Heads quarterly. VE HICLE INSPECTION CHECKLIST All EMS & HARTS vehicles in use shall be inspected daily by the driver before and after operation to assure that the vehicles, equipment and accessories are in safe operating condition . The Fire Marshall and Emergency Management vehicles are inspected weekly . All other employees who are assigned a County vehicle shall complete a Vehicle Inspection checklist (Appendix A) and provide a copy to the Department Head , or their designee , twice a year-January and July. GAS STATIONS Only gas stations accepting Wright Express Gas Cards may be used . The driver shall input the correct odometer reading . PASSENGE RS Only passengers on County business are allowed in County vehicles , for example, local Government officials and contractual relationships . C E L L PHONE The use of a cell phone while operating a County vehicle or while operating a personal vehicle while conducting County business is discouraged except in emergency situations. Employees are encouraged to pull to a safe and responsible location when using a cell phone . D E F E NSIVE DRIVING TRAINING Each employee who is assigned a County vehicle or who drives any vehicle more than 10 % of his/her work time, shall be required to attend a Defensive Driving course facilitated by the Risk Management & Safety Coordinator no less than once every three years . 8 032916wsa HC BOC Page9 Vehicle ID: _____ _ Next Service Due: APPENDIX A VEHICLE INSPECTION CHECKLIST HARNETT COUNTY Driver completing report (Print): _________ _ --------NC Inspection Date: _________ _ ___ First Aid Kit Oil Level --- Pre-Start (if not applicable, stateN/A) ___ Fire Extinguisher (properly charged) ___ Windshield Wiper Fluid ___ Tires (Pressure and Wear) Coolant Level --- ___ Spare Tire License Plate --- ___ Seatbelts Oil Pressure --- ___ Jack/Lug Wrench ___ Registration Card/Insurance card Horn --- Start Engine (if not applicable, state N/ A) ___ Adjust rear view mirror ___ Water Temperature ___ Steering Operation ___ Parking Brake ___ Defroster ___ Windshield Wipers ___ Turning Signals ___ Emergency Signals ___ Reverse Lights ___ Indicator Lights (High Beam , Brake, etc.) Air Conditioner --- ___ Backup Alarm ___ Head Lights (High and Low Beam) ___ Topped off with Fuel ___ Brake Li ghts ** LIFT VANS ONLY ** Lift has been checked and run through full cycle (Ye s/No) _______ _ Cleanliness of Vehicle (check if clean) Exterior Interior Truck Bed T oolbox ------------ NOTE ANY ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS DISCOVERED DURING INSPECTION Signature of driver completing report: ___________ Date: ___ _ Signature of Department Head or Supervisor Date: ------- 9 032916wsa HC BOC Page10 APPENDIX 8 HARNETT COUNTY VEIDCLE ACCIDENT GUIDELINES This guide, while it is designed to assist in determining the preventability of vehicular accidents, cannot list every causal factor that may be involved in a given accident. It does cover the most common aspects ofthe principal causes of accidents, and as such, it can serve as a guide only when considering preventability. From time to time revisions may be necessary to improve accuracy to apply to the facts of a case. Struck While Parked Non-Preventable if: 1. Driver was properly parked in a location where parking was permitted. 2. Vehicle was protected by emergency warning devices as required by federal and state regulations, or if driver was in process of setting out or retrieving signals. Intersection Accidents Preventable if: 1. Driver failed to c ontrol speed so that he could stop within available sight distance. 2 . Driver failed t o check cross-traffic and wait for it to clear before entering intersection. 3. Driver pulled out from side-street in the face of on coming traffic. 4. Driver collided with person, vehicle or object while making right or left tum. 5. Driver, going straight through an intersection, collided with another vehicle making a turn. Striking Other Vehicle in Rear Preventable if: 1. Driver failed to maintain safe following distance and have vehicle under control. 2 . Driver failed to keep alert to traffic conditions and note slowdown. 3 . Driver failed to ascertain whether vehicle ahead was moving slowly, stopped or slowing down for any reason. 4. Driver misjudged rate of overtaking. 5 . Driver came too close before pulling out to pass. 6. Driver failed to wait for car ahead to move into the clear before starting up . 7. Driver failed to leave sufficient room for passing vehicle to get safely back in line. Sideswipe and Head-On-Collisions Preventable if: 1. Driver was not entirely in the proper lane of travel. 10 032916wsa HC BOC Page11 2. Driver did not pull to the right and slow down and stop for vehicle encroaching on own lane of travel when such action could have been taken without additional danger. Struck in Rear or Side by Other Vehicle Preventable if: 1. Driver was passing slower traffic near an intersection and had to make sudden stop. 2. Driver made sudden stop to park, load or unload. 3. Driver's vehicle was improperly parked. 4. Driver rolled back into vehicle behind. Non-Preventable if: 1. Driver's vehicle was legally and properly parked. 2. Driver was proceeding in own lane of traffic at a safe and lawful speed. 3. Driver was stopped in traffic due to existing conditions or was stopped in compliance with traffic sign or signal or the directions of a police officer or other person. 4. Driver was in proper lane , stopped and waiting to make turn. Backing Accidents Preventable if: 1. Driver backed vehicle, causing accident, when such backing could have been avoided. 2. Driver failed to get out of vehicle and check proposed path of backward travel. 3. Driver failed to use a "spotter" if driver was in a position where the mirrors failed to show the hazard. Accidents Involving Train Preventable if: 1. Driver attempted to cross tracks directly ahead of train or streetcar. 2. Driver ran into side of train or streetcar. 3. Driver stopped on or parked too close to tracks. Accidents While Passing Preventable if: 1. Driver passed when view of road ahead was obstructed by hill , curve, vegetation, traffic, adverse weather conditions, etc. 2. Driver attempted to pass in the face of closely approaching traffic. 3. Driver failed to warn the driver of the vehicle being passed. 4. Driver failed to signal change of lanes. 5 . Driver pulled out in front of other traffic overtaking from rear. 6. Driver cut-in short returning to right lane. II 032916wsa HC BOC Page12 Accidents While Being Passed Preventable if: I. Driver failed to stay in own lane , or hold or reduce speed to permit safe passing. Accidents While Entering Traffic Stream Preventable if: 1. Driver failed to signal when pulling out from curb. 2. Driver failed to check traffic before pulling out from curb. 3 . Driver failed to look back to check traffic if driver was in position where mirrors did not show traffic conditions. 4. Driver attempted to pull out in a manner, which forces other vehicles(s) to change speed or direction. 5. Driver failed to make full stop before entering from side-street, alley or driveway. 6. Driver failed to make full stop before crossing sidewalk. 7. Driver failed to yield right of way to approaching traffic. Pedestrian Accidents Preventable if: 1. Driver did not reduce speed in area of heavy pedestrian traffic. 2. Driver was not prepared to stop. 3. Driver failed to yield right of way to pedestrian. Mechanical Defects Accident Preventable if: 1. Defect was of a type which driver should have detected in making a pre-trip or inspection of vehicle. 2. Defect was a type which driver should have detected during the normal operation of the vehicle. All Types of Accidents Preventable if: 1. Driver was not operating at a speed consistent with the existing conditions of the road , weather, and traffic. 2. Driver failed to control speed to be able to stop within assured clear distance. 3 . Driver misjudged available clearance. 4. Driver failed to yield right of way to avoid accident. 5. Driver failed to accurately observe existing conditions and drive in accordance with those conditions. 12 032916wsa HC BOC Page13 6. Driver was in violation of County operating rules or special instructions, the regulations of any federal or state regulatory agency , or any applicable traffic laws or ordinances. Accidents Involving Animals/Debris Preventable if: 1. Driver was not operating at a speed consistent with the existing conditions of the road, weather, and traffic. 2 . Driver failed to control speed to be able to stop within assured clear distance. 3. Driver misjudged available clearance. 4. Driver failed to accurately observe existing conditions and drive in accordance with those conditions. 5. Driver was in violation of company operating rules or special in structions, the regulations of any federal or state regulatory agency, or any applicable traffic laws or ordinance. Non-preventable if: 1. Driver attempted to stop safely while maintaining control of the vehicle and stay in their lane of traffic. 2. Driver was operating at a speed consistent with existing condition of the road , weather and traffic. \3 032916wsa HC BOC Page14 APPENDIX C HARNETT COUNTY REQUEST FOR REPAIR FORM Date:--------Signature: ___________ _ Vehicle Info: Unit Number: Mileage: Location: Required Service: I Oil & Oil Filter Change Needed I Brake Inspection Needed I Cooling System Inspection ~ : Primary Fuel Filter Replacement Secondary Fuel Filter Replacement I I Air Filter Replacement I Tire Replacement DMV Inspection I Tire Rotation I Transmission Inspection I Wheel Alignment I Heat -NC Inspection Type of Service Needed: Please note type of service performed: DAMAGED VEIDCLE HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS: Towing -if needed , vehicles should be towed to the County Garage at II 00 E. McNeill Street Estimates -Johnny Stone (9I0.984.4247) or Chris John son (910.984.4173) should be contacted within 24 hours to obtain quotes for repairs *Leave this completed form in the vehicle if towed to the County Garage or forward to Johnny Stone at the County Garage 14 032916wsa HC BOC Page15 Gina Wheeler From: Sent: To: Subject: Steve Berube Friday, March 18, 2016 9:16 AM Gina Wheeler Municipal Animal Control Ordinance Gina here is what I want to amend see below SECTION XXX Potentially Dangerous and Dangerous Dogs (A} It shall be unlawful for a citizen to keep a dog within the corporate limits of the Town a dog that has been deemed potentially dangerous or Dangerous by Harnett County Animal Services and any other Animal Servrces Agency in the State of North Carolina. (B) Any owner found in violation of this section will be required to relea se the dog to the Harnett County An imal Service s Department for euthanasia and will face a civil fine of $400.00. Thanks Steve Berube Proaro111 Monoaer Harnett County Animal Semes Phone 910-814-29Q fox91 0-814-04~ 1 032916wsa HC BOC Page16 VERNON K. STEWART DISTRICT ATTORNEY State of %ortli Carolina (jenera{ Court of Justice (]'rosecutoria[ lDistrict 11-)l 301 West Conulius Jfanutt tB[wf. Suite 101 Lilli"'Jtorr, !NC 27546 March 22, 20 16 Harnett County Board of Commissioners Post Office Box L illington, NC 27546 Re: North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Dear Commissioners: SANFORD: (919) 718-6310 LILLINGTON: (910) 814 -4500 After reading the February 26letter from John Byrd, Director ofthe North Carolina State Crime Laboratory (NCSCL) to Sheriff Rollins and copied to each member of the County Commissioners I felt it necessary to weigh in with my observations. First, I was at the forefront in meeting with NMS , a private lab , in an effort to bring a second source of laboratory analysis to our office and to local law enforcement. This was not done as a criticism of the NCSCL but rather to ease the burden on that overworked entity and to improve our efforts in fighting crime, solving cases, exonerating the innocent, and providing juries with the best evidence available in a timely manner. At no time was it considered to move the bulk of forensic testing away from the NCSCL. In fact, Mr. Byrd's letter points out that the lab itself (because of its overwhelming case inventory) has to outsource some of their testing to the very lab (NMS) that this office and the Sheriff's office wish to use. Second, we all know that the NCSCL has implemented new procedures through their case management guidelines because of issues in the past. At times, those guidelines have been overly restrictive on our office and law enforcement in our attempts to solve crimes. At times, the lab has refused to analyze submissions based on those guidelines, when that refusal makes no sense from a crime solving perspective. Regardless of the statements in the letter, the lab has refused to accept touch DNA for analysis. They have also refused to test DNA unless all known samples of individuals involved are submitted. They have also made determinations about what evidence should be tested, and in what order, based on THEIR idea about what evidence is "most critical" to a case. (See paragraph 4 of the February 26 letter.) I do not believe that should be their role . It is for us to make that determination and for the lab (as a truly neutral player) to test items submitted. 032916wsa HC BOC Page17 .. Finally, we are extremely pleased with the progress the lab has made over the years in implementing the latest methodology and technology in forensic testing. We applaud them in reducing turnaround times. We know it will only get better. Obviously, we all will continue to use this valuable resource. However, we remain certain that we need the resources available through the use of the private lab in order to fulfill our obligations to provide justice to the citizens of this county in bringing people to justice more quickly and in exonerating those people suspected of criminal conduct; and while that is our ultimate responsibility, the limited use of the private lab will also benefit the people of Harnett County in reducing the costs of housing those charged with crimes and awaiting trial or disposition. Si~ f7 .. ~«nrT V em on K. Stewart District Attorney Cc: Sheriff Wayne Coats 032916wsa HC BOC Page18 Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County Sheriff Larry Rollins Director Jolm Byrd North Carolina State Crime Lab 121 E . Tryon Road Raleigh, NC 27603 Dear Director Byrd, PO Box S99 17 5 Bain Street, Lillington, NC ~7 546 Phone: 910..89S-9lll; Fax: 910..89Hif50 RECEIVED MAR -7 201~ HARNETT COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE March 3, 2016 After reading your letter which was in response to a news article written by the Dunn Daily Record I have realized that there are some areas that I feel need to be clarified. First and foremost, the article is titled "SHERIFF WANTS DNA TESTING TO GO PRIVATE -SAYS STATE IS TOO SLOW, TOO RESTRICTIVE". This title infers a misguided perception that was not meant in the manner in which it is displayed. At no point do I belittle or dismiss the importance of the NC Crime Lab and its qualified staff. Let me continue to say that when my deputies and I met with the board of County Commissioners last month, this meeting in no way had an objective to discredit the NC Crime Lab but rather to explain what other options are available to us in solving criminal cases by way of DNA evidence. After review of the article I too recognize that there was a misquote and an error that the Patrice Rivera case was in fact a 1999 case and not a 2009 case. I would point out that this date was not the emphasis of the case being presented but instead presented for the purpose to show that this case is an unsolved cold case homicide whereby only one arrest was made on one of two victims. You are correct in that the crime lab had worked the evidence first which was factually presented to the board of County Commissioners. Another reason to highlight this case is simply to show that a private Jab at this time has the availability to do more with the DNA sample. The second reason for this was the voluminous amount of evidence that was collected poses a problem with the current guidelines associated with the NC Crime Lab. To reiterate this to you it was explained that since this case was a homicide and that only ten items would be looked at first before any additional items would be considered. These submissions are based upon the guidelines which the NC Crime Lab has instituted for case management in September 2013. I understand the reasoning for these guidelines and agree that they're needed to accomplish the tasks of managing th e influx of your current case load. I do however disagree with your point that your letter infers that, should more evidence be submitted on this case that it would receive precedence over other cases which have already been submitted from other agencies; therefore not producing results in under five months or in as little as thirty days. These facts you have presented were the way things were in 1999; however this is not the case today and I recogniz e that the NC Crime Jab is overwhelmed from submissions from serving over 400 police agencies in the State. It is my belief that once we resubmit evidence that these items will be received and queued at the back of the line. 032916wsa HC BOC Page19 Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County Sheriff Larry Rollins POBox S99 176 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27646 Phone: 91~89S-9111; Fax: 91~893-6+50 Our main pitch to the County Commissioners was to show a need that our agency has for further DNA testing. With regards to choosing, on case by case basis, which lab we would chose to use that will procure the best results for the case, depending on the evidence available. In other words, a lot is taken in consideration and frankly a private lab offers more than one type of extraction process and several different types of chemistry which can be used to process the evidence and provide results and in a much quicker time. Your letter reads that the NC Crime Lab is "making continuous and determined advances to address processing times and use the latest methodology and technology." By this statement alone you have indicated that the NC Crime Lab is not to the ability of what a private lab can provide us with. You also say with confidence that you have effectively reduced your pending case load by half. I contend that this is made possible because of the NC Crime Lab's case management methods which eliminates evidence to be analyzed until either known samples are submitted, upon second submission or at the request of the District Attorney. While I have no proof of this I can attest to the fact that on every case that is submitted without known standards from all parties the evidence is returned unanalyzed. I implore you to consider this. Your statement further down in your letter states that "contrary to the article that the Forensic Biology Section routinely analyzes evidence from cases without known samples." Please find attached to this letter just one of many Evidence Return Inventory sheets our agency has received. In the block is a free text response that states "The Forensic Biology Section of the NC State Crime Laboratory does not analyze evidence without known DNA Standards from all relevant individuals involved in a case ... " It is my perception that when my deputies receive these documents stating that evidence was not analyzed and this evidence is then returned, we then have to resubmit the evidence back and often the second submission is when the NC Crime Lab will take action and analyze our request. The problem I have with these procedures is the time that is wasted and lost because of multiple submissions and the back log wait time often hinders not only the investigation but a timely prosecution. To explain this further I have also attached the evidence chain of custody documents from my report management system. You will notice that on 05/31/2011 the evidence was submitted to the evidence custodian at the Harnett County Sheriff's Office. On 06/29/2011 this same evidence was submitted to the NC State Crime Lab. On 08/28/2013 the evidence was returned unanalyzed to the Sheriff's Office. The NC Crime Lab submitted a report indicating the reasons mentioned above on 08/22/2013 . This same evidence was then resubmitted to the NC State Crime Lab on 09/18/2013. This evidence was then returned to the Harnett County Sheriff's Office on 11118/2015. The results were that the items tested revealed a partial profile. Given the aforementioned facts you can see where the evidence had taken initially 26 months to be looked at by the NC Crime Lab and then returned unanalyzed because we didn't have the known suspect standard. We then resubmitted the same evidence in the same manner as the first submission dated 06/29/2011 . The NC Crime Lab had the evidence another 26 months before it was returned analyzed with a report. 032916wsa HC BOC Page20 Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County Sheriff Larry Rollins POBox S99 175 Bain Street, Lillington, NC 27546 Phone: 91~89S-9111; Fax: 91~89S-6+50 I would like to point out to you another example of how a private lab has been able to provide results linking a man to a murder. The NC Crime Lab analyzed DNA evidence but sent back swabbing's from fingernail's unanalyzed. The fingernail evidence was submitted to the private lab and in under two months provided a DNA profile matching the suspect. This evidence is being used by the District Attorney's Office to prosecute the suspect. NC Crime Lab ref number is R201113879. After carefully reading the article and comparing to the known policies and procedures of the NC Crime Lab I can concur that the way the article is written misleads its readers about the comments with regard to the firearms touch DNA. I will tell you this, the touch DNA demonstration was made to educate the commissioners. LT J Armstrong had misspoke about the NC Crime Lab not accepting guns, however we also spoke with the Commissioners about using touch DNA on property crimes and convicted felon cases whereby the NC Crime Lab will not take these types of submissions. We currently still use the State Crime Lab and will continue to do so. We know you're working to update your technology which I take to mean more advanced chemistry process much like is being used in the private sector. I also recognize that these measures can cost a substantial amount of funding given what evidence we have already had processed. I furthermore understand that your funding from the State may be restricted much like mine is from the County. In light of the misunderstandings which have arose from not only the news article but from the letter which you have sent; I would be glad to sit down with you so that we both benefit from an open discussion about these issues. I know that you share our goal to use all available technology and resources available to provide justice for the citizens ofNorth Carolina. The use of private labs for DNA and other testing allows us to use the latest methods and receive results in a timely manner. Kind Regards, r:Y~~ Larry Rollins Sheriff of Harnett County C c: Mr. Jim Burgin, Chairman Mr. C Gordon Springle, Vice Chairman Mr. Joe Miller Ms. Barbara McKoy Mr. Abe Elmore Ms. Gina Wheeler, C ounty Manager's Office 032916wsa HC BOC Page21 Evidence Return Inventory North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Det. J. Armstrong NORTH CAROLINA STATE CRIME LABORATORY EVIDENCE RETURN INVENTORY TO: Harnett County Sheriffs Office PO Box 399 Lillington , NC 27546 Version I Effective Date: 08/16/2013 Ra le1 gh Crime Laboratory P 0 Box 2000 Garner, NC 27529-2000 Western Regional Laboratory PO Box 2408 Sk)·Jand, "t'C 28776-2408 Tt~ad Reg1ona l Labora tory 2306 West Meadowv1ew Road , Suite 110 Greensboro, NC 27407 FROM : Evidence Technician DATE : 08/22/2013 AGENCY NUMBER: _1_1 0_0_3_13_5 ______ LAB NUMBER:'-IR_2_0_11_1_0_7_77 ____ ----' SBI CASE NUMBER: --------------------- The following evidence is being returned (List reason for return and Agency item #'s): The Forensic Biology Section of the NC State Crime Laboratory does not analyze evidence without known DNA Standards from all relevant individuals involved in the case. Since the required standards were not submitted , agency item# 2 and 3 are being returned to y"our department unanalyzed . Once the standards have been collected, resubmit the evidence and the laboratory will process your request. If you have any questions, please contact this section at F d C b Ot;llilllly $•SI "t'd by Svz• 8.1rker onn appr ove I or use y: s . B k ~N <••Sol• ...... o •NC , .... u z 1 a r e r c .. ~. e>b ... -FCU SupeNUO< lPI.IIilcEbillfil.f!!i§'f"lGdO,.!;OV, C"U5 D ate 20130806 164529..04 '[)0' Page I of l 032916wsa HC BOC Page22 Barcode: 201 1EV103710002 Chain of Custody Report Report Date: March 02 , 2016 Description : ENV/(2) DNA SWABS FROM HANDLE OF STUN GUN (ITEM 1) Case Number: 11003135 Folder Number: 201104010004 Category: Classification: Bodily Elements Jurisdict ion : NC0430000 Evidence Number: 2011EV10371 Prop Code/Description : (2) DNA SWABS FROM HANDLE OF STUN GUN (ITEM 1) Make: Serial No : Narcotics Type : Measure: Item Status: Evidence Temporary Location : Recovery Date: 4/30/2011 1:15:00AM Recovery Address: Released By : RJF Other Jurisdiction: Associated Numbers: Involvement Tvpe location ID: A 39 : CRIMINAL ROOM SHELF A Officer: DSM MATTHEWS , DONNAS location 10: SBI : SBI LAB FOR ANALYSIS Officer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS location ID: A 39 : CRIMINAL ROOM SHELF A Officer : DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS location 10: SBI : SBILAB FOR ANALYSIS Offtcer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS location 10: A 39: CRIMINAL ROOM SHELF A Officer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS Model: Vlr-t Quantity : Color: Temporary Location Date: Recovery Officer: JHA ARMSTRONG , JEFFREY HAROLD/ RJF Released To: DSM Involved Partjes MdrW Locatioo'Moyement Historv Reason: EVID STORAGE Transaction Date: 11/18/2015 2:3 1:04PM Reason: G KIDD TO SBI LAB Transaction Date: 9/18/2013 3:11 :00PM Reason: EVID STORAGE Transact ion Date: 8128/2013 3:12:00 PM Reason: ANALYSIS Transaction Date: 6129/20 11 3:58:30PM Reaso n: EVID STORAGE Transaction Date: 5/31 120 11 8:29:02AM Entered_By. DONNAS MATIHEWS Entered_By: DONNAS MATTHEWS Ente red_By: DONNAS MATTHEWS Entered_By. DONNAS MATTHEWS Entered_B y. JASON A NORRIS Page 1 of2 032916wsa HC BOC Page23 Barcode: Description: 2011EV103710003 ENV/2 DNA SWABS Case Number: 11003135 Folder Number: 201104010004 Category: Classification: Bod ily Elements . . 2 DNA SWABS Prop Code/Descnpt1on: Make: Serial No: Narcotics Type: Measure: Item Status: Evidence Temporary Location: Recovery Date: 4/30/2011 1: 15:00AM Recovery Address: Released By: RJF Other Jurisdiction : Associated Numbers: Involvement Tyoe Location ID: A 39 : CRIMINAL ROOM SHELF A Officer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS Location ID: SBI : SBI LAB FOR ANALYSIS Officer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNA S Location ID: A 39: CR IMINAL ROOM SHELF A Officer: DSM MA TIHEWS, DONNAS Location ID: SBI: SBI LAB FOR ANALYSIS OffiCer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS Location ID: A 39: CRIMINAL ROOM SHELF A OffiCer: DSM MATTHEWS, DONNAS Chain of Custody Report Report Date: March 02, 2016 Jurisdiction : NC0430000 Evidence Number: 2011 EV1 0371 Model: VIN: Quantity: Color: Temporary Location Date: Recovery Officer: JHA ARMSTRONG, JEFFREY HAROLD/ RJF Released To: DSM Involved Parties ~ Location/Movement History Reason: EVID STORAGE Transaction Date: 11/1812015 2 :31 :04PM Reason: G KIDD TO SBI LAB Transaction Date: 9/18/2013 3:12:00PM Reason: EVID STORAGE Transaction Date: 8/28/2013 3 :12:00PM Reason: ANALYSIS Transaction Date: 6129/2011 3:58:51PM Reason: EVID STORAGE Transaction Date: 6/8/2011 8:45 :59AM Entered_By: DONNAS MATTHEWS Entered_By : DONNAS MATTHEWS Entered_By : DONNA S MATTHEWS Entered_By: DONNAS MATTHEWS Entered_ By: JASON A NORRIS Page 1 of 2 032916wsa HC BOC Page24 ' J..l ., ROY COOPER ATTORNEY GENERAL Sheriff Larry Rollins North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Depanment of Justice 121 E. Tryon Road Raleigh , North Carolina 27603 February 26. 2016 Harnett County Sheriffs Office Post Office Box 399 Lillington. NC 27546 Dear Sheriff Rollins, JOHN A . BYRD DIRECTOR I read with interest the article entitled ·'Sheriff Wants DNA Testing to Go Private .. by Oonagh McQuarrie in the February 17, 2016 edition of The Daily Record. The article refers to comments s ubmitted before a recent public meeting of the Harnett County Commissioners . Unfortunately. the article contained gross mi sstatements and mi sundersta nding~ regarding the State Crime Laboratory which it is my respons ibility to correct. The State Crime Lab is making continuous and determined advances to address processing times and use the latest methodology and technology. Lean Six Sigma. a private industry workfl ow system focu sed on process improvement and internal efficiency has helped the Lab reduce pending cases by over 50%. As the case load continues to drop so does the turnaround time. The article references a 2009 case. but according to State Crime Lab records this c ase is actually a 1999 case. Contrary to the article, t o date, th e State Crime Lab has analyzed more than 80 items of evidence s ubmitted in this case and stands read y to analyze additional item s if needed . For thi s one case. between 1999 and 20 15 , we received fourteen s ubmission s from your department resulting in sixteen separate reports. The first twelve reports were all completed in less than five months (five in less than thirty days). Of the remaining four reports, three were completed in nine months and o nl y the last rep ort was o lder than one year. As you may know, case management guidelines exist to make sure the most critical evidence in a case gets analyzed first. The State Crime Lab implemented case management guidelines to help law enforcement agencies identify the evidence items most likely to yie ld results and submit those for testing first, with additional su bmiss ions allowed once the initial item s have been analyzed. The State Crime Lab has rules on what evi dence it can and cannot accept in order to maintain its strict quality standards and make s ure lab result s will be admissible as evidence in court . Where warranted and requested. exceptions t o these guidelines can be made with my approval. Law enforcement agencies and District Attorneys always have the opportunity to request that the Lab accept additional items for analysis or that anal ys is in a case be expedited. Specifically, District Attorneys in coordination with Sheriffs and Police Chiefs may request expedited processing when lab results are needed for public safety or court deadlines. Again . contrary to th e article, the Forensic Biology Section routinely collects and analyzes touch DNA samples from firearm s from areas that are likel y to be handled or t ouched while firin g a firearm. including the grip. trigger, areas of the s lide , a nd the magazine . These areas are targeted because they typically have raised and rough surfaces that are not conducive for collecting latent prints. and therefore are better sui ted for touch DNA collection. The Forensic Biology Section prefers that the actual fireann be subm itted if touch DNA analysis is reque sted. however if the firearm can not be submitted , the ACCREDITED 032916wsa HC BOC Page25 Laboratory's Evidence Guide instructs the investigating agency on the correct method for collecting touch DNA by swab. Again . contrary to the article, the State Crime Lab routinely analyzes firearms used in crimes for touch DNA and does not require the investigating agency to collect swabs from firearms before submitting them. Again, contrary to the article. the Forensic Biology Section routinelv analyzes evidence from cases without known suspects. Last year, the State Crime Laboratory analyzed 54.986 submissions at no charge to law enforcement to help solve crimes and is constantly working to provide quality forensic analysis as efficiently as possible. The Lab increased the number of DNA cases it worked last year by 49% and obtained 356 hits (matches to help solve cases) to the national DNA database (CODIS), a 34% increase from the previous year. Additionally. the State Crime Lab secured more than $1 million in one-time funds for outsourcing toxicology cases for analysis. creating another way to reduce case inventory for District Attorneys who choose to participate. The article stated that your department.'' ... already uses NMS labs to evaluate drug and blood alcohol samples, and see turnarounds of as little as 10 days." District Attorney Vernon Stewart, has agreed to use the State Crime Lab's outsourcing program, at our request. and is sending toxicology cases from Harnett County to our vendor lab . I would encourage you to have your cases added to this list as well as it is a free service. The men and women of the State Crime Lab continue to provide professional \\Ork each and every day for our criminal jus tice stakeholders and the citizens of this state. Our staff is providing quality work in an efficient manner. The case inventory continues to drop which is resulting in a corresponding drop in turnaround time. Cooperation and collaboration with our criminal justice stakeholders continues to improve but as in all relationships, it requires constant communication between all parties. I respectfully request that your department please communicate with us so we might assist you in every way possible. If I or my staff can be of assistance to you and your team, please do not hesitate to contact us. ~ Sincerely yours. ~ q~~~(b Director. North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Cc: Mr. Jim Burgin. Chairman jburgin@hamett.org Mr. C. Gordon Springle. Vice Chairman gspringle!@ harnett.org Mr. Joe Miller. jmiller(a)hamett.org Ms. Barbara McKoy,bmckoy@ harnett .org Mr. Abe Elmore. aelmore(@harnett.org Ms. Gina Wheeler. County Manager's Oftice 032916wsa HC BOC Page26 Agenda Item __ '-{.a._-__..F'----- Board Meeting Agenda Item TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: DNA Testing Funding REQUESTED BY: Sheriffs Office REQUEST: Harnett County Sheriffs Office is requesting $30,000.00 for DNA testing through NMS Labs. Harnett County Sheriff's Office at present have over twenty cases that has evidence that need to be tested for the presence of DNA. These are major that involves murder, kidnapping ans sexual assaults. DNA can be used to identify criminal with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. By the same token, DNA can be used to clear suspecT persons mistakenly accuses of crimes. DNA technology is increasingly vital to ensuring accuracy and fairness in the criminal justice system. FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: U:\My Documents\2016 Folders\NMS Lab\DNA Funding Agenda 2016.doc I of I Page 032916wsa HC BOC Page27 032916wsa HC BOC Page28 032916wsa HC BOC Page29 032916wsa HC BOC Page30 032916wsa HC BOC Page31 032916wsa HC BOC Page32 032916wsa HC BOC Page33 032916wsa HC BOC Page34 032916wsa HC BOC Page35 032916wsa HC BOC Page36 032916wsa HC BOC Page37 032916wsa HC BOC Page38 032916wsa HC BOC Page39 032916wsa HC BOC Page40 032916wsa HC BOC Page41 032916wsa HC BOC Page42 032916wsa HC BOC Page43 032916wsa HC BOC Page44 032916wsa HC BOC Page45 032916wsa HC BOC Page46 032916wsa HC BOC Page47 032916wsa HC BOC Page48 032916wsa HC BOC Page49 032916wsa HC BOC Page50 032916wsa HC BOC Page51 032916wsa HC BOC Page52 032916wsa HC BOC Page53 032916wsa HC BOC Page54 032916wsa HC BOC Page55 032916wsa HC BOC Page56 032916wsa HC BOC Page57 032916wsa HC BOC Page58 State announces new LME/MCO service regions Agencies to merge to provide behavioral health, intellectual and developmental disability and substance use services State health officials announced today that the state-and Medicaid-funded organizations providing mental health, intellectual and developmental disability and substance use services to North Carolina citizens will be consolidating into four service regions across the state. Further consolidation will improve quality of services, accessibility, accountability and long-term sustainability. "I'm a strong believer in LME/MCOs," said Rick Brajer, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. "This population deserves dedicated management." The newly consolidated service areas are: • North Central Region: CenterPoint Human Services and Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions will be merging • South Central Region: Sandhills Center and Alliance Behavioral Healthcare will be merging • Eastern Region: Eastpointe and Trillium Health Resources will be merging • Western Region: Partners Behavioral Health Management and Smoky Mountain LME/MCO will be merging "We need strong LME/MCOs to achieve our Medicaid reform objectives," Brajer said. "Now is the right time to strengthen these organizations for long-term sustainability." In addition to their role in the future of Medicaid reform, LME/MCOs will play an important role in implementing recommendations that come from the Governor's Task Force on Mental Health and Substance Use as its members seek innovative ways to streamline systems already in place to address mental health and substance use needs across the state. Covering larger regions will allow for more consistent services to be offered to all areas of the state. It will also foster better coordination of care for people who may temporarily move into different service areas, such as children in foster care. It is also expected to decrease the administrative burden on providers who offer services in more than one LME/MCO region. This consolidation reflects much of what the organizations themselves had proposed when mergers were first considered in late 2013. Local Management Entities/Managed Care Organizations (LME/MCOs) proposed regions to serve the east, the west and two to serve central North Carolina . LME/MCO leaders will work closely with DHHS leadership on implementation plans and timelines throughout coming months. ### 032916wsa HC BOC Page59 Proposed Local Management Entity -Managed Care Organizations (LME-MCOs) Reflects Proposed Regional Entities As Of 3/17/16 Western Region: North (A!ntral Realon: Smoky Mountain Center Partners Behavioral Health llanagement Medicaid Membets: 2H,658 (21%) C8rtlina/ Innovations Healthcare Solutions Centi!I'Polnt Human SetVIces Medicaid Members: 410,065 (WA ) South Central Realon: Alliance Behavioral Healthcare Sandhllls Center Medicaid Members: 318,136 (26%) Medicaid Members are the number enrolled as of December 2015. E!stem Region: TrlHium Health Resources Eastpointe lledicaid llembers: 351,69f (:U%) 032916wsa HC BOC Page60