051815a Agenda Package051815a HC BOC Page 1
051815a HC BOC Page 2
051815a HC BOC Page 3
051815a HC BOC Page 4
051815a HC BOC Page 5
051815a HC BOC Page 6
051815a HC BOC Page 7
051815a HC BOC Page 8
051815a HC BOC Page 9
051815a HC BOC Page 10
051815a HC BOC Page 11
051815a HC BOC Page 12
051815a HC BOC Page 13
051815a HC BOC Page 14
051815a HC BOC Page 15
051815a HC BOC Page 16
051815a HC BOC Page 17
051815a HC BOC Page 18
051815a HC BOC Page 19
051815a HC BOC Page 20
051815a HC BOC Page 21
051815a HC BOC Page 22
051815a HC BOC Page 23
051815a HC BOC Page 24
051815a HC BOC Page 25
051815a HC BOC Page 26
051815a HC BOC Page 27
051815a HC BOC Page 28
051815a HC BOC Page 29
051815a HC BOC Page 30
051815a HC BOC Page 31
051815a HC BOC Page 32
051815a HC BOC Page 33
051815a HC BOC Page 34
051815a HC BOC Page 35
051815a HC BOC Page 36
051815a HC BOC Page 37
051815a HC BOC Page 38
051815a HC BOC Page 39
051815a HC BOC Page 40
051815a HC BOC Page 41
051815a HC BOC Page 42
051815a HC BOC Page 43
051815a HC BOC Page 44
051815a HC BOC Page 45
051815a HC BOC Page 46
051815a HC BOC Page 47
051815a HC BOC Page 48
051815a HC BOC Page 49
051815a HC BOC Page 50
051815a HC BOC Page 51
051815a HC BOC Page 52
051815a HC BOC Page 53
051815a HC BOC Page 54
051815a HC BOC Page 55
051815a HC BOC Page 56
051815a HC BOC Page 57
051815a HC BOC Page 58
051815a HC BOC Page 59
051815a HC BOC Page 61
051815a HC BOC Page 62
051815a HC BOC Page 63
STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 6
REZONING STAFF REPORT
Case: RZ-15-142
Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board: May 4, 2015 County Commissioners: May 18, 2015
Requesting a Rezoning from RA-20R to Commercial
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Applicant:
Name: Johnny Faircloth Name: Same
Address: 5272 Cool Springs Rd Address: Same
City/State/Zip: Broadway, NC 27505 City/State/Zip: Same
Property Description Consists of three parcels
PIN(s): 9575-24-1972, 9575-24-4764, 9575-24-4817 Acreage: 1.49 total
Address/SR No.: 49 & 50 Chipmunk Ct and 51 Red Bird Dr Cameron, NC 28326 (Hwy 24 vicinity)
Township:
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
Vicinity Map
STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 6
Physical Characteristics
Site Description: All three sites are currently
vacant undeveloped land and were originally
approved as part of the Natures Crossroads
Subdivision.
Surrounding Land Uses: Surrounding land uses
consist of manufactured homes, stick built
homes, several churches, a flea market, a
beauty salon, and a dilapidated commercial
building. There are also two convenience stores
located within one mile from this site.
Aerial Photograph
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other: unverified
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count:
8,800 on NC 24
Site Distances: Moderate
Zoning District Compatibility
The following is a summary list of general uses,
or actual permitted uses refer to the Zoning Ordinance.
CURRENT REQUESTED
RA-20R Commercial
Parks & Rec X
Natural Preserves X
Bona Fide Farms X
Single Family X
Manufactured Homes,
Design Regulated X
Manufactured Homes
Multi-Family
Institutional
Commercial Services X
Retail X
Wholesale X
Industrial
Manufacturing
Zoning Map
STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 6
Land Use Classification Compatibility
ZONING LAND USE
RA-20R LDR
Parks & Rec X
Natural Preserves X
Bona Fide Farms X
Single Family X
Manufactured Homes,
Design Regulated
Manufactured Homes X
Multi-Family
Institutional X X
Commercial Service X
Retail X
Wholesale
Industrial
Manufacturing
Future Land Use Map
Additional Information
As required for all zoning changes within a five mile radius of Fort Bragg, RLUAC (Regional Land Use
Advisory Commission) was contacted.
On May 4, the Harnett County Planning Board voted 4- 1 to recommend denial of this Rezoning application
based on the multiple uses that would accompany a Commercial zoning district. They did feel a
Commercial use would benefit this area, however recommended that the applicant instead apply for a
Conditional Use permit. This could possibly improve a residential to commercial transition.
Evaluation
Yes No The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding community is
reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or
harm to the community.
REASONING: The requested rezoning to commercial would have an unresasonable
impact on the community. If rezoned to Commercial , this would allow all uses
permitted in the commercial zoning district. Some of these uses may not be compatible
with the residential nature of the community. These lots were originally approved to be
developed for single family residential use within the Natures Crossroads Subdivision.
Therefore rezoning the proposed properties to commercial may have a negative impact
on the residents who live within the subdivision. If rezoned, there is the potential of
traffic and quality of life issues, especially to property owners adjacent to these internal
lots.
Yes No The requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification.
REASONING: The proposal does not enhance the public general welfare, as the requested
zoning is not compatible the County Land Use Plan. Further the current zoning allows
several commercial uses via the conditional use process. This mechanism would allow
the community to provide input on the uses that could be placed on the site, as well as
conditions that could reduce or prevent potential negative impacts.
STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 6
Yes No The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare.
REASONING: The requested zoning to Commercial would not maintain the public health,
safety and general welfare due to the existing residential uses within the area.
Yes No The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for
reasonableness
REASONING: This request does not need to be evaluated for a small scale rezoning,
because the parcels are contiguous to commercial zoning.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that…)
As stated within the evaluation, the requested rezoning to Commercial is not compatible with all Harnett
County regulatory documents. This rezoning has the potential to impact on the surrounding community, as
well as fails to enhance the public health, safety, and general welfare because all permitted uses within a
Commercial district would not be compatible with the residential nature of the community. It is
recommended that this rezoning request be DENIED.
Site Photographs
Subject Property1 @ cul-de-sac Subject Property2 @ cul-de-sac
Subject Property3 @ corner lot Homes on Chipmunk Ct
STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 6
Red Bird Dr & Golden Finch Cr
Corner lot view towards HWY 24
Hwy 24 view
Standards of Review and Worksheet
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning distr ict will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
Yes No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same
category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes No B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
Yes No C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When
a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so
long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they
intend to make of the property involved.)
Yes No D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound
planning practices.
STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 6
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above
findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the publ ic interest.
DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest
and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property similarly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it
meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of
the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning
practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning
Attachments
Original Rezoning Application
Justification Statement
051815a HC BOC Page 70
STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 6
REZONING STAFF REPORT
Case: RZ-15-130
Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services
jsikes@harnett.org
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 814-8278
Planning Board: May 4, 2015 County Commissioners: May 18, 2015
Requesting a Rezoning from RA-30 & Commercial to RA-30 only
Applicant Information
Owner of Record: Applicant:
Name: Ruth Jackson Altman Name: Ruthie Jackson
Address: 5458 Fayetteville Hwy Address: 5386 Fayetteville Hwy
City/State/Zip: Godwin, NC 28344 City/State/Zip: Godwin, NC 28344
Property Description Consists of two parcels
PIN(s): 1515-53-5302 & 1515-53-5398 Acreage: 3.24
Address/SR No.: Near 1545 Bud Hawkins Rd, Dunn, NC 28334
Township:
(09) Johnsonville
(10) Lillington
(11) Neill’s Creek
(12) Stewart’s Creek
(13) Upper Little River
(01) Anderson Creek
(02) Averasboro
(03) Barbecue
(04) Black River
(05) Buckhorn
(06) Duke
(07) Grove
(08) Hectors Creek
Vicinity Map
Vicinity Map
STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 6
Physical Characteristics
Site Description: Site is currently vacant.
Surrounding Land Uses: farmland, low density
residential, several churches as well as Heritage
Bible College, and various commercial uses.
Aerial Photograph
Services Available
Water:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Well)
Other: Unverified
Sewer:
Public (Harnett County)
Private (Septic Tank)
Other: unverified
Transportation:
Annual Daily Traffic Count:
280 vehicle trips per day
Site Distances: Good
Zoning District Compatibility
The following is a summary list of general uses,
or actual permitted uses refer to the Zoning Ordinance.
CURRENT REQUESTED
Commercial RA-30
Parks & Rec X X
Natural Preserves X X
Bona Fide Farms X
Single Family X
Manufactured Homes,
Design Regulated
Manufactured Homes X
Multi-Family X
Institutional X
Commercial Services X
Retail X X
Wholesale
Industrial
Manufacturing
Zoning Map
STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 6
Land Use Classification Compatibility
ZONING LAND USE
Commercial MG
Parks & Rec X X
Natural Preserves X X
Bona Fide Farms X X
Single Family X
Manufactured Homes,
Design Regulated X
Manufactured Homes X X
Multi-Family X
Institutional X
Commercial Service X
Retail X X
Wholesale X X
Industrial
Manufacturing
Future Land Use Map
Additional Information
On May 4, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of this
Rezoning application based on the existing zoning compatibility to the surrounding properties district.
Evaluation
Yes No The IMPACT to the adjacent property owners and the surrounding community is
reasonable, and the benefits of the rezoning outweigh any potential inconvenience or
harm to the community.
REASONING: The impact to the surrounding community is reasonable, as the
requested zoning district is similar in nature to neighboring zoning.
Yes No The requested zoning district is COMPATIBLE with the existing Land Use Classification.
REASONING: The requested zoning to RA-30 is compatible with the Land Use
Classification of Municipal Growth area. As per the existing plan, a Municipal Growth
area is meant to encourage uses that would promote a city/ town based development.
Yes No The proposal does ENHANCE or maintain the public health, safety and general welfare.
REASONING: The requested zoning to RA-30 would maintain the public health, safety
and general welfare due to the existing residential uses within the area.
Yes No The request is for a SMALL SCALE REZONING and should be evaluated for
reasonableness.
REASONING: The proposed rezoning to RA-30 is immediately adjacent to RA-30 zoned
land, thus the application does not need to be considered a Small Scale
Rezoning.
STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 6
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency (Staff concludes that…)
As stated in the evaluation, the requested rezoning to RA-30 would not have an unreasonable impact on
the surrounding community and will maintain the public health, safety, and general welfare because of the
existing residential uses within the area and the compatibility with neighboring zoning districts. It is
recommended that this rezoning request be APPROVED.
Site Photographs
Subject Property Subject Property
Heritage Bible College across the street Residences across the street
STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 6
Adjacent property & street view Area properties & street view
Standards of Review and Worksheet
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
The Planning Board shall consider and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners
concerning each proposed zoning district. The following policy guidelines shall be followed by the Planning
Board concerning zoning districts and no proposed zoning district will receive favorable recommendation
unless:
Yes No A. The proposal will place all property similarly situated in the area in the same
category, or in appropriate complementary categories.
Yes No B. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
Yes No C. There is convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When
a new district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so
long as it meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they
intend to make of the property involved.)
Yes No D. There is convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
Yes No E. The proposed change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound
planning practices.
GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to grant the rezoning upon finding that the rezoning is reasonable based on All of the above
findings of fact A-E being found in the affirmative and that the rezoning advances the public interest.
DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST
Motion to deny the rezoning upon finding that the proposed rezoning does not advance the public interest
and is unreasonable due to the following:
The proposal will not place all property simil arly situated in the area in the same category, or in
appropriate complementary categories.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be in the general public interest and not merely in the interest of the
individual or small group.
There is not convincing demonstration that all uses permitted under the proposed district
classification would be appropriate in the area included in the proposed change. (When a new
district designation is assigned, any use permitted in the district is allowable, so long as it
STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 6
meets district requirements, and not merely uses which applicants state they intend to make of
the property involved.)
There is not convincing demonstration that the character of the neighborhood will not be
materially and adversely affected by any use permitted in the proposed change.
The proposed change is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and sound planning
practices.
The proposed change was not found to be reasonable for a small scale rezoning
Attachments
Original Rezoning Application
Justification Statement
051815a HC BOC Page 77
051815a HC BOC Page 78
Board Meeting
Agenda Item
Agenda I tern 10
MEETING DATE: May 18, 2015
TO: HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT : Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendments
REQUESTED BY: Mark Locklear, Director of Planning Services
REQUEST:
Public Hearing
Proposed Text Amendments to Harnett County UDO
Applicant: Harnett County Planning Services
Text Amendments:
A. Dead-End Street Length & Width
Article VII (Development Design Guidelines)
Section 2.0 (Street & Transportation Standards)
B. Subdivision Street Maintenance
Article VII (Development Design Guidelines)
Section 14.0 (Installation & Maintenance ofRequired Improvements)
C. Manufactured Horne Park Business License
Article II (Nonconformities)
Section 6 .0 (Nonconforming Manufactured Horne Parks)
Section 8.0 (Continuation ofNonconforming Situations)
Article III (Development & Subdivision Review, Permitting, & Approval Requirements),
Section 2 .0 (Permit Requirements)
Section 5.0 (Manufactured Horne Park Site Plan Review Requirements)
Article V (Use Regulations)
Section 11.0 (Other Uses)
Article XIII (Enforcement & Penalties)
Section 6.0 (Remedies), Section 7.0 (Compliance Period);
Article XIV (Definitions & Certifications)
Section 2.0 (General Definitions & Acronyms)
The Harnett County Planning Board reviewed all text amendments as presented by Planning
Services staff. A uannirnous vote was taken at the May 4, 2015 Planning Board Meeting to
recommend approval of all text amendments as presented.
C:\Users\gwheeler\AppData\Local\Microsoft\ Windows\ Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\98RKKOE5\CC Agenda
Request Form-Text Amendments.doc Page 1 of2
FINANCE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION:
COUNTY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
C:\Users\gwheeler\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\98RKKOE5\CC Agenda
Request Form-Text Amendments.doc Page 2 of2
Harnett
TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
(Internal)
COUNTY
NOR! H CAROLINA
Planning Department
108 E. Front Street
P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 893 -7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793
Applicant Information
Applicant:
Name: Harnett County Planning Services
Address: 108 E Front St
City/State/Zip: Lillington NC, 27546
E-mail:
Phone: 893-7525
Fax:
Type of Change
D New Addition [gj Revision
Unified Development
Ordinance : Ordinance
Current Text:
See attached
Article:
Proposed Text: (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
See attached
Reason for Requested Change:
VII Section: 2.10
To ensure that Harnett County's U.D.O. regulations concerning dead-end streets coincide with the
NCDOT guidelines.
Planning Board Recommendation:
On May 4th, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of this
text amendment.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency: (Staff concludes that...)
The requested Text Amendment is compatible with Harnett County regulatory documents, and
the benefits outweigh any potential inconvenience or harm to the community. This will maintain
orderly and compatible land use and development patterns and encourage compatibility with
NCDOT development practices. Therefore, it is recommended that this Text Amendment request
be APPROVED.
Page 1 of 1
Please Add/ Delete & Amend the following to ...
Article VII "Development Design Guidelines"
Section 2.0 Street & Transportation Standards
2.10 Dead-End Streets & Cui-de-sacs
2.10.1 Dead-End Street Length & Width
A. A permanent dead-end street shall not exceed 2,500 feet in length-measured from
the centerline of its beginning point on a through street to the centerline of its end in
the center of the turnaround of the cul-de-sac or the centerline at the end of a
temporary turnaround. Stub out streets or intersecting cul-de-sacs shall not be points
of measurement for dead-end streets. The distance from the edge of pavement on the
vehicular turnaround to the right of way line shall not be less than the distance from
the edge of pavement to right of way line on the street approaching the turnaround .
.!i.__Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum *35 foot pavement radius and should not be used
to avoid connection with an existing street or to avoid the extension of an important
street, unless exception is granted by the DRB. The distance from the edge of
pavement on the vehicular turnaround to the right-of-wav line shall not be less than
the distance from the edge of pavement to right-of-way line on the street approaching
the turnaround.
Harnett
TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
(Inte rnal)
COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Planning Departm e nt
108 E. Front Street
P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 8 93-7525 Fax : (910) 893-2793
Applicant Information
Applicant:
Name : Harnett County Planning Services
Address : 108 E Front St
City/State/Zip: Lillington NC, 27546
E-mail:
Phone : 8 93-7525
Fa x :
Type of Change
0 New Addition IZl Revision
U nified Deve lopment
Ord i nance: Ordinance ~~~~----------------
Curre nt Tex t:
See attached
Article:
Proposed Tex t: (Attach additional s heets if necessary)
See attach ed
Re ason for Re quest e d Change:
VII Secti o n: 1 4.0
To provide an option for street maintenance to property owners w ithin neighborhoods where the
Developer of Record no longer exi st s .
Planning Board Recomm e ndation:
On May 4th, the Harn ett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of thi s
text amendment.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency: (Staff concludes that ... )
The requested Text Amendment is compatible with Harnett County regu latory documents and
maintains the public health, safety and general welfare . This Amendment will maintain orderly
development patterns and coinc ide with NCDOT regulations. T herefore, it is recommended that
this T ext Amendment request be APPROVED .
Page 1 of 1
ADD the following to ...
Article VII "Development Design Guidelines"
Section 14.0 Installation & Maintenance of Required Improvements
A. It is the intent of this Ordinance that the original developer or any subsequ ent developer shall be
responsible for the maintenance of all required improvements until such time as a unit of government,
public utility, or other legal entity assumes responsibility for the maint enance of those improvements.
B . It shall be the responsibility of the developer to complete the installation of sidewalks, street trees, curb and
gutter systems, and any and all other required improvements. If the installation o f these listed amenities is
not complete by the time that the County has issued building permits for 75 percent (75%) of the lots
shown on the record plat within a subdivision, the County shall not issue any more building permits until
the improvements have been completed. The County shall have the ability to call the improvement
guarantee due at this time to ensure installation of all required improvements. Development of a
subdivision in phases shall be considered on a phase by phase basis . No building permit shall be issued for
single lot development prior to installation of improvements. I n the cnnt that the dcwloper of record ha~
di~~olnd. tiled for bankruptcy. or executed any other action that would disbar the developer from
continuing such a project. as determined by the Planning Department. the following shall apply:
c.
D.
E.
F .
G .
Subsequent indi,·i dual(s) that m\·n . or han an inrere~t in lots that are not allowed to obtain permits . may be
allowed to make the necessary impn>,·ements on a per street basis . if determined to be acceptable by
NCDOT. Only streets that are contiguous with existing NCDOT maintenance are eligible for this
excepuon.
Harnett
TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
(Internal)
COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Planning Department
108 E. Front Street
P.O. Box 65, Lillington, NC 27546
Phone: (910) 893-7525 Fax: (910) 893-2793
Applicant Information
Applicant:
Name: Harnett County Planning Services
Address: 108 E Front St
City/State/Zip: Lillington NC, 27546
E-mail:
Phone: 893-7525
Fax:
Type of Change
D New Addition ~Revision
6.0; 8.0;
2.0; 5.0;
11.0; 6.0, Unified Development
Ordinance: Ordinance
II; III; V;
Article: XIII; XIV Secti on: 7 .0; 2.0
Current Text:
See attached
Proposed Text: (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
See attached
Reason for Requested Change:
• To ensure that Harnett County's U.D.O. regulations, concerning Manufactured Home Park
business licenses, coincide with the N.C. guidelines & new General Statute regulations.
• To create an option for MHP owner's to reduce the total acres of the Park, without reducing their
rented lots.
Planning Board Recommendation:
On May 4th, the Harnett County Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of this
text amendment.
Suggested Statement-of-Consistency: (Staff concludes that. .. )
The requested Text Amendment is compatible with Harnett County regulatory documents and
maintains the public health, safety and general welfare. This Amendment will maintain typical
Zoning compliance and coincide with NC General Statute regulations. Therefore, it is
recommended that this Text Amendment request be APPROVED.
Page 1 of 1
Please Add/ Delete & Amend the following to ...
Article II ''Nonconformities"
Section 6.0 Nonconforming Manufactured Home Parks
6.1 Existing, Unlicensed Unpermitted Manufactured Home Parks
The purpose of this Section is to provide for the licensing pennitting of previously unlicensed
unpennitted, nonconforming manufactured home parks, existing prior to September 15, 2003.
6.1.1 Eligibility
B. Previously licensed pennitted manufactured home parks that are now unlicensed
unpennitted shall not be eligible for licensing pennitting under this Section.
6.1.2 Licensing Permitting Procedure
C. The Administrator shall cause to be issued a provisional business license certificate of zoning
compliance for said application following a passing manufactured home park inspection.
6.1.3 Initial Licensing Period Zoning Verification Requirements
A. Manufactured home parks licensed pennitted under the provisions included in this Section
shall meet the requirements set forth in Subsection "Standards for New & Altered
Manufactured Home Parks" of Section "Manufactured Home Park" of Article V "Use
Regulations" and Subsection "Buffering & Landscaping" of Article VII "Development
Design Guidelines" of this Ordinance. Parks licensed permitted under said provisions shall
be granted a provisional license probationary certificate of zoning compliance, valid for a
period of 12 months.
B. At the conclusion of a 12 month period a manufactured home park inspection shall be
performed. Passing manufactured home parks shall be issued a standard business license
certificate of zoning compliance . Failure to meet said requirements shall result in the
forfeiture of business license the certificate of zoning compliance.
6.2 Existing, Licensed Permitted Manufactured Home Parks
The purpose of this Section is to regulate licensed permitted, nonconforming manufactured home
parks.
6.2.1 Parks Existing Prior to September 15, 2003
Manufactured Home Parks existing prior to September 15,2003 shall, within 12 months, be required
to comply with Subsections "General Provisions" and "Maintenance of Park & Facilities" of Section
"Manufactured Home Park" of Article V "Use Regulations", and Section "Manufactured Home
Park Business License Certificate of Zoning Compliance" Section of Article III "Development &
Subdivision Review, Pennitting, & Approval Requirements" of this Ordinance.
Section 8.0 Continuation of Nonconforming Situations
For purposes of determining whether a right to continue a nonconforming situation is lost pursuant
to this Article, all of the buildings, activities, and operations maintained on a lot are generally to be
considered as a whole. For example, the failure to rent one (1) space in a nonconforming
manufactured home park for 180 days shall not result in the loss of the right to rent that space
thereafter so long as the manufactured home park as a whole is continuously maintained and has a
valid privilege lieense certificate of wning compliance . But if a nonconforming use is maintained in
conjunction with a conforming use, discontinuance of a nonconforming use for the required period
shall terminate the right to maintain it thereafter. And so, if a manufactured home is used as a
nonconforming use on a residential lot where a conforming residential structure also is located,
removal of that manufactured home for 180 days terminates the right to replace it.
Article III. "Development & Subdivision Review, Permitting, & Approval Requirements"
Section 2.0 Permit Requirements
2. 9 Manufactured Home Park Business License Certificate of Zoning Compliance
All manufactured home parks shall maintain a valid business lieense certificate of zoning
compliance. The business lieense A certificate of zoning compliance issued to the owner of a
manufactured home park applieant shall constitute the authority to operate the utilize the property
as a manufactured home park in accordance with this Ordinance. The business lieense certificate of
zoning compliance shall expire after a two (2) year period or at the sale of the park to a new
owner(s), whichever comes first, and shall be renewed to remain valid. The Planning Department
shall withhold all permits to parks without a valid business lieense certificate of zoning compliance.
Failure to obtain a certificate of zoning compliance valid business lieense within six (6) months of
September 15, 2003 shall be subject to Article "Enforcement & Penalties" of this Ordinance.
2.9.1 Issuance of Business License Certificate of Zoning Compliance
Upon completion of construction of the manufactured home park or each phase, the developer shall
then apply for a business lieense certificate of zoning compliance.
2.9.2 Amended Business License Certificate of Zoning Compliance
Any reduction in si2e, whether of the total number of lots or aereage, shall require the issuance of an
amended business lieense certificate of zoning compliance. Said amended business lieense shall be
valid only for the remainder of the term of the previous business lieense for the same manufa:etured
home park The transfer of a manufactured home space or spaces either by sale or by any other
means within the manufactured home park is prohibited.
2.9.3 Department of Public Health
A. Biannual Inspection
All manufactured home parks in Harnett County shall be inspected by the Harnett County
Department of Public Health at least once every two (2) years . The business license
certificate of zoning compliance of parks with sewage problems based on current 15A
NCAC 18A .1900may be revoked upon request of the Harnett County Department of Public
Health.
Section 5.0 Manufactured Home Park Site Plan Review Requirements
5.3 Manufactured Home Site Plan Requirements
Board of Development Park Existing,
Adjustment Site Review Board Alteration Site Unlicensed
Plan Site Plan Plan U npcrmitted
Park Site Plan
5.5 Manufactured Home Park Alteration Site Plan
3 . Approval of Reduction
All lots to be removed from said park shall be vacated prior to issuance of an amended
business license certificate of zoning compliance.
Article V. "Use Regulations"
Section 11.0 Other Uses
11.6 Manufactured Home Park
11.6.1 General Provisions
C. Improvements
3 . Fence or Wall
Fences or walls shall not be permitted unless approved as part of the park plan. This
excludes one (1) temporary pet containment areas per manufactured home space.
Pet containment areas that-de shall not exceed 120 square feet that ate and shall be
made of any suitable and durable material§. tfla.t--is intended for such use that are
installed in a good workman-ship manner.
E. Recreational V chicles
2. Recreational Vehicles (RV's)
k. Sub section "Existing, Licensed Permitted Manufactured Home Parks" of Section
"Alteration & Expansion of Existing Parks" of Article II "Nonconformities" is not
applicable .
Article XIII. "Enforcement & Penalties"
Section 6.0 Remedies
D. Call for denial or withhold approval of any permit or lieense provided for in this
Ordinance that is sought for the property on which the violation exists until such
time that the violation is remedied; or
F. Revoke any requited business lieense certificate of zoning compliance due to failure
to comply with this Ordinance; and/ or
G. Withhold any permit or lieense certificate of compliance provided for in this
Ordinance for a property, or property under development, that is in violation of this
Ordinance, or any other State or Federal regulations.
Section 7.0 Compliance Period Table
7.1 Compliance Period Table
Nature of Violation Specified Compliance Period
Junked/ Abandoned Vehicles 5 Calendar D~s
Abandoned Manufactured Homes 60 Calendar Days
Illegal Signs 0-5 Calendar Days
Manufactured Home Park / Business License 30 Calendar Days
( ~ertificatc of Zoninl?" Comnliancc
Landscaping & Plantings 180 Calendar Days
Zoning, Subdivision, & Historic Preservation 30 Calendar Days
Regs.
All Other Regulations 30 Calendar Days
Subsequent Violations 0 Calendar Days
Article XIV. Definitions & Certifications
Section 2.0 General Definitions & Acronyms
2.2 General Definitions
Manufactured Home Park
A manufactured home park is a parcel of land, adjoining parcels of land, or a group of lots within
500 feet of each other in single/ same ownership designed to provide three (3) or more
manufactured homes or spaces, or any combination of homes and spaces . One (1) lot, solely
established for the primary residence of the park owner(s) may be established on a parcel adjacent to
a licensed permitted manufactured home park.
www.harnett.org
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
HARNETT COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of Harnett County adopted the UDO on October 17, 2011 for
the purpose of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the county residents; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance was adopted under authority granted by the General Assembly of the State of
North Caro lina , particularly G.S. 153A-340; and
WHEREAS, the UDO contains provisions for amending said ordinance and those provisions have been
followed; and
WHEREAS, the Harnett County Planning Board has reviewed the amendment to the articles of the UDO
as listed below and recommends the adoption of the following amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HARNETT
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA that Article VII "Development Design Guidelines"; Section 2.0 "Street
& Transportation Standards"; Article VII "Development Design Guidelines"; Section 14.0 "Installation &
Maintenance of Required Improvements"; Article II "Nonconformities"; Section 6 .0 "Nonconforming
Manufactured Home Parks"; Section 8.0 "Continuation ofNonconforming Situations"; Article III
"Development & Subdivision Review, Permitting, & Approval Requirements"; Section 2 .0 "Permit
Requirements"; Section 5.0 "Manufactured Home Park Site Plan Review Requirements"; Article V "Use
Regulations", Section 11.0 "Other Uses"; Article XIII "Enforcement & Penalties", Section 6.0
"Remedies", Section 7.0 "Compliance Period"; Article XIV "Definitions & Certifications", Section 2.0
"General Definitions & Acronyms", shall be amended to read as indicated in the "Attachments."
"Attachments" are filed w ith the Unified Development Ordinance in the Clerk to the Board's Office.
Duly adopted this 18 1h day ofMay, 20 15 and effective upon adoption.
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Jim Burgin, Chairman
ATTEST:
Margaret Regina Wheeler, Clerk to the Board
strong roots • new growth
051815a HC BOC Page 90
051815a HC BOC Page 91
051815a HC BOC Page 92
051815a HC BOC Page 93
051815a HC BOC Page 94
051815a HC BOC Page 95
2
Table of Contents
I. Revenue Breakdown
Inspections:
Inspection Revenue…………………………………………………………………….….3
Planning:
Activity Report…………………………….……………………………………….………..4
Planning Revenue…………………………….……………………………….……………9
Cell Tower Revenue…………………………………………………………….…….…..10
Recreational Fees……………………………………………………………….…….…..11
A.M.P.I. ……………………………………………………………………………….…....12
Environmental Health:
E-Health Revenue…………………………………………………………………….…...13
Food & Lodging Revenue………………………………………………………………....14
Public Utilities:
Public Utilities Revenue……………………………………………………………..…….15
Fire Marshall:
Fire Marshall Revenue……………………………..………………………………….…..16
II. Applications & Permits
Permits:
Permits Issued By Month………………….…….…………………………………..…....17
Permits by SFH/Manufactured Homes…………………………………………………..18
Valuations:
Permit Valuations……………………………….…………………………….….…….…..19
III. Township Information:
Recreational Fee ……………………………………………………………………………..….....20
Lots…………………………………….….……………………………………………………..……21
Applications………………….……….………………………………………………………..…....22
3
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $100,391 $57,218 $60,319 $46,249 $51,961 $30,566 $33,723 $58,632 $99,530 $98,338 $73,324 $67,868 $778,119
FY 09-10 $86,771 $66,489 $93,014 $81,537 $61,148 $92,292 $81,129 $67,281 $103,548 $100,216 $79,804 $69,365 $982,594
FY 10-11 $87,913 $76,715 $58,124 $88,071 $101,297 $74,283 $71,218 $84,997 $80,399 $95,521 $187,293 $93,581 $1,099,412
FY 11-12 $80,637 $118,971 $122,574 $81,479 $85,075 $56,285 $71,908 $91,662 $83,841 $84,000 $113,049 $106,431 $1,095,912
FY 12-13 $125,159 $96,940 $79,878 $96,342 $92,119 $81,678 $130,365 $124,565 $82,768 $118,398 $111,644 $104,006 $1,243,862
FY 13-14 $127,150 $112,368 $61,868 $78,174 $61,113 $40,752 $94,942 $62,630 $89,368 $87,892 $104,572 $73,937 $994,766
FY 14-15 $84,601 $57,816 $66,542 $68,157 $53,422 $91,821 $70,415 $50,843 $92,279 $77,799 $-$-$713,695
Inspection Revenue
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
Angier and Lillington are not
included in this dataset.
Angier contracts with HC
Inspections at $2,083 monthly.
Lillington at $2,333 monthly.
4
Planning Activity Report For April 2015
Board Of Adjustments
Appeal Cell Tower Swmh / Dwmh PUD Commercial Variance Total
Monthly 2 2
Year To Date 1 1 7 0 12 2 23
Recreational Fees For Major Subdivisions
Townships Total For Month Year To Date Total (since f.y. 06)
Anderson Creek $ 27,000.00 $ 990,500.00
Averasboro $ - $ - $ 6,500.00
Barbecue $ - $ 17,000.00 $ 352,000.00
Black River $ - $ - $ 29,500.00
Buckhorn $ - $ - $ -
Duke $ - $ - $ -
Grove $ - $ - $ -
Hectors Creek $ - $ - $ 67,000.00
Johnsonville $ - $ - $ 191,500.00
Lillington $ - $ - $ -
Neills Creek $ - $ - $ -
Stewarts Creek $ - $ - $ 77,500.00
Upper Little River $ - $ - $ 49,000.00
Totals $ 44,000.00 $ 1,763,500.00
Preliminary Major Subdivisions
Townships Number Of Subdivisions By Month Number of Lots By Month YTD
Anderson Creek Approved 117
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Averasboro Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 1
Barbecue Approved 1
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Black River Approved 32
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Buckhorn Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Duke Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Grove Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Hectors Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Johnsonville Approved 37
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Lillington Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Neills Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Stewarts Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Upper Little River Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
5
Preliminary Major Subdivision Totals
Monthly
Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 0 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0 0
Year To Date
Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 5 187
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0 0
Final Major Subdivisions
Townships Number Of Subdivisions
Number of Lots By
Month YTD
Anderson Creek Approved 164
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Averasboro Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Barbecue Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Black River Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Buckhorn Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Duke Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Grove Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Hectors Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Johnsonville Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Lillington Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 7
Neills Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Stewarts Creek Approved 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Upper Little River Approved 2
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0
Final Major Subdivision Totals
Monthly
Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 0 0
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0 0
Year To Date
Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 3 166
Reviewed & Placed On Hold 0 0
Minor Subdivisions
Monthly Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 6 13
Year To Date Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 59 92
6
Exempt Subdivisions
Monthly Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 20 33
Year To Date Number Of Subdivisions Number Of Lots
Approved 128 218
Flood Zone Permits Issued
Monthly 0
Year To Date 0
Zoning Inspections
Monthly 36
Year To Date 287
Manufactured Home Park License Issued
Monthly Number Of Parks Number Of Lots
Approved 12 430
Year To Date Number Of Parks Number Of Lots
Approved 80 1588
Manufactured Home Park Inspections
Monthly Number Of Inspections 33
Year To Date Number of Inspections 202
Rezoning Requests
Monthly
Type Of Request P.B. Action C.C. Action
1
RA-20R TO
COMMERCIAL 1 Approved Approved 1
Tabled
Year To Date
Total Number Of Requests P.B. Action C.C. Action
2 2 Approved Approved 2
Denied Denied
Text Amendments/Ordinances
Monthly 0
Year To Date 3
Violations
Monthly Complaints Resolved Pending
4 4 0
Year To Date Complaints Resolved Pending
51 15 36
Commercial Site Plan Reviews
Monthly 2
Year To Date 23
Abandoned Mobile Home Project Initiative (A.M.P.I)
Monthly
S.W.M.H. D.W.M.H. TOTALS
Contracts 2 2
Removed 1 1
Year To Date
S.W.M.H. D.W.M.H. TOTALS
Contracts 10 1 11
Removed 5 1 6
7
Special Project Activity
April 2015
New
On April 1st, Wake County Planning Board voted unanimously 10 -0 to approve the Town of Angier request to extend its ETJ, adding
approximately 120 acres.
On April 23rd, the Advisory Committee for the new Harnett County Comprehensive Land Use and Economic D evelopment Strategic
Plan met with our consultants to discuss the progress and future of the plan. After the Advisory Committee met, there was a p ublic
drop-in session where approximately 50 Harnett County citizens attended to learn about the plan and give feedback.
Ongoing
In respect to a NC Wildlife Resources Grant received by the County, Planning Staff is working with our specific contractors f or each
portion of the grant as well as providing hard data for their use. A curriculum has been formatted by S ustainable Sandhills, and
children are currently being recruited to participate in these activities. Land Design, Inc. is approximately 80% complete o n their
tasks of interactive mapping and key area location. We anticipate both portions of this process t o be complete within 4 months. This
grant has helped us parlay these resources into the proposed Land Use Plan.
Staff Reviewing Commercial Site Plans for:
New
1. Campbell Pointe Townhomes Phase II & III (77 units)
2. South River EMC Substation
3. Lexington Plantation Clubhouse and Pool #2
Ongoing
4. Zaxby’s –Hwy 87
5. Hodges Chapel Church - expansion
6. United Methodist Church - expansion
7. Building Blocks Daycare – expansion
8. Wal-Mart & Spout Springs Shops
9. Anderson Creek Commercial Complex
10. Strickland’s Repair
Hold
Development of the Problem Properties Task Force (No funding approved for FY:2014)
Upcoming
Harnett County Planning Board Meeting:
Monday, May 4, 2015
Proposed Zoning Change: Case # RZ-15-130
Landowner/Applicant: Ruth Jackson Altman/Ruthie Jackson
3.5 +/- acres (consisting of 2 parcels); From RA-30 & Commercial to RA-30
SR # 1811 Access Road/Bud Hawkins Road
Averasboro Township
Proposed Zoning Change: Case # RZ-15-142
Landowner/Applicant: Johnny Faircloth
1.45 +/- acres (consisting of 3 parcels); From RA-20R to Commercial
Off NC Hwy 24 (on Chipmunk Court)
Johnsonville Township
8
Proposed Text Amendments
A. Dead-End Street Length & Width
Article VII (Development Design Guidelines)
Section 2.0 (Street & Transportation Standards)
B. Subdivision Street Maintenance
Article VII (Development Design Guidelines)
Section 14.0 (Installation & Maintenance of Required Improvements)
C. Manufactured Home Park Business License
Article II (Nonconformities)
Section 6.0 (Nonconforming Manufactured Home Parks)
Section 8.0 (Continuation of Nonconforming Situations)
Article III (Development & Subdivision Review, Permitting, & Approval Requirements), Section 2.0 (Permit Requirements)
Section 5.0 (Manufactured Home Park Site Plan Review Requirements)
Article V (Use Regulations)
Section 11.0 (Other Uses)
Article XIII (Enforcement & Penalties)
Section 6.0 (Remedies), Section 7.0 (Compliance Period);
Article XIV (Definitions & Certifications)
Section 2.0 (General Definitions & Acronyms)
Harnett County Board of Adjustment Meeting:
Monday, May 11, 2015
Conditional Use
1. BA-CU-10-15. Blackmon, Lavada / Blackmon, Daniel. A Singlewide Manufactured Home in an RA -30 Zoning District; Upper
Little River Township; Pin # 0519-75-2503.000; Off SR # 1229 (McDougal Road on Blackmon Lane).
2. BA-CU-11-15. Currin Heirs, LLC C/O Bill Currin / Sunlight Partners -Keith Colson. A Solar Farm in an RA-30 Zoning
District; Hector’s Creek Township; Pin # 0654-83-6117.000; SR # 1441 (Chalybeate Springs Road).
3. BA-CU-12-15. The Winston 401 Group, LLC. Multifamily Townhome Development in an RA -30 Zoning District; Neil’s
Creek Township; Pin # 0670-98-2503.000; SR # 1532 (Main Street).
SNIA-Special Nonresidential Intensity Allocation-Watershed Board
4. Winston 104 Group, LLC. Multifamily Townhome Development in an RA-30 Zoning District; Pin # 0670-98-2503.000; Neill’s
Creek Township; SR # 1532 (Main Street.).
9
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $12,870 $10,532 $8,367 $16,615 $7,130 $4,317 $3,690 $12,170 $10,095 $9,875 $6,743 $6,790 $109,194
FY 09-10 $14,052 $8,355 $7,438 $11,755 $10,365 $8,095 $6,350 $9,575 $10,285 $12,455 $9,250 $8,370 $116,345
FY 10-11 $12,540 $7,980 $7,960 $12,205 $9,430 $7,230 $11,445 $7,850 $12,160 $9,880 $8,985 $8,860 $116,525
FY 11-12 $6,189 $35,772 $7,930 $9,305 $7,904 $7,745 $7,854 $12,517 $8,788 $10,035 $8,262 $13,917 $136,218
FY 12-13 $10,322 $10,414 $11,068 $10,615 $8,635 $7,243 $10,521 $10,539 $13,451 $16,832 $12,750 $7,033 $129,423
FY 13-14 $4,934 $5,470 $11,157 $7,156 $8,598 $8,791 $5,552 $11,063 $17,782 $10,291 $13,852 $6,160 $110,806
FY 14-15 $8,736 $6,978 $11,782 $9,902 $10,129 $9,818 $7,956 $5,393 $7,991 $29,870 $-$-$108,555
Planning Fees
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
Angier is not included in this
dataset. Angier contracts with
HC Planning at $1,833 monthly.
10
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $8,750 $-$-$-$6,000 $-$-$-$-$4,500 $4,500 $-$23,750
FY 09-10 $-$-$-$-$-$4,300 $-$4,500 $49,500 $-$-$4,250 $62,550
FY 10-11 $4,500 $-$-$-$-$-$4,500 $-$-$-$-$-$9,000
FY 11-12 $-$15,000 $-$-$5,000 $-$-$-$-$4,500 $4,500 $-$24,500
FY 12-13 $13,500 $4,500 $-$4,500 $40,000 $20,000 $18,500 $10,000 $5,000 $28,000 $20,000 $-$164,000
FY 13-14 $11,500 $1,000 $28,000 $6,500 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,000 $5,000 $3,000 $2,000 $4,000 $67,000
FY 14-15 $-$-$5,000 $8,000 $1,000 $-$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $-$-$-$17,000
Cell Tower Fees
No cell tower fees were tracked prior to February of 02 -03
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
11
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $-$18,500 $-$-$5,500 $-$-$40,000 $-$71,000 $10,500 $57,500 $203,000
FY 09-10 $-$96,500 $15,000 $-$500 $-$15,000 $-$30,500 $-$9,500 $17,000 $184,000
FY 10-11 $-$20,000 $49,500 $-$5,500 $-$-$15,500 $23,000 $21,500 $-$13,000 $148,000
FY 11-12 $35,500 $-$-$35,000 $16,000 $-$92,000 $21,000 $129,000 $13,500 $500 $19,500 $362,000
FY 12-13 $-$55,000 $30,500 $3,500 $67,500 $11,000 $4,500 $-$-$15,000 $28,000 $-$215,000
FY 13-14 $7,500 $6,500 $59,000 $-$-$-$8,500 $-$-$26,500 $-$12,000 $120,000
FY 14-15 $18,000 $-$-$-$-$-$-$-$27,000 $-$-$-$45,000
Recreational Fees
No recreational fees were tracked prior to October of FY 06-07
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
12
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $500 $810 $500 $1,979 $1,578 $1,972 $1,023 $648 $666 $1,303 $2,299 $668 $13,946
FY 09-10 $1,666 $561 $740 $1,964 $350 $-$868 $-$1,885 $1,600 $616 $-$10,249
FY 10-11 $1,359 $696 $1,050 $1,468 $1,035 $451 $958 $700 $584 $595 $721 $578 $10,195
FY 11-12 $-$250 $287 $-$-$-$-$-$350 $-$1,250 $-$2,137
FY 12-13 $1,576 $2,110 $52 $152 $1,022 $2,366 $2,071 $215 $-$-$70 $-$9,634
FY 13-14 $-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-
FY 14-15 $-$350 $298 $-$-$1,050 $550 $47 $1,625 $1,400 $-$-$5,320
Abandoned Manufactured Home Planning Initiative Fees
No A.M.P.I. fees were tracked prior to November of FY 05-06
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
13
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $16,450 $14,475 $23,825 $9,750 $8,950 $6,925 $8,450 $10,175 $20,750 $12,775 $17,225 $15,650 $165,400
FY 09-10 $14,600 $14,900 $13,175 $10,600 $13,000 $9,600 $11,975 $18,375 $13,225 $16,975 $15,950 $13,875 $166,250
FY 10-11 $18,225 $11,075 $10,800 $7,000 $11,800 $5,300 $10,750 $11,675 $13,450 $10,400 $10,750 $16,100 $137,325
FY 11-12 $15,275 $22,525 $21,425 $26,650 $23,025 $11,175 $39,175 $21,550 $29,675 $23,700 $21,200 $32,150 $287,525
FY 12-13 $17,000 $31,250 $33,525 $18,450 $21,900 $19,450 $18,650 $58,425 $35,400 $30,150 $26,100 $22,075 $332,375
FY 13-14 $26,600 $30,775 $27,050 $22,750 $22,050 $22,800 $26,700 $19,900 $27,425 $25,225 $19,400 $28,350 $299,025
FY 14-15 $35,150 $17,850 $13,650 $24,900 $18,050 $11,050 $21,325 $27,675 $18,925 $20,225 $-$-$208,800
Enviromental Health Revenue
Based upon fees received & processed through Central Permitting
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
14
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $600 $800 $800 $400 $800 $800 $400 $200 $1,000 $600 $600 $200 $7,200
FY 09-10 $800 $1,100 $200 $400 $-$400 $600 $200 $-$200 $400 $400 $4,700
FY 10-11 $600 $400 $1,000 $300 $400 $-$400 $400 $700 $300 $400 $700 $5,600
FY 11-12 $200 $800 $400 $400 $400 $200 $300 $-$500 $-$200 $-$3,400
FY 12-13 $400 $400 $-$800 $-$-$200 $400 $200 $400 $500 $200 $3,500
FY 13-14 $200 $200 $200 $-$-$-$-$-$400 $600 $200 $500 $2,300
FY 14-15 $400 $200 $-$-$-$200 $200 $400 $200 $200 $-$-$1,800
Food & Lodging Revenue
Based upon fees received & processed through Central Permitting
No food & lodging fees were tracked prior to August FY 07-08
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
15
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $76,555 $33,430 $41,130 $50,815 $23,300 $27,385 $21,160 $33,840 $24,585 $31,190 $39,955 $47,210 $450,555
FY 09-10 $48,335 $57,700 $40,520 $50,505 $50,905 $20,420 $51,285 $31,880 $54,305 $67,815 $24,445 $68,095 $566,210
FY 10-11 $35,200 $55,910 $38,055 $27,785 $34,900 $39,370 $18,270 $26,620 $63,290 $49,315 $51,650 $42,925 $483,290
FY 11-12 $47,475 $54,145 $54,300 $54,385 $43,490 $36,430 $33,255 $44,425 $32,040 $30,275 $39,815 $35,445 $505,480
FY 12-13 $34,995 $28,260 $39,940 $43,990 $33,320 $24,520 $27,515 $36,535 $48,965 $22,640 $44,285 $28,060 $413,025
FY 13-14 $25,085 $35,825 $36,690 $43,500 $17,725 $13,775 $27,605 $22,555 $39,485 $37,925 $20,570 $47,270 $368,010
FY 14-15 $35,025 $39,440 $31,860 $40,345 $15,795 $13,535 $18,950 $15,700 $24,110 $28,360 $-$-$263,120
Plubic Utilities
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
16
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$0.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $1,180 $1,160 $1,095 $1,285 $1,065 $380 $915 $940 $770 $1,155 $395 $725 $11,065
FY 09-10 $1,030 $1,455 $864 $2,118 $1,879 $2,508 $763 $897 $1,007 $2,313 $660 $1,949 $17,443
FY 10-11 $703 $1,106 $1,080 $1,346 $1,949 $2,461 $1,364 $1,907 $940 $1,059 $1,715 $542 $16,172
FY 11-12 $660 $2,181 $1,043 $615 $3,133 $4,235 $1,196 $1,407 $2,436 $581 $2,106 $1,337 $20,930
FY 12-13 $1,675 $1,534 $1,100 $835 $539 $702 $3,138 $693 $825 $1,193 $5,021 $1,279 $18,534
FY 13-14 $2,530 $1,594 $3,289 $1,722 $926 $725 $3,251 $862 $1,023 $650 $2,446 $741 $19,759
FY 14-15 $1,275 $1,745 $1,093 $1,370 $1,092 $783 $650 $1,327 $971 $1,203 $-$-$11,509
Fire Marshall Fees
Based upon fees received & processed through Central Permitting
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
17
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY
Total
FY 08-09 339 219 225 198 175 139 134 154 172 218 218 222 2,413
FY 09-10 242 219 274 305 188 209 218 200 231 290 290 234 2,900
FY 10-11 250 245 198 285 276 240 225 236 250 242 318 320 3,085
FY 11-12 192 250 207 197 223 160 172 222 218 219 222 275 2,557
FY12-13 265 241 219 210 199 182 254 251 201 267 259 235 2,783
FY 13-14 263 248 174 211 187 161 203 186 319 286 265 291 2,794
FY 14-15 298 227 188 200 183 250 213 143 278 294 2274
Permits Issued By Month
Includes Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Insulation, Manufactured Homes & Single Family Dwellings
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
18
Permit Type July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June Totals
Manufactured Home 10 17 7 7 15 5 6 12 12 19 110
Single-Family 50 36 48 32 35 83 41 21 75 42 463
Total 60 53 55 39 50 88 47 33 87 61 573
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June Totals
SFH and Manufactured Home Permits Issued
Manufactored Home Single-Family Total
19
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
$-
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FY Total
FY 08-09 $12,691,631 $8,776,508 $5,220,612 $4,920,978 $5,369,579 $3,450,528 $5,649,131 $7,522,965 $9,077,151 $7,856,281 $8,725,777 $7,417,729 $86,678,870
FY 09-10 $11,379,224 $10,362,784 $10,638,492 $7,230,957 $9,428,102 $9,361,441 $8,443,143 $9,086,404 $8,810,094 $12,441,314 $9,830,598 $9,402,588 $116,415,141
FY 10-11 $11,252,733 $7,950,958 $8,345,311 $11,182,071 $10,872,478 $11,426,556 $8,228,678 $11,513,785 $14,305,568 $13,132,419 $13,407,863 $1,403,883 $123,022,303
FY 11-12 $11,473,930 $273,697 $9,121,214 $10,094,638 $8,891,826 $4,212,104 $7,595,696 $10,643,099 $7,896,499 $8,047,635 $15,469,436 $12,968,827 $106,688,601
FY 12-13 $6,648,277 $11,216,486 $8,186,483 $9,713,654 $8,884,669 $8,409,146 $14,682,203 $12,334,320 $12,393,618 $11,295,201 $9,394,109 $10,291,523 $123,449,689
FY 13-14 $13,270,018 $10,211,222 $5,736,233 $9,105,513 $5,639,513 $1,558,260 $6,553,020 $6,817,970 $10,994,367 $8,907,093 $8,492,767 $4,644,885 $91,930,861
FY 14-15 $6,124,175.0 $7,502,842.0 $2,815,257.0 $6,389,420.0 $3,479,358.0 $7,479,229.0 $6,177,814.0 $4,597,044.0 $11,668,501.$7,695,408.0 $63,929,048.
Residential Application Valuation By Month
FY 08-09
FY 09-10
FY 10-11
FY 11-12
FY 12-13
FY 13-14
FY 14-15
20
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
$1,000,000
Anderson
Creek
Averasboro Barbecue Black River Buckhorn Duke Grove Hectors
Creek
Johnsonville Lillington Neills Creek Stewarts
Creek
Upper Little
River
Fees $963,500 $6,500 $352,000 $29,500 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $191,500 $0 $0 $77,500 $49,000
Recreation Fees By Township (TOTALS SINCE 10/1/06)
No recreational fees were tracked prior to October of FY 06-07
21
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Anderson
Creek
Averasbor
o
Barbecue Black
River
Buckhorn Duke Grove Hectors
Creek
Johnsonvil
le
Lillington Neills
Creek
Stewarts
Creek
Upper
Little River
Lots 1927 13 704 59 0 0 0 118 383 0 0 155 98
Lots By Township (TOTALS SINCE 10/1/06)
No lots were tracked prior to October of FY 06-07
22
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Township Applications YTD 14-15
Demolition -
Add/Alter Residential -
Add/Alter Non-Residential -
Stores & Other Customer Service -
Office/Bank Plaza -
Hospitals, Institutions & Schools -
Commercial Activities -
Industrial, Public Works & Utilities -
Church or other Religious -
Amusement,Social or Recreational -
Hotels/Motels -
Munufactored Homes -
Multiple family Dwellings -
Duplex Dwellings -
Single family Dwellinngs -
Other Non-residential-
051815a HC BOC Page 96
051815a HC BOC Page 97
051815a HC BOC Page 98
051815a HC BOC Page 99
051815a HC BOC Page 100
051815a HC BOC Page 101
051815a HC BOC Page 102
051815a HC BOC Page 103
051815a HC BOC Page 104
051815a HC BOC Page 105
051815a HC BOC Page 106
051815a HC BOC Page 107
051815a HC BOC Page 108
051815a HC BOC Page 109
051815a HC BOC Page 110
051815a HC BOC Page 111
051815a HC BOC Page 112
051815a HC BOC Page 113
051815a HC BOC Page 114
051815a HC BOC Page 115
051815a HC BOC Page 116
051815a HC BOC Page 117
051815a HC BOC Page 118
051815a HC BOC Page 119
051815a HC BOC Page 120
051815a HC BOC Page 121
051815a HC BOC Page 122
051815a HC BOC Page 123
051815a HC BOC Page 124
051815a HC BOC Page 125
051815a HC BOC Page 126
051815a HC BOC Page 127
051815a HC BOC Page 128
051815a HC BOC Page 129
051815a HC BOC Page 130
051815a HC BOC Page 131
051815a HC BOC Page 132
051815a HC BOC Page 133
051815a HC BOC Page 134
051815a HC BOC Page 135
051815a HC BOC Page 136
051815a HC BOC Page 137
051815a HC BOC Page 138
051815a HC BOC Page 139
051815a HC BOC Page 140
051815a HC BOC Page 141
051815a HC BOC Page 142
051815a HC BOC Page 143
051815a HC BOC Page 144
051815a HC BOC Page 145
051815a HC BOC Page 146
051815a HC BOC Page 147
051815a HC BOC Page 148
051815a HC BOC Page 149
051815a HC BOC Page 150
051815a HC BOC Page 151
051815a HC BOC Page 152
051815a HC BOC Page 153
051815a HC BOC Page 154
051815a HC BOC Page 155
051815a HC BOC Page 156
051815a HC BOC Page 157
051815a HC BOC Page 158